Hagel may seek GOP nomination, wonders aloud about impeaching Bush
posted at 5:01 pm on March 7, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
I can only assume he has his eye on a third-party candidacy. The Democratic field is too strong for him to earn a VP nomination on a fusion ticket so he must be thinking Reform Party or maybe of starting one of his own. Or maybe he’s looking for a spot at the Republican primary debates so he can lob anti-war rhetorical grenades at McCain and Giuliani. By the time the serious debates roll around, the success or failure of the surge should be apparent. If it fails, he’ll look like a genius — and, er, the entire conservative base will hate him for it.
Or, just maybe, he’s been hanging around reporters too much lately and is starting to believe their fawning adulation of his mavericky maverickness is part of some phantom grassroots trend. That must be it. Otherwise he wouldn’t possibly be saying stuff like this:
“The president says, ‘I don’t care.’ He’s not accountable anymore,” Hagel says, measuring his words by the syllable and his syllables almost by the letter. “He’s not accountable anymore, which isn’t totally true. You can impeach him, and before this is over, you might see calls for his impeachment. I don’t know. It depends how this goes.”
Actually, there is a grassroots trend. It’s just that the grass happens to be located in a state with a socialist senator.
There is some good news for Hagel. A prominent Baptist hinted today that Rudy’s radioactive because of the atomic jerkiness he displayed in dumping Donna Hanover at a press conference. And Ace relays a Radar story about the good ship McCain sinking fast, with aides heading for the lifeboats and St. John himself wondering what the hell happened:

The Radar thing sounds too bad to be true, but if it is, then Hagel moves right into the slot reserved for the media’s Anointed One. Which should bump him up to 1%.
Rudy had better hope McCain doesn’t drop out. So long as he’s in the race, public attention remains focused on the two of them with Romney as a peripheral candidate. Once one of them sinks, Romney becomes the only viable alternative and suddenly his social con views start to look very attractive to the base. I wouldn’t be surprised if our two moderates focus their attacks on Mitt first in hopes of driving him out and then take their chances with each other. (I’m sure Duncan Hunter, Sam Brownback, and Newt wouldn’t mind either.)
Exit question: To what does Edwards owe his backsliding here? Obamamania or Blunder Twins fallout?

Update: Someone’s ship might be going down, but I’m not sure it’s McCain’s.
Update: And right on cue, here’s McCain trying to drive Romney out of the race by opening up the California Republican primary to social moderates, i.e., independents.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Edward’s slide? It is from more people paying attention to his,uh,hair? Yeah,that’s it.
bbz123 on March 7, 2007 at 5:09 PM
All of the above, plus Jesus socialism; that is, unless Silky Pony was going for irony by denouncing greed and capitalism from his gilded rooftops.
Kid from Brooklyn on March 7, 2007 at 5:12 PM
Maybe Hagel can fill in for Edwards during the FNC Nevada debate.
JammieWearingFool on March 7, 2007 at 5:13 PM
Do all country club Republicans think that social conservatives are monolithic in their voting?
Capitalist Infidel on March 7, 2007 at 5:19 PM
Hagel is a disgusting moron. The good people of Nebraska should return this bum to the rock the found him under.
rplat on March 7, 2007 at 5:20 PM
Hagel? He couldn’t get a nomination for assistant weed wacker. If he ran, he probably would do it for no other reason than to be a jackass spoiler. What a tool.
Spassvogel on March 7, 2007 at 5:20 PM
Newt!
MCPO Airdale on March 7, 2007 at 5:26 PM
Hagel doesn’t have a snowball’s chance. Good lord. What a jerk.
CP on March 7, 2007 at 5:32 PM
Thanks for the good news about Maverick. It shows he has become too unstable to ever be president.
Valiant on March 7, 2007 at 5:35 PM
I can’t wait to not vote for Hagel…
canvas on March 7, 2007 at 5:38 PM
In 2004 it was the 17 (give or take) dwarfs, and two primadonas, on the liberal side.
