Certainly the vast majority of citizens who identify as Republicans are not so, and retain the values of personal responsibility and self-reliance that Reagan preached. Either a large enough body of party members takes a stand against further leftward shifts, or it’s time to do as Reagan did and find another place to call political home.

That goes double for McPain.

I am afraid for this nation when, the best Republicans can offer is a morally bankrupt “good leader”. Giuliani has the morals and political leanings of Bill Clinton and the rank-n-file republicans are fawning over him. I’d rather lose and stand for something then win and comprimise.

God help us all.

Get with the program!
Fred Thompson FTW!

A look at Senator Thompson’s voting record.

Closer to a Reagan conservative than any of the “front-runners”. During his time in the Senate I don’t know of a single word impugning his integrity or suggesting any skeletons. Sure would be nice to have someone in the Oval Office with a less tarnished (stained?) past.

At Hot Air…

Apparently it was under lock and key during the entire Clinton Administration and, as soon as Bubba left office, it magically appeared once again.
I’m sure that the thesis, in its entirety, will…

……

As such, he has been feared – just as Eugene Debs or Walt Whitman or Martin Luther King has been feared, because each embraced the most radical of political faiths – democracy.

I’m pretty sure Eugene Debs was a big socialist.

Socialism = democracy???

What a bonehead.

this Giuliani thing’s a bubble, baby.
It won’t be unless a real conservative enters the race. Other than Newt, who has more baggage than Hillary and can’t win, I’ll be damned if I know who it could possibly be.

BacaDog on February 7, 2007 at 12:49 PM

Get with the program!
Fred Thompson FTW!

Hillary scares the sh+t out me; jimmy not so much

And don’t give me any of that “it was 1969″ crap. I was in America by then and many, many people–young people–were living normal and decent lives, and did not want to nationalize the oil companies or introduce Britsh-style NHS medical care.

Dim bulbs out there like to characterize whole decades as this or that–this is the “everyone was doing_____” school of thought For Dummies. Ain’t true: More young men were in Vietnam in August 1969 than were at Woodstock

Hillary was a crazy-lefty before her time, and still is.

Crazy and dangerous in 1969, and crazy and dangerous now

You’ve virtually highjacked the thread defending yourself since. Learn when enough’s enough and let it go.

Freelancer on February 7, 2007 at 8:44 PM

i’m done.

I understood your first post as you intended it, critical hyperbole aimed at the “extreme far right”. That didn’t make it interesting, funny, or useful. You’ve virtually highjacked the thread defending yourself since. Learn when enough’s enough and let it go.

On topic, I wonder that Shrillary didn’t title her thesis, “There is Only the Struggle”.

maybe its the neo-nazi’s who have placed a stranglehold on the GOP. Not the snake charmers.

?!

I looked at the dictionary…just as i thought there is no definition for vulgar nativists

!?!?!?!?!

since you’re not here enough to know what you’re talking about, you may have missed the hal turner fiasco. hal turner is a neonazi who called for the assasination of u.s. legislatoirs if the voted up on the amnesty bill. i spent a very frustrating night trying to dissuade a number of frequent, long-term posters from endorsing his call.

maybe its the neo-nazi’s who have placed a stranglehold on the GOP. Not the snake charmers.

Even if i don’t post enough i read/view this blog enough to know that ever since they opened the register a few months ago the whole tone of the comments section has changed and more often than not there is one commenter who seems to not belong.

….hmmmm

I looked at the dictionary…just as i thought there is no definition for vulgar nativists.

second, you’ve posted on this site, maybe, a dozen times. so when you have some kind of judgement as to who is a loyal poster, who is who they say they are and who is not, sit on it. i didn’t answer that suggestion of yours because i don’t honor your judgement.

instead i challenged you to demonstrate what was “overblown” about my characterizations
you bolded the part where i mock the violent and militaristic speech used in discussing the immigration issue here.

here is a quote from a frequent poster…

If the traitors allowing this slo-mo invasion were shot and their bodies piled on up along the border, that would make a goddamned good start to the ‘fence’.
Just a thought.
profitsbeard on January 5, 2007 at 1:31 AM

since you’re not here enough to know what you’re talking about, you may have missed the hal turner fiasco. hal turner is a neonazi who called for the assasination of u.s. legislatoirs if the voted up on the amnesty bill. i spent a very frustrating night trying to dissuade a number of frequent, long-term posters from endorsing his call.

i’m only barely joking about ted haggard or about satisfying the base. i’ll repeat what i said before: the fact that we’re discussing the idea that romney’s preference of one variety of christianity over another is a dealbreaker is prima facie evidence that SNAKE-HANDLING THEOCRATS – not people who happen to be christian apart from their public identity – presume excessive controll over the conservative movement and republican party. i’m not laughing either. it’s a despicable shame, and it must be reversed.

then you said something about…

And the vulgar nativists…a reference to the whole country or just hollyweird?

please open a dictionary.

So if your not a troll then you are…nvm i dont like to ridicule people in a real or a virtual public forum. Its very unconservative.

Have a good day.

“A man with books who does not read them has no advantage over an illiterate man” – Samuel Clemens(paraphrased)

- The Cat

a REAL conservative. one who’ll nuke the kkabbah and mine the border. we need a real conservative who will round up every border-jumper, march them out to the desert and force them to dig their own graves. and HE’ll toss the anchor babies in to fill. a REAL conservative who will take a firm stand against poop sex. the kind of guy who’s so not-gay he wears a clip-on tie with his flannel shirt. a REAL conservative who is christian, because christianty and conservatism are the same thing.

No real explaination needed there…you overblow it yourself.

Comment 2:

TED HAGGARD FOR PRES

Stupid Humor…no laughed…crickets. Get the point. lets continue…

Comment 3:

and if you’re not losing your mind with anger and dissapointment as a group of snake-handlers and vulgar natavists strangle the party like an octopus, then you’re part of the problem.

The snake handlers are very small part of the country. And the vulgar nativists…a reference to the whole country or just hollyweird?

Comment 4:

maybe i paint them in broad strokes as well

‘nough said…by you

I oculd go on but the fact that hardly anyone agree with oyu on this site and you refusal to answer the question from my previous post says to me: You are a left troll. So brin g your rediculous arguments and over blown rationlizations…no one will agree with you here. As most conservatives, we are civilized bunch. And finally no god does not choose our leaders. God provided the us with the ability of free will. Something not even he can control. We would be robots if that was the case.

So jummy = lefty troll or s not very smart and loves to make hugley over blown rationalizations.

Which is it?

Which is it?

It’s a disease…just take the medicine-you wouldn’t forgo asthma medication just to prove a point would you?