<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audio: Michael Yon says Iraq is still winnable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:43:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: techno_barbarian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-218432</link>
		<dc:creator>techno_barbarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 01:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-218432</guid>
		<description>John on February 5, 2007 at 3:37 PM
&lt;blockquote&gt;Look, Iraq is a big problem that will fade over time. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

John, it&#039;s apparent you have a great deal yet to learn about history, radical islam, iran, saudi arabia and what the situation and the stakes actually are should we fail in the ME.

These are non-trivial matters that we walk away from at our extreme peril.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John on February 5, 2007 at 3:37 PM</p>
<blockquote><p>Look, Iraq is a big problem that will fade over time. </p></blockquote>
<p>John, it&#8217;s apparent you have a great deal yet to learn about history, radical islam, iran, saudi arabia and what the situation and the stakes actually are should we fail in the ME.</p>
<p>These are non-trivial matters that we walk away from at our extreme peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-218093</link>
		<dc:creator>angler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-218093</guid>
		<description>John,

I guess I just can&#039;t find common ground with someone who compares the Iraqi people to sexual predators and animals to be kept in line, and our troops to seeds needlessly expended in an infertile, hopeless endeavor.  

I&#039;m the last person who would like to see a President Clinton or Obama.  But to say, &quot;Hey, we&#039;ve got an election to win, let&#039;s hurry up and lose this unpopular war&quot; is crass and short-sighted.  Did you support the troops and the mission when this operation began?  If you did, a soldier reading your comments would be forgiven if he&#039;d conclude he&#039;d rather not have had your support, if he knew you would so easily withdraw it if things in Iraq got difficult, unpopular at home, and an election was coming up.

I agree that Republicans used to kick ass.  I think some still do.  But I don&#039;t agree that a way to kick ass at home means being a pussy abroad.  Making national security decisions based on pure electoral politics has a home in another party.  We don&#039;t need it in this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I guess I just can&#8217;t find common ground with someone who compares the Iraqi people to sexual predators and animals to be kept in line, and our troops to seeds needlessly expended in an infertile, hopeless endeavor.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m the last person who would like to see a President Clinton or Obama.  But to say, &#8220;Hey, we&#8217;ve got an election to win, let&#8217;s hurry up and lose this unpopular war&#8221; is crass and short-sighted.  Did you support the troops and the mission when this operation began?  If you did, a soldier reading your comments would be forgiven if he&#8217;d conclude he&#8217;d rather not have had your support, if he knew you would so easily withdraw it if things in Iraq got difficult, unpopular at home, and an election was coming up.</p>
<p>I agree that Republicans used to kick ass.  I think some still do.  But I don&#8217;t agree that a way to kick ass at home means being a pussy abroad.  Making national security decisions based on pure electoral politics has a home in another party.  We don&#8217;t need it in this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RushBaby</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-218023</link>
		<dc:creator>RushBaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-218023</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This is like the parable about not casting good seeds onto unfertile ground.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Our policy in Iraq is like a new parable: If the ground is unfertile, sift out the big rocks, amend the soil with some nutrients, then &lt;em&gt;then&lt;/em&gt; plant some seeds. And after they start to grow, don&#039;t forget to fertilize and keep the area weed-free!

John, I use to share your pessimism. Heck, I said worse stuff than your &quot;slim handful of decent Iraqi people.&quot; Even compared them to piranhas at one point.

But I am ashamed of that mindset and it is thanks to Hot Air, a daily dose of Rush Limbaugh, and other sources that I rejected the pessimism and defeatism I felt at one point.

Please stick around  - because I am hoping that this website will help to nurture your optimism about our future and that of the Iraqi people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is like the parable about not casting good seeds onto unfertile ground.</p></blockquote>
<p>Our policy in Iraq is like a new parable: If the ground is unfertile, sift out the big rocks, amend the soil with some nutrients, then <em>then</em> plant some seeds. And after they start to grow, don&#8217;t forget to fertilize and keep the area weed-free!</p>
<p>John, I use to share your pessimism. Heck, I said worse stuff than your &#8220;slim handful of decent Iraqi people.&#8221; Even compared them to piranhas at one point.</p>
<p>But I am ashamed of that mindset and it is thanks to Hot Air, a daily dose of Rush Limbaugh, and other sources that I rejected the pessimism and defeatism I felt at one point.</p>
<p>Please stick around  &#8211; because I am hoping that this website will help to nurture your optimism about our future and that of the Iraqi people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217989</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217989</guid>
		<description>Look, Iraq is a big problem that will fade over time. What the Democrats would do to &lt;strong&gt;OUR COUNTRY&lt;/strong&gt; with both houses of congress and the White House is a big problem getting bigger. Hillary has basically announced a domestic policy agenda on par with the thinking of Hugo Chavez. And we all remember what the Clinton years were like. If you think Obama is even the slightest bit more conservative than Hillary, you&#039;re delusional. Obama is just the glossed over Chicago Machine version of Hillary without the checkered past. We have given the Iraqi people every opportunity to get along and play nice. But trying to jump start democracy in Iraq has been like trying to have a tea party with Beavis and Butthead. This is like the parable about not casting good seeds onto unfertile ground. I find it really surprising that the same people who understand that violent sexual predators cannot be rehabilitated can&#039;t wrap their minds around the Iraqi people. The insurgents are not fighting against the Iraqi people, they are the Iraqi people. The only good thing about Saddam was that the old SOB was the one animal that could keep all the other animals in line. Maybe if we stay in Iraq for the next hundred years we could finally make some headway. But we don&#039;t have that luxury. We have an election coming up in a little more than a year, and we have to decide what&#039;s best for us.

Republicans used to kick ass on a regular basis back when they were about limited government, social conservatism and economic responsibility. Now everything is about the damned Iraq war. Every issue on every level is being voted on based on the war. We&#039;ve got to slay this dragon before 2008 or this country is going to be had over a barrel by the likes of Dean, the Clintons and Pelosi. I feel bad for the slim handful of descent Iraqi people. I really do. But time is running out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, Iraq is a big problem that will fade over time. What the Democrats would do to <strong>OUR COUNTRY</strong> with both houses of congress and the White House is a big problem getting bigger. Hillary has basically announced a domestic policy agenda on par with the thinking of Hugo Chavez. And we all remember what the Clinton years were like. If you think Obama is even the slightest bit more conservative than Hillary, you&#8217;re delusional. Obama is just the glossed over Chicago Machine version of Hillary without the checkered past. We have given the Iraqi people every opportunity to get along and play nice. But trying to jump start democracy in Iraq has been like trying to have a tea party with Beavis and Butthead. This is like the parable about not casting good seeds onto unfertile ground. I find it really surprising that the same people who understand that violent sexual predators cannot be rehabilitated can&#8217;t wrap their minds around the Iraqi people. The insurgents are not fighting against the Iraqi people, they are the Iraqi people. The only good thing about Saddam was that the old SOB was the one animal that could keep all the other animals in line. Maybe if we stay in Iraq for the next hundred years we could finally make some headway. But we don&#8217;t have that luxury. We have an election coming up in a little more than a year, and we have to decide what&#8217;s best for us.</p>
<p>Republicans used to kick ass on a regular basis back when they were about limited government, social conservatism and economic responsibility. Now everything is about the damned Iraq war. Every issue on every level is being voted on based on the war. We&#8217;ve got to slay this dragon before 2008 or this country is going to be had over a barrel by the likes of Dean, the Clintons and Pelosi. I feel bad for the slim handful of descent Iraqi people. I really do. But time is running out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217844</link>
		<dc:creator>angler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217844</guid>
		<description>John,

Your analysis of the situation in Iraq is about as informed and cogent as your first comment questioning the bona fides of Mr. Yon.

That you come to your conclusions about the proper way forward regarding Iraq based on what you see on TV is not surprising.

That you conclude it is &quot;essential that President Bush find a way to end the war now,&quot; i.e. quit immediately and lose, is saddening.  Not only on the merits, but because your conclusion represents pure political calculation over principle.  Fuck whether the war is actually worth fighting and winning.  No, John says we out to stake out our position on the war on how many political points we can earn or whether a Republican gets elected local dog catcher.  You counsel taking a long-term approach, but adopt the short-term version - abandoning a worthy and important effort on an important front on the war on terror because, right now, that effort is unpopular and may cost votes.

I also fail to see the logic in your &quot;plan.&quot;  You argue that Republicans must abandon the war so that they can salvage their chances at the next elections.  But you also argue that if they don&#039;t, the war will be abandoned by Democrats, who, having won office by opposing the war, will carry through on their promise.  Well, if abandoning the war is so important, why would the electorate select a Republican, who presumably would end the war despite his principles but for political gain, when a Democrat would abandon the war because he really thinks that&#039;s the right thing to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Your analysis of the situation in Iraq is about as informed and cogent as your first comment questioning the bona fides of Mr. Yon.</p>
<p>That you come to your conclusions about the proper way forward regarding Iraq based on what you see on TV is not surprising.</p>
<p>That you conclude it is &#8220;essential that President Bush find a way to end the war now,&#8221; i.e. quit immediately and lose, is saddening.  Not only on the merits, but because your conclusion represents pure political calculation over principle.  Fuck whether the war is actually worth fighting and winning.  No, John says we out to stake out our position on the war on how many political points we can earn or whether a Republican gets elected local dog catcher.  You counsel taking a long-term approach, but adopt the short-term version &#8211; abandoning a worthy and important effort on an important front on the war on terror because, right now, that effort is unpopular and may cost votes.</p>
<p>I also fail to see the logic in your &#8220;plan.&#8221;  You argue that Republicans must abandon the war so that they can salvage their chances at the next elections.  But you also argue that if they don&#8217;t, the war will be abandoned by Democrats, who, having won office by opposing the war, will carry through on their promise.  Well, if abandoning the war is so important, why would the electorate select a Republican, who presumably would end the war despite his principles but for political gain, when a Democrat would abandon the war because he really thinks that&#8217;s the right thing to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217753</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217753</guid>
		<description>My apologies. Michael Yon seems like a real stand up guy based on your descriptions. But don&#039;t you dare knock the Midwest or my small town background. That besides, I&#039;ve lived in three states, been to more than a few of them and seen quite a bit. Granted, I have never been to Iraq, so I can only base my opinions of that situation on what I see on TV and read on the internet. 

Honestly, I think that our guys have done an exceptional job considering the circumstances, but Iraq is a tough go for all the obvious reasons. It is essential that President Bush find a way to end the war now, or we&#039;re going to be stuck a President Hillary or a President Obama and a rubber stamp Dem congress for four years plus. No Republican is going to win dog catcher running on a pro-Iraq war platform. And if the Dems get the White House, its over anyway. Think long term. Let Bush&#039;s mistakes fade away with Bush, for the good of the country. Bush might have made a great American president. Sadly, we&#039;ll never know since he&#039;s spent the last six years trying to be President of Iraq and ambassador to Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies. Michael Yon seems like a real stand up guy based on your descriptions. But don&#8217;t you dare knock the Midwest or my small town background. That besides, I&#8217;ve lived in three states, been to more than a few of them and seen quite a bit. Granted, I have never been to Iraq, so I can only base my opinions of that situation on what I see on TV and read on the internet. </p>
<p>Honestly, I think that our guys have done an exceptional job considering the circumstances, but Iraq is a tough go for all the obvious reasons. It is essential that President Bush find a way to end the war now, or we&#8217;re going to be stuck a President Hillary or a President Obama and a rubber stamp Dem congress for four years plus. No Republican is going to win dog catcher running on a pro-Iraq war platform. And if the Dems get the White House, its over anyway. Think long term. Let Bush&#8217;s mistakes fade away with Bush, for the good of the country. Bush might have made a great American president. Sadly, we&#8217;ll never know since he&#8217;s spent the last six years trying to be President of Iraq and ambassador to Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RushBaby</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217684</link>
		<dc:creator>RushBaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217684</guid>
		<description>This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/TalkRadio/Show.aspx?ContentGuid=20e5e620-153d-44ab-aa64-030e72a9f0c4&amp;RadioShowId=5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt; with Hugh Hewitt may help some not familiar with Michael Yon get to know him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.townhall.com/TalkRadio/Show.aspx?ContentGuid=20e5e620-153d-44ab-aa64-030e72a9f0c4&amp;RadioShowId=5" rel="nofollow">interview</a> with Hugh Hewitt may help some not familiar with Michael Yon get to know him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wide Awake Cafe &#187; There are Some Things More Important than Getting Reelected.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217642</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wide Awake Cafe &#187; There are Some Things More Important than Getting Reelected.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217642</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Yon says Iraq is still winnable. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Yon says Iraq is still winnable. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217573</link>
		<dc:creator>angler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217573</guid>
		<description>John,

In addition to blogging, Yon is an author.  Prior to that, he was a special operations soldier.  He&#039;s been to Iraq a number of times, including being embedded with the 1st Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment, 25th I.D.  He may not be an &quot;expert,&quot; but a lot of people, myself included, care about what he has to say because of his experience in the military and his proximity to the events he describes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>In addition to blogging, Yon is an author.  Prior to that, he was a special operations soldier.  He&#8217;s been to Iraq a number of times, including being embedded with the 1st Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment, 25th I.D.  He may not be an &#8220;expert,&#8221; but a lot of people, myself included, care about what he has to say because of his experience in the military and his proximity to the events he describes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Owens</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217571</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217571</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Who is Michael Yon and why should I care? I know the guy has a website, but so do I and that doesn’t make me an expert on anything. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Lemme see... you&#039;re a small town kid, who according to your own bio, hasn&#039;t apparently spent much (if any) time outside the midwest.

Yon, a former Green Beret, is currently on his second major tour of Iraq, and is so widely regarded by military brass, many consider him a must-read for his accuracy, insights, and of course, photos.

Gee, I wonder who is more worth reading on this subject?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Who is Michael Yon and why should I care? I know the guy has a website, but so do I and that doesn’t make me an expert on anything.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Lemme see&#8230; you&#8217;re a small town kid, who according to your own bio, hasn&#8217;t apparently spent much (if any) time outside the midwest.</p>
<p>Yon, a former Green Beret, is currently on his second major tour of Iraq, and is so widely regarded by military brass, many consider him a must-read for his accuracy, insights, and of course, photos.</p>
<p>Gee, I wonder who is more worth reading on this subject?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217567</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217567</guid>
		<description>This last quote on his website tell a lot.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Great stuff, Bill. Thank God you&#039;re not a &quot;journalist&quot;, or we&#039;d never see such things.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This last quote on his website tell a lot.</p>
<blockquote><p>Great stuff, Bill. Thank God you&#8217;re not a &#8220;journalist&#8221;, or we&#8217;d never see such things.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Angry Christian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217558</link>
		<dc:creator>One Angry Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217558</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Andrew Sullivan’s heart will not ache will reading this one:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

maybe I&#039;m not reading this right, but shouldnt that say &quot;Andrew Sullivan’s heart will not ache &lt;em&gt;while&lt;/em&gt; reading this one:&quot;

color me blond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Andrew Sullivan’s heart will not ache will reading this one:</p></blockquote>
<p>maybe I&#8217;m not reading this right, but shouldnt that say &#8220;Andrew Sullivan’s heart will not ache <em>while</em> reading this one:&#8221;</p>
<p>color me blond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217555</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217555</guid>
		<description>Who is Michael Yon and why should I care? I know the guy has a website, but so do I and that doesn&#039;t make me an expert on anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is Michael Yon and why should I care? I know the guy has a website, but so do I and that doesn&#8217;t make me an expert on anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valiant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217545</link>
		<dc:creator>Valiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217545</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If this war is lost, it will not be a military defeat. It will be a political one.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Amen

Our troops can secure Baghdad as long as they are there in greater numbers.  It will boost morale tremendously.  Unfortunately, the Religion of Peace® is completely incompatible with peace, freedom, and self-government.  Until the root cause of terrorism is addressed (the Koran and its proponents), we are setting ourselves up for long-term failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If this war is lost, it will not be a military defeat. It will be a political one.</p></blockquote>
<p>Amen</p>
<p>Our troops can secure Baghdad as long as they are there in greater numbers.  It will boost morale tremendously.  Unfortunately, the Religion of Peace® is completely incompatible with peace, freedom, and self-government.  Until the root cause of terrorism is addressed (the Koran and its proponents), we are setting ourselves up for long-term failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/comment-page-1/#comment-217520</link>
		<dc:creator>jman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/05/audio-michael-yon-says-iraq-is-still-winnable/#comment-217520</guid>
		<description>Of course it is winnable.  Our troops are the finest in the world.  

We are in the position we are in now, not because our troops are falling short, but because our politicians and media are.  They say they support the troops with one breath and undermine their mission with the next.

If this war is lost, it will not be a military defeat.  It will be a political one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it is winnable.  Our troops are the finest in the world.  </p>
<p>We are in the position we are in now, not because our troops are falling short, but because our politicians and media are.  They say they support the troops with one breath and undermine their mission with the next.</p>
<p>If this war is lost, it will not be a military defeat.  It will be a political one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
