<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Dan Riehl versus Mike Stark on &#8220;Reliable Sources&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194421</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194421</guid>
		<description>Strangest segment, when Stark said that he and Mr. Kurtz are the &quot;reasonable&quot; people. 

Mr. Kurtz said that the &quot;woman drank something like 7 gallons of water&quot;. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Jennifer Lea Strange, 28, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/108430.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;drank nearly two gallons of water -- 224 ounces &lt;/a&gt;-- at the radio station over three hours, according to a contestant who drank one fewer bottle of water.

Strange was found dead in her home about five hours later.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strangest segment, when Stark said that he and Mr. Kurtz are the &#8220;reasonable&#8221; people. </p>
<p>Mr. Kurtz said that the &#8220;woman drank something like 7 gallons of water&#8221;. </p>
<blockquote><p>Jennifer Lea Strange, 28, <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/108430.html" rel="nofollow">drank nearly two gallons of water &#8212; 224 ounces </a>&#8211; at the radio station over three hours, according to a contestant who drank one fewer bottle of water.</p>
<p>Strange was found dead in her home about five hours later.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194343</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194343</guid>
		<description>He can&#039;t figure out who Spocko is but he could come up with a list of gay republicans that are closeted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He can&#8217;t figure out who Spocko is but he could come up with a list of gay republicans that are closeted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spmat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194253</link>
		<dc:creator>spmat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194253</guid>
		<description>Eliminationist rhetoric? The left has been fantasizing about killing conservatives and Republicans for the past 6 years, and they want to preach about eliminationist rhetoric?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliminationist rhetoric? The left has been fantasizing about killing conservatives and Republicans for the past 6 years, and they want to preach about eliminationist rhetoric?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinionnation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194219</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinionnation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194219</guid>
		<description>Stark looked so proud to be an idiot who holds up little signs talking about ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stark looked so proud to be an idiot who holds up little signs talking about ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog-o-Fascists</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194195</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog-o-Fascists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194195</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Marg ... inalized Stark: He Don&#039;t Beat Down, He Beats ......&lt;/strong&gt;

Riehl World View

Naturally there&#039;s bound to be a hometown team effect regarding reactions to Mike Stark and I appearing together today on CNN&#039;s Reliable Sources. Frankly, I&#039;d have liked a little more time for rebuttal, but such is life. Kurtz was w...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Marg &#8230; inalized Stark: He Don&#8217;t Beat Down, He Beats &#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Riehl World View</p>
<p>Naturally there&#8217;s bound to be a hometown team effect regarding reactions to Mike Stark and I appearing together today on CNN&#8217;s Reliable Sources. Frankly, I&#8217;d have liked a little more time for rebuttal, but such is life. Kurtz was w&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill's Bites</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194143</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill's Bites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194143</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Video: Dan Riehl versus Mike Stark on “Reliable Sources”...&lt;/strong&gt;

Video: Dan Riehl versus Mike Stark on “Reliable Sources”Allahpundit Kurtz did a good job with the intro so I won’t bother with background. You might remember “guerrilla tactics” aficionado Stark from Campaign ‘06, where he shoved his way pa...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Video: Dan Riehl versus Mike Stark on “Reliable Sources”&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Video: Dan Riehl versus Mike Stark on “Reliable Sources”Allahpundit Kurtz did a good job with the intro so I won’t bother with background. You might remember “guerrilla tactics” aficionado Stark from Campaign ‘06, where he shoved his way pa&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Angry Christian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194109</link>
		<dc:creator>One Angry Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194109</guid>
		<description>The longer this goes on the more dangerous the left becomes. It&#039;s amazing to me that they&#039;re openly calling for the destruction of the First amendment while that&#039;s what they use to spew all kinds of henious hatred. 

