Buy ambien 12.5 mgm overnight mail md consultation. Buy ambien cr. Ambien cr buy online no rx. Buy ambien….

Wasn’t dingy Harry a shoe salesman before he was elected?

Yes, a used shoe salesman

So as everyone knows, the Congress decided to play government this weekend with their vote on a non-binding resolution to signal America’s defeat. We had resisted in commenting on it, mainly because it’s taken us a little while to get……

But it hasn’t left the nightly news. And the average voter is saying, “What? Why do I even vote! I want to hear about Bald Britney, not Iraq!”…

Redeployment? But the Democrats told us that they would bring the troops home! I’m glad to see yet another liberal lie debunked.

Wasn’t dingy Harry a shoe salesman before he was elected?

I thought he was a mortician.

Well. . .where do you think he got all those shoes to sell?

I’m confused by the term “redeployment”.

Redeployment = PC Quit Giveup Surrender Lose

Also, if Iraq is a huge disaster, as Reid is saying, why are we “redeploying”? Why aren’t we just gettin’ the heck out of there? Good questions for such a “respected” journalist as Blitzer to come up with on his own.

According to an Investor’s Business Daily poll (see chart accompaning article)

70% of all Americans thing that winning in Iraq is important. (42% VERY Important, 24% somewhat important).

This is an INCREASE from 66% from December 2006.

By party, even the majority of DEMOCRATS believe winning in Iraq is important (53%). Among Republicans, 85%

The majority of Americans (58%) are either very hopeful or somewhat hopeful that America will succeed in Iraq. The percentage of Americans that are very hopeful increased from 29% to 35%. The percentage of people who are somewhat hopeful decreased from 31% to 23%.

Murtha and Pelosi and Reid, YOU ARE FLAT OUT LYING when you claim that these votes are simply expressing the will of the people.

The will of the people is NOT that America should cut and run, but that America should WIN in Iraq.

Capitalist Infidel on February 19, 2007 at 3:19 AM

They don’t want to fight to preserve, they want to appease to get re-elected.

Nice post!

Furthermore being a resident in Reid’s district, he is a never-was boxer and probably the reason i have to pay b/t $600-700 per year for registrering my 2004 Tacoma which gets 20 MPG as a 4X4 (that’s the best in its class for you green peace types). Reid preaches ignorance like most ofther Dems. Note: Nevada – one of the largest states – has only 2 quasi large cities so pollution (CO2) is not a problem.

“Ike” came up with the Dominoe Theory and how to stop it from happening, the democrats screwed it up. End of story.

Why isnt there a test mandated for every politician to pass before eligibility for election on American History and how the 3 branches of our Govt function? Because 99% would fail!

Nonfactor on February 18, 2007 at 10:45 PM
WTF?

Perhaps the second worst U.S foreign policy “mistake” ever was also made by a Democrat. Soon after becoming President in 1977, Jimmy Carter launched a deliberate campaign to undermine the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlevi, a good friend and ally of the United States. The Shah of Iran fell from power as a direct result of Jimmy Carter’s withdrawal of support and Iran fell into the hands of the tyrannical and anti-American Ayatollah Khomeini. This was the key event in history that led to the terrorist supporting state of Iran today that now threatens to develop nuclear weapons to destroy both the United States and Israel. (Pretty big “mistake” hun?)

I am fairly sure the top one-hundred worst U.S. foreign policy “mistakes” ever made were all by Democrats, but I just don’t have time to run them all down.

Now for Harry Reid’s statement that Iraq is an even worse mistake than Vietnam, of course this implies, that in Reid’s opinion, Vietnam was the worst foreign policy mistake ever. So lets first remember who got us into Vietnam, none other than Lyndon Baines Johnson, another Democrat. But Ried’s comment that Iraq is worst than Vietnam is just more liberal claptrap. The U.S. fought for ten years in Vietnam and lost a total of 58,000 troops. Doing the math, that equates to an average loss of 5,800 troops per year. We have been in Iraq for almost four years (46 months to date), so if we were loosing troops in Iraq at the same rate we lost troops in Vietnam, we would have lost over 22,000 troops by now. But of course the actual loss of troops at this point is something on the order of 3,300. It is painful to loose any of our troops, but we cannot expect to fight a war against a vicious and barbaric enemy without losses. Freedom isn’t Free Mr. Reid, and American is worth fighting for.

Get the clip, HotAir. Hearing an Iraq go on and on about how beloved America is, about how we “liberated” his people, was pretty damn heart-warming.

And to CBS – well done.