Crunch time: U.S., Iraqi troops set to occupy Sadr City; Update: Sadr still in Iran?
posted at 4:51 pm on March 1, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
U.S. troops have been waiting, with dread, for weeks to see if the order would come. The Times reported on January 17 that the brass were considering bypassing the neighborhood altogether:
American military commanders are now debating whether a large-scale offensive in Sadr City, a vast grid of cinder-block houses in northeastern Baghdad that is the stronghold of the Mahdi Army, should be the way to confront the fighters. American soldiers battled the militia twice in 2004, but it emerged stronger after Mr. Sadr entered the political system and helped install Mr. Maliki as Iraq’s prime minister last spring.
One senior military official said a large-scale operation “cannot be taken off the table,” but others speak of plans to isolate the militia by cutting off northeastern neighborhoods where the militia dominates, and then continuing to chip away at its networks elsewhere.
In fact, it wasn’t taken off the table. They’re going in:
U.S. and Iraqi troops will soon launch a major sweep in the Shi’ite militia bastion of Sadr City, military officials said on Thursday, a pivotal moment for the make-or-break security crackdown in Baghdad…
In the new campaign, U.S. and Iraqi troops will set up joint checkpoints in Sadr City and conduct large-scale door-to-door operations on houses and buildings, a significant escalation in a plan regarded as the last chance to avert sectarian civil war…
“We have conducted special operations in Sadr City for some months but this will be the first time we will launch full-scale operations there and the first time we will have a permanent presence there,” said Colonel Billy Don Farris, coalition forces commander for Sadr City and Adhamiya neighborhoods.
“There will be no sanctuaries in Iraq. We are going to go to every building and every house and incrementally clear the area. We will target any group that attacks Iraqi and U.S. troops,” he told Reuters…
Sheikh Raheem al-Darruji, the mayor of Sadr City, said the Sadrists were willing to give the plan a chance but said if attacks against the Shi’ite community continued “the people of Sadr City would defend again their neighborhoods”.
Darruji met with military commanders last month to broker a truce between the residents and U.S. forces that would have avoided any major operations there. I guess it didn’t pan out. Bill Roggio says he knows why — it’s because we’ve decided to divide and conquer the Sadrists rather than make a deal with them.
The obvious question now is whether Sadr’s going to stick to his passive resistance strategy or whether things are going to blow up. I wish I had answers for you.
Update: Iraqslogger has a few more details about the planned U.S. presence in the area. It includes a “joint security position,” a.k.a., mini-fort.
Update: Meanwhile, in Anbar, Iraqi troops — acting alone — allegedly cut a swath through the jihad today. And the dispute about the soccer field car bomb in Ramadi is still raging. Local U.S. forces insist that it never happened; a local sheikh swears to WaPo that it did, on Monday afternoon, and that AQ was responsible. There are two silver linings if the sheikh is lying: not only would there be 18 fewer dead kids, but disgust with Al Qaeda will have obviously reached the point where even Sunnis are planting propaganda against them in the media.
Update: Word on the street from the MEMRI Blog is that Sadr’s hanging around his cousin’s house in Qom, Iran, along with many of the Mahdi Army’s leaders.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Just in case Mooki isn’t hiding out in Iran, this time when you corner him, kill him.
Wander on March 1, 2007 at 4:53 PM
Puh-lease, exterminate this cockroach!!
omnipotent on March 1, 2007 at 5:18 PM
Call me a naive son-of-a-gun, but I actually think this surge/crunch/push is going to accomplish a great deal of good and may tip the tide in our favor. I’m an optimist, but I also want my optimism to be grounded in reality. As I see it, the reality of a troop withdrawal right now would be the worst idea in the world. You want to withdrawal when the fighting slows down, not when the insurgents are gaining momentum.
Bush made the right call, and shame on Congress for not having the guts to back him up — or to cancel the war funding on the flip side, for that matter. Wimps.
Jared White on March 1, 2007 at 5:23 PM
Long overdue. Good hunting gentlemen.
Tony737 on March 1, 2007 at 5:26 PM
I know they didn’t give operational details, and maybe I’m naive, but why the h*ll would we announce that we’ll soon have a full-time presence in Sadr city? Isn’t that giving the terrorists time to prepare?
dalewalt on March 1, 2007 at 5:26 PM
Dontcha just love that picture of Mookie?
“They call me Yuckmouth, ’cause I don’t brush, oh I like my teeth like this …”
DING DING DING
Round Three!
Tony737 on March 1, 2007 at 5:48 PM
Kinda looks like hell’s idea of Dom DeLouise, doesn’t it?
flipflop on March 1, 2007 at 5:50 PM
I have several words for this guy. Words like, toothbrush, toothpaste or maybe floss! Even just Listerine would be a vast improvement. His breath alone could probably be classified as a weapon of mass destruction! To be a nutjob is it a requirement that prospective members give up hygiene? Blech
xanadu1015 on March 1, 2007 at 5:54 PM
Clearly you are biased against Sadr, look at the photo you used! It’s pure Islamophobia and it’s total hipocrisy! You complain about the photos the SO CALLED msm use of Bush, but you turn around and play the same game!
