Comments on: Nutroots whining over Fox News’s Democratic debate reaches fever pitch

By: 2008 - which choice for US President - Page 3

2008 - which choice for US President - Page 3 — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:46:11 +0000

[...] Could John Edwards be any more pathetic? First, he hired and backed anti-Christian bloggers to help get his ‘word’ out and then he presumed to speak for Jesus. Then, after appearing on FOX News some thirty-three times, he decided to back out of their debate because he had a "principled objection" against appearing on the network. Now comes word that he was against the Iraq War all along, and only voted for it in the first place on advice from his strategist, Bob Shrum. Quite a stretch from this little piece, isn’t it? America is at a crossroads, in my view. We are at war with a brutal and defiant enemy that will surely attack us again on our own soil. We are engaged in conflict around the globe. We have very serious issues like illegal immigration, veterans care and rising crime and poverty rates that need to be addressed immediately. We need a leader who will put what is right before what is easy. A leader that is immune from political pandering and pressure and that will do what is best for this nation and her people. A leader that understands words like honesty and loyalty and honor, and actively displays those virtues. And John Edwards certainly isn’t the man for the job. http://copthetruth.typepad.com/ __________________ Listening to your mom scream my name. [...]

By: Cop The Truth

Cop The Truth — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:22:47 +0000

John Edwards? Not a chance…

Could John Edwards be any more pathetic? First, he hired and backed anti-Christian bloggers to help get his ‘word’ out and then he presumed to speak for Jesus. Then, after appearing on FOX News some thirty-three times, he decided to…

By: Much ado about… what? « Azman Family Politics

Much ado about… what? « Azman Family Politics — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:22:44 +0000

[...] So what’s the big deal? Let’s assume the firings were political. In politics, it’s ok to be political. All three stories stated clearly that the U.S. attorneys serve “at the pleasure of the president.” Some say that influential Republicans applied pressure on those who would listen to have these attorneys fired. Seems a bit hypocritical to me. When influential Republicans apply pressure and demand politicians do what they say, it’s “bad politics.” But when influential Democrats apply pressure and demand politicians do what they say, it’s “good politics.” Will the small but very, VERY vocal minority of the Democrats who are far, FAR left not stop until every politican takes his cue from them? [...]

By: Even the LVRJ is laughing at Democrats « Mark’s Forum

Even the LVRJ is laughing at Democrats « Mark’s Forum — Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:51:53 +0000

[...] Nutroots: We Hate Fox [...]

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: Chuck Schumer deeply, deeply concerned about conditions at Walter Reed

Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:21:41 +0000

[...] To precisely the same extent that John Edwards is concerned about right-wing bias at Fox. [...]

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Fox News in talks with Congressional Black Caucus to co-sponsor debates

Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:02:47 +0000

[...] They’re going to answer the nutroots’ moral objections to the event by inoculating their coverage with the strongest possible dose of absolute moral authority. Simply brilliant. Lefty Garance Franke-Ruta explains the stakes succinctly: First, while MoveOn and the netroots can go after the Nevada Democratic Party without alienating anyone except Nevada Democrats (one of whom, it should be noted, is the Senate Majority Leader), it is going to be much harder for the largely white netroots to go after the CBC Institute for its debate partner without setting up a very unpleasant intra-party clash between constituency groups, thereby bringing smiles of delight to Fox News and its viewers. [...]

By: Sister Toldjah » Liberal hypocrites of the week: John Edwards and certain Washington state Dem lawmakers

Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:27:37 +0000

[...] BTW, as a side note, Edwards has caved to the Nutroots (this is not the first time, either) and weaseled out of a Dem candidate debate in Nevada because the debate – get this – is hosted in part by Fox News. Surrender, thy name is John Edwards. [...]

By: budorob

budorob — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:24:04 +0000

Cry foul before the firing even starts…isn’t that a page from their playbook?

By: The Thunder Run

The Thunder Run — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:16:29 +0000

Web Reconnaissance for 03/08/2007…

A short recon of whats out there that might draw your attention….

By: bones47

bones47 — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:44:03 +0000

I may have left out one or two other things the left has to offer.

Bryan on March 8, 2007 at 6:59 PM

You left out TP and Tums

By: 186k Per Second » Nutroots and Fox News Boycott - Roger Ailes Sums It Up

186k Per Second » Nutroots and Fox News Boycott - Roger Ailes Sums It Up — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:02:10 +0000

[...] Because there are Better Blogs…Hot Air [...]

By: csdeven

csdeven — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:44:16 +0000

Uh, yeah. “Faggot” is specifically offensive to gay people. I thought this was covered on an earlier thread?

aengus on March 8, 2007 at 7:28 PM

Yeah, especially when the use is taken out of context, right? Which also has been explained many times in many threads. Keep carrying the liberals PC water.

By: BacaDog

BacaDog — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:23:01 +0000

What a pansy…

SouthernGent on March 8, 2007 at 7:36 PM

SG, the flowers in my yard are offended.

Seriously, who gives a rats ass whether Edwards shows up or not. If he does, he’ll get outclassed by the other Dem candidates. If he doesn’t they’ll roast him alive as a coward. Lose-lose for the pony.

We should be thanking Reid though. He just made it ok for Republican candidates to “take another look at the parameters of this debate in order to ensure that all ~~Democrats~~ Republicans are comfortable as we move forward…” Sorry CBS. No debates for you.

By: georgej

georgej — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:02:11 +0000

Let’s see if I get this…..

Nevada is a CONSERVATIVE, GUN-LOVING, red-neck state. And most of the Democrats are somewhat to the right of Vladimir Lenin.

The Democrats in the state want to nominate a candidate that can carry Nevada in the general election.

So, they chose FOX News, to carry the debate to THEIR Democratic Party constituents, ’cause they’re watching Fox anyway.

Silk phony Pony objects and says he won’t participate because Fox is going to carry the debate. Queston: How’s he going to win Nevada in the primary, then? How’s he going to convince moderate/conservative Democrats in Nevada to vote for him?

Edwards is more stupid that I thought. How did he ever pass the bar exam?

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: Roger Ailes toasts liberals at press dinner

Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:33:53 +0000

[...] Earlier, Allah wrote about Fox News caving in to the nutroots. digg_url = ‘http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/08/video-roger-ailes-toasts-liberals-at-press-dinner/’;digg_topic = ‘political_opinion’; [...]

By: JustTruth101

JustTruth101 — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:53:32 +0000

Fox should honor little lord flauntery’s wishes and simply…never…mention…his…name…again on Fox. heh heh, that’d serve him right…

By: smellthecoffee

smellthecoffee — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:02:50 +0000

You can thank Silky Pony for giving this creepy, ideologically puritanical movement some media momentum.

The Breck Girl has just reserved hisorher seat on the Lamont Express to oblivion.

By: foxforce91

foxforce91 — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:36:04 +0000

Isn’t the point of a political debate to convince people who might not vote for you to vote for you? What an idiot.

By: PinkyBigglesworth

PinkyBigglesworth — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:02:11 +0000

Between Alan and Silky Pony…….. I have to wipe the liberal ooze off of my screen……. what a pair of jack asses!

By: thesheesh

thesheesh — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:44:58 +0000

I’ve came from not having much to having a lot. Uh, Um, throughout my entire life, I’ve taken advantage of, of America!

There’s an understatement if I’ve ever heard one…

By: Mazztek

Mazztek — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:38:24 +0000

And how brave of the video poster disabling comments but leaving up a link to her blog post.

P.S. Eddie boy? Bull Sh## about economic growth only among the rich. Since Bush took office and gave us all those tax cuts, I paid off 2 credit cards and am on my way to paying the 3rd. My own bank offered me a credit line equal to all the other cards I paid off based on my financial merit alone since 2001.. (I haven’t accepted the card, tho) Funy, though… I noticed that all fothese dimpcrap canidates that think things are soooo bad “play” with more money than I make in a year in a shady transaction.

By: CyberCipher

CyberCipher — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:31:38 +0000

I may have left out one or two other things the left has to offer.

Bryan on March 8, 2007 at 6:59 PM

Offsets. How could you? You left out offsets.

By: Metro

Metro — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:48:05 +0000

Hilarity ensues!

By: major john

major john — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:42:49 +0000

That’s just one step up from having it covered by the Thrifty Nickel.

Oh man – I think I sprained something, laughing so hard…gasp.

By: SouthernGent

SouthernGent — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:36:29 +0000

What a pansy…