Searcharticles.in More Resource For your sites…

Kevin M on February 25, 2007 at 3:47 AM

Ok. Yeah, I didn’t read your quoted link.

Also…Giuliani has already made some smart “concessions” on social issues. He’s against gay marriage and vowed to defend the constitution, including the right to bear arms and the possibility of a gradual rollback of Roe vs Wade by a more conservative Supreme Court. Conservatives have nothing to fear from Giuliani. They should give him a chance.

modifiedcontent on February 24, 2007 at 1:18 PM

Kevin M on February 24, 2007 at 5:45 PM

the only thing I have found on Mitt regarding gun control is his 1994 support of the AWB.

Do you have any other data that supports your claim that he is anti-gun?

Must be pro-life, pro-family, pro-military, spiritual, pro-border enforcement, articulate, and who won’t run from a fight. Walks along the beach are a plus.

Link plz. I don’t believe you. He’s as anti ‘gun-freedom’ as McGovern. This is number one of his 20+ sticking points. He’s no more than a liberal who wants to acheive victory abroad. One part of that is great (victory), the other… not so much (liberal hell). And I don’t think he’s a Frank Warner liberal. He’s Kennedy/Johnson style. Great for a minute, horrible for a decade. He’d get my vote against any Democrat running, but I’ll be damned if I’d vote for him in a primary. Republicans shouldn’t have to vote for liberals.

Exit question: Is Ace right? Is she done?

Is Ace kidding? There is no way she is done. Expect a video sooner or later of Obama smoking or bobbing up and down hundreds of times in a Jakarta madrassa.

Barack Hussein Obama has way too many negatives that Clinton can exploit. Even if he did get the nomination, the fact that Muslims consider him Muslim will do him in.

Sigh…

When it comes to the “social conservative” agenda that the purists complain about with Giuliani, I observe that the GOP is already far from united on those issues…
-Halley on February 24, 2007 at 1:14 AM

Social conservatism is not my beef with the guy. Is he fiscally conservative? Will he veto new taxes? Will he stop any new entitlements or increases in current ones? will he stop the illegal alien invasion? The answer to all of these appears to be ‘no’.

He was pretty tough on criminals, which leads us to believe he would be equally tough on terrorists. And that’s great, but if he saves the world from terrorism while allowing America to continue it’s steady decline, what have we won? I’m still hoping we find a politician willing to cover both fronts: international and domestic. Also, I guess he has to be electable :(.

As for Rudy Giuliani, I haven’t decided yet who I will be endorsing or voting for, but he has an impressive record and on 9/11 he was the face of America. He stepped up to the plate and he showed a courage that not many in this day and age did or cou….

O’bama Bobby Kennedy sure has the base excited. I really didn’t think he had a shot at first but Billary better pull a rabbit out of her pink pants suit pretty quick. The more anti-war the party trends the harder it is going to be for the Carpetbagger to stay in the race.

There’s a somewhat sick joke there :)

I could only think of one thing that could completely and totally energize Hitlery’s chances of election, and that would be if (God forbid) Obama were killed during the Primaries. That would give her the opportunity to pin it on the VRWC, get 100% if the black vote and coast to victory.

For me, I’ll vote for the most conservative Republican in the primaries, then support whomever comes out of that primary. In no way will I vote third party or Dim.

That hissing noise you hear is the oxygen being sucked out of Queen Hillary’s presidential aspirations. In a match-up between the early 2008 frontrunners, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) leads New York Senator Hillary Clinton (D) 52%……

Gregor on February 24, 2007 at 12:43 AM

I have looked and I can’t find anything substantial from Romney that would lead anyone to believe a vote for him is a choice between protecting Iraq or protecting the USA.

Joke she’s probably heard a thousand times: What would her name be if she married Sandy Burger? Seriously, I’d vote for a Ham-Burger, even if it turned out to be a liberal.

But my other point stands about the primary poll vs. general election polls.

Gee, thanks alot, lol.

Well, that’s what I asked for. At least someone can actually do some research.

That sucks.

As for the poll … it’s interesting that it conflicts with most other polls which show Gingrich up at the top for first choice, although most of those negative votes come from Democrats.

It doesn’t surprise me though, as I think Giuliani is going to be the next President, like it or not.

Gregor on February 24, 2007 at 12:57 AM

I do “like it”, however I think you’re delusional if you truly believe that. Again, I and I think most of us here would like to see President Gingrich, but come on… Two thirds of the country say they will never vote for him, and that’s without the liberal MSM treatment he’d get if he were the nominee.

Anyway, I think you’re confusing a couple things… Where you see Gingrich polling well isn’t in general election polls, it’s in Republican primary polls where he’s pitted against Romney, McCain, and Giuliani. Of course Newt is going to poll well among conservatives when you’re choosing between him and those guys… but that has nothing to do with electability. This is Hillary’s problem, again she’s unelectable, but she’s a hero in her own party. But as bad as Hillary has it in the general election, it would appear that Newt has it that much worse.