Like you, he will only keep sourcing me as long as I don’t out him. Yeah, I know this is hearsay, but following your logic line I should be able to *report* it as fact.

Apparently others do as well.

Thanks for posting that link, brtex. I think I actually witnessed that exchange. A few others, too. If she’s really a conservative, my heart won’t be able to take it!

MSNBC often runs a promo when Alex is on showing her taking her kids to a baseball game. I watch for it on the weekends in the morning just so I can enjoy a few more precious glimpses of her lovely face. No one is hotter than Alex, not even Contessa Brewer.

Ok, I’m starting to sound like a stalker, so I’ll stop.

It is obvious that the prosecutor should be disbarred and that the judge should be impeached.

This is the kind of absolute misuse of the system that make everyone very concerned.

I think Laura Ingraham is HOT! Just don’t tell my wife I said that, I hate sleeping on the couch.

I give Roberts credit for one thing: He had the b@lls to come on a Conservative talk show, and defend his report. His colleagues have big strong opinions, then when they’re asked to support them, hide under rocks.

Hugh Hewitt is on vacation so they are running a series of shows where he grilled MSM reporters on bias. Helen Thomas hung up on him. So did “pollster” James Zogby.

And, based on some of the questions she’s asked in her pieces, I suspect she leans to the conservative side of things.

Ok, I feel better now.

jaleach on March 8, 2007 at 3:55 PM

Apparently others do as well.

Blame yourself Laura! You piled on top of this Ann Coulter bashing, refusing to give Ann’s side of this and whole heartedly embracing the liberals side of the issue, and now you’re surprised that the MSM gives creedence to one side of the Libby issue? What’s wrong Laura? He didn’t ask for your take on it?

HA!

Ok, I feel better now.

That was a pretty empty defense:

#1 John Roberts chose “Unatributed Republican Source” rather than get an atributable quote from any of the thousands of republican strategists willing to speak on the record about how this was a sham trial, Libby was denied testimony, and there was no underlying crime.

#2 That music… hell, why not play Liberi Fatali during all republican-related news stories
Or perhaps the Star Wars Imperial March?

#3 Then John Roberts doesn’t even defend his story’s slant, just states that the rest of the coverage was supposed to balance it out… alas, no one I know saw this supposed “Balancing coverage” and if it is played out of context BY CNN, then either he needs to go to CNN and tell them not to do that (Yeah right.) OR He needs to be less heavy handed because he’s on notice that CNN will not make an effort to keep his stories in context.

So yeah. My distrust of CNN continues.

He exhibits the same smarmy charm at CNN as Miles O’Brien, which is just another reason why I can’t watch the daily bias dished out on that “news” channel.

What’s the big deal about releasing your Republican source’s name John? I don’t think he’s protecting a source, he probably doesn’t have one. If he does, the source must be a traitor to his own party because, a], he/she provides derogatory ammunition to CNN, and b] CNN protects his/her identity.

So the “source” either doesn’t exist, or the source is a RINO. CNN’s journalistic code of conduct justifies using either option in their persistent pusuit of bringing down Bush/Cheney.

You know he’s bad.

On an unrelated note. Just read this on Drudge. Send it to all your friends panicking about Global Warming:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/na.html