<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking: GOP blocks Senate vote on House anti-surge resolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:02:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shackler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-249950</link>
		<dc:creator>shackler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-249950</guid>
		<description>Oh, and about the surge. We did want more troops. We wanted enough to quell violence. We wanted the Powell Doctrine. Overwhelming force. But, as with everything he does, Bush done f***ed it up again and pussy-footed into it. 20,000 troops to secure a city the size of Baghdad? Come on! You claim to be a military man and you think this is enough troops? I sure as hell hope you are not high up in the ranks making decisions. That would be a tragedy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and about the surge. We did want more troops. We wanted enough to quell violence. We wanted the Powell Doctrine. Overwhelming force. But, as with everything he does, Bush done f***ed it up again and pussy-footed into it. 20,000 troops to secure a city the size of Baghdad? Come on! You claim to be a military man and you think this is enough troops? I sure as hell hope you are not high up in the ranks making decisions. That would be a tragedy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shackler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-249932</link>
		<dc:creator>shackler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-249932</guid>
		<description>Of course the conservatives aren&#039;t being prosecuted, they are the ones in power at the Justice Dept. Dee-de-dee! You are military and you have that kind of attitude about torture? You do the uniform and this country a great disservice!!! We fight to uphold tried and true values...regardless of our enemy. When we abandon our values to &quot;win&quot; (whatever the hell that means), we fail in moral relevence. We become another occupier. But, since Conservatives hate America (your position on warrantless wiretapping proves that. Remeber the bill of rights? Anyone?) I suppose I am not shocked that you support this President and this war. It will have done nothing to make us more secure, and you got to watch thousands of Americans die for nothing. Keep it up bud, the V.A. thanks you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the conservatives aren&#8217;t being prosecuted, they are the ones in power at the Justice Dept. Dee-de-dee! You are military and you have that kind of attitude about torture? You do the uniform and this country a great disservice!!! We fight to uphold tried and true values&#8230;regardless of our enemy. When we abandon our values to &#8220;win&#8221; (whatever the hell that means), we fail in moral relevence. We become another occupier. But, since Conservatives hate America (your position on warrantless wiretapping proves that. Remeber the bill of rights? Anyone?) I suppose I am not shocked that you support this President and this war. It will have done nothing to make us more secure, and you got to watch thousands of Americans die for nothing. Keep it up bud, the V.A. thanks you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-249916</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-249916</guid>
		<description>Please, please use another picture because the first thing I always think of when I see this picture is advising this obviously big time constipated guy to eat a lot of prunes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, please use another picture because the first thing I always think of when I see this picture is advising this obviously big time constipated guy to eat a lot of prunes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overtaken by Events</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-249686</link>
		<dc:creator>Overtaken by Events</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-249686</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Congress wastes enormous amount of time not passing anti-Iraq war resolution...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thus, not accomplishing passage of something that would have accomplished nothing. Your tax dollars at work.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Congress wastes enormous amount of time not passing anti-Iraq war resolution&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thus, not accomplishing passage of something that would have accomplished nothing. Your tax dollars at work&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Guapo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-249349</link>
		<dc:creator>El Guapo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-249349</guid>
		<description>And that vote was not a vote for support for troops. It was a vote opposing what the Demcrats were advocating from the beginning!  More Troops!  

the Dems called for it.  The ISG called for it.  The Dems called for implementation of the ISG.  So when Bush finally committs more troops, which is what we need, the Democrats are agaisnt it.  That is a real funny way to support your troops and their mission.   Treasonists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that vote was not a vote for support for troops. It was a vote opposing what the Demcrats were advocating from the beginning!  More Troops!  </p>
<p>the Dems called for it.  The ISG called for it.  The Dems called for implementation of the ISG.  So when Bush finally committs more troops, which is what we need, the Democrats are agaisnt it.  That is a real funny way to support your troops and their mission.   Treasonists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Guapo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-249331</link>
		<dc:creator>El Guapo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-249331</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;shackler on February 18, 2007 at 2:11 PM  (Rusty Shackleford?)&lt;/strong&gt;

What the Sam Hill are you talking about?  It is the liberal agendas that are restricting the troops from doing their jobs: making us honor Geneva Conventions even though our enemy refuses so (and according to Geneva if our enemy doesn&#039;t honor the rules we don&#039;t have to either), giving us ROE’s more strict than a U.S. city cop, etc…  I can tell by your tone that you are not military.  Well my friend, I am, almost 9 years.  And I assure it is not conservative agendas making this war harder to fight.