/typical moonbat
Max Power on March 1, 2007 at 6:00 PM
Now … how do we keep him there?
darwin on March 1, 2007 at 6:01 PM
We make it clear that the Iraqi warrant for his arrest as an acomplice for murder (couple years old… but still in force) will be served, and he will be arrested, the moment he sets foot on Iraqi soil.
Romeo13 on March 1, 2007 at 6:08 PM
Couldn’t we just send him some spoiled meat? Come on, you know the guy would eat it (raw). All under the pretense of humanitarianism and reaching out to give him a splendid feast.
Wineaholic on March 1, 2007 at 6:08 PM
Does anyone know why we let the scumbag Sadr get as powerful as he did? Wouldn’t it have easier just to deal with him and the consequences Back then?
With that being said … “Sheikh Raheem al-Darruji, the mayor of Sadr City, said the Sadrists were willing to give the plan a chance but said if attacks against the Shi’ite community continued “the people of Sadr City would defend again their neighborhoods”.”
Maybe we need to scrap “Sadr City” … as in level it. If we had done that to Fallujah it would have been understood we meant business.
darwin on March 1, 2007 at 6:10 PM
I wonder if it’s at all possible for Mookie to “have an accident” or get “stabbed to death in a random street fight” in Qom. If the CIA were worth anything these arte the kind of ops they’d be pulling. Exile in Iran is okay, but I’d much prefer ignominious death in a “car accident”.
The Apologist on March 1, 2007 at 6:16 PM
My favorite part of the Anbar report
Sooner or later, progress is going to be noticed outside the blogosphere.
JackStraw on March 1, 2007 at 6:17 PM
I think this is good news. Let’s hope they go down hard…
Oh, and mini-forts are cool. Though, theirs will probably be cooler than mine.
nailinmyeye on March 1, 2007 at 6:23 PM
Doesn’t that make him off limits?
Esthier on March 1, 2007 at 6:37 PM
Jack would do it.
Esthier on March 1, 2007 at 6:38 PM
The surge must be working if this is for sale in Baghdad.
billy on March 1, 2007 at 7:00 PM
Too much tea.
He’s all talk – he ran well before the surge got surging.
Hot pursuit is international legal.
naliaka on March 1, 2007 at 8:39 PM
Gotta love that dead tooth.
smellthecoffee on March 1, 2007 at 9:47 PM
AP, its such a long read, thats why so few comments…but here’s another.
shooter on March 1, 2007 at 10:29 PM
The 82nd is in Sadr right now. I know this 18 year old kid. All day long….boom, boom, and automatic gunfire.
All American!! Hooah!
csdeven on March 1, 2007 at 10:43 PM
Maybe, finally, we can let our troops take the gloves off…?
PinkyBigglesworth on March 2, 2007 at 12:33 AM
This time it needs to emerge deader.
Mojave Mark on March 2, 2007 at 1:02 AM
“U.S. troops have been waiting, with dread, for weeks…”
Yes, a story appeared in the ARMY TIMES (not a publication of the US Army nor the DoD but in a paper owned by Gannett Publishing), under an Associated Press By-line, that claims that American soldiers are afraid to tackle Sadr city.
This is PURE BS from the anti-war, Bush-hating MSM. And you should be ashamed of repeating it in your opening line because it simply isn’t true.
The troops are NOT waiting “with dred.” Any more than the Marines were “dreading” taking down Fallujah, the one-time invincible stronghold of Al Qaeda. They have the tactics, the training, and the support fires to do in Sadr City what the Marines did in Falljuah, and which is clean house.
It is a military operation, a task that is doable, and one that will be successful at the expense of the Shiite militias.
Don’t fool yourself otherwise.
georgej on March 2, 2007 at 4:31 AM
I see we are still using these ridiculous tactics to fight the enemy. Our political and military leaders have no balls.
What we should be doing is carpet bombing the whole area.
Why put more or our troops in lethal danger by going house to house. This is why we are not putting the fear of Allah into their hearts and minds. We are fighting this war like a police action.
ScottyDog on March 2, 2007 at 10:12 AM
“What we should be doing is carpet bombing the whole area.”
This would be neither productive nor wise, as it is not needed. The majority of Shiites welcomed us when we entered Baghdad. The majority still approve of our presence in Iraq. The average Iraqi, regardless of sect, is neither our enemy nor is fighting us.
Specifically, Gatewaypundit reports:
The surge is already working even though we’ve only put one additional battalion into Baghdad. Body counts and abductions are down.
As Jules Crittenden put it: “It’s gotta be good news when it gets so quiet in Baghdad they are forced to admit it and make news out of it.”
georgej on March 2, 2007 at 1:16 PM
Comment pages: