<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blunder Twins: The hilarity continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Silky&#8217;s wife: Hillary may not be as &#8220;good&#8221; an advocate for women as Silky</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-563153</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Silky&#8217;s wife: Hillary may not be as &#8220;good&#8221; an advocate for women as Silky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-563153</guid>
		<description>[...] Entirely true assuming you define &#8220;good&#8221; the way Elizabeth Edwards and the campaign&#8217;s most notorious hires do. Silky&#8217;s staked himself as the true nutroots champion, willing to pander to the hard left on every point of leftist dogma, so in that sense it&#8217;s hard to be &#8220;better&#8221; than he is on gender short of signing on to the SCUM manifesto. On the other end, Hillary&#8217;s keen to explode stereotypes about how a woman president would act in office which is one of the reasons why she hasn&#8217;t apologized &#8212; yet &#8212; for her Iraq vote: Mrs. Clinton’s image as a strong leader, in turn, is critical to her hopes of becoming the nation’s first female president. According to one adviser, her internal polling indicates that a high proportion of Democrats see her as strong and tough, both assets particularly valuable to a female candidate who is seeking to become commander in chief. Apologizing might hurt that image, this adviser said. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Entirely true assuming you define &#8220;good&#8221; the way Elizabeth Edwards and the campaign&#8217;s most notorious hires do. Silky&#8217;s staked himself as the true nutroots champion, willing to pander to the hard left on every point of leftist dogma, so in that sense it&#8217;s hard to be &#8220;better&#8221; than he is on gender short of signing on to the SCUM manifesto. On the other end, Hillary&#8217;s keen to explode stereotypes about how a woman president would act in office which is one of the reasons why she hasn&#8217;t apologized &#8212; yet &#8212; for her Iraq vote: Mrs. Clinton’s image as a strong leader, in turn, is critical to her hopes of becoming the nation’s first female president. According to one adviser, her internal polling indicates that a high proportion of Democrats see her as strong and tough, both assets particularly valuable to a female candidate who is seeking to become commander in chief. Apologizing might hurt that image, this adviser said. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Angry Christian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-229573</link>
		<dc:creator>One Angry Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-229573</guid>
		<description>is anyone surprised at the usual reaction from the left? Seriously, you call islamofascism &lt;i&gt;what it is, and point out the facts of how it imbeds itself in a nation and eats it from the inside out and they call it hate speech.

This is nothing new. It&#039;s business as usual. 

Why is anyone outraged?&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is anyone surprised at the usual reaction from the left? Seriously, you call islamofascism <i>what it is, and point out the facts of how it imbeds itself in a nation and eats it from the inside out and they call it hate speech.</p>
<p>This is nothing new. It&#8217;s business as usual. </p>
<p>Why is anyone outraged?</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-229255</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-229255</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Other people might have a different opinion on this than me. However, my feeling is, if the vast majority of acts of pedophilia worldwide had been traced back to Christians (as the vast majority of terrorist acts worldwide have been traced back to Muslims) then something like that might be o.k.

JadeNYU on February 9, 2007 at 4:01 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But only, to be truly fair, if those heinous acts were also supported by an enthusiastic doctrine, theology and practice stretching back over 1,000 years &lt;i&gt;mandating&lt;/i&gt; such acts, supported by chapter after chapter of text delivered verbatim from God himself, devoted solely to the one issue, claiming those who &lt;i&gt;didn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; support the molestation of children were going to suffer torment in this life and Hellfire in the next.

Then the comparison would be roughly equivalent.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Especially if (in our hypothetical) the only Christians that bothered speaking up said things like “Of course we don’t support pedophilia, but, in certain situations, it is justified.” or “It’s not pedophilia if they brought it on themselves.” or other manners of saying “We don’t agree with it *wink*, but, we’ve also defined it to not include everything that we do support (such as pedophilia).”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A-&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/08/video-husham-al-husainy-on-hannity-colmes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;meen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Other people might have a different opinion on this than me. However, my feeling is, if the vast majority of acts of pedophilia worldwide had been traced back to Christians (as the vast majority of terrorist acts worldwide have been traced back to Muslims) then something like that might be o.k.</p>
<p>JadeNYU on February 9, 2007 at 4:01 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>But only, to be truly fair, if those heinous acts were also supported by an enthusiastic doctrine, theology and practice stretching back over 1,000 years <i>mandating</i> such acts, supported by chapter after chapter of text delivered verbatim from God himself, devoted solely to the one issue, claiming those who <i>didn&#8217;t</i> support the molestation of children were going to suffer torment in this life and Hellfire in the next.</p>
<p>Then the comparison would be roughly equivalent.</p>
<blockquote><p>Especially if (in our hypothetical) the only Christians that bothered speaking up said things like “Of course we don’t support pedophilia, but, in certain situations, it is justified.” or “It’s not pedophilia if they brought it on themselves.” or other manners of saying “We don’t agree with it *wink*, but, we’ve also defined it to not include everything that we do support (such as pedophilia).”</p></blockquote>
<p>A-<i><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/08/video-husham-al-husainy-on-hannity-colmes/" rel="nofollow">meen</a></i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-228930</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-228930</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I just took a look at &quot;Sadly, No!&quot;.  Sal, Gavin or whatever name he goes by today seems pretty obsessed with HotAir and Bryan.  It appears he&#039;s proud of posting as a puppet and finds some type of conspiracy in even the most mudane comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I just took a look at &#8220;Sadly, No!&#8221;.  Sal, Gavin or whatever name he goes by today seems pretty obsessed with HotAir and Bryan.  It appears he&#8217;s proud of posting as a puppet and finds some type of conspiracy in even the most mudane comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedecider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-228277</link>
		<dc:creator>thedecider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-228277</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Blunder Twins: The hilarity continues&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Blundertwins power activate!

Form of, a steaming POS.  
Shape of a douchebag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Blunder Twins: The hilarity continues</p></blockquote>
<p>Blundertwins power activate!</p>
<p>Form of, a steaming POS.<br />
Shape of a douchebag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-228275</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-228275</guid>
		<description>You saw that Gavin M. admitted at Sadly, No! that he is &quot;Sal Leno&quot; (not that he went to great lengths to hide it to begin with).

Do you find it odd that he would just tell a blatant lie like that?

A couple of his commenters seem to . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You saw that Gavin M. admitted at Sadly, No! that he is &#8220;Sal Leno&#8221; (not that he went to great lengths to hide it to begin with).</p>
<p>Do you find it odd that he would just tell a blatant lie like that?</p>
<p>A couple of his commenters seem to . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techno_barbarian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-228274</link>
		<dc:creator>techno_barbarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-228274</guid>
		<description>Coming out of the woodwork, aren&#039;t they?

The idiots think they smell blood in the water. But the truth is, the world is slowly waking up, taking a good hard look at them, and going &quot;WTF?&quot;

What&#039;s happening is a good thing. The &#039;radical&#039; left is coming out of the shadows. They think it&#039;s time for them to rise. 

This is gonna be fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming out of the woodwork, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>The idiots think they smell blood in the water. But the truth is, the world is slowly waking up, taking a good hard look at them, and going &#8220;WTF?&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s happening is a good thing. The &#8216;radical&#8217; left is coming out of the shadows. They think it&#8217;s time for them to rise. </p>
<p>This is gonna be fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReubenJCogburn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-228019</link>
		<dc:creator>ReubenJCogburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 02:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-228019</guid>
		<description>Man, who to believe here? Who has more credibility, liberal sock puppets trolling and whoring for attention, or the guy that goes on record and posts under his real name? Not exactly a tough call, is it?

And for the record, I wouldn&#039;t have given a rat&#039;s *ss either if there&#039;d been foundation money involved. It&#039;s ridiculous for any liberal to make accusations like that anyway, considering how many left wing organizations are bought and paid for by George Soros one way or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, who to believe here? Who has more credibility, liberal sock puppets trolling and whoring for attention, or the guy that goes on record and posts under his real name? Not exactly a tough call, is it?</p>
<p>And for the record, I wouldn&#8217;t have given a rat&#8217;s *ss either if there&#8217;d been foundation money involved. It&#8217;s ridiculous for any liberal to make accusations like that anyway, considering how many left wing organizations are bought and paid for by George Soros one way or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-227931</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 02:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227931</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a nice bit of goalpost moving, there, MKR.  You&#039;re outta here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a nice bit of goalpost moving, there, MKR.  You&#8217;re outta here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKR</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-227756</link>
		<dc:creator>MKR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227756</guid>
		<description>Bryan,

I will follow your request and not comment on the matter further. However, as you have raised further points and declared me a &quot;malicious&quot; liar after publicly declaring the matter closed I will repond to them in my final comment.

&lt;blockquote&gt;For what it’s worth, there’s nothing wrong with taking foundation money if that’s how your site is run, as Media Matters and a lot of other sites are run,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I absolutely agree.

&lt;blockquote&gt;but Hot Air hasn’t taken any foundation money and none of us are paid by any foundation. We’re not owned or funded by any foundation. So what MKR and the sock puppet Sal Leno are spreading are malicious lies.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I never said anything of the sort, just as you never denied being paid for your work here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,</p>
<p>I will follow your request and not comment on the matter further. However, as you have raised further points and declared me a &#8220;malicious&#8221; liar after publicly declaring the matter closed I will repond to them in my final comment.</p>
<blockquote><p>For what it’s worth, there’s nothing wrong with taking foundation money if that’s how your site is run, as Media Matters and a lot of other sites are run,</p></blockquote>
<p>I absolutely agree.</p>
<blockquote><p>but Hot Air hasn’t taken any foundation money and none of us are paid by any foundation. We’re not owned or funded by any foundation. So what MKR and the sock puppet Sal Leno are spreading are malicious lies.</p></blockquote>
<p>I never said anything of the sort, just as you never denied being paid for your work here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-227649</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227649</guid>
		<description>I wanna know the identities of the sad sock puppets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanna know the identities of the sad sock puppets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-227646</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227646</guid>
		<description>Hey MKR ... why don&#039;t you issue an IMMEDIATE ACTION ALERT then whip up a pretty vivious rant.

What a loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey MKR &#8230; why don&#8217;t you issue an IMMEDIATE ACTION ALERT then whip up a pretty vivious rant.</p>
<p>What a loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JadeNYU</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-2/#comment-227524</link>
		<dc:creator>JadeNYU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227524</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bryan on February 9, 2007 at 5:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Laser tag is a blast!  Have fun.

I agree about foundation money.  It wouldn&#039;t bother me in the least if HotAir did receive funding from foundations.  As long as the bills are paid and the good commentary is there when I type in the URL, I don&#039;t have to know how the sausage is made. :)

Similarly, it doesn&#039;t bother me that HotAir doesn&#039;t receive foundation money.

I haven&#039;t been bothered about HotAir and it&#039;s finances since I learned how to turn off that blinking McCain ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bryan on February 9, 2007 at 5:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Laser tag is a blast!  Have fun.</p>
<p>I agree about foundation money.  It wouldn&#8217;t bother me in the least if HotAir did receive funding from foundations.  As long as the bills are paid and the good commentary is there when I type in the URL, I don&#8217;t have to know how the sausage is made. :)</p>
<p>Similarly, it doesn&#8217;t bother me that HotAir doesn&#8217;t receive foundation money.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been bothered about HotAir and it&#8217;s finances since I learned how to turn off that blinking McCain ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227490</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227490</guid>
		<description>By the way, I&#039;ll be away from the computer for a while fulfilling a promise to my kid (laser tag!).  For what it&#039;s worth, there&#039;s nothing wrong with taking foundation money if that&#039;s how your site is run, as Media Matters and a lot of other sites are run, but Hot Air hasn&#039;t taken any foundation money and none of us are paid by any foundation.  We&#039;re not owned or funded by any foundation.  So what MKR and the sock puppet Sal Leno are spreading are malicious lies.  They know that they&#039;re lies but they don&#039;t seem to care.  It&#039;s all ultimately about getting some kind of attack in on Michelle, since she owns and is to a great extent the face of Hot Air.  They&#039;ll be banned if the continue.  We have plenty of great commenters here, so those two won&#039;t be missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I&#8217;ll be away from the computer for a while fulfilling a promise to my kid (laser tag!).  For what it&#8217;s worth, there&#8217;s nothing wrong with taking foundation money if that&#8217;s how your site is run, as Media Matters and a lot of other sites are run, but Hot Air hasn&#8217;t taken any foundation money and none of us are paid by any foundation.  We&#8217;re not owned or funded by any foundation.  So what MKR and the sock puppet Sal Leno are spreading are malicious lies.  They know that they&#8217;re lies but they don&#8217;t seem to care.  It&#8217;s all ultimately about getting some kind of attack in on Michelle, since she owns and is to a great extent the face of Hot Air.  They&#8217;ll be banned if the continue.  We have plenty of great commenters here, so those two won&#8217;t be missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottMcC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227486</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottMcC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227486</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s obvious Bryan is the bag man that transports the millions of dollars required to produce HotAir.com from the international banking cabal. However, in his comments Bryan has been carefully dodging this fact by saying things like politically-conservative think tanks and foundations have not paid a dime of Hot Air&#039;s expenses in any way.

See? A total dodge! CONSPRIACY!!!

This is so &lt;strong&gt;blatant&lt;/strong&gt;; why are all of you stoopid godbags unable to see it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious Bryan is the bag man that transports the millions of dollars required to produce HotAir.com from the international banking cabal. However, in his comments Bryan has been carefully dodging this fact by saying things like politically-conservative think tanks and foundations have not paid a dime of Hot Air&#8217;s expenses in any way.</p>
<p>See? A total dodge! CONSPRIACY!!!</p>
<p>This is so <strong>blatant</strong>; why are all of you stoopid godbags unable to see it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JadeNYU</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227484</link>
		<dc:creator>JadeNYU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227484</guid>
		<description>MKR - I take back my above post.  It would appear that your legal action threat detector is much better than mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MKR &#8211; I take back my above post.  It would appear that your legal action threat detector is much better than mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JadeNYU</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227479</link>
		<dc:creator>JadeNYU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227479</guid>
		<description>MKR on February 9, 2007 at 5:01 PM

I&#039;m almost done feeding the trolls for the day.

Stop looking for conspiracies and threats where there are none.

All I read from Bryan&#039;s comment was that you and Sal were edging towards being banned.  His &quot;we know who you are&quot; comment seems directly related to Sal&#039;s earlier comments about having been banned many times (&quot;Bryan, Allah, and Michelle can ban us — but can they ban all our HotAir accounts?&quot;) but this time being different because it is more &#039;complex&#039; (Oh, he’s banned us about two dozen times before. I think this time it’s a little more complex.)

Those may have been things that Sal said and not you, but, at this point, I think it&#039;s safe to say you&#039;re both in the same boat in most of our minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MKR on February 9, 2007 at 5:01 PM</p>
<p>I&#8217;m almost done feeding the trolls for the day.</p>
<p>Stop looking for conspiracies and threats where there are none.</p>
<p>All I read from Bryan&#8217;s comment was that you and Sal were edging towards being banned.  His &#8220;we know who you are&#8221; comment seems directly related to Sal&#8217;s earlier comments about having been banned many times (&#8220;Bryan, Allah, and Michelle can ban us — but can they ban all our HotAir accounts?&#8221;) but this time being different because it is more &#8216;complex&#8217; (Oh, he’s banned us about two dozen times before. I think this time it’s a little more complex.)</p>
<p>Those may have been things that Sal said and not you, but, at this point, I think it&#8217;s safe to say you&#8217;re both in the same boat in most of our minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227474</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227474</guid>
		<description>I was suggesting that you stop suggesting that there&#039;s some foundation behind Hot Air, and that if you continue it&#039;s possibly legally actionable.  But I&#039;m not a lawyer, just a simple godbag, so what do I know?  

That&#039;s all, nothing more.  Just a polite suggestion to stand down.  

As to the banning.  The above post is, after all, about the credibility of Digby and MyDD, not anything having to do with Hot Air or its finances.  You have failed to stay on topic, and I&#039;ve banned people for that alone.  To go into allegations passed off by sock puppets and interpret everything as I say as some kind of dodge is also grounds for banning.  I don&#039;t allow commenters to come in here with bad faith accusations against other commenters, other blogs and certainly not our own blog.  You are making bad faith insinuations about us that are off-topic and untrue.  It&#039;s our bandwidth that you are using here.  We don&#039;t have to continue to allow you to use it if your purpose here is to sling accusations against us.  

So the choice is yours.  Knock it off or get banned.  There was never any physical threat implied or suggested in any way, ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was suggesting that you stop suggesting that there&#8217;s some foundation behind Hot Air, and that if you continue it&#8217;s possibly legally actionable.  But I&#8217;m not a lawyer, just a simple godbag, so what do I know?  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s all, nothing more.  Just a polite suggestion to stand down.  </p>
<p>As to the banning.  The above post is, after all, about the credibility of Digby and MyDD, not anything having to do with Hot Air or its finances.  You have failed to stay on topic, and I&#8217;ve banned people for that alone.  To go into allegations passed off by sock puppets and interpret everything as I say as some kind of dodge is also grounds for banning.  I don&#8217;t allow commenters to come in here with bad faith accusations against other commenters, other blogs and certainly not our own blog.  You are making bad faith insinuations about us that are off-topic and untrue.  It&#8217;s our bandwidth that you are using here.  We don&#8217;t have to continue to allow you to use it if your purpose here is to sling accusations against us.  </p>
<p>So the choice is yours.  Knock it off or get banned.  There was never any physical threat implied or suggested in any way, ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227472</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227472</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;2. It shows a strength of character, a moral courage that most people never know, to shrug off such attacks and continue to have empathy for your fellow man.

Freelancer on February 9, 2007 at 11:36 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

True.  Our adversaries know nothing about character or moral courage.  They hide behind word games, innuendo, and carefully crafted half-truths.  But just because we don&#039;t attach back in kind doesn&#039;t mean they are fooling anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>2. It shows a strength of character, a moral courage that most people never know, to shrug off such attacks and continue to have empathy for your fellow man.</p>
<p>Freelancer on February 9, 2007 at 11:36 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>True.  Our adversaries know nothing about character or moral courage.  They hide behind word games, innuendo, and carefully crafted half-truths.  But just because we don&#8217;t attach back in kind doesn&#8217;t mean they are fooling anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKR</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227470</link>
		<dc:creator>MKR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227470</guid>
		<description>Too late, he&#039;s already opted with Initiate Operation: Threaten Legal Action!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too late, he&#8217;s already opted with Initiate Operation: Threaten Legal Action!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227462</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227462</guid>
		<description>MKR&#039;s getting too close to the truth! &lt;strong&gt;Initiate Operation: Comment Latency.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MKR&#8217;s getting too close to the truth! <strong>Initiate Operation: Comment Latency.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKR</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227453</link>
		<dc:creator>MKR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227453</guid>
		<description>Oh no, that&#039;s not what you meant at all.

Of course you know who I am, my name is emblazoned on my comments. If your threat was an intention to ban me you would be foolishly under the impression that I believe my comments are anonymous.

No, you know that your comment was a veiled threat. I am fully aware that my IP address is logged with my comments which is why I am careful with what I say.

So Bryan, what exactly are you threatening me with, legal action for commenting on another poster&#039;s comments about HotAir&#039;s financing? What are your grounds? Do you have any?

Hot air indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, that&#8217;s not what you meant at all.</p>
<p>Of course you know who I am, my name is emblazoned on my comments. If your threat was an intention to ban me you would be foolishly under the impression that I believe my comments are anonymous.</p>
<p>No, you know that your comment was a veiled threat. I am fully aware that my IP address is logged with my comments which is why I am careful with what I say.</p>
<p>So Bryan, what exactly are you threatening me with, legal action for commenting on another poster&#8217;s comments about HotAir&#8217;s financing? What are your grounds? Do you have any?</p>
<p>Hot air indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227449</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227449</guid>
		<description>Only with being banned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only with being banned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKR</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227448</link>
		<dc:creator>MKR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227448</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And we know who you are.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are you threatening me Bryan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And we know who you are.</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you threatening me Bryan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKR</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-227445</link>
		<dc:creator>MKR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/09/blunder-twins-the-hilarity-continues/#comment-227445</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Actually, there is no truth to “Sal Leno’s” contention that any foundation has paid a dime of Hot Air’s expenses in any way. So what we have are two commenters, “Sal Leno” and MKR, who are lying about Hot Air’s finances.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Again you continue to hide behind careful language.

I have not alleged that a foundation has paid *any* of HotAir expenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Actually, there is no truth to “Sal Leno’s” contention that any foundation has paid a dime of Hot Air’s expenses in any way. So what we have are two commenters, “Sal Leno” and MKR, who are lying about Hot Air’s finances.</p></blockquote>
<p>Again you continue to hide behind careful language.</p>
<p>I have not alleged that a foundation has paid *any* of HotAir expenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