Who was NOT prosecuted for leaking the NSA witetaps (NOT domestic spying)?  Who was NOT prosecuted for revealing that we were listening to Bin Laden’s satellite phone?  Who was NOT prosecuted for leaking that we were using “borderline” interrogating tactics that was producing positive results and preventing future attacks around the world?

Answer:  Not GW Bush or other Conservatives.  Dee-de dee!  

 Who is being prosecuted for not having a good memory, just like the prosecutions’ witnesses, for revealing the ID of an un-undercover CIA agent (who was not undercover in the past 5 years) even though someone already fessed up, including her husband?  Dee-de-Dee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>shackler on February 18, 2007 at 2:11 PM  (Rusty Shackleford?)</strong></p>
<p>What the Sam Hill are you talking about?  It is the liberal agendas that are restricting the troops from doing their jobs: making us honor Geneva Conventions even though our enemy refuses so (and according to Geneva if our enemy doesn&#8217;t honor the rules we don&#8217;t have to either), giving us ROE’s more strict than a U.S. city cop, etc…  I can tell by your tone that you are not military.  Well my friend, I am, almost 9 years.  And I assure it is not conservative agendas making this war harder to fight.</p>
<p>Who was NOT prosecuted for leaking the NSA witetaps (NOT domestic spying)?  Who was NOT prosecuted for revealing that we were listening to Bin Laden’s satellite phone?  Who was NOT prosecuted for leaking that we were using “borderline” interrogating tactics that was producing positive results and preventing future attacks around the world?</p>
<p>Answer:  Not GW Bush or other Conservatives.  Dee-de dee!  </p>
<p> Who is being prosecuted for not having a good memory, just like the prosecutions’ witnesses, for revealing the ID of an un-undercover CIA agent (who was not undercover in the past 5 years) even though someone already fessed up, including her husband?  Dee-de-Dee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-248159</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-248159</guid>
		<description>&quot;No one can defeat us unless we first defeat ourselves.&quot;

 

-- Dwight D. Eisenhower</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No one can defeat us unless we first defeat ourselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; Dwight D. Eisenhower</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking: GOP blocks Senate vote on House anti-surge resolution &#171; Tons of Fresh News</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247988</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking: GOP blocks Senate vote on House anti-surge resolution &#171; Tons of Fresh News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247988</guid>
		<description>[...] February 18, 2007 at 7:43 pm &#183; Filed under Uncategorized   Breaking: GOP blocks Senate vote on House anti-surge resolution 60 votes were needed, only 56 were to be had. That ’s six more than the Dems got two weeks ago when they tried to invoke cloture on the more complicated Warner resolution, which not only opposed the surge but demanded new policies in the region[news][entertainment][world &amp; business][political news] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 18, 2007 at 7:43 pm &#183; Filed under Uncategorized   Breaking: GOP blocks Senate vote on House anti-surge resolution 60 votes were needed, only 56 were to be had. That ’s six more than the Dems got two weeks ago when they tried to invoke cloture on the more complicated Warner resolution, which not only opposed the surge but demanded new policies in the region[news][entertainment][world &amp; business][political news] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shackler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247931</link>
		<dc:creator>shackler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247931</guid>
		<description>I always knew conservatives hated America, and this proves it. They won&#039;t allow a vote on a resolution that expresses support for the troops? They will probably try to block the resolution coming up that says that troops cannot be re-deployed without adequate armor and rest. Wouldn&#039;t surprise me. The GOP hates our troops and they hate America. Well, at least we&#039;re gonna get the White House back in a couple years. Then the GOP will once again be what it always should have been: irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always knew conservatives hated America, and this proves it. They won&#8217;t allow a vote on a resolution that expresses support for the troops? They will probably try to block the resolution coming up that says that troops cannot be re-deployed without adequate armor and rest. Wouldn&#8217;t surprise me. The GOP hates our troops and they hate America. Well, at least we&#8217;re gonna get the White House back in a couple years. Then the GOP will once again be what it always should have been: irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247770</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247770</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Surging Ahead:...&lt;/strong&gt;

The blocked Senate anti-surge resolution &quot;was the first baby step in Murtha’s slow bleed strategy, and it failed,&quot; says Allahpundit, but he doesn&#039;t think the Dems are so upset since they actually &quot;don’t want to do anything about the surge,......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Surging Ahead:&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The blocked Senate anti-surge resolution &#8220;was the first baby step in Murtha’s slow bleed strategy, and it failed,&#8221; says Allahpundit, but he doesn&#8217;t think the Dems are so upset since they actually &#8220;don’t want to do anything about the surge,&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Condo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247727</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Condo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247727</guid>
		<description>Self-answering question ...

Is it humanly possible for any group of alleged professionals ...

... to be any more incompetent, craven, and blockheaded than today&#039;s congressional Pubbies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-answering question &#8230;</p>
<p>Is it humanly possible for any group of alleged professionals &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; to be any more incompetent, craven, and blockheaded than today&#8217;s congressional Pubbies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Condo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247716</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Condo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247716</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Lisa Condo asks: “why not allow the loony, traitorous, leftist demonrats … and the snivelling RINOs … to publicly vote … on the record … against it?”

Because passage of the measure, even “non-binding” is GIVING AID AND COMFORT TO THE ENEMY, the ones we are fighthing. It emboldens them to hang in. It tells them, that if they only hold on, AMERICA will fold.

Lisa also asks: “What better means can we have of defeating all of those cretins in 2008?”

My son is a US Marine. Is he, his fellow marines, and every soldier serving today, going to have to go in harm’s way and continue fighting an enboldened enemy OVER THERE (rather than over here) just so some RINO Republicans can save their asses in 2008?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You misread my post.

My goal is to defeat the RINOs as well as the demonrats.  They&#039;re included in &quot;all those cretins.&quot;

Passage of the resolution in the Senate ... will not embolden the enemy any more than near-passage of it already has ... especially since the same resolution already passed in the House.

Let&#039;s let the traitors identify themselves beyond a shadow of a doubt ... and then move in for the kill.

I hope you feel better about my post now ... your family&#039;s contribution to our freedom and safety is very much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lisa Condo asks: “why not allow the loony, traitorous, leftist demonrats … and the snivelling RINOs … to publicly vote … on the record … against it?”</p>
<p>Because passage of the measure, even “non-binding” is GIVING AID AND COMFORT TO THE ENEMY, the ones we are fighthing. It emboldens them to hang in. It tells them, that if they only hold on, AMERICA will fold.</p>
<p>Lisa also asks: “What better means can we have of defeating all of those cretins in 2008?”</p>
<p>My son is a US Marine. Is he, his fellow marines, and every soldier serving today, going to have to go in harm’s way and continue fighting an enboldened enemy OVER THERE (rather than over here) just so some RINO Republicans can save their asses in 2008?</p></blockquote>
<p>You misread my post.</p>
<p>My goal is to defeat the RINOs as well as the demonrats.  They&#8217;re included in &#8220;all those cretins.&#8221;</p>
<p>Passage of the resolution in the Senate &#8230; will not embolden the enemy any more than near-passage of it already has &#8230; especially since the same resolution already passed in the House.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s let the traitors identify themselves beyond a shadow of a doubt &#8230; and then move in for the kill.</p>
<p>I hope you feel better about my post now &#8230; your family&#8217;s contribution to our freedom and safety is very much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Angry Christian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247705</link>
		<dc:creator>One Angry Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247705</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“The hard left wants out of this war yesterday,’’ Graham added. “And two-thirds of this body understands the hard left is dead wrong.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

but panders to them anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“The hard left wants out of this war yesterday,’’ Graham added. “And two-thirds of this body understands the hard left is dead wrong.”</p></blockquote>
<p>but panders to them anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NRA4Freedom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247697</link>
		<dc:creator>NRA4Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247697</guid>
		<description>At least there are some elected officials who still have half a brain and a spine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least there are some elected officials who still have half a brain and a spine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247635</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247635</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I disagree. Why follow us home?

billy on February 18, 2007 at 1:43 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Billy,

I agree with most of what you have said, but I have to challenge you on this statement. I picked your remark only because I think it illustrates how complacency sneaks into the mind set of the most dedicated patriots.

