Red on red: Jihadi satellite network turns on Al Qaeda in Iraq

posted at 12:55 pm on February 19, 2007 by Allahpundit

Verrry interesting. I wrote about al-Zawraa back in December: it’s based in Syria, carried on Egypt’s Nilesat signal, and run by a talking pig named Mishan al-Jibouri who used to be an Iraqi MP before he was accused of corruption and ran away to Assad country, and who was last seen almost getting into a fistfight with an Iraqi Shiite on Al Jazeera.

Now, according to Nibras Kazimi of the Hudson Institute, he’s had a change of heart.

[A] few days ago, Al-Zawra began running some anti-Al-Qaeda messages in its news ticker, and the jihadists began to mumble and some even penned invectives against al-Jebouri.

Yesterday, however, Al-Jebouri gave a whole anti-Al-Qaeda speech and this drove the jihadists berserk: the premier jihadist organ had begun to badmouth the jihad!…

My own little reading of al-Jebouri’s little speech is that this was spurred on by Syrian Intelligence. Sure, some may say it’s the Barzanis, or the Jordanians, or even the CIA. But al-Jebouri, who is now hiding-out in Damascus, may have been prodded into this by his Syrian hosts who, according to a source, are getting information that Al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia is moving resources and personnel from Iraq to Syria in preparation for launching operations against the regime there and beyond in Lebanon and Israel.

Follow the link for a bullet-point treatment of Jibouri’s speech. I can’t understand why AQ would want to threaten Assad when Syria’s the main highway for Sunni jihadis into Iraq, unless they think Iraq’s a lost cause for them at this point and they’re looking for another battlefield. That’s actually not as far-fetched as it sounds: with AQ leaders being rolled up, more tribes in Anbar turning against them, and the attentions of a surging U.S. military focused mainly on jihadis as the Sadrists disappear from view, Al Qaeda might figure Iraq’s not worth the trouble anymore and leave the fighting to the Baathist remnants and indigenous Sunnis. On the other hand, having declared the Islamic State of Iraq, they really can’t just abandon it. So I don’t quite follow Kazimi’s thinking.

Maybe it has nothing to do with Syria at all and Jibouri just got nervous about being a mouthpiece for the most widely despised “insurgent” group in the country? That’s my guess.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Maybe MSNBC and CNN will follow suit.

infidel on February 19, 2007 at 1:05 PM


Maybe MSNBC and CNN will follow suit.

infidel on February 19, 2007 at 1:05 PM

Don’t hold your breath infidel.

Griz on February 19, 2007 at 1:12 PM

just have the jihadis keep killing each other and all will be good

Defector01 on February 19, 2007 at 1:20 PM

Good news from Iraq The Model. Attacks in Baghdad down by 80%!

Looks like the surge is already bearing some tangible fruit. Hope it continues.

Take THAT you cowards in congress!

techno_barbarian on February 19, 2007 at 1:35 PM

It seems more likely that, although Syria has an interest at keeping violence in Iraq at a sustainable boil, its Alawite-led regime has plenty to fear from Wahabist al Qaida. This could be just a way of keeping the scales in balance.

SWLiP on February 19, 2007 at 4:53 PM

“I can’t understand why AQ would want to threaten Assad when Syria’s the main highway for Sunni jihadis into Iraq, unless they think Iraq’s a lost cause for them at this point and they’re looking for another battlefield.”

It could very well be.

“Maybe MSNBC and CNN will follow suit.”

Sure, when Hell freezes over.

Or when Al Qaeda blows up their corporate headquarters in New York City and Atlanta.

georgej on February 19, 2007 at 7:04 PM

Let us see how the MSM nuances this “good news”, and if it makes the cover of Time?

PinkyBigglesworth on February 19, 2007 at 8:35 PM

This could be partly political, but it could have more to do with the various religious sects themselves. Christopher Hitchens just released an excellent article on this topic where he provides more detail on this. As extreme as the Wahhabist’s and other “versions” of the Muslim faith are, if their plan for a caliphate is ever going to materialize it will require (don’t laugh because it sounds so impossible) all the religious sects uniting together. Barring that, the only option is to battle for king of the hill.

thedecider on February 19, 2007 at 10:06 PM

SHIITE happens.

seejanemom on February 20, 2007 at 8:13 AM