Comments on: Banned by YouTube III

By: The Tech Propaganda War YouTube vs Second Life « DaTechguy’s Blog

The Tech Propaganda War YouTube vs Second Life « DaTechguy’s Blog — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:55:44 +0000

[...] Google’s/Youtube’s history this should be no [...]

By: Social Orb

Social Orb — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:09:45 +0000

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Banned by YouTube III…

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Banned by YouTube III
Soooooo… you have been banned from YouTube? You video has been removed by the user even though your the user and you haven’t removed anything? Then you might wanna watch this video.
TrueTube …

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » YouTube censors strike again

Hot Air » Blog Archive » YouTube censors strike again — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:45:05 +0000

[...] This follows closely on the heels of another YouTube censorship scandal, that one involving atheist Nick Gisburne. We profiled him in Vent a few days ago. Gisburne posted video after video slamming Christianity with no problems, but YouTube yanked his videos and killed his account when he posted a video using verses from the Koran to criticize Islam. Christians rose to Gisburne’s defense in spite of his many attacks on Christianity, rightly seeing a threat to his free speech as a threat to our own. [...]

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: “Jew Watch” on YouTube

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: “Jew Watch” on YouTube — Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:42:31 +0000

[...] Why mention this? Because of Nick Gisburne, the UK atheist whose account was twice deleted recently by YouTube after he posted an innocuous video about violent passages in the Koran. Go see the screencaps at Gisburne’s site in which YouTube defines the offense as “inappropriate content.” Exit question, then: Why is Gisburne persona non grata at YT while Weltner’s videos are in the top 100? There are only two possibilities — either not a single person of the thousands who’ve seen the Jew Watch stuff has flagged them as inappropriate, or the Jew Watch stuff has been flagged but YouTube’s decided they’re okay. Extremely depressing, whichever it is. [...]

By: Katie Favazza

Katie Favazza — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:44:46 +0000

Investigative blogging……

Newt’s YouTube challenge has disappeared from YouTube.Today, when I clicked the link–in search of a few entries–I was disappointed. YouTube said: “This video has been removed by the user.” Why would Newt remove his own challenge? Hmm. Made me……

By: Jihadist Videos on YouTube at No Man’s Blog

Jihadist Videos on YouTube at No Man’s Blog — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:44:19 +0000

[...] Michelle Malkin wants to know why YouTube has removed certain anti-jihad videos created for Hot Air. Here’s her most recent “Vent” on the topic: [...]

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Banned by YouTube III « Social Orb

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Banned by YouTube III « Social Orb — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:48:35 +0000

[...] Hot Air » Blog Archive » Banned by YouTube III Hot Air » Blog Archive » Banned by YouTube III [...]

By: Coronagold

Coronagold — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:52:33 +0000

Great video Michelle! UserTube is trash & passe. Time to make a new video server array elsewhere.

Wow! realVerse!! Where’s Beppy been?!

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:33:37 +0000

Bravo. I was clapping hands while watching.

By: WastelandMan

WastelandMan — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:39:06 +0000

Part-ay!!
Part-ay!!
Part-ay!!

-Wasteland Man

By: Zorro

Zorro — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:24:08 +0000

Bryan and Michelle,

Good job. Your vids are looking better every month. Like the background and graphic treatments, not to mention the topic. Keep up the good work!

realVerse on February 21, 2007 at 1:58 PM

Ditto and thank you for creating this site. The first anniversary is coming up soon, where’s the party?

By: spazzmomma

spazzmomma — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:47:38 +0000

I am looking for a place other than Dhemmi tube.If they can keep speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi’s account open (and thriving with nutroot comments,they should not sensor an opposition discussion.The comment section is rich with empeach Bush,Cheney and investigate 911 blather.

By: CyberCipher

CyberCipher — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:24:24 +0000

I say flood YT with copies of the offending video…

Mojomatrix on February 21, 2007 at 6:36 PM

If you visit Nick Gisburne’s site, you will see that this is precisely the same strategy that he himself suggests. But before everyone rushs off to do his bidding, you should be cognizant of the fact that the man’s hostility towards Christianity equals or exceeds his hostility towards Islam. (Sorry, but he’ll have to get his assistance from someone else besides me.)

By: zerodamage

zerodamage — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:54:07 +0000

This is why I use Dailymotion.com Their site is faster, you can have a much larger embedded video and there isn’t any current jihad against conservatives over there… at least that I know of.

By: Mojomatrix

Mojomatrix — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:36:40 +0000

I say flood YT with copies of the offending video. Then run a contest to see who gets banned first.

By: syncrodude

syncrodude — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:21:19 +0000

Update, Comment did register..

By: syncrodude

syncrodude — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:20:04 +0000

Hey I just came from the Youtube. There was copy of the Offending Video The length showed 9 minutes, but ended after 12 seconds. Also, I tried to post a comment, but it would not register! I went to one of the videos along the side, and the submission went right thru! Seems they are rigorously patrolling this.... Haha..

By: syncrodude

syncrodude — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:49:49 +0000

I know how to get a hold of skewtube.com

Maybe something could be done with that.

By: LakeRuins

LakeRuins — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:57:08 +0000

CyberCipher on February 21, 2007 at 11:55 AM

You might want to extend that offer to zombie also.

By: Highrise

Highrise — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:45:10 +0000

I agree..Michelle, have Bill cover this censorship from Utube. This is outrageous. Maybe we should get a list of who financially supports Utube and start sending complaint mails.

By: sharinlite

sharinlite — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:34:25 +0000

The only reason I everwatch Youtube is because Hot Air or a few other sites I visit link to something I need to see, hear or know about.

If this is a “public” company, they need competition and anyone who owns “shares” should get rid of them. I’ll support a fair, honest and more conservative site for sure!!

By: Ed Driscoll.com

Ed Driscoll.com — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:14:46 +0000

Let Me Cogitate On That…

The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz writes:The reason these two [satellite radio] companies have 13 million subscribers willing to cough up $12.95 a month for something we all grew up thinking should be free is that commercial radio has self-destructed…

By: Ferris

Ferris — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:45:25 +0000

So…

Who owns the copyright for the Koran, anyway? Allah? Big Mo? The Saudi princes?

And how much are they raking in in royalties?

In order to officially copyright something (1) the author of (2) an original work must (3) fix it in a recognizable media. Those are the main criteria of a copyright. That said, current copyright term is the life of the author plus 70 years.

a) I think the Koran has been around longer than that.
b) I don’t think the author is around any more.
c) The Koran is in the public domain, just like the Bible and It’s a Wonderful Life. Sorry, YouTube — if copyright infringement is the official story, I’m not buying it.

By: CyberCipher

CyberCipher — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:28:57 +0000

Good job. Your vids are looking better every month. Like the background and graphic treatments, not to mention the topic. Keep up the good work!

realVerse on February 21, 2007 at 1:58 PM

Good to hear from you. I think that I speak for nearly everyone here at HotAir when I say that “We MISS Bethany!”

BTW, speaking of someone who has experience with streaming videos from an internet web-site…”where for art thou” realVerse? Will you be returning? (Some of us still haven’t heard or figured out what happened.)

By: realVerse

realVerse — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:58:10 +0000

Bryan and Michelle,

Good job. Your vids are looking better every month. Like the background and graphic treatments, not to mention the topic. Keep up the good work!