On 9/11 they followed us home. They declared war on us, and our defeat in this war will not be an agreement to a cease-fire with the terrorists. Americans (even the traitorous liberals) will not disavow all the ideals that make this country what it is. It is exactly those ideals that the terrorists hate and want to destroy.

That all I wanted to say to you specifically. Thanks.

Now, my rant....

We could pull out of Iraq and save some lives, but they will still be at war with us. We can sit in our castle while they hurl stones against the gate and hope for what? That they&#039;ll get tired and go home? Or will the cowards within our walls open the gate for them? Or will we be lulled into complacency and welcome the Trojan Horse in?

WE ARE AT WAR. But this war is not over land just yet, it&#039;s over ideologies. And ALL WARS have to be fought and have to be won. Our enemy is relatively small and they are able to fight us in unconventional ways that makes it very hard to make progress the way we are used to making it. We are used to fighting large standing armies over huge stretches of land. Well, our enemies are not that big....YET. Make no mistake, they WANT to be a huge force to be reckoned with, and right now, we are standing in the way. If we leave Iraq, THEY WILL get the foothold they are seeking and threatening the entire middle east. Then instead of losing 3000 soldiers over the course of 4 years, we will lose 300,000 like we did during WWII.

Liberals are liberals and they look at extremists with the same arrogance as they do everyone else that is not as enlightened as they are. They think that touchy feely policies will enlighten the poor ignorant masses just like they think that the neanderthal conservatives just need to be enlightened. They do not recognized the threat for what it is. It is an old school mentality from the dark ages that understands brutality and how effective it is against liberal thinking.

The liberals would prefer to fight a traditional war because they refuse to learn from past mistakes. Conservatives are fighting this war the way we are BECAUSE we have learned the lessons of the past. We don&#039;t want extremists to gather in strength like we did just before WWII because the loss of life is exponentially greater. Just like Hitler slaughtering millions in concentration camps, the genocide in Iraq wont stop if we quit and it wont stop if we fight on, it will only stop when we crush those who subscribe to the extremist ideals.

To sum it all up in one statement.....

Nothing will champion the ideals of extremism against civilization and swell the ranks of the terrorists, like losing the war in Iraq will. Nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I disagree. Why follow us home?</p>
<p>billy on February 18, 2007 at 1:43 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Billy,</p>
<p>I agree with most of what you have said, but I have to challenge you on this statement. I picked your remark only because I think it illustrates how complacency sneaks into the mind set of the most dedicated patriots.</p>
<p>On 9/11 they followed us home. They declared war on us, and our defeat in this war will not be an agreement to a cease-fire with the terrorists. Americans (even the traitorous liberals) will not disavow all the ideals that make this country what it is. It is exactly those ideals that the terrorists hate and want to destroy.</p>
<p>That all I wanted to say to you specifically. Thanks.</p>
<p>Now, my rant&#8230;.</p>
<p>We could pull out of Iraq and save some lives, but they will still be at war with us. We can sit in our castle while they hurl stones against the gate and hope for what? That they&#8217;ll get tired and go home? Or will the cowards within our walls open the gate for them? Or will we be lulled into complacency and welcome the Trojan Horse in?</p>
<p>WE ARE AT WAR. But this war is not over land just yet, it&#8217;s over ideologies. And ALL WARS have to be fought and have to be won. Our enemy is relatively small and they are able to fight us in unconventional ways that makes it very hard to make progress the way we are used to making it. We are used to fighting large standing armies over huge stretches of land. Well, our enemies are not that big&#8230;.YET. Make no mistake, they WANT to be a huge force to be reckoned with, and right now, we are standing in the way. If we leave Iraq, THEY WILL get the foothold they are seeking and threatening the entire middle east. Then instead of losing 3000 soldiers over the course of 4 years, we will lose 300,000 like we did during WWII.</p>
<p>Liberals are liberals and they look at extremists with the same arrogance as they do everyone else that is not as enlightened as they are. They think that touchy feely policies will enlighten the poor ignorant masses just like they think that the neanderthal conservatives just need to be enlightened. They do not recognized the threat for what it is. It is an old school mentality from the dark ages that understands brutality and how effective it is against liberal thinking.</p>
<p>The liberals would prefer to fight a traditional war because they refuse to learn from past mistakes. Conservatives are fighting this war the way we are BECAUSE we have learned the lessons of the past. We don&#8217;t want extremists to gather in strength like we did just before WWII because the loss of life is exponentially greater. Just like Hitler slaughtering millions in concentration camps, the genocide in Iraq wont stop if we quit and it wont stop if we fight on, it will only stop when we crush those who subscribe to the extremist ideals.</p>
<p>To sum it all up in one statement&#8230;..</p>
<p>Nothing will champion the ideals of extremism against civilization and swell the ranks of the terrorists, like losing the war in Iraq will. Nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theater of the Absurd &#171; Thespis Journal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247608</link>
		<dc:creator>Theater of the Absurd &#171; Thespis Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247608</guid>
		<description>[...] The drive-by news media will not accurately report this story. The republicans were more than willing to let the democrats have their meaningless vote, if there could be one meaningful vote on funding the troops and the mission. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The drive-by news media will not accurately report this story. The republicans were more than willing to let the democrats have their meaningless vote, if there could be one meaningful vote on funding the troops and the mission. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247597</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247597</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, lawrence, it’s better to have the Demos doing nothing in Congress rather than having the Repubs doing nothing in Congress? Maybe? I dunno………..

Janos Hunyadi on February 17, 2007 at 11:09 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not exactly.  But the track record of the Repbulicans lately hasn&#039;t been that great the last couple years either.

Is it better to have the Dems not doing anything stupid, or not having the GOP doing something a little less stupid.  As long as neither are doing anything, then nothing stupid gets done.

But, then, nothing good is getting done either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, lawrence, it’s better to have the Demos doing nothing in Congress rather than having the Repubs doing nothing in Congress? Maybe? I dunno………..</p>
<p>Janos Hunyadi on February 17, 2007 at 11:09 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Not exactly.  But the track record of the Repbulicans lately hasn&#8217;t been that great the last couple years either.</p>
<p>Is it better to have the Dems not doing anything stupid, or not having the GOP doing something a little less stupid.  As long as neither are doing anything, then nothing stupid gets done.</p>
<p>But, then, nothing good is getting done either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247579</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247579</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Because passage of the measure, even “non-binding” is GIVING AID AND COMFORT TO THE ENEMY, the ones we are fighthing. It emboldens them to hang in. It tells them, that if they only hold on, AMERICA will fold.

georgej on February 17, 2007 at 5:13 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Right on the money! The conservatives are not voting politically, they are voting to protect our troops and this country. The liberals are playing politics with the troops lives and the security of this country.

I am ashamed of the american people who have been fooled by the lefts lying about the war in Iraq, and support pulling out before the mission is accomplished. I am disgusted that the conservatives have allowed the left to couch this war in their own terms. I am maddened at the traitorous liberals who put their political aspirations above the safety of this country and the lives of our troops.

THAT is why I will be at the Vietnam Veterans Mermorial in Washington D.C. on March 17th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Because passage of the measure, even “non-binding” is GIVING AID AND COMFORT TO THE ENEMY, the ones we are fighthing. It emboldens them to hang in. It tells them, that if they only hold on, AMERICA will fold.</p>
<p>georgej on February 17, 2007 at 5:13 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Right on the money! The conservatives are not voting politically, they are voting to protect our troops and this country. The liberals are playing politics with the troops lives and the security of this country.</p>
<p>I am ashamed of the american people who have been fooled by the lefts lying about the war in Iraq, and support pulling out before the mission is accomplished. I am disgusted that the conservatives have allowed the left to couch this war in their own terms. I am maddened at the traitorous liberals who put their political aspirations above the safety of this country and the lives of our troops.</p>
<p>THAT is why I will be at the Vietnam Veterans Mermorial in Washington D.C. on March 17th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spassvogel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247432</link>
		<dc:creator>Spassvogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247432</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the letter I wrote to Senator Smith:

