Potty mouth fembigot down
posted at 9:26 pm on February 12, 2007 by Bryan
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
John Edwards’ now former blogstress was the talk on O’Reilly tonight:
After the airing, Amanda Marcotte resigned from the Edwards campaign. She’s blaming it all on Bill Donohue, and the AP is only too happy help her tote that banner:
One of the chief campaign bloggers for Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards quit Monday after conservative critics raised questions about her history of provocative online messages.
Amanda Marcotte posted on her personal blog, Pandagon, that the criticism “was creating a situation where I felt that every time I coughed, I was risking the Edwards campaign.” Marcotte said she resigned from her position Monday, and that her resignation was accepted by the campaign.
Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, demanded last week that Edwards fire Marcotte and a second blogger, Melissa McEwan, for remarks he deemed anti-Catholic.
It’s a shame that the AP singles out “conservative critics” to credit/blame for all of this, when the critics who probably had more of an impact were the progressive Christians who also saw bigotry in Marcotte’s inflamatory writings. Put another way, which seems more likely: That Edwards worried about what Bill Donohue thinks, or that he worries about what his fellow Democrats who also happen to be Catholics think? With Hillary! and Obama waiting to crush him in about a year, he can’t afford to leave out any potential voters.
And all of the above masks the truth at the center of all of this, which is that on their face Marcotte’s writings on Christians and Catholics in particular smack of rank bigotry, from the 114 times she mimicked the name of Christ as “Jeebus” to the ways she graphically described carnal intercourse with the Holy Spirit. That’s what earned her the criticism from Donohue and from us and other conservatives from the progressive Christians as well. It’s not a smear to accurately quote someone’s own words when criticizing them.
Our friends on the left will undoubtedly go ape. They will attack us and others who were in the mix on this story. They won’t accept the fact that the initial hiring of Marcotte was a hint that something was broken within the Edwards vetting process, nor will they accept that bigotry is bigotry no matter who the target is or how much you try and soft pedal it. They won’t accept that words mean things, that a blatantly thin defense of “it was all satire” won’t fly when Marcotte’s writings clearly weren’t satire, and that it is possible that their own ways with words can become liabilities to their preferred candidates and political party. They’ll go off on apples and oranges comparisons to bloggers on the right whose work was clearly meant as satire and who aren’t on any presidential campaign staffs. In short, they won’t get it.
More: Marcotte vows revenge. For…being quoted accurately? Sheesh.
More: I just noticed this from Michelle’s post:
Bloggers heralded the decision to keep them; the Catholic League was outraged, and a top adviser to a rival Democratic campaign took a shot: “Apparently they’re more afraid of the bloggers than they are the Catholics.”
Predictably, Kos is gunning for the rival campaign. But what he’s decrying is nothing more than normal politics. In hiring the Blunder Twins Edwards created a self-inflicted wound that Hillary! and Obama were bound to exploit. They would have been fools not to exploit it.
Of course, the problem for the netroots is that Edwards’ wound is their wound too. And that’s gotta hurt.
More: Howard Kurtz already has a solid story posted about the brouhaha. Unlike the Associated Press, Kurtz references the writings that actually earned Marcotte her criticism–the anti-Catholic screeds as well as the unhinged posts on the Duke rape case.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: [1] 2 »
Hehe. Who didn’t see this coming? I’m no Kreskin, but was easily able to call it 4 days ago. Now, I just need sleazebag number 2 to qit within 3 days. I think the other one will resign tomorrow. Here’s my post from 4 days ago…
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/08/patriarchy-thwarted-edwards-to-retain-marcotte-mcewan/
greggish on February 12, 2007 at 9:28 PM
Michelle, a little off topic, but I’m liking the make-up.
bloggless on February 12, 2007 at 9:29 PM
It will be interesting to check the Edwards campaign disclosures to see what her separation package entailed. Divide it by the number of posts she made to the Edwards blog, and there should be some numbers to rival CEO compensation.
So what no-show job with what liberal group will she land next?
rw on February 12, 2007 at 9:31 PM
The think Amanda should take away from all this is to never underestimate the power of prayer.
bloggless on February 12, 2007 at 9:32 PM
Both lovely ladies are right. The money question is BOr’s: how can Pretty Pony handle Ahmedinajad if he can’t handle his own stable of moonbats.
spmat on February 12, 2007 at 9:33 PM
Maybe Hillary has another assignment for her.
bloggless on February 12, 2007 at 9:37 PM
Both ladies were on top of their game tonight…Well spoken!
Pam on February 12, 2007 at 9:37 PM
You mean people were praying for her to get fired?? If I had prayed about this at all, it would have been for her to stay on. Who better to represent a Democratic presidential candidate? She was perfect.
By the way, what happened to the first post on this subject? It was up for about ten minutes or so and then somebody Marcotted it.
Laura on February 12, 2007 at 9:39 PM
Perfect! Edwards has permanently lost the ability to do the right thing and fire her. This will follow him throughout his (possibly now shortened) campaign. What a maroon.
db on February 12, 2007 at 9:43 PM
Hehe. Who didn’t see this coming? I’m no Kreskin, but was easily able to call it 4 days ago.
greggish
spazzmomma on February 12, 2007 at 9:47 PM
What’s funny is this poor victim of the evil Bushitler anti-speecha machine censors comments at her site… I think it may be early to say she’s doing it to me (as I’ve never commented before, and perhaps I’m in moderation because it’s my first comment… though I have a feeling she won’t allow it)
I’ll repost my comment here for the HA audience’s pleasure anyway (though do to language, I’m sure it will be in moderation here as well):
RightWinged on February 12, 2007 at 9:50 PM
RW- I had no idea she was thaaat bad…so then can someone please tell me how I am supposed to respect her as a woman? She obviously has no self respect..why should I respect her?
Pam on February 12, 2007 at 9:59 PM
And when the moonrises they shall eat their own and cry woe upon the cruel world.
And the moonbats did lament that their vision was denied and they wailed unto the heavens decrying how unfair the holy net has treated them when free speech is only for the true believers and they must cast out the wicked and sinful with the righteous true tinfoilers.
Oh WOE upon us that castigated the harlot who should be forgiven of her sins (not the least a very big mouth) and may her reappearence bring joy to the exaluted net breathern.
(quote from the Anti Saint John of Edward and his leftist cult upon the fall of the Heathen back to Earth.)
William Amos on February 12, 2007 at 10:06 PM
You Can Take the Woman out of Pandagon, but You Can’t Take the Venom out of the Woman.
I had no doubt that she felt constrained each time she hit the keyboard and that, psychologically and behaviorally, it would be impossible. Human nature is what it is…
Now she can go work for a: female, non-white, non-rich, non-Christian candidate…wait, none such running…ohhhh…pity…well, back to cussing.
There’s always Pandagon!
Entelechy on February 12, 2007 at 10:13 PM
But the trashing against Ann Coulter will go on as usual.
:/
hadsil on February 12, 2007 at 10:20 PM
The very notion of the Solk Pony picking cabinet members gives me real bad gas after this little incident.
bbz123 on February 12, 2007 at 10:25 PM
There’s no doubt that she’s a piece of work, but still…it would have been enormously entertaining to watch it all unfold over the next year or so.
Bob's Kid on February 12, 2007 at 10:27 PM
Edwards: I’ve talked to Amanda and Melissa; they have both assured me that it was never their intention to malign anyone’s faith, and I take them at their word.”
Patterico points out here http://patterico.com/2007/02/12/5816/marcotte-resigns/ a post Marcotte made on her blog just yesterday
http://pandagon.net/2007/02/11/review-of-children-of-men/
I don’t think she’s capable of contolling herself. It seems to be pathalogical.
greggish on February 12, 2007 at 10:27 PM
Let Kos know–
the campaign member who made the quote was part of my campaign.
And I promoted him.
Nethicus on February 12, 2007 at 10:27 PM
Who is Gravel? from the list of those on the Democratic candidates list, who haven’t denied talking to Slate about the “Catholics being feared more than the bloggers”…
Entelechy on February 12, 2007 at 10:29 PM
Amanda needs to study her catechism a little more (her English, too, but that’s besides the point). Anyway, God allowed Mary to be so pure that she was born without original sin, the only person to be born that way. She also went to heaven without actually dying. So, I think that Amanda is mistaken. Mary is actually superior to all people. Amanda needs prayer.
bloggless on February 12, 2007 at 10:32 PM
It’s not only hurting now - fire is shooting out of it. And this reality hasn’t even set in with all of them yet - tomorrow it will be bloodshed or out-and-out war! Pseudo-significance taken to the highest level, yet!
Entelechy on February 12, 2007 at 10:32 PM
Wow, she really martyred herself. What a gasbag.
JammieWearingFool on February 12, 2007 at 10:33 PM
When does the shoe drop for the other skank?
bloggless on February 12, 2007 at 10:33 PM
Ms. Powers is correct. It is emblamatic of the democrat hatred of
religionChristianity. It’s one of the reasons I had to stop voting for them, and I’m not even a Christian!SouthernGent on February 12, 2007 at 10:34 PM
dem’ girls. Boinke.
Griz on February 12, 2007 at 10:34 PM
Jammie, do you think that maybe the Pansuit had already hired her?
bloggless on February 12, 2007 at 10:35 PM
“I didn’t say that….”
“Yes you did…”
“I didn’t mean it….”
“Then why did you say it over and over and over again in one more post, more vile than the next?”
“Your taking me out of context….”
“I am quoting your own words, without editing….”
“You’re, you…are…….. you…… AAAAHHHHHHHHHH…
“What did you mean by THAT???”
“I didn’t say that…………”
And the “Oscar” goes to, the Liberal Teacher’s Unions for providing such a wonderful education to a child of the United States of America……. I am sure you are so very proud tonight.
Just think, she will someday be responsible for your Social Security……. Brings tears of joy to my eyes.
PinkyBigglesworth on February 12, 2007 at 10:36 PM
And when listing those offended by their writings don’t forget Edwards himself, if we believe what he said in response to the criticism.
taznar on February 12, 2007 at 10:37 PM
ROFL …. yeah. Right. Sure she “resigned.” Can I sell you a bridge now?
Funniest news I’ve heard all week.
I’m bummed, though. MadMarcotte was going to be entertaining for months.
Damn you, John Edwards.
Nice flip-flop, though (I fired that girl after I hired her and rehired her before I fired her again …)
Professor Blather on February 12, 2007 at 10:37 PM
Professor, she will still be good for a few laughs, especially if she is really ticked off. She probably had a confidentiality agreement. We may have to read between the lines.
bloggless on February 12, 2007 at 10:42 PM
It seems now every day there is a new reason to get a case of the red @$$ with the incredibly biased media. AP’s stringer caught with terrorists, Arkin, Dan Rather, AP’s mosque problem, and now this sloppy reporting.
Nothing like glossing over or ignoring significant facts.
So why has she threatened revenge? because we didn’t get her “satire”?
This is the first I ever heard of a commedienne vowing payback for not getting their “act”.
91Veteran on February 12, 2007 at 10:46 PM
Of course she resigned. Looks like she is smarter than Edwards in recognizing the major problems she brought to the campaign. What does that say about John?
News2Use on February 12, 2007 at 10:51 PM
There is only way for Edwards to handle this worse than he already has so far. Right now he’s thinking to himself, “By not imediatley firing these two I looked weak, by not condemning their anti-catholic bigotry in stronger language than the mealy mouthed statement I made, I appeared anti-catholic, anti-religion. So, now I’m going to fire the second one and strongly blast what they have written.”
If he did that, that would truley be the dumbest thing he can do at this point. It’s too late to do the right thing now, that would simply mean he would have the nutroots as well as everybody else attacking him… so that’s why I now think this is what he will do. I think he has a knack for doing the stupidest thing at the “wrongest” time.
greggish on February 12, 2007 at 10:53 PM
AmazingAll of a sudden Amanda wrote something that was worth reading” I am leaving John Edwards campaign, LOL She is a loser and Edwards has also lost by not nipping this last week when it all started. Mr O had it right on and so did KP and MM. Just can’t wait to hear about the revenge of the nerd. LOL
bones47 on February 12, 2007 at 10:54 PM
As Crazy as it may sound, Christians should pray for the souls of the two clearly misguided girls.
By persecuting Christ is just more confirmation of His soon return as the Bible says in the NASB
2 Peter 3:3
Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts,
As unfotunate as it may be they will have to answer to God
abinitioadinfinitum on February 12, 2007 at 10:56 PM
If nothing else a press conference under Edwards would be entertaining…..
Can you image - instead of Tony Snow we have Amanda Pottymouth.
CrazyFool on February 12, 2007 at 10:59 PM
wow, me either. She’s the vilest, lowest form of human trash I have heard of in my four+ decades.
We should put her with Alan Colmes, you know, save two other people in the process.
shooter on February 12, 2007 at 11:05 PM
people act as though someone like this is actually going to own up to what they did.
fools.
People like this would deny that fish need water if they needed to. they would deny the existence of their own parents if necessary.
I call it The Criminal Mentality
“How dare you say I robbed the store.”
“you’re on the surveilence video.”
“I’ve been framed.”
“You’re wearing a gold watch you stole”
“You must have slipped it on my arm when I wasn’t looking.”
“Your brother admitted to being in on the job with you.”
“I don’t have a brother.”
…
SIGH.
It’s too bad that political debates are not conducted under oath.
WAIT.
THERE’S AN IDEA.
Jones Zemkophill on February 12, 2007 at 11:05 PM
Kirsten, Kirsten,
Freedom of speach is great, but not when it involves absolute falsehoods such as the lies these two Democrat Dumbells tell about people, and especially the made-up nonsensical stuff they post about Christianity, as well as the general social conservative populace.
When you make up this kind of bull-sqeeze you deserve to get called for it. When you defend it after being proven wrong, you should expect to be ridiculed. And most of the Christians you attack are going to respond with nothing more than pity as you wallow in the seclular-left gutter of society.
Lawrence on February 12, 2007 at 11:18 PM
Caveat..
When I talk about making up stuff… I meant the two Dumbell Bloggers, not Kirsten.
Lawrence on February 12, 2007 at 11:20 PM
Michelle, Michelle,
Wow! As always.
Lawrence on February 12, 2007 at 11:20 PM
Excellent delivery tonight, Michelle and Kirsten!
Edwards has shot himself in the foot Big Time. Can’t wait to see the Moonbat’s venomous rants from DU and/or Kos posted at P.J. Comics tomorrow on the FReep!
Jack.
Jack Deth on February 12, 2007 at 11:27 PM
Yep ! ! They were. But Michelle won by 10 points in that
match. Zap ! Pow ! Zing ! Thump ! and she looked
the best.
Texyank on February 12, 2007 at 11:29 PM
Lots of venom spewing from the comments at this Dailykos diary
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/2/12/195414/765
They are absolutley out of their tiny little minds.
greggish on February 12, 2007 at 11:36 PM
Finally some closure.
I didn’t see this coming. Edwards tells everyone “i’m offended but I will keep them”, then tells her to resign. This way he gets as close to the cake and eating it to.
Sneaky sneaky.
unamused on February 12, 2007 at 11:40 PM
Greggish, thanks for the link.
It looks like even the battiest of moonbats gets things right once in a while - check out what the Kos diarist suggests might have been behind this (cough) “resignation”:
PJ needs to give this guy a Kewpie Doll for a moment of lucidity. My money’s on option 2. Of course, they may not have told Marcotte - and she may have been dumb enough to not see it coming.
Oh, and by the way: she says “it’s on.” So be careful. Expect lots of yummy anti-religious vulgarity and a few Important Action Alerts to be coming down the pike.
Holy @%@#$^, are these people funny or what? The more serious they get, the more I’m laughing.
“It’s on!”
Mwa ha ha ha ha ha
Professor Blather on February 12, 2007 at 11:49 PM
Marcotte is deluded in thinking that anyone could possibly take her writings “out of context”.
Amanda Marcotte
Feb 12th, 2007 at 10:43 pm
On the why did I apologize thing—I never apologized for my opinions or beliefs. I do feel bad if people read my comments out of context and are hurt, but I don’t think that’s my fault so much as the fault of people who take my writing out of context.
darwin on February 12, 2007 at 11:50 PM
A la Kerry and many many others on the left. What I said wasn’t really what I meant.
Yet when a conservative does it - they always meant what they said.
Such a double standard.
(yet of course now we know she really and truly meant what she said!)
armyvet on February 12, 2007 at 11:58 PM
I love the whole “out of context” thing.
The Internet is like a convenience store security cam. We might have to rewind the tape but if it’s there, we’ll find it.
Mojave Mark on February 12, 2007 at 11:58 PM
Greggish
I need the california Superlotto and Megamillions numbers for 4 days from now. If I win, I’ll buy you a beer. In Hawaii…
Mazztek on February 13, 2007 at 12:06 AM
Well, she is ’siccing the IRS’ on Donahue and the Catholic League and asked everyone else to do so also.
At least according to her pandagon website.
LegendHasIt on February 13, 2007 at 12:14 AM
So, being a concerned supporter of Edwards and a registered commenter on the EdwardsBlog, I went there to commiserate and share my feelings tonight; to get closure.
But, because I am how I am, I couldn’t help mention how totally dolly MM looked on O’R in tonight’s segment. To my shock and disappointment, my fellow Edwards supporters could not be lifted from their doldrums, and chose to break ugly on me and the divine Ms. M.
Heh.
Jaibones on February 13, 2007 at 1:08 AM
Quite respectful……
You can’t just help yourself, can you Amanda Marcotte?
Let me give you some advice, if you don’t believe in Christ, why comment? I could give you more advice, but I will teach my son to pray instead……. God Bless anyway…
PinkyBigglesworth on February 13, 2007 at 1:58 AM
When asked for comment Marcotte responded: “G********! Why cant these f****** Jeebus f****** c*** s****** realize they can’t win by throwing false accusations at me? F***!”
Neo on February 13, 2007 at 2:02 AM
Heh. I’m going to enjoy watching all the vermin turn on each other. Fortunately for us, you can’t catch rabies from rabid moonbats. At least not via the Internet.
ReubenJCogburn on February 13, 2007 at 2:27 AM
On her site, she says she is proud of pushing back. I asked if pushing means resigning and running. My comment there is awaiting moderation, as all the rest are in total sympathy with her.
Well, okay, I may have also suggested she is a hateful bigot.
laelaps on February 13, 2007 at 4:11 AM
Sorry, there’s just not a lot of context to statements like, “I’m a tw@t.”
I’m so morbidly fascinated by this whole story. Preschoolers have a better grasp of the repercussions of their little tantrums. A lot has been said about Marcotte’s anti-religion writing, but to me you don’t have to look beyond the “I’m a tw@t” comment. I can’t imagine wanting to be in a room with someone who would speak like that in a public forum, much less put that person in a position of responsibility. At best it shows a complete lack of common sense and character, at worst it’s sociopathic. Given that she can’t conceive her own responsibility in her current problems, I’m leaning toward the latter.
Quisp on February 13, 2007 at 6:59 AM
John-boy must of learned everything he knows from his former-runningmate Mr. Kerry. The foremost authority on the foot-in-mouth virus.
Griz on February 13, 2007 at 7:55 AM
FEMBIGOT…I’m still howling over that one.
seejanemom on February 13, 2007 at 7:55 AM
I’m guessing that Clinton and Obama have been watching this very closely. They definitely know what not to do now.
flipflop on February 13, 2007 at 8:47 AM
An apt descriptor of the new feminism. All pretense aside.
Lawrence on February 13, 2007 at 9:32 AM
So now the democrats have to walk the line. Kiss the bloggers a** or kiss the bloggers good-bye. Those bloggers, who do represent a large portion of liberals, do not like to be shunned. Their poor little fingers are probably raw and bleeding with anger at being dissed by Edwards.
Now what will Hillary do? How do you appease that part of the democratic party, and still maintain civility?
right2bright on February 13, 2007 at 9:38 AM
Looks like her probationary seat at the grown-up table was revoked. She got sent back to sit in the cyber corner of the
PandagonAmanda’sgon Wild Blog with a big cake of soap in her Feminazi truck driver mouth. tsk tsk.Dang, I was looking forward to her catching a couple of good cases of “foot in mouth” disease over the next 2 years, our loss.
Lesson Learned: You write it, you own it.
Alden Pyle on February 13, 2007 at 9:44 AM
hahaha
Potty mouth Amanda and her loony followers are threatening Donahues 501c3 status. hahaha They sound like the teenagers who threaten to call the cops on their parents when they get punished for doing something stupid!
In one breath they bemoan the attack on free speech and in the next, they want to silence someone else’s free speech. Meanwhile, Mad Marcotte (heh, I love that nickname for her and I’m going to use it!) refuses to accept responsibility for her own comments.
csdeven on February 13, 2007 at 9:50 AM
I’m just confused.
If, as Marcotte so rabidly states, she is a jihadist against “The Patriarchy”, why hasn’t she attacked the supreme patriarchal religion of them all … islam?
darwin on February 13, 2007 at 10:11 AM
“Worst mistake ever by a campaign”?
Yeah. This wasn’t a smart move by Edwards, but “worst mistake ever by a campaign”? Not by a long shot.
This won’t sink Edwards. He’s still the Silky Pony lightweight in this campaign, but a little internet dustup won’t end his run.
Fred on February 13, 2007 at 10:32 AM
Mad Marcotte feels, like all bleeding heart liberals, everything is about THEM and their FEELINGS. She probably has had some personal experience with religion that has soured her against God, Jesus, and Christians (Catholics specifically). She has no honor or class and her only moral committment is to her own sick, twisted, and perverted beliefs.
csdeven on February 13, 2007 at 10:39 AM
These are the people who got the Dems elected in November. They are owed! /s
Connie on February 13, 2007 at 10:39 AM
She never resigned; Edwards told her last week that in return for a big severance package, plus help in the future, he’d keep her on, but after a week she would ‘resign’.
dalewalt on February 13, 2007 at 10:42 AM
Liberals don’t recongize Islamic Fascism because their definition of fascism only includes white conservative American men.
If they publicly recognized an other fascist groups they could no longer blame all the worlds problems on white conservative American men.
Lawrence on February 13, 2007 at 11:05 AM
Here’s what she is saying: She meant what she said when she said it, but didn’t mean what she said now that others say what she said and now she can say what she means when she says what she says.
The may be a bit confusing so I’ll make it easy to understand:
She said to Edwards what she means when she said what she said and how people have misunderstood what she meant when she said what she said. It’s the fault of other people because they say what she meant when they say what she said, so now she’s force to say what she means when they say what she said. How much clearer can it be?
Apparently now that she has left the Edwards campaign she is free to mean what she says without having to say what she means when she says what she says and others can say what she says without saying what she says she means when she says what she says. That should make thing a lot simpler for her and us.
RedinBlueCounty on February 13, 2007 at 11:18 AM
Exactly. She is completely filled with hate. The vile stuff that comes out of her mouth is like a snake spewing its venom. The best thing that we can do is pray for her.
I must admit, though, Amanda (and her ilk) provoke the curious side in me. I always find myself wondering what happened to her to make her into what she is. It is almost as if someone subjected her to bizarre medical experiments.
People like her sorta’ remind me of the Gollum character in the “Lord of the Rings” films.
CyberCipher on February 13, 2007 at 12:04 PM
Where’s the IMPORTANT ACTION ALERT? Doggoneit I want an IMPORTANT ACTION ALERT!!!
KelliD on February 13, 2007 at 12:18 PM
Where’d THIS come from?
Links, please.
Lonevoice on February 13, 2007 at 12:56 PM
Michelle was right on in her assessment of the situation - she hit right to the core of the issue in the first minute.
She looked really great too ……
omegaram on February 13, 2007 at 12:57 PM
And Ms. Marcotte is gone…
If she was asked to leave, with or without a package, which we’ll never know about, then it was by a white, male, rich and assumed Christian candidate - the irony is syrupy, sweet and thick as molasses.
I like Femmebigot :)
Entelechy on February 13, 2007 at 1:19 PM
Kinda like driving past a car wreck. Ya just can’t help taking a peek.
Lawrence on February 13, 2007 at 2:23 PM
“If they publicly recognized an other fascist groups they could no longer blame all the worlds problems on white conservative American men.”
Ah … it’s all so clear now, why couldn’t I see it before?
So, a liberal can pick and choose who they denigrate as long as it fits into the “all white men are evil” category, and ignore anyone else. Hmmm …
darwin on February 13, 2007 at 2:45 PM
Comment pages: [1] 2 »