Video: Coulter on Gore: “he may be a hypocrite but at least he’s not a moron”
posted at 1:02 pm on February 27, 2007 by Ian
Send to a Friend |
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Ann Coulter along with environmental whackivists Daryl Hannah and Jon Coifman appeared on Hannity & Colmes last night to discuss Algore’s enormous energy bill.
Coulter laid out Gore in this gem:
Coulter: “I kind of respect him more, it shows he is not stupid enough to believe all this global warming nonsense. He’s trying to get us to believe. Okay, fine, he may be a hypocrite but at least he’s not a moron.”
Al Gore’s office sent a response to “Think” Progress using the same rhetoric they used last time:
1) Gore’s family has taken numerous steps to reduce the carbon footprint of their private residence, including signing up for 100 percent green power through Green Power Switch, installing solar panels, and using compact fluorescent bulbs and other energy saving technology.
2) Gore has had a consistent position of purchasing carbon offsets to offset the family’s carbon footprint — a concept the right-wing fails to understand. Gore’s office explains:
What Mr. Gore has asked is that every family calculate their carbon footprint and try to reduce it as much as possible. Once they have done so, he then advocates that they purchase offsets, as the Gore’s do, to bring their footprint down to zero.
These people obviously don’t get the point — or refuse to acknowledge it. The problem isn’t so much as Gore’s consumption of energy, but that he asks us common folk to live a modest lifestyle while he’s living it up. Hypocrite indeed.
Like Hannity said, these “carbon offsets” are nothing but a farce. These “carbon offsets” are nothing more than indulgences in the Church of Liberalism.
Update (AP): “If we’re looking at gondolas floating down Wall Street in 20 years, what good does it do to plant some trees?”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: [1] 2 »
Love the phrase on the screencap: “Warming Hysteria”.
Yep, it’s a cult thing. Government’s gonna punish you from on high for made-up sins.
Libs, you own it.
RushBaby on February 27, 2007 at 1:09 PM
I went out and beat up some minorities this morning. But I bought some racism offsets, so it’s OK.
see-dubya on February 27, 2007 at 1:10 PM
that was a good line… I just wish she wouldn’t act just like idiot-liberals in her refusals to answer direct questions. And it would be nice if she would stop filibustering with moronic exaggerations (what was with her and the obsession of candle-power). she can be entertaining… but she is just as annoying as the far-left.
Opinionnation on February 27, 2007 at 1:11 PM
How did that work? In medieval times if you commited a sin, you paid your tithe to the church and you were absolved of your sin.
That’s what I think of every time Gore’s publicity people trot out the line that “he bought offsetting carbon credits.” The rich buy their absolution, the poor have to earn theirs.
taznar on February 27, 2007 at 1:12 PM
If you take the “casbn offset” concept to it’s logical extreme, there will have to be a permanent underclass living in dirt. Oh, another Liberal plan with “unintended” consequences? I think not. Their track record would seem to suggest otherwise.
bbz123 on February 27, 2007 at 1:12 PM
I Love You Ann!!!
TheFamousOne on February 27, 2007 at 1:15 PM
Ann is good
Defector01 on February 27, 2007 at 1:17 PM
Haha! Where did you buy them?
PRCalDude on February 27, 2007 at 1:17 PM
As anyone who has the power to think logically knows, man-made global warming is a farce. Global warming itself is doubtful, as the earth’s temperature has only gone up .6 Celsius in the last hundred years. Since most of the readings these days are taken in urban areas across the globe, they have the downtown effect skewing the results upwards.
Carbon footprints: Al Gore is an important liberal Democrat, so his lifestyle demands a gigantic mansion, personal jets, three vacation homes, heated pools, etc. But he is trying to make these places energy efficient, so his carbon footprint is zero.
What a hypocrite!
januarius on February 27, 2007 at 1:19 PM
Jesse Jackson. He’s got a whole industry devoted to it.
Hmm. There’s a post in this when I get the time.
see-dubya on February 27, 2007 at 1:19 PM
Not that I wish bad things to happen but the one thing that
wouldmight shut these enviroweenies up would be a nice big volcanic eruption. Or perhaps that asteroid that is supposed to hit Earth. As I told some of my siblings, this would solve the problem of human-caused global warming real quick. It worked with them so why shouldn’t it work with these morons.JohnnyD on February 27, 2007 at 1:20 PM
Anybody know the carbon footprint for Coulter’s black dress? Inquiring minds, and all that…
Kid from Brooklyn on February 27, 2007 at 1:21 PM
Has anyone found out just how much Al has spent?
I’d love to know. I bet it’s less than 300 bucks, either that or he is lying.
With this lifestyle, he had better be buying every carbon credit that he can get his big ham hands on. Looks like his budget is going more to lasagna credits than carbon credits.
benrand on February 27, 2007 at 1:22 PM
Al and Tipper are conserving. Now that they are the same size, they can share their clothes.
bopbottle on February 27, 2007 at 1:23 PM
Here’s a “think Green” suggestion for Gore:
Sell the mansion, move into a 1000 sq. ft. condo, donate the profit to your favorite environmental charity.
Coyote D. on February 27, 2007 at 1:25 PM
Don’t listen to TheFamousOne, Ann…he’s a loser and he’s no good for you.
I love you!
saint kansas on February 27, 2007 at 1:28 PM
Not nice, bopbottle, but it’s still my thought for the day.
mymanpotsandpans on February 27, 2007 at 1:28 PM
If you had said “offended” instead of “beat up”, you could have been Toyota.
Perchant on February 27, 2007 at 1:31 PM
I think that is how Kennedy got off, he bought everyone drinks, so his drunk driving was ok because he bought liquor offsets.
right2bright on February 27, 2007 at 1:42 PM
Haha. I was arguing with a buddy of mine about this the other day. I pointed out how hypocritical Gore was considering his home energy usage, private jets, SUVs, etc. My buddy’s response was so rediculous it made me laugh. He tried to defend it by saying,
“Gore’s message to the world far outweighs his personal consumption. He’s a big picture thinker!”
My response to him was:
“using this “logic”:
-A civil rights activist who owns a slave would just be a “big picture thinker.”
-A House Majority Leader vowing to run the “most ethical Congress ever” then taking bribes left and right would just be a “big picture thinker.”
-A priest who preaches community service and funds children’s programs and later gets caught molesting a little boy is just a “big picture thinker.”
-A “say no to drugs” activist who later dies of an overdose is just a “big picture thinker.”
-The PETA activists who recently got convicted for abusing animals are just “big picture thinkers.”
-The fire fighter who got convicted last year for starting the wild fires out west was nothing more then a “big picture thinker.”
-A police chief who gets busted for murdering someone is just a “big picture thinker.”
But then you might say to me, “but hey, a civil right activist who really believed in freeing the black race and equal rights for all would never own a … Ooooops.” Exactly.
Zetterson on February 27, 2007 at 1:43 PM
If I wanted to go and buy a “carbon offset” this afternoon, ’cause I really, really needed one before the weekend, where would I go to buy one?
If I own a stand of prairie grass, which is a fabulous carbon sink, better than trees, can I sell certificates? That this was thunked up by Enron is no surprise. Not a soul on the planet has been able to explain in simple English what exactly that company was selling before it went belly up. It seemed to be simply an elaborate Ponzi scheme, with better offices.
This is better than selling the Brooklyn Bridge.
naliaka on February 27, 2007 at 1:47 PM
I like it, Zetterson. let me try one:
Mark Foley co-sponsored that online child predator act. Therefore his ickazoid e-mails to underage pages were okay, because he’s a “big picture thinker”.
see-dubya on February 27, 2007 at 1:52 PM
What this comes down to is elitists versus egalitarians. The Democrats are devoted to elitism. You can see it in all their talk about Kennedy and Camelot. Is it a surprise when Gore preaches environmentalism and then gorges on utilities? Of course not! He considers himself exempt from the standards he wants to impose on you, the little people. That’s why Patrick Kennedy preaches environmentalism from his private jet. That’s why there were all those stories about Kerrey cutting in line then facing down anybody who objected with the pompous, “Do you know who I am?” Yeah, we know you are and what you are.
Tantor on February 27, 2007 at 1:53 PM
What is a “carbon credit” anyway? Isn’t it just an arbitrary tax?
stonemeister on February 27, 2007 at 1:55 PM
Oh, great. Now the impoverished have another thing they can’t afford to buy, find themselves envious and will have to have it given to them.
Carbon Offset welfare?
CBarker on February 27, 2007 at 1:56 PM
Somebody had better warn Daryl Hannah that elective plastic surgery contributes to greenhouse gas problems.
mattshu on February 27, 2007 at 1:57 PM
How about carbon offset bling? It could be like little gold badges you can wear to the Oscars…and each one represents a contribution that absolves the wearer of a million kilowatt/hours of used energy.
see-dubya on February 27, 2007 at 1:58 PM
right on see-dubya.
Zetterson on February 27, 2007 at 2:00 PM
Who do you trust? Einstein, Galileo, or Al Gore?
JammieWearingFool on February 27, 2007 at 2:06 PM
He’s using some of those rooms for political meetings…and politicians are full of…root cause of some of the global warming.
Mr. Gore is soooo boring. I’m so happy I didn’t have to see him for 8 years, almost daily. Not that Mr. Bush hasn’t entertained me too.
That Gore Oscar clip with “My fellow Americans” still makes me smile - colder than Mr. Nixon, heh.
In leadership there’s nothing like ‘by example’. Hypocrisy is always obvious and no amount of refutation can ‘kill’ it.
Entelechy on February 27, 2007 at 2:08 PM
So Mr. Big Thinker Al spends more in energy cost annually then my wife made as a science teacher her first few years out of school. I suppose that makes us real carbon neutral for not having enough to buy the second car or go on a vacation….I have some carbon credits for sale (I suppose all people at a certain income level have extra)
jimwesty on February 27, 2007 at 2:15 PM
Daryl Hannah was testifying as an expert witness on the effect of global warming on mermaids.
Is anyone else tired of hearing about “awareness?” No honey, I didn’t wash the dishes, but I’ve made the kids aware of the need for clean utensils.
saint kansas on February 27, 2007 at 2:16 PM
When they star in a film and act, I listen.
When they open their pie hole and speak in public, huh?! You say sompting?!?
No hablo
espanolwackoKini on February 27, 2007 at 2:25 PM
ROFLMAO!
csdeven on February 27, 2007 at 2:26 PM
Daryl Hanna looked BAD! If I didn’t know better, I’d say that Ann gave her a backstage beating before the on air one she gave her.
csdeven on February 27, 2007 at 2:31 PM
Ann and Shawn both have an obnoxious rating that is soaring these days. Hard to sway independents to the right when these two are acting out just as bad as the nutroots. There is a place and time for everything and these two seem to be lost-in-space lately. Either comedeinne or analysist, but the mockery has became distasteful at the very least. Hopefully no one is watching.
Griz on February 27, 2007 at 2:35 PM
Haha! Where did you buy them?
KKK-Mart!
Jim Treacher on February 27, 2007 at 2:42 PM
Gore is a frigging schmuck! I’m going burn a tire tonight and dedicate the fumes to him.
jaleach on February 27, 2007 at 2:42 PM
At last, the core, the essence, the root meaning of the Left: “anti-human”, is spoken out loud. Way to go, Ann. They ARE anti-human (didn’t the 20th century prove that beyond any doubt?) and the sooner people realize that the better.
How bout this for a bumper sticker - “Anti-human? Resist climate change!”
Halley on February 27, 2007 at 2:42 PM
Barbra Streisand is another hypocrite. The water bill for her California home was over $22,000 one year.
Hilts on February 27, 2007 at 2:47 PM
BTW… I’m selling carbon
indulgencesoffsets at my website youranidiot.org.Mojave Mark on February 27, 2007 at 2:48 PM
I love the mockery.
JackM on February 27, 2007 at 2:50 PM
Now let’s see. Gore purchases offsets which go to plant trees. But he also wants much more ethanol, so we’re going to have to cut down trees to create more crop land for the added corn. Does that mean Gore can offset the offsets’ offsets by simply not the planting trees in the first place so they don’t have to be cut down to plant the corn? Oh, the ecomath is just too hard for us mere mortals…
eeyore on February 27, 2007 at 2:51 PM
Not likely. Robert Byrd bought them all up in the 1960s.
Hoodlumman on February 27, 2007 at 2:58 PM
He reselling them. It’s new kind of recycling.
eeyore on February 27, 2007 at 3:01 PM
OK, so assuming I had a 2-digit IQ and wanted to go buy some carbon offsets, where exactly would I go to do that?
What a load of crap.
flipflop on February 27, 2007 at 3:02 PM
Oh, they were on sale over at the bong shop next to the carbon offsets.
What’s to understand? You ‘buy’ an offset, it’s like holier than thous fixing a ticket.
How is that carbon footprint reduction?
Just another liberal feel good intention paving the road to ruin.
Speakup on February 27, 2007 at 3:03 PM
Assuming for a moment that I had a 2-digit IQ, where exactly would I go to buy some carbon offsets if I wanted them? 7-11? Target? Wal-Mart?
flipflop on February 27, 2007 at 3:04 PM
Whoops…serious lag. Didn’t mean to post twice. I thought my “cr*p” comment got whacked by a filter.
flipflop on February 27, 2007 at 3:05 PM
I went out and beat up some minorities this morning. But I bought some racism offsets, so it’s OK.Funniest post of the year!
fogw on February 27, 2007 at 3:07 PM
miscalibrated, sorry for the strike.
fogw on February 27, 2007 at 3:08 PM
By the way…is it just me, or is Melissa Ethridge starting to look a lot like Hillary?
flipflop on February 27, 2007 at 3:09 PM
I love Ann! Anytime she is on I stop what I’m doing and watch. She is honest and direct and it’s hard to refute her assertions so the left can only resort to their usual distraction of the real issue by attempting to insult her…
CCRWM on February 27, 2007 at 3:12 PM
Funniest post of the year!
fogw on February 27, 2007 at 3:07 PM
Easily!
I’m now going to shamelessly use it around the office to get a laugh!!
Darksean on February 27, 2007 at 3:16 PM
I live in a 700 sq. ft. efficiency and don’t own a car. Where the fuck do I get my check? What I want to know.
B Moe on February 27, 2007 at 3:19 PM
I love Ann and want her to have my children (They’re in the car. Let me go get them) :)
x95b10 on February 27, 2007 at 3:22 PM
I must agree Gore looks a little hypocritical…20 times the national average? My God is he enriching Uranium in his basement?
Anyway, I hope Coulter gets more and more TV time for her little anti-climate change, anti-solar energy rants. She sounds so absolutely ridiculous and obnoxious I’m sure she’s only alienating reasonable people who may harbor some doubts.
JaHerer22 on February 27, 2007 at 3:26 PM
Hooray to all of you Ann Coulter fans, but that entire segment was embarassing. That over-the-top shoutfest is why I almost never watch H&C anymore (flipping channels and saw it last night). She was like a car wreck, talking over everybody, raving on about construction materials and “candles” which no one ever brought up. I’m not kidding, she was completely unhinged for a full two segments. Embarassing.
As for Daryl Hannah, she said that she has been “off the grid for 13 years.” With the notable exception of Kill Bill, I think that she’s right.
But this is just funny as hell see-dubya:
carlitos on February 27, 2007 at 3:34 PM
I did a little google search on Carbon Offsets.
I found a company (that is certified by a bunch of Green agencies that I’ve never heard of before) that offers enough carbon offsets for me to be a carbon neutral world citizen.
Apparently, by virtue of living in North America, I produce 19.9 tons (actually, tonnes, it was a UK website) of carbon each year.
To offset that, I just have to send this company between 141 pounds and 185 pounds and they will either -
1) Invest in new technologies that will save at least 19.9 tons of CO2 each year.
2) Invest in ’some great’ projects in developing countries which will save 19.9 tons of CO2 each year.
3) Plant trees in the UK to save 19.9 tons of CO2 each year.
I might just invest in this…..for 150 pounds a year, I buy the right to do whatever the heck I please because I can say, “Pardon me Mr. Left Envirowacko, but I’m carbon neutral….so excuse me while I go burn my fossil fuels.”
It worked for Al Gore, it should work for me too.
JadeNYU on February 27, 2007 at 4:03 PM
WORD!!!!
budorob on February 27, 2007 at 4:20 PM
You forgot to mention the months she spent squatting in a tree in Los Angeles to prevent the rightful owner of the land from kicking illegal Mexicans off his land. And Ann was completely unhinged. Puh-leeze. What planet are you from?
Andy in Agoura Hills on February 27, 2007 at 4:33 PM
How typical of the elitist left.
If you’re RICH, you can use electricity all you want, cause you can buy and the “carbon offsets.” If you’re poor, F-you. Welcome to darkness.
Liberals are pigs.
georgej on February 27, 2007 at 4:37 PM
Forgive me, Algore, for I have emitted carbon.
The Monster on February 27, 2007 at 4:38 PM
I’m giong to suggest that a pretty healthy chunk of your ₤185 may be going to some pretty fancy lobbying offices. I remember years ago the Sierra Club being ridiculed by big-time corporate lobbiyists for having the fanciest offices around, and the World Wildlife Fund was caught spending only 10% of their receipts on programs. Maybe the company uses the offset income to pay for Al Gore’s travel expenses to spread the word.
eeyore on February 27, 2007 at 4:45 PM
Andy in Agoura Hills ,
Thanks for that link. I had completely forgotten about Daryl squatting on behalf of squatters. That was great!
I like some of Ann Coulter’s writing, but the last two TV appearances I’ve seen struck me as completely incoherent. Sorry, that’s my take, and I’ve seen a lot of incoherence in my time. Plus, she was wearing jeans, forcing the cameramen to do quick cuts when their pans caught the wrong angle. Unprofessional all the way ’round. Just because some of their liberal guests talk over everyone doesn’t make it ok.
carlitos on February 27, 2007 at 4:47 PM
If Gore truly believed that the carbon emissions were going to lead to the destruction of the earth (and he cared), why would he be happy with being carbon neutral?
Instead of using 20X more electricity and natural gas than the average american in just 1 of your homes, why not get that down to just 2X or 3X more? Why not fly commercial (you could still sit in 1st class) when you travel? Get rid of that limo riding entourage and put all your people in a couple bulletproof hybrids….
THEN spend the same amount on carbon offsets as you are currently spending so that instead of being carbon neutral you are offsetting even more than you are using.
Side Note: What the heck is he doing to use that much electricity? His mansion isn’t 20X larger than the average American house. He doesn’t have 20X more people living there than the average american household. He doesn’t even live there full time.
JadeNYU on February 27, 2007 at 4:48 PM
I agree… Hannity is absolutely intolerable these days. The constant outraged preachyness has got to go. Seriously.
And Coulter, while occasionally getting off some good witty zingers, has this constant hyperventilation thing going on nowadays. There was a time when she knew how to sit quietly, let the other side say dumb stuff, and then calmly dispose of them. Now it’s way over the top.
DaveS on February 27, 2007 at 4:53 PM
When you look at the famous front-page pic for HotAir’s “Inconvenient Al’s mansion consumes 20x more energy than average household Feb 26, 2007 5:49 PM by Ian,” you’ll see he needs it mostly just to keep his own bellows stoked.
eeyore on February 27, 2007 at 5:04 PM
I really want to know this:
1) who owns and sells “carbon offsets?”
which will answer:
2) who banks the money from the “sale” of carbon offsets?”
naliaka on February 27, 2007 at 5:19 PM
Right now my carbon footprint is a size 14. I’m going to try to have it up to about 21 by the end of the year.
I mean, you know….large carbon footprint means a large…
TugboatPhil on February 27, 2007 at 5:23 PM
From what I could tell, most of the carbon offset companies were non-profits….which doesn’t really mean much.
Also, it looks as if some of the offsets go to pay for installation of wind/solar mills. I’m assuming that the electricity generated from those mills will be sold for a profit, so, it kind of looks like a great way to get suckers to pay for the construction of your solar/wind energy plant.
JadeNYU on February 27, 2007 at 5:33 PM
Ann Coulter cut right to the heart of the matter. She attacked the silly and nonsensical notion of Global Warming itself and this is where the focus needs to remain. Al Gore doesn’t care if you call him a hypocrite, he just laughts all the way to the bank.
Maxx on February 27, 2007 at 5:37 PM
Typed in “carbon offsets” and looked thru the listings.
It seems that a “carbon offset” is nothing more than investing in a mutual fund; only one that invests in “green companies/thingys,” which are under less pressure than EXXON/Mobil is under to actually produce something.
Let’s do this the European way. For every watt over Goer’s monthly allotment, he should pay a premium of 1000%. Gore’s household electrical bill would be even more impressive than it is now. He obviously has too much money, that he can’t use. He needs a luxury tax. Hollywood looks like it could use some slimming - luxury tax them.
naliaka on February 27, 2007 at 5:40 PM
Oh,
JadeNYU, you did some scrounging around, too. Did you notice more talk and earnest prose than products?
:P
naliaka on February 27, 2007 at 5:43 PM
Just a little quote to ponder, when you google Enron and Carbon offsets.
right2bright on February 27, 2007 at 5:49 PM
Haven’t read through it, but here is an 80 page report detailing carbon offsets.
http://www.carbontradewatch.org/pubs/carbon_neutral_myth.pdf
right2bright on February 27, 2007 at 5:58 PM
Did any of the stars at the Oscars carpool in those big, long limos? and I mean more than 2 in one?
Mazztek on February 27, 2007 at 6:05 PM
Indeed eeyore ! Who is paying Al Gore and how much ? Somehow the media never gets around to asking these questions.
And if the Global Warmers are so concerned about the planet, why don’t they suggest that people plant their own trees ? Oh, I forgot… that would mean no money would be sent to them.
Maxx on February 27, 2007 at 6:09 PM
I am amazed that this is he first I have heard of this
http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0429-03.htm
bbz123 on February 27, 2007 at 6:23 PM
I am amazed that this is he first I have heard of this
http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0429-03.htm
bbz123 on February 27, 2007 at 6:23 PM
Click here to hear Al Gore after the awards.
Wade on February 27, 2007 at 6:39 PM
Ya, a mutual fund that you pay into and pay into, but never make a return on. WTF?!
thomashton on February 27, 2007 at 6:39 PM
Couric worried about papa ‘climate change’…
Entelechy on February 27, 2007 at 7:08 PM
Hush! I’m working on that right now.
I never figured gold to have the atomic number 8.
HerrMorgenholz on February 27, 2007 at 7:10 PM
Just make your check out to “Open Society Institute, c/o George Soros.”
mojojojo on February 27, 2007 at 7:26 PM
OK so Carbon has the atomic number 6. No wonder I can’t afford carbon offsets.
HerrMorgenholz on February 27, 2007 at 7:30 PM
High priced “green power” and “carbon offsets”
It’s even simpler than indulgences. You don’t have to go back to the dark ages.
It’s the position: “only the rich should have power”.
I thought this was the Republican position? ROFL
Anil Petra on February 27, 2007 at 7:46 PM
Ann Coulter is refreshing in her opposion to the politically correct Global Warming liberals. She is saying that the science behind the conclusions are flawed and that only data favorable to politically correct notions is being given credbility. “Don’t confuse me with the facts, I already have my mind made up” exemplifies the Global Warming mob.
The Left is trying to use Global Warming as a method of taking wealth from the United States and distributing it to 3rd world countries in a scheme is that is politically motivated and based on scientific theory that is flawed. The people we see advocating pain for the rest of us will not be hurt, but the American middle class will be.
omegaram on February 27, 2007 at 7:56 PM
Treacher nails it:
RightWinged on February 27, 2007 at 7:56 PM
That a sweet blast by Coulter. I actually laughed out loud.
Metro on February 27, 2007 at 7:58 PM
Interesting article (via Drudge) on a meeting of Global Warming skeptics, that didn’t censor language:
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/greenhouse-sceptics-to-congregate/2007/02/27/1172338625822.html
RightWinged on February 27, 2007 at 8:07 PM
Check out the link Entelechy left regarding Couric. Check out the comments after the article.
WOW! They slam her pretty hard.
csdeven on February 27, 2007 at 8:10 PM
Hey, we planted 55,000 pine trees in the last 3 years. Doesn’t someone owe me carbon offset money?
Kevin M on February 27, 2007 at 8:17 PM
Thank goodness someone else thinks that. The message is lost in their smugness. Much like Gore’s credibility is lost in his elitism.
What’s really sad about this is that it clouds the real environmental issues, which are not global threats but local ones, and casts a pall of irrationality on true conservationists.
SouthernDem on February 27, 2007 at 8:20 PM
Couric:
Oops.
Those comments are brutal!
see-dubya on February 27, 2007 at 8:21 PM
Comment pages: [1] 2 »