<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Afghan civilians claim U.S. troops shot at them after jihadi ambush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Poll of Afghans: More occupation, please</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-741284</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Poll of Afghans: More occupation, please</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-741284</guid>
		<description>[...] or so. Some people on the right have too, Michael Yon foremost among them. Add to that the sporadic incidents involving high civilian casualties and you might reasonably assume that Afghan public opinion is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or so. Some people on the right have too, Michael Yon foremost among them. Add to that the sporadic incidents involving high civilian casualties and you might reasonably assume that Afghan public opinion is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Let&#8217;s stop &#8220;just air-raiding villages and killing civilians&#8221; in Afghanistan, says Messiah</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-640799</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Let&#8217;s stop &#8220;just air-raiding villages and killing civilians&#8221; in Afghanistan, says Messiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-640799</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve gotten four or five e-mails about this since Glenn posted on it last night and Captain Ed went nuclear on it this morning. I&#8217;m loath to defend his holiness but I think this is less a case of Obama meaning to cast unfair aspersions on the troops in Afghanistan than being too flip in describing a serious recurring problem. The fact is, there have been a number of high profile airstrikes lately that ended up killing &#8212; unintentionally, of course &#8212; large numbers of Afghan civilians. That&#8217;s not according to the lying, lying Taliban, either. Here&#8217;s a report from May quoting the governor of Helmand province claiming that 21 civilians died in a raid on jihadis; here&#8217;s another from June reporting 25 dead sourced to a local police chief; and here&#8217;s one just a few days later citing estimates from Afghan officials of 60 dead in the latest strikes. It&#8217;s a longstanding issue, sufficiently so as to have drawn a promise from NATO at the start of the year to do more to avoid collateral damage, but this fiasco in March brought the problem to a head. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve gotten four or five e-mails about this since Glenn posted on it last night and Captain Ed went nuclear on it this morning. I&#8217;m loath to defend his holiness but I think this is less a case of Obama meaning to cast unfair aspersions on the troops in Afghanistan than being too flip in describing a serious recurring problem. The fact is, there have been a number of high profile airstrikes lately that ended up killing &#8212; unintentionally, of course &#8212; large numbers of Afghan civilians. That&#8217;s not according to the lying, lying Taliban, either. Here&#8217;s a report from May quoting the governor of Helmand province claiming that 21 civilians died in a raid on jihadis; here&#8217;s another from June reporting 25 dead sourced to a local police chief; and here&#8217;s one just a few days later citing estimates from Afghan officials of 60 dead in the latest strikes. It&#8217;s a longstanding issue, sufficiently so as to have drawn a promise from NATO at the start of the year to do more to avoid collateral damage, but this fiasco in March brought the problem to a head. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRCalDude</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-285552</link>
		<dc:creator>PRCalDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-285552</guid>
		<description>War is ugly. Deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>War is ugly. Deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichSchein</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-284131</link>
		<dc:creator>RichSchein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-284131</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

That is what happens in war, some folks are just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Sad but predictable.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just don&#039;t say that at Huffpo or the attack machine goes into overdrive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>That is what happens in war, some folks are just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Sad but predictable.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Just don&#8217;t say that at Huffpo or the attack machine goes into overdrive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzzy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-284093</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-284093</guid>
		<description>That is what happens in war, some folks are just in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Sad but predictable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is what happens in war, some folks are just in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Sad but predictable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unamused</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-284057</link>
		<dc:creator>unamused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-284057</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but I agree about the civilian-looking adversary thing.  If militants fight without a uniform, or trying to look like civies on purpose.....civilians will end up dead.

Isn&#039;t that part of why the enemy is so detestable?  They dress down on purpose, hoping that news stories such as this will undermine our troops.

And I hold our media in higher contempt than terrorists for being so GLEEFULLY complicit in this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but I agree about the civilian-looking adversary thing.  If militants fight without a uniform, or trying to look like civies on purpose&#8230;..civilians will end up dead.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that part of why the enemy is so detestable?  They dress down on purpose, hoping that news stories such as this will undermine our troops.</p>
<p>And I hold our media in higher contempt than terrorists for being so GLEEFULLY complicit in this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rayvet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283962</link>
		<dc:creator>rayvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283962</guid>
		<description>&quot;Well the Military Haters are out in force already calling the Marine Special Ops people cowards&quot;

Except never to their face in a dark alley, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well the Military Haters are out in force already calling the Marine Special Ops people cowards&#8221;</p>
<p>Except never to their face in a dark alley, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichSchein</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283934</link>
		<dc:creator>RichSchein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283934</guid>
		<description>Well the Military Haters are out in force already calling the Marine Special Ops people cowards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the Military Haters are out in force already calling the Marine Special Ops people cowards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theworldisnotenough</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283928</link>
		<dc:creator>Theworldisnotenough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283928</guid>
		<description>Jamil Hussein could not be reached for comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamil Hussein could not be reached for comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rayvet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283826</link>
		<dc:creator>rayvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 22:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283826</guid>
		<description>Ooops, talking about being in the wrong place at the wrong time, or might it be in the right place at the right time.  Depends on the persuasion of those our men killed.  But hey, it&#039;s like my dad told me when I was a kid, if you hang around with the troublemakers, trouble will certainly find you.  I consider this a non story except that our fine fighting soldiers have now decreased the number of people out to kill us, so this is a good thing, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, talking about being in the wrong place at the wrong time, or might it be in the right place at the right time.  Depends on the persuasion of those our men killed.  But hey, it&#8217;s like my dad told me when I was a kid, if you hang around with the troublemakers, trouble will certainly find you.  I consider this a non story except that our fine fighting soldiers have now decreased the number of people out to kill us, so this is a good thing, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlong</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283804</link>
		<dc:creator>mlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283804</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t see the Dems trying to make too much out of this...Afghanistan is like hunting rifles to them ....it&#039;s something they can pretend to support when they go after something their against like while their against the war in Iraq they support Afghanistan so they don&#039;t look anti-troops and while they want more gun control they&#039;ll say their not against using guns for hunting..it&#039;s just a way to avoid looking too much like Socialists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see the Dems trying to make too much out of this&#8230;Afghanistan is like hunting rifles to them &#8230;.it&#8217;s something they can pretend to support when they go after something their against like while their against the war in Iraq they support Afghanistan so they don&#8217;t look anti-troops and while they want more gun control they&#8217;ll say their not against using guns for hunting..it&#8217;s just a way to avoid looking too much like Socialists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisIansNana</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283770</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisIansNana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283770</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;3. John Murtha is a walking sphincter.

(ok, I just threw that last one in for the fun of it) 

TugboatPhil on March 4, 2007 at 3:50 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

thank goodness you didn&#039;t say the f-word</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>3. John Murtha is a walking sphincter.</p>
<p>(ok, I just threw that last one in for the fun of it) </p>
<p>TugboatPhil on March 4, 2007 at 3:50 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>thank goodness you didn&#8217;t say the f-word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savage</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283769</link>
		<dc:creator>Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283769</guid>
		<description>In a war where your enemies dress like civilians because they are civilians, civilians are going to be attacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a war where your enemies dress like civilians because they are civilians, civilians are going to be attacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MirCat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283767</link>
		<dc:creator>MirCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283767</guid>
		<description>Ah, nuts.  I read the title wrong 3 times and just now noticed the AT in shot at.

In that case, was it &quot;Hey crowd, back off.&quot; Warning shot shots.

- The Cat looking rather silly now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, nuts.  I read the title wrong 3 times and just now noticed the AT in shot at.</p>
<p>In that case, was it &#8220;Hey crowd, back off.&#8221; Warning shot shots.</p>
<p>- The Cat looking rather silly now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisIansNana</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283765</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisIansNana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283765</guid>
		<description>What the hell is a photographer doing there in the first place. Especially with the US Secial Ops! DUH!  The dumba$$ needs to get out of the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell is a photographer doing there in the first place. Especially with the US Secial Ops! DUH!  The dumba$$ needs to get out of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MirCat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283761</link>
		<dc:creator>MirCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283761</guid>
		<description>Afghan civilians claim U.S. troops shot at them after jihadi ambush

King Arthur:  You were shot?

Afghan civilian: I got better.

TugboatPhil is right about not taking pics of Spec Ops.  Thing is were there pictures of dead US Military and any number of things that they know they are not allowed to take pictures of?  I would have probably told the reporter the same thing (if it were actually said in the first place) after what happened with the video of the dieing soldier earlier and the sniper vid.

- The Cat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Afghan civilians claim U.S. troops shot at them after jihadi ambush</p>
<p>King Arthur:  You were shot?</p>
<p>Afghan civilian: I got better.</p>
<p>TugboatPhil is right about not taking pics of Spec Ops.  Thing is were there pictures of dead US Military and any number of things that they know they are not allowed to take pictures of?  I would have probably told the reporter the same thing (if it were actually said in the first place) after what happened with the video of the dieing soldier earlier and the sniper vid.</p>
<p>- The Cat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TugboatPhil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283701</link>
		<dc:creator>TugboatPhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 20:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283701</guid>
		<description>Lessons Learned:

1.  Don&#039;t be near US troops after they have been fired upon.

2.  Don&#039;t take photos of US Special Ops personnel.

3.  John Murtha is a walking sphincter.

(ok, I just threw that last one in for the fun of it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lessons Learned:</p>
<p>1.  Don&#8217;t be near US troops after they have been fired upon.</p>
<p>2.  Don&#8217;t take photos of US Special Ops personnel.</p>
<p>3.  John Murtha is a walking sphincter.</p>
<p>(ok, I just threw that last one in for the fun of it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinionnation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283683</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinionnation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 20:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283683</guid>
		<description>street - jihadis = no one being killed.

hmm, whom shall I blame?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>street &#8211; jihadis = no one being killed.</p>
<p>hmm, whom shall I blame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283604</link>
		<dc:creator>rw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 20:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283604</guid>
		<description>The troops should be equipped with Tasers for situations such as this.  The left will then have nothing to complain about... oh wait.. nevermind.  

If we had not invaded Iraq, everything now being said about Iraq would instead be said about Afghanistan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The troops should be equipped with Tasers for situations such as this.  The left will then have nothing to complain about&#8230; oh wait.. nevermind.  </p>
<p>If we had not invaded Iraq, everything now being said about Iraq would instead be said about Afghanistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defector01</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/comment-page-1/#comment-283564</link>
		<dc:creator>Defector01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 19:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/04/afghan-civilians-claim-us-troops-shot-at-them-after-jihadi-ambush/#comment-283564</guid>
		<description>I remember yahoo saying that Americans ran away from a suicide bomber and a &#039;militant&#039; ambush, and that then the americans opened fire on civilian cars

bias anyone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember yahoo saying that Americans ran away from a suicide bomber and a &#8216;militant&#8217; ambush, and that then the americans opened fire on civilian cars</p>
<p>bias anyone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
