Fox News: Senior U.S. official says Iranian general is not in custody
posted at 3:29 pm on March 8, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
WaPo has a senior U.S. official saying he is; Fox comes back with a senior U.S. official saying he isn’t.
A former Iranian deputy defense minister who disappeared from Turkey last month is not cooperating with Western intelligence agencies and his whereabouts remain a mystery, a U.S. official told FOX News Thursday…
[A] senior U.S. official flatly denied the [Washington Post's] report…
The official did not rule out the possibility that Asgari, who once commanded Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards and served as the country’s deputy defense minister, was conducting negotiations with an intelligence organization, but denied that there was any type of cooperation with the U.S.
It’s hard for me to believe WaPo’s source made it up whole cloth. Either Fox’s source is out of the loop or WaPo’s source leaked it when he shouldn’t have leaked it and it’s causing problems for our guys somehow somewhere, thus precipitating this attempt to put the genie back in the bottle.
I don’t know. Like Nigel, I’m just passing on information.
Update: Lo and behold, a senior U.S. official also tells the Blotter that Asgari isn’t in custody. Probably the same guy who talked to Fox, but there’s no way of knowing. An Iranian journalist named Ali Nourizadeh is driving this story for Asharq al-Awsat, which has scooped the competition repeatedly on it. I don’t know if that makes him more or less credible given the tall tales told occasionally by Iranians opposed to the regime. But for what it’s worth:
Asgari was in charge of military purchases at the defense ministry as well as military relations between Iran and Syria, according to Ali Nourizadeh, a prominent Iranian journalist who reported that Asgari was in a northern European country where he is cooperating with U.S. and other Western intelligence agents. “He is considered a big fish,” Nourizadeh told ABC News…
Nourizadeh says Asgari has information about Iran’s operations in Iraq, including support and training of the Shiite militia al Mahdi Army and identities of Iranian agents…
Nourizadeh says Asgari was forced to resign in 2003 after exposing corruption at the ministry of defense. Officials involved in the scandal then turned against him and led to the resignation.
A year later, the government tried to win him back by offering him to work as a consultant, says Nourizadeh, who assures Asgari’s military information about Iran are not outdated even though he did not hold an official position since 2003.
This is weird, too. By every account I’ve read, Asgari went missing on February 7. And yet:
The pan-Arab newspaper Asharq al Awsat quoted Israeli sources today as saying Asgari may have disappeared in January and not February as has been widely reported. Asgari felt bitter about being forced to resign from his post, said the sources.
Update: Moran parses the contradictions and prays we haven’t blown it here. He thinks one possibility is that WaPo was purposely fed disinformation to see how the Iranians would react to the news, although in that case, why have a second U.S. official deny the reports the very next day?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
I think he’s matriculating at Kent State.
x95b10 on March 8, 2007 at 3:33 PM
its jewish mis-information
damned zionists kidnapped him
Defector01 on March 8, 2007 at 3:39 PM
Who’s on first … ?
doufree on March 8, 2007 at 3:44 PM
If you can’t trust major MSM media like WaPo, who can you trust?
Why, NOBODY. And that’s the point.
georgej on March 8, 2007 at 3:49 PM
Come on, this is the intel game. If the US had such a source, why would they confirm it and let Iran know the extent of the damage.
Dinnerjacket – maybe we have him, and maybe we don’t. You figure it out pal. Sleep well.
shaken on March 8, 2007 at 3:51 PM
Start checking the strip clubs. Isn’t that where Muslim men go when they step off Allah’s turf?
jaleach on March 8, 2007 at 4:00 PM
This is the money quote. “an intelligence organization” = the Mossad. “denied any type of cooperation” = the Israelis aren’t done with him yet and haven’t given the CIA/NSA guys access yet.
rokemronnie on March 8, 2007 at 4:07 PM
Dude, he’s like at spring break in Daytona!
db on March 8, 2007 at 4:12 PM
Where’s Waldo, Iranian edition.
honora on March 8, 2007 at 4:13 PM
I’m not sure what “This Is Spinal Tap” has to do with anything, but here’s my favorite part:
flipflop on March 8, 2007 at 4:15 PM
If you are saying that you are telling the truth, then you are lying, but if you are lying, then you are telling the truth, but you can’t, because everything tht you say is a lie, but you just said you are lying and that is the truth, but you can’t be telling the truth because everything is a lie………..
PinkyBigglesworth on March 8, 2007 at 4:26 PM
This is getting to be like the ending of “The Prestige”.
Matticus Finch on March 8, 2007 at 4:48 PM
Good question, Allah.
It could be that the sources are from two different agencies. Defectors in the past have initiated furious turf battles between CIA, DIA, and State. It wouldn’t be out of the ordinary for the agency that has Asgari to keep him for themselves for a while and not tell others about him.
Or if disinformation, it may be a simple case of one department not telling another what they’re up to. Or again, two sources, two agencies.
It also could be that the Israelis have him and haven’t allowed us access to him yet. That would make the Fox source technically correct, wouldn’t it?
rick moran on March 8, 2007 at 4:50 PM
That all depends on what the definition of “custody” is.
ej_pez on March 8, 2007 at 4:53 PM
He was just hired by the Edwards cam-pain.
right2bright on March 8, 2007 at 4:57 PM
“I don’t know. Like Nigel, I’m just passing on information.”
Or…
“I don’t know. Like the NYT, I’m just passing on information.”
hmm….
Kevin M on March 8, 2007 at 4:58 PM
I don’t believe a word you are posting.
Is it Friday yet?
right2bright on March 8, 2007 at 4:58 PM
Off topic, but I see the swiftboating of Rudy has officially kicked off.
Matticus Finch on March 8, 2007 at 5:01 PM
Yep! Saw him yesterday hanging out at the 7/11 with Elvis.
taznar on March 8, 2007 at 5:14 PM
Why WOULDN’T the US intel people leak every possible different scenario about the Asgari? As long as they had intel that he wasn’t killed by Iranians (in which case misinformation would have no effect), why not spread stories that he’s cooperating, that he’s not, that the isrealis bought him, that the US abducted him, etc, etc. If the Iranians don’t know, they have to deal with the impact of ALL the scenarios.
That might include recalling every agent Asgari knew about, rehiding any weapons programs, “cutting” loose ends in Iraq and Lebanon that might link them to American deaths, shadowing all their generals to avoid future defections as well as guarding them against abductions, etc.
Clark1 on March 8, 2007 at 5:17 PM
Hee hee! That makes me laugh!
Norman, coordinate!
ScottG on March 8, 2007 at 5:22 PM
ROSWELL, ROSWELL, ROSWELL!!
Bearhopi on March 8, 2007 at 5:34 PM
They should think that we’re going to hit anyone at anytime. Force protection works both ways, and makes for some very interesting conundrums in a totalitarian state.
libertarianuberalles on March 8, 2007 at 5:55 PM
I’ll take your word on it. I turned that movie off well before the end. Not good at all IMO.
However, I did think the Illusionist was very well done. I like Ed Norton as an actor; so that helps.
DWB on March 8, 2007 at 7:11 PM
Pelosi and Reid were popping champagne as this update broke.
roninacreage on March 8, 2007 at 7:16 PM
I saw him selling falafels in Tel Aviv.
profitsbeard on March 8, 2007 at 7:33 PM
Maybe we have to determine what “custody” is before we can say whether the general is in custody.
Kralizec on March 8, 2007 at 7:33 PM
What me worry?
Texas Mike on March 8, 2007 at 7:43 PM
He’s not in custody because he’s defected and wasn’t apprehended by anyone. He’s applying for political asylum and is being held in an undisclosed location for his protection, at his request. That’s my two cents worth.
RedinBlueCounty on March 8, 2007 at 7:52 PM
Q: Assuming the first quote to be true, exactly when did Mookie and his crew peel out of Iraq for Iran ?
A: The Hot Air search function is your friend…
elgeneralisimo on March 8, 2007 at 8:16 PM
Comment pages: