<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wedding photo of the year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 18:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-614634</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 05:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-614634</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jack...&lt;/strong&gt;

I just love what you posted. Gimme more!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jack&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I just love what you posted. Gimme more!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texyank</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-233816</link>
		<dc:creator>Texyank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-233816</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;…and Arkin thinks these guys are mercenaries. What a damn fool. WaPo should be hounded daily with that question until Arkin is forced out in disgrace.

…before he writes a future column on the “obscene amenities” at San Antonio. 

91Veteran on February 11, 2007 at 11:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

   Arkins a fool.  May these two have a wonderful marriage and a houseful of kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>…and Arkin thinks these guys are mercenaries. What a damn fool. WaPo should be hounded daily with that question until Arkin is forced out in disgrace.</p>
<p>…before he writes a future column on the “obscene amenities” at San Antonio. </p>
<p>91Veteran on February 11, 2007 at 11:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>   Arkins a fool.  May these two have a wonderful marriage and a houseful of kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mach1bugs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-233813</link>
		<dc:creator>mach1bugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-233813</guid>
		<description>Allah, great job with this post.  I had seen the picture but didn&#039;t know the story.  Bringing the story to light here is in no way disrespectful.  I would like to have seen this on the MSM, but then there is now way they could have done it without twisting the tone to their standard moonbat angles.  As for my credentials, senior Navy officer, 26 years service, fighter aviator, combat in the sandbox, still serving.  
&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Semper America!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
mach1bugs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allah, great job with this post.  I had seen the picture but didn&#8217;t know the story.  Bringing the story to light here is in no way disrespectful.  I would like to have seen this on the MSM, but then there is now way they could have done it without twisting the tone to their standard moonbat angles.  As for my credentials, senior Navy officer, 26 years service, fighter aviator, combat in the sandbox, still serving.<br />
<em><strong>Semper America!</strong></em><br />
mach1bugs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EricPWJohnson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-233802</link>
		<dc:creator>EricPWJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-233802</guid>
		<description>wades not a Moron - he just took it wrong - thats all - defending his fellow marine is a forgiveable and understandable reaction - some are rightfully defensive - and since this site deals in sarcasm at times masterfully created - he may have read some other post and then went to this and overreacted at the expression on the brides face - thats it.

Lighten up - all is forgiven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wades not a Moron &#8211; he just took it wrong &#8211; thats all &#8211; defending his fellow marine is a forgiveable and understandable reaction &#8211; some are rightfully defensive &#8211; and since this site deals in sarcasm at times masterfully created &#8211; he may have read some other post and then went to this and overreacted at the expression on the brides face &#8211; thats it.</p>
<p>Lighten up &#8211; all is forgiven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-233634</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-233634</guid>
		<description>Know how I know Wade was never a Marine?

Easy - if he was, he would have apologized by now.

They call it &quot;honor.&quot; First thing they taught us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Know how I know Wade was never a Marine?</p>
<p>Easy &#8211; if he was, he would have apologized by now.</p>
<p>They call it &#8220;honor.&#8221; First thing they taught us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hadsil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-233586</link>
		<dc:creator>hadsil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 03:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-233586</guid>
		<description>&quot;Amenities&quot;.

&quot;Marraige is just another way men oppress women.&quot;

Love always conquers hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Amenities&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Marraige is just another way men oppress women.&#8221;</p>
<p>Love always conquers hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subsunk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-233563</link>
		<dc:creator>Subsunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 03:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-233563</guid>
		<description>A Real Man. A Real Woman. A Real Marriage.

God bless &#039;em both.

Subsunk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Real Man. A Real Woman. A Real Marriage.</p>
<p>God bless &#8216;em both.</p>
<p>Subsunk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viper1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-233259</link>
		<dc:creator>Viper1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-233259</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I was in the 2nd Force Recon and who the hell are you to question my service? You got something to say about the post just say it and don’t dishonor yourself by questioning my 26 yrs of service.

As far as shameful, I find shame in the posting by Allah in exploiting this Marines situation. Leave it for others who will post this in hopes of getting more site hits. 

Wade on February 11, 2007 at 2:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

OK Wade, So its just proof that yes even though we honor the men and women who wear the uniform, its still holds true that every now and then a moron gets through.. youre disgraceful.

Ty Ziegel has more integrity and courage than your small mind can ever comprehend.

Im sorry Allah but I could not let this stand, Men and women like Ty should be brought to forefront of our minds at every opportunity, and should be given the respect and gratitude they so richly deserve.

Thank you for posting the links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I was in the 2nd Force Recon and who the hell are you to question my service? You got something to say about the post just say it and don’t dishonor yourself by questioning my 26 yrs of service.</p>
<p>As far as shameful, I find shame in the posting by Allah in exploiting this Marines situation. Leave it for others who will post this in hopes of getting more site hits. </p>
<p>Wade on February 11, 2007 at 2:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>OK Wade, So its just proof that yes even though we honor the men and women who wear the uniform, its still holds true that every now and then a moron gets through.. youre disgraceful.</p>
<p>Ty Ziegel has more integrity and courage than your small mind can ever comprehend.</p>
<p>Im sorry Allah but I could not let this stand, Men and women like Ty should be brought to forefront of our minds at every opportunity, and should be given the respect and gratitude they so richly deserve.</p>
<p>Thank you for posting the links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedinBlueCounty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232864</link>
		<dc:creator>RedinBlueCounty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232864</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This is worth a reply, most the rest not.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;m glad you find something you feel is worthy of a response.  But you still haven&#039;t answered the question.

You claim that this site is money driven and that your blog is not, and I&#039;ll accept that as the reasoning behind your feeling that this story is disgraceful, but you still haven&#039;t show me why I should accept your insistence that the story is actually disgraceful and exploitive?  Is it because the Marine in question is disfigured?  Is disfigurement the only criteria you use to determine whether something is exploitive?  That makes me wonder if you believe that any pictures of disfigured men and woman should be banned from public display as there may be a case of someone profiting from those pictures.  Do you think that these types of posts should be stopped because the subject of the post happens to be disfigured in some way?

Unlike you, I would call portraying a Marine, returning to his soon to be  wife and family and living as normally as could be expected after suffering a debilitating injury, a very noble and honorable tribute and not an attempt to exploit someone.  People need to hear these kinds of stories as they reflect the great spirit and commitment to love and devotion most Americans hold as high esteem.

Unlike you, I don&#039;t use the content of a post as a determination of exploitation, but rather the intent of such postings and the effect such images have upon the reader.  If HotAir was using this man in an attempt to persuade the reader to accept a political or religious ideology, or using the image to enforce a particular point of view, I would call that exploitive.  Since HotAir makes no such inference as to the &#039;meaning&#039; of this story, and lets the readers make their own determination as to it&#039;s relevance and importance, there is no exploitation.

And as far as not being welcomed at your site, what difference does that makes at all?  None, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is worth a reply, most the rest not.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you find something you feel is worthy of a response.  But you still haven&#8217;t answered the question.</p>
<p>You claim that this site is money driven and that your blog is not, and I&#8217;ll accept that as the reasoning behind your feeling that this story is disgraceful, but you still haven&#8217;t show me why I should accept your insistence that the story is actually disgraceful and exploitive?  Is it because the Marine in question is disfigured?  Is disfigurement the only criteria you use to determine whether something is exploitive?  That makes me wonder if you believe that any pictures of disfigured men and woman should be banned from public display as there may be a case of someone profiting from those pictures.  Do you think that these types of posts should be stopped because the subject of the post happens to be disfigured in some way?</p>
<p>Unlike you, I would call portraying a Marine, returning to his soon to be  wife and family and living as normally as could be expected after suffering a debilitating injury, a very noble and honorable tribute and not an attempt to exploit someone.  People need to hear these kinds of stories as they reflect the great spirit and commitment to love and devotion most Americans hold as high esteem.</p>
<p>Unlike you, I don&#8217;t use the content of a post as a determination of exploitation, but rather the intent of such postings and the effect such images have upon the reader.  If HotAir was using this man in an attempt to persuade the reader to accept a political or religious ideology, or using the image to enforce a particular point of view, I would call that exploitive.  Since HotAir makes no such inference as to the &#8216;meaning&#8217; of this story, and lets the readers make their own determination as to it&#8217;s relevance and importance, there is no exploitation.</p>
<p>And as far as not being welcomed at your site, what difference does that makes at all?  None, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232799</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232799</guid>
		<description>They went on Oprah and were featured in People magazine, honora.  If they minded, I doubt they would have done either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They went on Oprah and were featured in People magazine, honora.  If they minded, I doubt they would have done either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: labwrs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232725</link>
		<dc:creator>labwrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232725</guid>
		<description>Now that&#039;s what I call ROMANCE! WOW! How beautiful and inspiring. Love truely does conquer all!
The quote from his Sister is really compelling, something to the affect that the family would not have blamed Renee had she just bolted after he was injured. She never did..and now they want to be &quot;young, cool parents&quot;. Our Country should be so blessed that should happen.
&lt;strong&gt;What a WONDERFUL Valentine&#039;s story. Thanks AP..you romantic curmudgeon! :)&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s what I call ROMANCE! WOW! How beautiful and inspiring. Love truely does conquer all!<br />
The quote from his Sister is really compelling, something to the affect that the family would not have blamed Renee had she just bolted after he was injured. She never did..and now they want to be &#8220;young, cool parents&#8221;. Our Country should be so blessed that should happen.<br />
<strong>What a WONDERFUL Valentine&#8217;s story. Thanks AP..you romantic curmudgeon! :)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Burton</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232722</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232722</guid>
		<description>My God, the strength she must have to be willing to sacrifice so much....I bow to her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My God, the strength she must have to be willing to sacrifice so much&#8230;.I bow to her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232589</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232589</guid>
		<description>I am rather ambivalent re this photo.  On one hand, it&#039;s incredibly moving and I think we need to face the human costs and consequences of our Iraq policy.  But on the other hand, there is a feeling of invasion of privacy somehow.

I&#039;m a lot of help....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am rather ambivalent re this photo.  On one hand, it&#8217;s incredibly moving and I think we need to face the human costs and consequences of our Iraq policy.  But on the other hand, there is a feeling of invasion of privacy somehow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a lot of help&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Gal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232503</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232503</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As far as shameful, I find shame in the posting by Allah in exploiting this Marines situation. Leave it for others who will post this in hopes of getting more site hits. 
Wade on February 11, 2007 at 2:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wade, I think you make an assumption of Allah’s motivation that is not true. In his posting he did not include any searchable language that would return results and thus drive the HA site meter. Instead, Allah included links to the picture and the story that passed the hits on from HA’s readership. 

I just tried searching Ty and Renee Ziegel in my Google search engine and of all the hits that it returned, Hot Air was not one of them. 

Thanks Allah for such a touching true love story as out Valentine’s gift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As far as shameful, I find shame in the posting by Allah in exploiting this Marines situation. Leave it for others who will post this in hopes of getting more site hits.<br />
Wade on February 11, 2007 at 2:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Wade, I think you make an assumption of Allah’s motivation that is not true. In his posting he did not include any searchable language that would return results and thus drive the HA site meter. Instead, Allah included links to the picture and the story that passed the hits on from HA’s readership. </p>
<p>I just tried searching Ty and Renee Ziegel in my Google search engine and of all the hits that it returned, Hot Air was not one of them. </p>
<p>Thanks Allah for such a touching true love story as out Valentine’s gift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GPE</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232477</link>
		<dc:creator>GPE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232477</guid>
		<description>Exploiting? Ha. If HotAir.com were some &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podunk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Podunk&lt;/a&gt; backwater omega web site, I might agree. Hot Air doesn&#039;t need the traffic bump.

That said, the story is most impressive and I wasn&#039;t aware of it (what with not having watched TV or read dead tree newspapers in over a year. Neither do I subscribe to candy mags.) So thanks, AP, for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exploiting? Ha. If HotAir.com were some <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podunk" rel="nofollow">Podunk</a> backwater omega web site, I might agree. Hot Air doesn&#8217;t need the traffic bump.</p>
<p>That said, the story is most impressive and I wasn&#8217;t aware of it (what with not having watched TV or read dead tree newspapers in over a year. Neither do I subscribe to candy mags.) So thanks, AP, for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob's Kid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232419</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob's Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232419</guid>
		<description>A nice way to start the day, thanks, Alllah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice way to start the day, thanks, Alllah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WriterMom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232403</link>
		<dc:creator>WriterMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232403</guid>
		<description>Correction-it was in people magazine. Debbie&#039;s post above reminded me...that&#039;s where there is the shot of a child staring at him in the grocery store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction-it was in people magazine. Debbie&#8217;s post above reminded me&#8230;that&#8217;s where there is the shot of a child staring at him in the grocery store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WriterMom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232398</link>
		<dc:creator>WriterMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232398</guid>
		<description>I saw this couple on TV, I can&#039;t remember where. There was a clip of him going to the grocery store and people staring. It&#039;s definitely real. More power to this couple for sticking together. Thank you for posting this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this couple on TV, I can&#8217;t remember where. There was a clip of him going to the grocery store and people staring. It&#8217;s definitely real. More power to this couple for sticking together. Thank you for posting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232379</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232379</guid>
		<description>Wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fogw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232375</link>
		<dc:creator>fogw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232375</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;HotAir until some recent posts has shown respect for others, in most cases. I think not in this case. 

Wade on February 11, 2007 at 6:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Cry me a river, Wade.  The injured Marine deserves all of our respect and heartfelt appreciation for his sacrifice.  Based upon your comments on this thread, you deserve none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>HotAir until some recent posts has shown respect for others, in most cases. I think not in this case. </p>
<p>Wade on February 11, 2007 at 6:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Cry me a river, Wade.  The injured Marine deserves all of our respect and heartfelt appreciation for his sacrifice.  Based upon your comments on this thread, you deserve none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232351</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232351</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wade is just sensitive about a fellow Marine who survived a terrible accident and (thankfully) can now get on with his life - and with the woman he loves, who is obviously in love with him. Just understand Wade’s projected defense of a fellow Marine.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ziegel is standing tall, proud, with his sh*t tight as a drum and the woman he loves on his arm, recording what might well be the happiest day of his life for the record. I don&#039;t see what needs defending. He has prevailed. That photo is one of triumph over adversity.

God bless them both and may they have many, many happy years together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wade is just sensitive about a fellow Marine who survived a terrible accident and (thankfully) can now get on with his life &#8211; and with the woman he loves, who is obviously in love with him. Just understand Wade’s projected defense of a fellow Marine.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ziegel is standing tall, proud, with his sh*t tight as a drum and the woman he loves on his arm, recording what might well be the happiest day of his life for the record. I don&#8217;t see what needs defending. He has prevailed. That photo is one of triumph over adversity.</p>
<p>God bless them both and may they have many, many happy years together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-232173</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-232173</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think I can speak to that, as there could be several valid reasons for her choice to show a serious face in the photo.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or another reason could simply have been because the photographer told her not to smile.

When I got married, I was told to do all sorts of things, taking a &quot;serious&quot; picture was at least one of the many that were taken.

But I&#039;m mostly saying that because of this picture, where both are smiling:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.reduxpictures.com/Common/PhotoDetailPage.aspx?msa=0&amp;pid=6938459&amp;slid=a6ad0b75-2600-49b7-a0d1-87dad8a3f7fc&amp;slididx=5&amp;lid=0&amp;rstid=ccb36489-f42a-4d8c-9629-f91583e2d960&amp;aid=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ty Ziegel and Renee Kline on their wedding day at Metamora High School.&lt;/a&gt;

It appears (in that picture) that both of their impulses naturally tell them to smile when they&#039;re picture is being taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think I can speak to that, as there could be several valid reasons for her choice to show a serious face in the photo.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or another reason could simply have been because the photographer told her not to smile.</p>
<p>When I got married, I was told to do all sorts of things, taking a &#8220;serious&#8221; picture was at least one of the many that were taken.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m mostly saying that because of this picture, where both are smiling:</p>
<p><a href="http://archive.reduxpictures.com/Common/PhotoDetailPage.aspx?msa=0&amp;pid=6938459&amp;slid=a6ad0b75-2600-49b7-a0d1-87dad8a3f7fc&amp;slididx=5&amp;lid=0&amp;rstid=ccb36489-f42a-4d8c-9629-f91583e2d960&amp;aid=1" rel="nofollow">Ty Ziegel and Renee Kline on their wedding day at Metamora High School.</a></p>
<p>It appears (in that picture) that both of their impulses naturally tell them to smile when they&#8217;re picture is being taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-231737</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-231737</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What bothered me was that photo. It looked like she really didn’t want to be there.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think I can speak to that, as there could be several valid reasons for her choice to show a serious face in the photo. 

1. He is as yet unable to smile, she might be sensitive about not wanting to appear happy when he cannot do likewise.

2. His condition is serious, perhaps she would fear her smile might belittle that.

There isn&#039;t an iota of question that she wanted to be there, given all they&#039;ve been through. If she felt so, she would have run before this point.

The wives and soon-to-be wives of military men are among the strongest humans in the world. The left, the media (as if that wasn&#039;t the same thing), and &quot;peaceniks&quot; haven&#039;t a clue how brave such women are. They deserve far more honor than they ever receive, for they all suffer hardship in staying true to their man.

AP, great story, and neither the Corps nor this family is dishonored in having it spread far and wide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What bothered me was that photo. It looked like she really didn’t want to be there.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think I can speak to that, as there could be several valid reasons for her choice to show a serious face in the photo. </p>
<p>1. He is as yet unable to smile, she might be sensitive about not wanting to appear happy when he cannot do likewise.</p>
<p>2. His condition is serious, perhaps she would fear her smile might belittle that.</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t an iota of question that she wanted to be there, given all they&#8217;ve been through. If she felt so, she would have run before this point.</p>
<p>The wives and soon-to-be wives of military men are among the strongest humans in the world. The left, the media (as if that wasn&#8217;t the same thing), and &#8220;peaceniks&#8221; haven&#8217;t a clue how brave such women are. They deserve far more honor than they ever receive, for they all suffer hardship in staying true to their man.</p>
<p>AP, great story, and neither the Corps nor this family is dishonored in having it spread far and wide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakko77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-231626</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakko77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-231626</guid>
		<description>Wow!  Inspirational doesn&#039;t even begin to describe this amazing story.

It&#039;s enough to bring a tear to your eye but it would tears of joy because of their love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Inspirational doesn&#8217;t even begin to describe this amazing story.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s enough to bring a tear to your eye but it would tears of joy because of their love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedecider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-231622</link>
		<dc:creator>thedecider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/11/wedding-photo-of-the-year/#comment-231622</guid>
		<description>Move along folks.  Wade is just sensitive about a fellow Marine who survived a terrible accident and (thankfully) can now get on with his life - and with the woman he loves, who is obviously in love with him.  Just understand Wade&#039;s projected defense of a fellow Marine.  That&#039;s all you need to know. 

As for the story - it is very inspiring.  Everyone who reads this should feel a great swell of pride for our folks in uniform, and for triumphs of the human spirit!  Thanks Allah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move along folks.  Wade is just sensitive about a fellow Marine who survived a terrible accident and (thankfully) can now get on with his life &#8211; and with the woman he loves, who is obviously in love with him.  Just understand Wade&#8217;s projected defense of a fellow Marine.  That&#8217;s all you need to know. </p>
<p>As for the story &#8211; it is very inspiring.  Everyone who reads this should feel a great swell of pride for our folks in uniform, and for triumphs of the human spirit!  Thanks Allah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