Now, one year earlier than ever, every as—-e, on both sides, thinks that he/she needs to be on the annals of “also sought the nomination”. Why?
Entelechy on March 7, 2007 at 5:40 PM
As long as it isn’t McCain, we can win the general. That’s what matters. Regarding the pro-lifers tanking Rudy (in the general), they’re fools for doing so. They’re trading a candidate that promises to give them the judges they want (Rudy) for a candidate that promises to give them judges they hate (column D).
If Rudy promises to replace JPS/Ginsburg with a Scalia or a Thomas, he’s functionally pro-life. I wonder if the pro-lifers get that. If the primary were held today, I’d vote for Romney. But if it came to Rudy v. Clobama, Rudy in a heartbeat. I’ll get what I need (judges, GWOT, taxes, economy, deficits) with Rudy, even if I don’t get what I want (socon leadership).
spmat on March 7, 2007 at 5:49 PM
Just what we need! Yet another Banana Republican in the running. Hagel is still a Republican, isn’t he? It’s so hard to tell these days….
tommy1 on March 7, 2007 at 5:54 PM
I wouldn’t elect Hagel dog-catcher.
tommy1 on March 7, 2007 at 5:55 PM
I smell a third party independent that will bleed RINO votes away from the conservative republican candidate (Newt or Romney), virtually guaranteeing the dems a win.
csdeven on March 7, 2007 at 6:00 PM
Good stuff about McVain – or should I now start calling him McPain?
snort snort …. chortle chortle
thirteen28 on March 7, 2007 at 6:14 PM
Anybody else want to throw up?
Bbbbblllllllllllllaaaaaaaa!!!
PinkyBigglesworth on March 7, 2007 at 6:33 PM
The grade for Hagel: “The Iraq And Afghanistan Veterans Of America gives Hagel a D+ rating for 2006.”
Exit question? The blunder twins for sure but you left out hypocrite (Two Americas, one with mansions, one without).
Zorro on March 7, 2007 at 7:02 PM
he can seek hte nomination but frankly he won’t get within 50 miles of it
Defector01 on March 7, 2007 at 7:07 PM
Don’t worry about the Silky Pony. I predict that he’ll not only be able to stem the bleeding, but he’ll most likely surge now — riding atop the crest of a wave that was born out of his new status as a victim, and conveniently handed to him courtesy of ACS.
CyberCipher on March 7, 2007 at 7:14 PM
Another one that needs to be tried for treason.
Viper1 on March 7, 2007 at 7:17 PM
Let him waste his money, get shellacked, be forced to quit, and be ridiculed. Schadenfreude baby.
liberty on March 7, 2007 at 7:27 PM
The official band of John “Bananas” McCain.
tommy1 on March 7, 2007 at 7:32 PM
Hagel is being courted by the libs to do exactly that. In this poll, they keep pushing him to the top. http://newpoliticalreview.com/poll.php
Connie on March 7, 2007 at 8:17 PM
Can we get anymore ridiculous? What’s he doing in the picture? He’s playing ‘come in Tokyo’
Griz on March 7, 2007 at 8:47 PM
“Exit question: To what does Edwards owe his backsliding here? Obamamania or Blunder Twins fallout?”
Ummm, idiocy and more than his fair share of hypocrisy?
Scotsman on March 7, 2007 at 8:55 PM
Only one thing bigger than Fagels ego and that’s McLames.
roninacreage on March 7, 2007 at 9:22 PM
WE DO NOT LIKE MR. HAGEL IN NEBRASKA! He said what a CONSERVATIVE should say to get elected and then went totally off the deep end. We are all sort of hoping that he will run again for the senate just so we can dope slap his worthless no good yellowbellied sapsucking backstabbing traitorous ass down! (Did I mention moneygrubbing? OK, Moneygrubbing too!)
serenity on March 7, 2007 at 9:32 PM
Hagel must be delusional. Isn’t that grounds for removal from office?
.
GT on March 7, 2007 at 9:33 PM
Appearing in public and speaking.
Time for the Silky Pony to arrange another photo-op in Nawlins.
fogw on March 7, 2007 at 9:42 PM
Tell us how you really feel. lol!
Connie on March 7, 2007 at 9:47 PM
Can we expell people from the party?
StuLongIsland on March 7, 2007 at 9:49 PM
Yes. Unfortunately it’s called “voting third party.”
Connie on March 7, 2007 at 9:54 PM
Newt/Rudy ‘08
Remember, the Clintons used third party candidates to get slick willy elected. It’s in their playbook and they always stick to the playbook.
Mojave Mark on March 7, 2007 at 9:59 PM
Guiliani / Romney
Learn it; Love it
……it’s either that, or The Pantsuit / Hussein
Janos Hunyadi on March 7, 2007 at 10:16 PM
Exactly. The strategy does work. They’ll use it.
Do not forget that the impeachment drive against Nixon is also part of the Hillary playbook. Cheney=Agnew, Nixon=Bush. Hillary argued in the early 1970s that only the “appearance” was necessary to fatally taint a sitting president.
Can hardly believe that these people have such a long and sordid involvement in American politics.
naliaka on March 7, 2007 at 10:17 PM
We do our best out here on the Great Plains to convey our feelings in a manner that is neither intentionally subtle or overtly offensive, but rather plainspoken so the no misunderstanding can occur. In the case of my previous post however, I did choose to utilize the more subtle form of expression (in deference to those who may not yet have been exposed to stronger forms of communication) Had I chosen to take the other path my comments no doubt would have included a tall cottonwood and a short rope…..(sarcasm!) Public humiliation (as in being thoroughly trounced in an election) of those who seek the limelight is always preferable (and far more satisfying) than just about any other way of dealing with someone of Mr. Hagels calibre.
serenity on March 7, 2007 at 10:35 PM
I never had the pleasure of living quite that far west. I think I would have enjoyed it.
Connie on March 7, 2007 at 10:40 PM
I wonder how long the “front runners” will slide along before they realize that without support from the “border conservatives” its most likely a waste of time and money?
Buzzy on March 7, 2007 at 10:43 PM
Our current Senate is the best argument there is for the repeal of the 17th Amendment
VinceP1974 on March 7, 2007 at 11:28 PM
This guy is a chameleon with a giant ego….
d1carter on March 7, 2007 at 11:57 PM
Hagel can go to Hell for being a traitor.
msipes on March 7, 2007 at 11:59 PM
Yeah, been there done that in 1992. Perot skimmed off enough RINO’s (and Bush’s no new taxes fiasco) and we got 8 years of slick willie and we are in danger of getting at least 4 of the hildebeast.
Notice how, just like these people who slammed Ann Coulter, this semi-psuedo-conservative (hagel) SOUNDS EXACTLY like the liberals. He carries their PC water with a big sh1t eating grin on his face.
csdeven on March 8, 2007 at 12:17 AM
If Hagel got the nod (fat chance) it would just prove we are now a one party system.
He and a few more need to be drummed out of the party, I think. Return it to its Reagan Roots that propelled it ot power.
LewWaters on March 8, 2007 at 2:57 AM
I would crawl over the ground on my bare knees over broken glass and vote for Hillary before I would ever vote for the Republican McGovernite Chuck Hagel.
Hilts on March 8, 2007 at 8:58 AM
Is it me or does Hagel have the look of a raging alcoholic? I recall last summer he was functionally pro Hezbollah.
Hilts on March 8, 2007 at 9:05 AM
I have an appropriate campaign slogan for Hagel:
UP CHUCK IN 2008!
His loyalty is about as visible as his intelligence.
profitsbeard on March 8, 2007 at 12:08 PM
This race shows how out of touch these idiots are with the American people. Most think all of the frontrunners are as valuable as an Americans resume on Bill Gates’ desk!
Mellen on March 8, 2007 at 8:10 PM
Comment pages: