<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollyweird sez no to Hillary, yes to Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-200268</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-200268</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Holding fundraisers with people who have lots of money. 

What were they thinking???? 

honora on January 25, 2007 at 10:20 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Like I was saying, the party of the blue collar/little guy/poor minorities holding high dollar fundraisers (where said supporters don&#039;t have a chance in hell to set foot in the door).  

The point, honora, is that the Dems are a party full of elitist snobs that don&#039;t see themselves as part of the &quot;collective&quot; (or peasants).  Tell the peasants what they want to hear - that way, they vote for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Holding fundraisers with people who have lots of money. </p>
<p>What were they thinking???? </p>
<p>honora on January 25, 2007 at 10:20 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Like I was saying, the party of the blue collar/little guy/poor minorities holding high dollar fundraisers (where said supporters don&#8217;t have a chance in hell to set foot in the door).  </p>
<p>The point, honora, is that the Dems are a party full of elitist snobs that don&#8217;t see themselves as part of the &#8220;collective&#8221; (or peasants).  Tell the peasants what they want to hear &#8211; that way, they vote for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen the Neocon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-199681</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen the Neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-199681</guid>
		<description>What were they thinking, honora?
Why they&#039;re thinking they wanna control all those &quot;little people out there in the dark!&quot;
They try to control our minds, thoughts and desires with their loathesome movies and if they can get their &quot;boy&quot; (or girl) in the White House, even better, although Obama and Hillary are going to need to a lot more than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What were they thinking, honora?<br />
Why they&#8217;re thinking they wanna control all those &#8220;little people out there in the dark!&#8221;<br />
They try to control our minds, thoughts and desires with their loathesome movies and if they can get their &#8220;boy&#8221; (or girl) in the White House, even better, although Obama and Hillary are going to need to a lot more than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-199335</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-199335</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s nice to see the party of the middle class/working man/underprivileged holding such fundraising events for it’s supporters. 

Rick on January 25, 2007 at 12:56 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Holding fundraisers with people who have lots of money. 
 
&lt;em&gt; What were they thinking????&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s nice to see the party of the middle class/working man/underprivileged holding such fundraising events for it’s supporters. </p>
<p>Rick on January 25, 2007 at 12:56 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Holding fundraisers with people who have lots of money. </p>
<p><em> What were they thinking????</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198987</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198987</guid>
		<description>Is this the moment when Dorthoy throws water on the Witch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the moment when Dorthoy throws water on the Witch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmett J.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198883</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmett J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198883</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ekuspa40 on January 24, 2007 at 11:19 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Then again, they &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; make the mistake of hiring one of the &lt;em&gt;few&lt;/em&gt; bands who are &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;older&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; than they are and expecting younger folks to attend.

Heck, in Hollywood, etc. even the middle aged are trying to act (and look) like teeny-boppers! Which for some is sort of hard when you have Keith Richards syndrome going for you facially.

And then there is that &quot;small&quot; matter of price.

Wait until this time - I&#039;ll bet the bands are younger (and hipper), the prices (depending on where the fund-raiser is held) lower, and the winning act of Hillabama sweeping first place.

At least out of the convention.

Then again, &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; is possible in Hollywood!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ekuspa40 on January 24, 2007 at 11:19 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Then again, they <strong><em>did</em></strong> make the mistake of hiring one of the <em>few</em> bands who are <strong><em>older</em></strong> than they are and expecting younger folks to attend.</p>
<p>Heck, in Hollywood, etc. even the middle aged are trying to act (and look) like teeny-boppers! Which for some is sort of hard when you have Keith Richards syndrome going for you facially.</p>
<p>And then there is that &#8220;small&#8221; matter of price.</p>
<p>Wait until this time &#8211; I&#8217;ll bet the bands are younger (and hipper), the prices (depending on where the fund-raiser is held) lower, and the winning act of Hillabama sweeping first place.</p>
<p>At least out of the convention.</p>
<p>Then again, <em>anything</em> is possible in Hollywood!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198850</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198850</guid>
		<description>Heh, this trio will give to all who come to Hollywood. It&#039;s early. They&#039;re covering all bases.

Just back from a bus. trip to Hollywood. What a strange place. The hotels of many stars don&#039;t even have C-Span or Fox, only CNN and the alphabets, even though they do have cable...all non-leftie numbers blocked out. The other half can suffer, but pay the high prizes nonetheless. Therefore, the before/after SotU commentaries were insufferable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, this trio will give to all who come to Hollywood. It&#8217;s early. They&#8217;re covering all bases.</p>
<p>Just back from a bus. trip to Hollywood. What a strange place. The hotels of many stars don&#8217;t even have C-Span or Fox, only CNN and the alphabets, even though they do have cable&#8230;all non-leftie numbers blocked out. The other half can suffer, but pay the high prizes nonetheless. Therefore, the before/after SotU commentaries were insufferable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198845</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198845</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to see the party of the middle class/working man/underprivileged holding such fundraising events for it&#039;s supporters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to see the party of the middle class/working man/underprivileged holding such fundraising events for it&#8217;s supporters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hadsil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198806</link>
		<dc:creator>hadsil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198806</guid>
		<description>I read there&#039;s a new sit-com in the works starring Patricia Heaton and Kelsey Grammer.  Because they are big name stars high salary assumption was hypothesized.  The article didn&#039;t say it would ruin the show, just an observation it would be expensive.

Question: Can two Republicans share a show together and not drive Hollywood crazy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read there&#8217;s a new sit-com in the works starring Patricia Heaton and Kelsey Grammer.  Because they are big name stars high salary assumption was hypothesized.  The article didn&#8217;t say it would ruin the show, just an observation it would be expensive.</p>
<p>Question: Can two Republicans share a show together and not drive Hollywood crazy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198799</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198799</guid>
		<description>I was busy getting drunk Election Night (and I do have a couple of stories about that; get me a few Sam Adams or Heinekens and I might tell them).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was busy getting drunk Election Night (and I do have a couple of stories about that; get me a few Sam Adams or Heinekens and I might tell them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198794</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198794</guid>
		<description>They don&#039;t think they need the triangulation of Clinton. If you watched MSNBC on election night you would have heard Matthews and Olberdouche talking about how the Dem&#039;s victory was a signal to veer hard to the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t think they need the triangulation of Clinton. If you watched MSNBC on election night you would have heard Matthews and Olberdouche talking about how the Dem&#8217;s victory was a signal to veer hard to the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198782</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198782</guid>
		<description>Getting back to the serious, I&#039;m actually starting to believe the Dems no longer believe they need the triangulation of Clinton to make 2008 their year.  Never mind that it was the male half of that team that was the master triangulator.  Never mind that, without the new &quot;moderate&quot; &#039;Rats (who, without exception, made that expected hard turn left upon arriving in DC), they wouldn&#039;t officially have the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting back to the serious, I&#8217;m actually starting to believe the Dems no longer believe they need the triangulation of Clinton to make 2008 their year.  Never mind that it was the male half of that team that was the master triangulator.  Never mind that, without the new &#8220;moderate&#8221; &#8216;Rats (who, without exception, made that expected hard turn left upon arriving in DC), they wouldn&#8217;t officially have the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberCipher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198774</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberCipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198774</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What? This Obama guy is black? When was somebody going to tell me?!? 

JoeEgo on January 24, 2007 at 10:49 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Very funny. Half black actually. Sorta&#039; like HillBillary (according to the SNL skit).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What? This Obama guy is black? When was somebody going to tell me?!? </p>
<p>JoeEgo on January 24, 2007 at 10:49 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Very funny. Half black actually. Sorta&#8217; like HillBillary (according to the SNL skit).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ekuspa40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198768</link>
		<dc:creator>ekuspa40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198768</guid>
		<description>Ok, my link did not come up. sorry.
remember the birthday bash for Bill that went bust? here&#039;s a snipit from the article.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Wife Hillary and daughter Chelsea sent out about 10,000 invitations to Hollywood tycoons, movie stars, captains of industry and Wall Street - with all proceeds to go to the former President&#039;s charitable foundation.

Those who pledged the top price were promised the &#039;Birthday Chair Package&#039;, with the best seating for the concert as well as a chance to have photographs taken with Mr Clinton during a round of golf and a three-day series of cocktail, brunch and dinner parties.

The minimum price, with inferior concert seats and no brunch, was set at $60,000 (£31,000). But with many rich Democrats sending their regrets, The Mail on Sunday can reveal that last Wednesday the Clintons drastically slashed prices to $12,500 (£6,500) for one reception and the concert, or $5,000 (£2,600) for just the Stones.

With the looming possibility of Bill and his long-suffering wife and daughter finding themselves amid a sea of empty chairs at the 2,900-seat Manhattan venue, tickets then went on sale to the public for as little as $1,710 (£900). &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, my link did not come up. sorry.<br />
remember the birthday bash for Bill that went bust? here&#8217;s a snipit from the article.</p>
<blockquote><p>Wife Hillary and daughter Chelsea sent out about 10,000 invitations to Hollywood tycoons, movie stars, captains of industry and Wall Street &#8211; with all proceeds to go to the former President&#8217;s charitable foundation.</p>
<p>Those who pledged the top price were promised the &#8216;Birthday Chair Package&#8217;, with the best seating for the concert as well as a chance to have photographs taken with Mr Clinton during a round of golf and a three-day series of cocktail, brunch and dinner parties.</p>
<p>The minimum price, with inferior concert seats and no brunch, was set at $60,000 (£31,000). But with many rich Democrats sending their regrets, The Mail on Sunday can reveal that last Wednesday the Clintons drastically slashed prices to $12,500 (£6,500) for one reception and the concert, or $5,000 (£2,600) for just the Stones.</p>
<p>With the looming possibility of Bill and his long-suffering wife and daughter finding themselves amid a sea of empty chairs at the 2,900-seat Manhattan venue, tickets then went on sale to the public for as little as $1,710 (£900). </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ekuspa40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198762</link>
		<dc:creator>ekuspa40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198762</guid>
		<description>Remember this. Priceless.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=413214&amp;in_page_id=1770&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember this. Priceless.<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=413214&amp;in_page_id=1770" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198755</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198755</guid>
		<description>Benthoven, that&#039;s an image I could have done without.  &quot;Legs&quot; and Hiliary don&#039;t belong in the same sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benthoven, that&#8217;s an image I could have done without.  &#8220;Legs&#8221; and Hiliary don&#8217;t belong in the same sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benthoven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198747</link>
		<dc:creator>Benthoven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198747</guid>
		<description>On a seriouser note.

The Hollywood star-making machine is notorious for turning their backs on such &quot;has-been&quot; celebs like Hillary - sooo yesterday&#039;s news, you know.  

But Obama, this hot, young, new star&#039;s career has &quot;legs&quot; that Hillary can only envy from afar. Plus with his history of  recreational drug use, he&#039;s so much more &quot;one of them&quot; than Hillary &quot;open marriage&quot; Clinton could ever be. Besides, she voted FOR the war, you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a seriouser note.</p>
<p>The Hollywood star-making machine is notorious for turning their backs on such &#8220;has-been&#8221; celebs like Hillary &#8211; sooo yesterday&#8217;s news, you know.  </p>
<p>But Obama, this hot, young, new star&#8217;s career has &#8220;legs&#8221; that Hillary can only envy from afar. Plus with his history of  recreational drug use, he&#8217;s so much more &#8220;one of them&#8221; than Hillary &#8220;open marriage&#8221; Clinton could ever be. Besides, she voted FOR the war, you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeEgo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198737</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeEgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198737</guid>
		<description>What?  This Obama guy is &lt;em&gt;black&lt;/em&gt;?  When was somebody going to tell me?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?  This Obama guy is <em>black</em>?  When was somebody going to tell me?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedecider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198736</link>
		<dc:creator>thedecider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198736</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;By my actual spreadsheet calculation, she’s blinked about 86,400 times since last night&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

No kidding.  I shall call her &quot;Blinker of the House&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>By my actual spreadsheet calculation, she’s blinked about 86,400 times since last night</p></blockquote>
<p>No kidding.  I shall call her &#8220;Blinker of the House&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benthoven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198735</link>
		<dc:creator>Benthoven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198735</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is Nanny Pelosi still blinking?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

By my actual spreadsheet calculation, she&#039;s blinked about 86,400 times since last night (allowing 6 hrs of sleep.) By comparison, Cheney has only blinked 4,320 times. 

I only report. You can decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is Nanny Pelosi still blinking?</p></blockquote>
<p>By my actual spreadsheet calculation, she&#8217;s blinked about 86,400 times since last night (allowing 6 hrs of sleep.) By comparison, Cheney has only blinked 4,320 times. </p>
<p>I only report. You can decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedecider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198725</link>
		<dc:creator>thedecider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198725</guid>
		<description>Sweet.  First we see SNL mocking her, now Hollyweird takes over.  Looks like a lefty trend to me.  It was Hollyweird that helped Billy Jeff get in the White House which makes this all very ironic.  I can&#039;t wait to see Shrillary and Obama in a grudge match.  It will wind up making the Republican candidate so much more appealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet.  First we see SNL mocking her, now Hollyweird takes over.  Looks like a lefty trend to me.  It was Hollyweird that helped Billy Jeff get in the White House which makes this all very ironic.  I can&#8217;t wait to see Shrillary and Obama in a grudge match.  It will wind up making the Republican candidate so much more appealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labamigo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198724</link>
		<dc:creator>Labamigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198724</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For $2,300 a person and $4600 a couple&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Someone enlighten me . . . where did they get those weird amounts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For $2,300 a person and $4600 a couple</p></blockquote>
<p>Someone enlighten me . . . where did they get those weird amounts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmett J.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198717</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmett J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198717</guid>
		<description>Barack is still the &quot;flavor of the month&quot;.

Come convention time, it will be Hillary getting the nomination with Barack as the running mate (pun unintended).

It will be the best of all worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack is still the &#8220;flavor of the month&#8221;.</p>
<p>Come convention time, it will be Hillary getting the nomination with Barack as the running mate (pun unintended).</p>
<p>It will be the best of all worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kid from Brooklyn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198712</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid from Brooklyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198712</guid>
		<description>Note that Wes Clark didn&#039;t say a peep about the California Money People.  As they say in my parents&#039; homeland, &quot;the monkey knows the tree it climbs&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that Wes Clark didn&#8217;t say a peep about the California Money People.  As they say in my parents&#8217; homeland, &#8220;the monkey knows the tree it climbs&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Say It Aint So: Hillary&#8217;s Hollywood Friends Switch Sides</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198705</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Say It Aint So: Hillary&#8217;s Hollywood Friends Switch Sides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198705</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out what Ian has to say  Bookmark to:     Tags: Steven, Spielberg, , , David, Geffen, , , Jeffrey, Katzenberg, , Campaign, 08\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\&#039;, , Democrats, , Obama, , dumping-hillary, , Follywood [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out what Ian has to say  Bookmark to:     Tags: Steven, Spielberg, , , David, Geffen, , , Jeffrey, Katzenberg, , Campaign, 08\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\&#8217;, , Democrats, , Obama, , dumping-hillary, , Follywood [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shermacman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-198698</link>
		<dc:creator>shermacman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/24/hollyweird-sez-no-to-hillary-yes-to-obama/#comment-198698</guid>
		<description>Sit back, crack a beer, enjoy the show!
Is Nanny Pelosi still blinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sit back, crack a beer, enjoy the show!<br />
Is Nanny Pelosi still blinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
