<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hannity to air controversial scene removed from &#8220;Path to 9/11&#8243;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Path to 9-11 &#187; Blue Star Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-2735614</link>
		<dc:creator>The Path to 9-11 &#187; Blue Star Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-2735614</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air has the edited and unedited videos. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air has the edited and unedited videos. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Men and Baffled Kings &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-206342</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Men and Baffled Kings &#171; Obi&#8217;s Sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-206342</guid>
		<description>[...] The Grand Dame had, as Michelle put it, her Maalox Moment. While she snickers at veiled references to you-know-who and The Clenis, the real Evil Men were smack dab in the middle of his/their/its administration. And they continued to do their dirty work for them, afterwards. Now she&#8217;s pouting that in her vain attempt at humor, she&#8217;s being &#8220;psycho-analyzed&#8221;. Waaah Waaaah. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Grand Dame had, as Michelle put it, her Maalox Moment. While she snickers at veiled references to you-know-who and The Clenis, the real Evil Men were smack dab in the middle of his/their/its administration. And they continued to do their dirty work for them, afterwards. Now she&#8217;s pouting that in her vain attempt at humor, she&#8217;s being &#8220;psycho-analyzed&#8221;. Waaah Waaaah. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate's Cove</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-202559</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate's Cove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-202559</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Path To 9/11 Redux. Let&#8217;s Go Diving!...&lt;/strong&gt;

In case you haven&#039;t heard about it, or, been sitting on&#160;a lake drinkin&#039; and a fishin&#039; most of the day (while the leftards did their little protests on a beautiful day!), taking one&#039;s Blackjack out every once and a while, Hannity is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Path To 9/11 Redux. Let&#8217;s Go Diving!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In case you haven&#39;t heard about it, or, been sitting on&nbsp;a lake drinkin&#39; and a fishin&#39; most of the day (while the leftards did their little protests on a beautiful day!), taking one&#39;s Blackjack out every once and a while, Hannity is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmett J.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-202301</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmett J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-202301</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So Hannity has finally gone all the way over to “Fiction”. He’ll be happier there don’t ya think? 

honora on January 27, 2007 at 10:42 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You mean he had to travel to get where he lives?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Don’t be modest. “You” found him, like, 4 or 5 times, did “you” not? 

RD on January 27, 2007 at 12:06 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not to mention that CNN and Al-Jezeera seem to have him on speed dial for interviews, etc..

Just how lost can he be?

The answer is probably as lost as our government wants him to be - after all, do many of the mass here even remember him?

Mission accomplished!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So Hannity has finally gone all the way over to “Fiction”. He’ll be happier there don’t ya think? </p>
<p>honora on January 27, 2007 at 10:42 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>You mean he had to travel to get where he lives?</p>
<blockquote><p>Don’t be modest. “You” found him, like, 4 or 5 times, did “you” not? </p>
<p>RD on January 27, 2007 at 12:06 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to mention that CNN and Al-Jezeera seem to have him on speed dial for interviews, etc..</p>
<p>Just how lost can he be?</p>
<p>The answer is probably as lost as our government wants him to be &#8211; after all, do many of the mass here even remember him?</p>
<p>Mission accomplished!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpartRan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-202138</link>
		<dc:creator>SpartRan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-202138</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does that scene just piss off anyone else like it does me. We coulda got him. 

oakpack on January 26, 2007 at 3:15 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Absolutely right. What&#039;s even more maddening than the scene, however, is realizing that not only did Berger drop the ball, he also stole and destroyed classified information that was probably pretty damning - and got away with doing so - yet no one gives a damn about it. That makes me madder than hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does that scene just piss off anyone else like it does me. We coulda got him. </p>
<p>oakpack on January 26, 2007 at 3:15 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely right. What&#8217;s even more maddening than the scene, however, is realizing that not only did Berger drop the ball, he also stole and destroyed classified information that was probably pretty damning &#8211; and got away with doing so &#8211; yet no one gives a damn about it. That makes me madder than hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-202109</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-202109</guid>
		<description>Loved the last clip.  &quot;I *did not* have sexual relations with that man! ...&quot;

[shackler]
&lt;blockquote&gt;

The Republicans bungled Afghanistan. Then they bungled Iraq. Now Hannity wants to divert attention away from his party’s failures, and lay the blame with Clinton? Maybe Burger should have made the call, &lt;strong&gt;but at least we found him.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Don&#039;t be modest.  &quot;You&quot; found him, like, 4 or 5 times, did &quot;you&quot; not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the last clip.  &#8220;I *did not* have sexual relations with that man! &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>[shackler]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The Republicans bungled Afghanistan. Then they bungled Iraq. Now Hannity wants to divert attention away from his party’s failures, and lay the blame with Clinton? Maybe Burger should have made the call, <strong>but at least we found him.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t be modest.  &#8220;You&#8221; found him, like, 4 or 5 times, did &#8220;you&#8221; not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-202074</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-202074</guid>
		<description>So Hannity has finally gone all the way over to &quot;Fiction&quot;.  He&#039;ll be happier there don&#039;t ya think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Hannity has finally gone all the way over to &#8220;Fiction&#8221;.  He&#8217;ll be happier there don&#8217;t ya think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizzee</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201978</link>
		<dc:creator>lizzee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201978</guid>
		<description>Shackler has to be joking, no one could be that perverted in their thinking. Good one Shackler you actually had some of them thinking you meant what you posted. You are one of the funniest posters here, you crack me up. And I laugh at the other posters who take you serious.

right2bright on January 26, 2007 at 9:34 PM
ummm the guys a liberal, numbnutz. Perhaps you should change your name to NOT2BRIGHT! 

Soothsayer on January 27, 2007 at 12:22 AM

Sooth, I think Right was being sarcastic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shackler has to be joking, no one could be that perverted in their thinking. Good one Shackler you actually had some of them thinking you meant what you posted. You are one of the funniest posters here, you crack me up. And I laugh at the other posters who take you serious.</p>
<p>right2bright on January 26, 2007 at 9:34 PM<br />
ummm the guys a liberal, numbnutz. Perhaps you should change your name to NOT2BRIGHT! </p>
<p>Soothsayer on January 27, 2007 at 12:22 AM</p>
<p>Sooth, I think Right was being sarcastic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedBlueChristian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MUCH ADO</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201675</link>
		<dc:creator>RedBlueChristian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MUCH ADO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201675</guid>
		<description>[...] HotAir has what they think is the edited scene (see here). Hardly earth-shattering. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HotAir has what they think is the edited scene (see here). Hardly earth-shattering. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soothsayer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201600</link>
		<dc:creator>Soothsayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 05:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201600</guid>
		<description>Republicans btw are just as full of crap as the liberals are. They engage in censorship while protesting violations of the first amendment all the time. Just post something that is harsh or profane ( protected speech btw) and see just how many light years it takes to read your post. You&#039;re no better than the liberals, no better at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans btw are just as full of crap as the liberals are. They engage in censorship while protesting violations of the first amendment all the time. Just post something that is harsh or profane ( protected speech btw) and see just how many light years it takes to read your post. You&#8217;re no better than the liberals, no better at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soothsayer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201597</link>
		<dc:creator>Soothsayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 05:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201597</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Shackler has to be joking, no one could be that perverted in their thinking. Good one Shackler you actually had some of them thinking you meant what you posted. You are one of the funniest posters here, you crack me up. And I laugh at the other posters who take you serious.

right2bright on January 26, 2007 at 9:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

ummm the guys a liberal, numbnutz. Perhaps you should change your name to NOT2BRIGHT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Shackler has to be joking, no one could be that perverted in their thinking. Good one Shackler you actually had some of them thinking you meant what you posted. You are one of the funniest posters here, you crack me up. And I laugh at the other posters who take you serious.</p>
<p>right2bright on January 26, 2007 at 9:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>ummm the guys a liberal, numbnutz. Perhaps you should change your name to NOT2BRIGHT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201519</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 03:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201519</guid>
		<description>Shackler  - tool &lt;em&gt;extraordinare&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shackler  &#8211; tool <em>extraordinare</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201446</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201446</guid>
		<description>Shackler has to be joking, no one could be that perverted in their thinking.  Good one Shackler you actually had some of them thinking you meant what you posted.  You are one of the funniest posters here, you crack me up.  And I laugh at the other posters who take you serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shackler has to be joking, no one could be that perverted in their thinking.  Good one Shackler you actually had some of them thinking you meant what you posted.  You are one of the funniest posters here, you crack me up.  And I laugh at the other posters who take you serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Star Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201352</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Star Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201352</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Path to 9-11...&lt;/strong&gt;

Remember the movie The Path to 9/11? Remember that the democrats threatened ABC&#8217;s broadcast license if they aired the movie? ABC finally edited the movie so that they could air it without the part that the Clinton administration didn&#8217;t want...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Path to 9-11&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Remember the movie The Path to 9/11? Remember that the democrats threatened ABC&#8217;s broadcast license if they aired the movie? ABC finally edited the movie so that they could air it without the part that the Clinton administration didn&#8217;t want&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unedited &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hannity to air controversial scene removed from ???Path to 9/11??? - Hot Air</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201338</link>
		<dc:creator>unedited &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hannity to air controversial scene removed from ???Path to 9/11??? - Hot Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201338</guid>
		<description>[...] Fox News recorded video of the unedited scene during a January 19 speech given by ???Path??? writer-producer Cyrus Nowrasteh at California State University, &#8230; Source http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fox News recorded video of the unedited scene during a January 19 speech given by ???Path??? writer-producer Cyrus Nowrasteh at California State University, &#8230; Source <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201328</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201328</guid>
		<description>The reason for the 9/11 commission was to put the blame on Pres. Bush for the attack.  They tried to convince everyone that an obscure note that said Bin Laden wanted to attack America was all the President needed to stop the terrorists.  Well, now that &quot;truth&quot; has been challenged and Clinton and his followers can&#039;t stand it.  They feel that they should be totally absolved from all responsibility.  Well, they can&#039;t be.  There is too much evidence that the Clinton administration simply dropped the ball.  Why can&#039;t they admit that they didn&#039;t do all they could instead of trying to cover up.  People would respect that more than this game of passing the buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for the 9/11 commission was to put the blame on Pres. Bush for the attack.  They tried to convince everyone that an obscure note that said Bin Laden wanted to attack America was all the President needed to stop the terrorists.  Well, now that &#8220;truth&#8221; has been challenged and Clinton and his followers can&#8217;t stand it.  They feel that they should be totally absolved from all responsibility.  Well, they can&#8217;t be.  There is too much evidence that the Clinton administration simply dropped the ball.  Why can&#8217;t they admit that they didn&#8217;t do all they could instead of trying to cover up.  People would respect that more than this game of passing the buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201287</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201287</guid>
		<description>shackler, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070126/ap_on_re_as/afghanistan_7&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this would have been the perfect time for your &quot;leader&quot; to have acted courageously&lt;/a&gt;, if he wouldn&#039;t have been otherwise engaged at the time (clue - young, chubby woman and cigars). This could have prevented a 9/11/01 and much which followed.

To be objective, the conservative Congress would probably not have jumped with joy to sign on, but leaders with cojones (not otherwise engaged) act with or without high approval ratings or other prima donnas&#039; nudges.

But, heh, the economy was good, &#039;stupid&#039;.

Also, you can wait long before you&#039;ll ever see/hear ObL again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shackler, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070126/ap_on_re_as/afghanistan_7" rel="nofollow">this would have been the perfect time for your &#8220;leader&#8221; to have acted courageously</a>, if he wouldn&#8217;t have been otherwise engaged at the time (clue &#8211; young, chubby woman and cigars). This could have prevented a 9/11/01 and much which followed.</p>
<p>To be objective, the conservative Congress would probably not have jumped with joy to sign on, but leaders with cojones (not otherwise engaged) act with or without high approval ratings or other prima donnas&#8217; nudges.</p>
<p>But, heh, the economy was good, &#8216;stupid&#8217;.</p>
<p>Also, you can wait long before you&#8217;ll ever see/hear ObL again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golfer_75093</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201263</link>
		<dc:creator>Golfer_75093</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201263</guid>
		<description>No, there aren&#039;t any &quot;men&quot; left in Washington.  Anyone can tell that by the fact that last year we lost 826 military people &lt;strong&gt;fighting a war&lt;/strong&gt; and the leaders in Washington and the MSM are going ape over the troop surge.  What would have happened on DDAY in WWII with these same leaders?  I suspect the white flag of surrender would have been raised.

God help us all with these elected wimps.  To hell with them &quot;Surge George Surge&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, there aren&#8217;t any &#8220;men&#8221; left in Washington.  Anyone can tell that by the fact that last year we lost 826 military people <strong>fighting a war</strong> and the leaders in Washington and the MSM are going ape over the troop surge.  What would have happened on DDAY in WWII with these same leaders?  I suspect the white flag of surrender would have been raised.</p>
<p>God help us all with these elected wimps.  To hell with them &#8220;Surge George Surge&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fogw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201234</link>
		<dc:creator>fogw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201234</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;shackler on January 26, 2007 at 3:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Please enlighten us and identify the &quot;Democrat who found Bin Laden&quot;.  Who did we send in, the Congressional Black Caucus Brigade or Kerry&#039;s Swiftboat Commandos, 101st Land Battalion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>shackler on January 26, 2007 at 3:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Please enlighten us and identify the &#8220;Democrat who found Bin Laden&#8221;.  Who did we send in, the Congressional Black Caucus Brigade or Kerry&#8217;s Swiftboat Commandos, 101st Land Battalion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jummy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201206</link>
		<dc:creator>jummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201206</guid>
		<description>well the troll is there. it&#039;s up to y&#039;all to refute the twin lies that &quot;we trained obl&quot; and &quot;we armed saddam&quot;. nobody ever seems to confront trolls on these points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well the troll is there. it&#8217;s up to y&#8217;all to refute the twin lies that &#8220;we trained obl&#8221; and &#8220;we armed saddam&#8221;. nobody ever seems to confront trolls on these points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201199</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201199</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;shackler on January 26, 2007 at 3:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, shackles, you aggressive, warmongering libs - stop with the overkill.  All you do is violate everyone&#039;s civil liberties.  If you all had been in charge in Afghanistan, it would now be a parking lot - thank God you all weren&#039;t.

Also, I recall many of the lib lawmakers talking in very hawkish tones in the years leading up to the Iraq invasion.  I remember that war veteran Kerry spewing on about how that Hussein guy had to be stopped.  I also recall Hillary acting very Thatcheresque - it scared me.  I knew that cooler heads needed to prevail.  Hearing all those Dems talk, I was afraid the entire Middle East was about to meet its demise.  Thank God the less aggressive Repubs were in the White House.  

You are scaring me with all that Dem military mumbo jumbo - go to some other hardcore military website, like DU or Hufpo, to spew that kind of hate.  Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>shackler on January 26, 2007 at 3:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, shackles, you aggressive, warmongering libs &#8211; stop with the overkill.  All you do is violate everyone&#8217;s civil liberties.  If you all had been in charge in Afghanistan, it would now be a parking lot &#8211; thank God you all weren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Also, I recall many of the lib lawmakers talking in very hawkish tones in the years leading up to the Iraq invasion.  I remember that war veteran Kerry spewing on about how that Hussein guy had to be stopped.  I also recall Hillary acting very Thatcheresque &#8211; it scared me.  I knew that cooler heads needed to prevail.  Hearing all those Dems talk, I was afraid the entire Middle East was about to meet its demise.  Thank God the less aggressive Repubs were in the White House.  </p>
<p>You are scaring me with all that Dem military mumbo jumbo &#8211; go to some other hardcore military website, like DU or Hufpo, to spew that kind of hate.  Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R D</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201095</link>
		<dc:creator>R D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201095</guid>
		<description>*sniff* *sniff* *sniff* Yep, the foul stench of a LLL troll is around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sniff* *sniff* *sniff* Yep, the foul stench of a LLL troll is around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oakpack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201057</link>
		<dc:creator>oakpack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201057</guid>
		<description>Does that scene just piss off anyone else like it does me. We coulda got him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that scene just piss off anyone else like it does me. We coulda got him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201052</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201052</guid>
		<description>Did they find that missing footage under a trailer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they find that missing footage under a trailer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shackler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/comment-page-1/#comment-201051</link>
		<dc:creator>shackler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/26/hannity-to-air-controversial-scene-removed-from-path-to-911/#comment-201051</guid>
		<description>Okay, the Democrats were able to find him. For that matter, they could have bombed him if they wanted. With what? A couple guys in the mountains and a plane overhead. The Republicans send the United States military, and they STILL couldn&#039;t find him. I think that is playing heavy on Hannity&#039;s conscience. The Republicans bungled Afghanistan. Then they bungled Iraq. Now Hannity wants to divert attention away from his party&#039;s failures, and lay the blame with Clinton? Maybe Burger should have made the call, but at least we found him. The best you republicans have is Saddamm. Not much of an international terrorist, is he? 
ps-I find it intersting that the new secretary of defense was the guy in charge when the CIA trained and armed Osama. Kinda like when Rumsfeld gave Saddamm his WMD. I have always said, &quot;Conservatives are bad for America.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, the Democrats were able to find him. For that matter, they could have bombed him if they wanted. With what? A couple guys in the mountains and a plane overhead. The Republicans send the United States military, and they STILL couldn&#8217;t find him. I think that is playing heavy on Hannity&#8217;s conscience. The Republicans bungled Afghanistan. Then they bungled Iraq. Now Hannity wants to divert attention away from his party&#8217;s failures, and lay the blame with Clinton? Maybe Burger should have made the call, but at least we found him. The best you republicans have is Saddamm. Not much of an international terrorist, is he?<br />
ps-I find it intersting that the new secretary of defense was the guy in charge when the CIA trained and armed Osama. Kinda like when Rumsfeld gave Saddamm his WMD. I have always said, &#8220;Conservatives are bad for America.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
