<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush: Hands off Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; U.S. rolling up Al Qaeda in Iraq?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-225293</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; U.S. rolling up Al Qaeda in Iraq?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-225293</guid>
		<description>[...] Obviously Khamenei would want to distance himself if Ahmadinejad really is that unpopular. But how about this theory &#8212; that by allowing criticism of Ahmadinejad, Khamenei&#8217;s trying to make the regime look weak in order to discourage an attack on the country for the reasons I explained here? Too clever by half? Maybe, but not even western intel seems to know what&#8217;s going on in Iran. Why should I? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obviously Khamenei would want to distance himself if Ahmadinejad really is that unpopular. But how about this theory &#8212; that by allowing criticism of Ahmadinejad, Khamenei&#8217;s trying to make the regime look weak in order to discourage an attack on the country for the reasons I explained here? Too clever by half? Maybe, but not even western intel seems to know what&#8217;s going on in Iran. Why should I? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cop The Truth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-208833</link>
		<dc:creator>Cop The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-208833</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Iran behind kidnapping, murder of U.S. troops...&lt;/strong&gt;

We all have been thinking of the recent kidnap and murder of U.S. soldiers by what appears to have been a special team of terrorists speaking English and using American equipment. Bill Roggio, Uncle Jimbo and I were all looking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iran behind kidnapping, murder of U.S. troops&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>We all have been thinking of the recent kidnap and murder of U.S. soldiers by what appears to have been a special team of terrorists speaking English and using American equipment. Bill Roggio, Uncle Jimbo and I were all looking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNN: U.S. suspects Iranian hand in Karbala killings of American soldiers</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-208445</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNN: U.S. suspects Iranian hand in Karbala killings of American soldiers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-208445</guid>
		<description>[...] That reference to a backlash is slightly ambiguous. A backlash among the Iranian people that will rally them to Ahmadinejad&#8217;s side? Or a backlash from Ahmadinejad himself that will lead him to do something rash that he hopes will rally the Iranian people to his side? Either way, it goes right back to the post I wrote this afternoon about how the regime&#8217;s present weakness, ironically, counsels against confronting it. Check it out if you haven&#8217;t yet, especially the excerpt from Robert Baer&#8217;s piece in Time. He&#8217;s hearing the same thing Roggio and CNN are about Iranian fingerprints in Karbala. As is the boss. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That reference to a backlash is slightly ambiguous. A backlash among the Iranian people that will rally them to Ahmadinejad&#8217;s side? Or a backlash from Ahmadinejad himself that will lead him to do something rash that he hopes will rally the Iranian people to his side? Either way, it goes right back to the post I wrote this afternoon about how the regime&#8217;s present weakness, ironically, counsels against confronting it. Check it out if you haven&#8217;t yet, especially the excerpt from Robert Baer&#8217;s piece in Time. He&#8217;s hearing the same thing Roggio and CNN are about Iranian fingerprints in Karbala. As is the boss. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-208161</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-208161</guid>
		<description>5 dead Americans at the hands of the Iranians, who killed them because we arrested 5 Iranian agents involved in terrorism.

If I were in charge, that would be 5 cruise missiles fired into 5 military target inside Iran, with the public announcement that any future interference in Iraq OR any attempt to close Hormuz OR any attempt to interfere in Gulf shipping means that all military bases in Iran and their oil producing facilities will be struck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 dead Americans at the hands of the Iranians, who killed them because we arrested 5 Iranian agents involved in terrorism.</p>
<p>If I were in charge, that would be 5 cruise missiles fired into 5 military target inside Iran, with the public announcement that any future interference in Iraq OR any attempt to close Hormuz OR any attempt to interfere in Gulf shipping means that all military bases in Iran and their oil producing facilities will be struck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonnyspats1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207751</link>
		<dc:creator>sonnyspats1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207751</guid>
		<description>Gosh-a-mighty Khomeini&#039;s book is just chock full of handy tips for the stinky,unbathed,unshaven muslim man about town. This comes from the spiritual head of state! AAAHahahahahaha....  Yeah right spiritual my a@@!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh-a-mighty Khomeini&#8217;s book is just chock full of handy tips for the stinky,unbathed,unshaven muslim man about town. This comes from the spiritual head of state! AAAHahahahahaha&#8230;.  Yeah right spiritual my a@@!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonnyspats1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207734</link>
		<dc:creator>sonnyspats1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207734</guid>
		<description>No were not thinking of fighting with Iran those three carrier groups are just on a shake down cruise. sheesh what a dumb question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No were not thinking of fighting with Iran those three carrier groups are just on a shake down cruise. sheesh what a dumb question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alden Pyle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207580</link>
		<dc:creator>Alden Pyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207580</guid>
		<description>Bloggless,

&lt;blockquote&gt;A man can have sex with animals such as sheep¹s, cows, camels and so on. However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.  
From Khomeini&#039;s book,&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Sheesh!  You&#039;d think that by now everybody would know you shouldn&#039;t sell the meat of the camel you boffed to the people in your own village, DUH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloggless,</p>
<blockquote><p>A man can have sex with animals such as sheep¹s, cows, camels and so on. However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.<br />
From Khomeini&#8217;s book,</p></blockquote>
<p>Sheesh!  You&#8217;d think that by now everybody would know you shouldn&#8217;t sell the meat of the camel you boffed to the people in your own village, DUH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloggless</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207429</link>
		<dc:creator>bloggless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207429</guid>
		<description>Will Achmendinijihad require all Iraqi&#039;s to read this book?
http://www.amcoptic.com/fatawy_islamiah/ayatollah_khomeini.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Achmendinijihad require all Iraqi&#8217;s to read this book?<br />
<a href="http://www.amcoptic.com/fatawy_islamiah/ayatollah_khomeini.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.amcoptic.com/fatawy_islamiah/ayatollah_khomeini.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Allahpundit: &#8220;The mullahs are running their country into the ground; why mess with a good thing?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207415</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Allahpundit: &#8220;The mullahs are running their country into the ground; why mess with a good thing?&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207415</guid>
		<description>[...] Allahpundit was discussing this interview between Juan Williams and the POTUS and followed up with this op-ed at the Guardian.   So why not leave them alone and let them stagger? We’re working them over at the margins. They’re already negotiating with the Saudis in Lebanon, apparently in earnest and to the dismay of Syria. Why not live and let die? Two reasons: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Allahpundit was discussing this interview between Juan Williams and the POTUS and followed up with this op-ed at the Guardian.   So why not leave them alone and let them stagger? We’re working them over at the margins. They’re already negotiating with the Saudis in Lebanon, apparently in earnest and to the dismay of Syria. Why not live and let die? Two reasons: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207393</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207393</guid>
		<description>Because of the times we live in, I&#039;m so happy that this man is the CiC, and not our other option, the honorable, smart, modest, not-at-all-narcissistic, curageous, good-looking, worldly and patriotic Mr. John Kerry.

I said CiC - Commander in Chief, and not Communicator in Chief:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I have no intent upon incur—going into Iran.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

On a very serious note, I&#039;m glad the NYT doesn&#039;t have the Iran plan, yet, little Mr. Reid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of the times we live in, I&#8217;m so happy that this man is the CiC, and not our other option, the honorable, smart, modest, not-at-all-narcissistic, curageous, good-looking, worldly and patriotic Mr. John Kerry.</p>
<p>I said CiC &#8211; Commander in Chief, and not Communicator in Chief:</p>
<blockquote><p>I have no intent upon incur—going into Iran.</p></blockquote>
<p>On a very serious note, I&#8217;m glad the NYT doesn&#8217;t have the Iran plan, yet, little Mr. Reid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207391</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The mullahs are running their country into the ground; why mess with a good thing?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Quite right. &quot;When your opponent is attempting to destroy himself, let him.&quot;

On the other hand, keep the safety off and your finger on the trigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The mullahs are running their country into the ground; why mess with a good thing?</p></blockquote>
<p>Quite right. &#8220;When your opponent is attempting to destroy himself, let him.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the other hand, keep the safety off and your finger on the trigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blacklake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207370</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacklake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207370</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how we could mount strategic airstrikes on a scale that could prevent Iran from smuggling basic insurgency material into Iraq.  That would entail, essentially, destroying all the explosives and ammunition in Iran, and that&#039;s obviously not possible.  So any sort of airstrikes against them would have to be punitive, aimed at dissuading them from interfering by imposing costs on the nation sufficiently high that, in their eyes, the rewards no longer justified the costs.  

In principle that can definitely be done; it worked against the North Vietnamese and Serbians, for example.  But with Iran I&#039;m not sure anybody&#039;s ready for that yet--particularly when you consider that it&#039;s the sort of action that could bolster the regime internally by giving it a popular rallying point.  Right now, I would think regulating the border along with internal counter-insurgency action would have the better chance of being effective on the ground in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how we could mount strategic airstrikes on a scale that could prevent Iran from smuggling basic insurgency material into Iraq.  That would entail, essentially, destroying all the explosives and ammunition in Iran, and that&#8217;s obviously not possible.  So any sort of airstrikes against them would have to be punitive, aimed at dissuading them from interfering by imposing costs on the nation sufficiently high that, in their eyes, the rewards no longer justified the costs.  </p>
<p>In principle that can definitely be done; it worked against the North Vietnamese and Serbians, for example.  But with Iran I&#8217;m not sure anybody&#8217;s ready for that yet&#8211;particularly when you consider that it&#8217;s the sort of action that could bolster the regime internally by giving it a popular rallying point.  Right now, I would think regulating the border along with internal counter-insurgency action would have the better chance of being effective on the ground in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207352</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207352</guid>
		<description>The Iranians have been trying to escalate this thing for quite some time. At least the top few idiots in charge.
With what Baer said, the escalation is drawing near. The Iranians/Ahmamadjihad do have a plan for when we take action. I just hope our spooks now what their plan is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Iranians have been trying to escalate this thing for quite some time. At least the top few idiots in charge.<br />
With what Baer said, the escalation is drawing near. The Iranians/Ahmamadjihad do have a plan for when we take action. I just hope our spooks now what their plan is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207339</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207339</guid>
		<description>pffft

By &quot;the rich&quot; I meant &quot;their leaders&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pffft</p>
<p>By &#8220;the rich&#8221; I meant &#8220;their leaders&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207290</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207290</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Romeo13 on January 30, 2007 at 5:22 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That sounds good but I believe any strike that hurts the population will backfire on us. The rich aren&#039;t harmed by oil shortages because they get theirs first.

I like the concept though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Romeo13 on January 30, 2007 at 5:22 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>That sounds good but I believe any strike that hurts the population will backfire on us. The rich aren&#8217;t harmed by oil shortages because they get theirs first.</p>
<p>I like the concept though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207241</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207241</guid>
		<description>Key here is to hit them where thay are weak.

I&#039;ve read that they have started Gas rationing... because they don&#039;t refine enough in country, and with Oil prices plummeting, can&#039;t sustain their transportation system...

Sooo... just like the WWII air campaign to take out ball bearing plants in Germany... take out their refineries... and when they rebuild? take em out again.

Minimal civilian casulties with maximumal societal pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key here is to hit them where thay are weak.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read that they have started Gas rationing&#8230; because they don&#8217;t refine enough in country, and with Oil prices plummeting, can&#8217;t sustain their transportation system&#8230;</p>
<p>Sooo&#8230; just like the WWII air campaign to take out ball bearing plants in Germany&#8230; take out their refineries&#8230; and when they rebuild? take em out again.</p>
<p>Minimal civilian casulties with maximumal societal pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalewalt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207149</link>
		<dc:creator>dalewalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207149</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;o the oil reserve fund was spent on cash handouts to the grateful poor, and the central bank, normally a bastion of prudence, was instructed to cut interest rates for small businesses.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So he&#039;s trying to buy stability for his presidency.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Blotter has a photo of that special Iranian-made IED that’s been killing so many American soldiers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And that jerk who wrote the LA Times editorial that we&#039;re overreacting tried to make the point that terrorists don&#039;t have any advanced weapons.  This IED sounds like an M1&#039;s SABOT round, and if it can really get through our thickest armor (and offense ALWAYS beats defense) then our soldiers are in even more danger.  If Pres. Bush says he won&#039;t invade, (which is probably a good thing) then how is he going to stop the influx of weapons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>o the oil reserve fund was spent on cash handouts to the grateful poor, and the central bank, normally a bastion of prudence, was instructed to cut interest rates for small businesses.</p></blockquote>
<p>So he&#8217;s trying to buy stability for his presidency.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Blotter has a photo of that special Iranian-made IED that’s been killing so many American soldiers.</p></blockquote>
<p>And that jerk who wrote the LA Times editorial that we&#8217;re overreacting tried to make the point that terrorists don&#8217;t have any advanced weapons.  This IED sounds like an M1&#8242;s SABOT round, and if it can really get through our thickest armor (and offense ALWAYS beats defense) then our soldiers are in even more danger.  If Pres. Bush says he won&#8217;t invade, (which is probably a good thing) then how is he going to stop the influx of weapons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limerick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207144</link>
		<dc:creator>Limerick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207144</guid>
		<description>can&#039;t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limerick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207139</link>
		<dc:creator>Limerick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207139</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;.”Let me put it this way,”he said.”In Basra today the currency is the Iranian toman, not the Iraqi dinar.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Chilling at best. Markets have a way of being way ahead of the politics.

Dinnerjacket wants to be the &#039;victim&#039; and I believe will welcome an attack. If GW doesn&#039;t follow the plan then he will put together something the American&#039;s can resist bombing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>.”Let me put it this way,”he said.”In Basra today the currency is the Iranian toman, not the Iraqi dinar.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Chilling at best. Markets have a way of being way ahead of the politics.</p>
<p>Dinnerjacket wants to be the &#8216;victim&#8217; and I believe will welcome an attack. If GW doesn&#8217;t follow the plan then he will put together something the American&#8217;s can resist bombing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedWinged Blackbird</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207122</link>
		<dc:creator>RedWinged Blackbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207122</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What if, to force precisely the sort of rallying point the Guardian author imagines, they attack us first? It’s far-fetched but if they reach a point where they feel the regime is in danger, what would they have to lose?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Indeed.  It&#039;s important to remember Ahmadinejad&#039;s apocalyptic perspective.  He doesn&#039;t need to win a war, nor even to survive it.  He merely needs to start it.  The Twelfth Imam will take it from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What if, to force precisely the sort of rallying point the Guardian author imagines, they attack us first? It’s far-fetched but if they reach a point where they feel the regime is in danger, what would they have to lose?</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed.  It&#8217;s important to remember Ahmadinejad&#8217;s apocalyptic perspective.  He doesn&#8217;t need to win a war, nor even to survive it.  He merely needs to start it.  The Twelfth Imam will take it from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweetlipsbutterhoney</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-207096</link>
		<dc:creator>sweetlipsbutterhoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/30/bush-hands-off-iran/#comment-207096</guid>
		<description>We should probably be looking forward to military airstrikes in Iran coming up. I&#039;m thinking precision strike on factories making the weapons that Iran is importing to Iraq. It&#039;s not like they can do any more than what they are doing. THey already send Iranian intelligence officers, IEDs, other weapons, and probably foreign insurgent fighters to Iraq to kill US and Iraqi troops. Short of full invasion, which they would lose, what more can they do to combat US forces more than they are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should probably be looking forward to military airstrikes in Iran coming up. I&#8217;m thinking precision strike on factories making the weapons that Iran is importing to Iraq. It&#8217;s not like they can do any more than what they are doing. THey already send Iranian intelligence officers, IEDs, other weapons, and probably foreign insurgent fighters to Iraq to kill US and Iraqi troops. Short of full invasion, which they would lose, what more can they do to combat US forces more than they are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