Dear Senator Smith:

I&#039;ve voted for you every time you&#039;ve been on the ballot, but your choice to side with defeatists and vote for the Democrats&#039; political stunt is an embarassment to the party and an embarassment to yourself as an American.  You should be ashamed.  Every Republican that I know thinks you are a joke who is going to be done for in the next election.  Your votes on immigration and now this terrorist-encouraging resolution have completely ruined your political future.  I hope your pandering was worth it.  I hope the friendly editorialis from local papers was worth it.  

Sad day for you, Senator Smith.  Sad, sad day for all of us.  We&#039;re just lucky there aren&#039;t many more spineless jerks in the party like you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the letter I wrote to Senator Smith:</p>
<p>Dear Senator Smith:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve voted for you every time you&#8217;ve been on the ballot, but your choice to side with defeatists and vote for the Democrats&#8217; political stunt is an embarassment to the party and an embarassment to yourself as an American.  You should be ashamed.  Every Republican that I know thinks you are a joke who is going to be done for in the next election.  Your votes on immigration and now this terrorist-encouraging resolution have completely ruined your political future.  I hope your pandering was worth it.  I hope the friendly editorialis from local papers was worth it.  </p>
<p>Sad day for you, Senator Smith.  Sad, sad day for all of us.  We&#8217;re just lucky there aren&#8217;t many more spineless jerks in the party like you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinkyBigglesworth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247361</link>
		<dc:creator>PinkyBigglesworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247361</guid>
		<description>&quot;I disagree. Why follow us home? Just leave sleeping dogs lie, an engaged America would be a threat. If al Quaeda does not attack America directly, we won’t respond.&quot;

Sorry, just some facts........ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/02/13/wiran13.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;

And more facts,\..........  &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2005/jan/comrasJan05.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2005/jan/comrasJan05.pdf&lt;/a&gt;

and you can finish with &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=i9P8kivXmQMC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PA14&amp;sig=h8gDt9u7vNdIKWoGpkL7klHUY-w&amp;dq=al+queda+in+america&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I disagree. Why follow us home? Just leave sleeping dogs lie, an engaged America would be a threat. If al Quaeda does not attack America directly, we won’t respond.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry, just some facts&#8230;&#8230;.. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/02/13/wiran13.xml" rel="nofollow">this</a></p>
<p>And more facts,\&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.  <a href="http://http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2005/jan/comrasJan05.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2005/jan/comrasJan05.pdf</a></p>
<p>and you can finish with <a href="http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=i9P8kivXmQMC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PA14&amp;sig=h8gDt9u7vNdIKWoGpkL7klHUY-w&amp;dq=al+queda+in+america" rel="nofollow">this</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinkyBigglesworth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247311</link>
		<dc:creator>PinkyBigglesworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 08:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247311</guid>
		<description>By the way &lt;blockquote&gt;billy on February 18, 2007 at 3:04 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;, if I am wrong on &lt;strong&gt;ANY&lt;/strong&gt; point, I encourage you to never let me forget it, OK?

Sleep tight.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way<br />
<blockquote>billy on February 18, 2007 at 3:04 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>, if I am wrong on <strong>ANY</strong> point, I encourage you to never let me forget it, OK?</p>
<p>Sleep tight&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinkyBigglesworth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247289</link>
		<dc:creator>PinkyBigglesworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 08:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247289</guid>
		<description>BTW &quot;billy&quot;, asking you to post your address was, more to the point, asking you to think.... &quot;if I take a stand, will someone notice?&quot;.... &quot;Like the Founding Father&#039;s of the United Staes of America? &quot;

I didn&#039;t want an answer, I just wanted you to think about it, and to the men and women who protect our country, and to the fear that when they come home, bad guys from home and abroad, might kill them in their sleep. Also know as &quot;Sleeper Cells&quot;.....

Oh, but you knew that...... sorry.

And no, sorry again....&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;The Congress of the United States has done something today that no other Congress in American history has done.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It didn&#039;t quite clear the Senate did it, but you forget the Democrat actions in Congress at the end of the Viet Nam war, and the resulting Millions of murders that followed, oh, but that is just nuance ..........

Keep up with your studies, &quot;billy&quot;, I will always be glad to assist you..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW &#8220;billy&#8221;, asking you to post your address was, more to the point, asking you to think&#8230;. &#8220;if I take a stand, will someone notice?&#8221;&#8230;. &#8220;Like the Founding Father&#8217;s of the United Staes of America? &#8221;</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t want an answer, I just wanted you to think about it, and to the men and women who protect our country, and to the fear that when they come home, bad guys from home and abroad, might kill them in their sleep. Also know as &#8220;Sleeper Cells&#8221;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Oh, but you knew that&#8230;&#8230; sorry.</p>
<p>And no, sorry again&#8230;.<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;The Congress of the United States has done something today that no other Congress in American history has done.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It didn&#8217;t quite clear the Senate did it, but you forget the Democrat actions in Congress at the end of the Viet Nam war, and the resulting Millions of murders that followed, oh, but that is just nuance &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Keep up with your studies, &#8220;billy&#8221;, I will always be glad to assist you&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinkyBigglesworth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247274</link>
		<dc:creator>PinkyBigglesworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 08:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247274</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;billy on February 18, 2007 at 3:04 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;billy&quot; you answered my question in exactly the way I thought you would....... straight to the point.

&quot;Sold out?&quot; Yeah, you explained that, thoroughly...

Son, or Daughter, please understand, in this communication between us, you put out a point of view, others, like me, respond.

The point is, my question was rhetorical, you din&#039;t like it....... so you responded.  We can do that.

But what is happening in Congress, the majority of the troops don&#039;t like, yet they can not respond. &quot;UCMJ&quot;

Billy, let me ask you this......... if you have been spending the major part of a year, away from your family, in the military because you &lt;strong&gt;Volunteered&lt;/strong&gt; to something that you believed in, you have endured multiple hardships, you have gotten to know many local civilians in the battle field, you have a sense of victory, and then you find out, for political reasons only, your means to achieve victory are going to be denied to you........

And......... if this happens, the enemy on the verge of defeat, gets a strong hold after you are forced to leave by these politicians, you have to come back in ten years because we have bombs exploding all over the world....... what responsibility will you take?

Your blog, &quot;billy:....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>billy on February 18, 2007 at 3:04 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;billy&#8221; you answered my question in exactly the way I thought you would&#8230;&#8230;. straight to the point.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sold out?&#8221; Yeah, you explained that, thoroughly&#8230;</p>
<p>Son, or Daughter, please understand, in this communication between us, you put out a point of view, others, like me, respond.</p>
<p>The point is, my question was rhetorical, you din&#8217;t like it&#8230;&#8230;. so you responded.  We can do that.</p>
<p>But what is happening in Congress, the majority of the troops don&#8217;t like, yet they can not respond. &#8220;UCMJ&#8221;</p>
<p>Billy, let me ask you this&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; if you have been spending the major part of a year, away from your family, in the military because you <strong>Volunteered</strong> to something that you believed in, you have endured multiple hardships, you have gotten to know many local civilians in the battle field, you have a sense of victory, and then you find out, for political reasons only, your means to achieve victory are going to be denied to you&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>And&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; if this happens, the enemy on the verge of defeat, gets a strong hold after you are forced to leave by these politicians, you have to come back in ten years because we have bombs exploding all over the world&#8230;&#8230;. what responsibility will you take?</p>
<p>Your blog, &#8220;billy:&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247243</link>
		<dc:creator>billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 08:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247243</guid>
		<description>Oh dear.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Let you post this……. “Where do you live?” 

PinkyBigglesworth on February 18, 2007 at 2:32 AM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;Let you post this……. “Where do you live?” 

PinkyBigglesworth on February 18, 2007 at 2:32 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;



When you have been threatened by a Pinkybigglesworth you must respond.
Mrs. Pinkeybigglestworryth have I offended you in some way?




Apparently I have, for you wrote:

 &lt;blockquote&gt;don’t know if you are just a fool, an idiot, or a collaborator….&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Mrs. Biggleworth,
Do you mind if I point something out?
The U.S Congress, both parties, have sold out 140,000 American soldiers, including georgej&#039;s son.
They have sold out us, thet is, those of us who hope for a better future for our country.
You don&#039;t get it do you? The Congress of the United States has done something today that no other Congress in American history has done.
And you&#039;re mad at me.
Who&#039;s the fool?
Really now, who is the fool?
I don&#039;t represent you in Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear.</p>
<blockquote><p>Let you post this……. “Where do you live?” </p>
<p>PinkyBigglesworth on February 18, 2007 at 2:32 AM</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Let you post this……. “Where do you live?” </p>
<p>PinkyBigglesworth on February 18, 2007 at 2:32 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>When you have been threatened by a Pinkybigglesworth you must respond.<br />
Mrs. Pinkeybigglestworryth have I offended you in some way?</p>
<p>Apparently I have, for you wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>don’t know if you are just a fool, an idiot, or a collaborator….</p></blockquote>
<p>Mrs. Biggleworth,<br />
Do you mind if I point something out?<br />
The U.S Congress, both parties, have sold out 140,000 American soldiers, including georgej&#8217;s son.<br />
They have sold out us, thet is, those of us who hope for a better future for our country.<br />
You don&#8217;t get it do you? The Congress of the United States has done something today that no other Congress in American history has done.<br />
And you&#8217;re mad at me.<br />
Who&#8217;s the fool?<br />
Really now, who is the fool?<br />
I don&#8217;t represent you in Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinkyBigglesworth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-247187</link>
		<dc:creator>PinkyBigglesworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/17/breaking-gop-blocks-senate-vote-on-house-anti-surge-resolution/#comment-247187</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The result of the Democrat’s action is predictable, should the Democrats prevail: Al Qaeda will fight even harder as a result. They WILL follow us home and strike us here. Rather than remain on the ropes in Iraq (where THEY CHOSE TO FIGHT US), they will survive and strike us here in our home.

I disagree. Why follow us home? Just leave sleeping dogs lie, an engaged America would be a threat. If al Quaeda does not attack America directly, we won’t respond. We’ll just slip into complacency, worrying about poor Britney’s hair.

billy on February 18, 2007 at 1:43 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know if you are just a fool, an idiot, or a collaborator.... 

Your really do not have any idea of what is going on, do you?  I hope you don&#039;t for making a statement like that, you are in for a very big wake up call one day..

I will give you this chance, &lt;blockquote&gt;billy on February 18, 2007 at 1:43 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;  If you really think that &lt;blockquote&gt;Why follow us home? Just leave sleeping dogs lie,&lt;/blockquote&gt;.....

Let you post this....... &quot;Where do you live?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The result of the Democrat’s action is predictable, should the Democrats prevail: Al Qaeda will fight even harder as a result. They WILL follow us home and strike us here. Rather than remain on the ropes in Iraq (where THEY CHOSE TO FIGHT US), they will survive and strike us here in our home.</p>
<p>I disagree. Why follow us home? Just leave sleeping dogs lie, an engaged America would be a threat. If al Quaeda does not attack America directly, we won’t respond. We’ll just slip into complacency, worrying about poor Britney’s hair.</p>
<p>billy on February 18, 2007 at 1:43 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you are just a fool, an idiot, or a collaborator&#8230;. </p>
<p>Your really do not have any idea of what is going on, do you?  I hope you don&#8217;t for making a statement like that, you are in for a very big wake up call one day..</p>
<p>I will give you this chance,<br />
<blockquote>billy on February 18, 2007 at 1:43 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>  If you really think that<br />
<blockquote>Why follow us home? Just leave sleeping dogs lie,</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;..</p>
<p>Let you post this&#8230;&#8230;. &#8220;Where do you live?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