Free speech ... so long as you&#039;re liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The longer this goes on the more dangerous the left becomes. It&#8217;s amazing to me that they&#8217;re openly calling for the destruction of the First amendment while that&#8217;s what they use to spew all kinds of henious hatred. </p>
<p>Free speech &#8230; so long as you&#8217;re liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194106</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194106</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mike Stark sucks ass.&quot;  Too bad that banner wasn&#039;t up whenever Start was on camera.  It would have served him right.

He likes to dish it out, but he doesn&#039;t like to take it.

Riehl had it right when he wrote: &quot;never send a guy who looks and sounds like he beats off to do a beat down.&quot;

Okay, I&#039;m off the watch DA-BEARS beat the Saints.  ;^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mike Stark sucks ass.&#8221;  Too bad that banner wasn&#8217;t up whenever Start was on camera.  It would have served him right.</p>
<p>He likes to dish it out, but he doesn&#8217;t like to take it.</p>
<p>Riehl had it right when he wrote: &#8220;never send a guy who looks and sounds like he beats off to do a beat down.&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m off the watch DA-BEARS beat the Saints.  ;^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William2006</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194100</link>
		<dc:creator>William2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194100</guid>
		<description>&quot;...reasonable people like you and me.&quot;

What?

Stark, 

What kind of &quot;reasoning&quot; are you referring to that makes you &quot;reasonable&quot; and superior to those whose speech you either disagree with, or you distort, fabricate, and misrepresent then disagree with your new, abridged, or altered version?

Also, Stark, you say that the content of the sign you were carrying that stated &quot;Hannity sucks ass&quot; is true.  How do you know that it is true?

Did Hannity suck your ass?

Did Hannity suck anyone&#039;s ass?

Whose ass did Hannity suck?

If you cannot prove your claim, then is that because you are lying and Hannity does not suck ass?&quot;

If you just made it up and it is not true that &quot;Hannity sucks ass&quot; tnen you lied.  If you did lie, and it appears that you did, and Hannity does not suck ass, then are you going to come out and admit that it is not true and that you lied and that Hannity does not suck ass?

This whole he said something I find offensive, she said something I find offensive trash talk is nuts!  The conservatives who make outrageous statements put their own foot in their mouth and they must pay the consequence of their actions.  We don&#039;t need to defend them.

Nevertheless, the leftists DO get a free pass on outrageous comments and actions, including the absurd call to mob action to go and kill Conservative congressmen, the absurd call to assassinate the president, the absurd call to US military personnel blow up and murder their own commanding officers, and so on.

The left, fifth columnists get a free pass on these absurd, vile, malicious calls to violent, indecent behavior.


William</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;reasonable people like you and me.&#8221;</p>
<p>What?</p>
<p>Stark, </p>
<p>What kind of &#8220;reasoning&#8221; are you referring to that makes you &#8220;reasonable&#8221; and superior to those whose speech you either disagree with, or you distort, fabricate, and misrepresent then disagree with your new, abridged, or altered version?</p>
<p>Also, Stark, you say that the content of the sign you were carrying that stated &#8220;Hannity sucks ass&#8221; is true.  How do you know that it is true?</p>
<p>Did Hannity suck your ass?</p>
<p>Did Hannity suck anyone&#8217;s ass?</p>
<p>Whose ass did Hannity suck?</p>
<p>If you cannot prove your claim, then is that because you are lying and Hannity does not suck ass?&#8221;</p>
<p>If you just made it up and it is not true that &#8220;Hannity sucks ass&#8221; tnen you lied.  If you did lie, and it appears that you did, and Hannity does not suck ass, then are you going to come out and admit that it is not true and that you lied and that Hannity does not suck ass?</p>
<p>This whole he said something I find offensive, she said something I find offensive trash talk is nuts!  The conservatives who make outrageous statements put their own foot in their mouth and they must pay the consequence of their actions.  We don&#8217;t need to defend them.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the leftists DO get a free pass on outrageous comments and actions, including the absurd call to mob action to go and kill Conservative congressmen, the absurd call to assassinate the president, the absurd call to US military personnel blow up and murder their own commanding officers, and so on.</p>
<p>The left, fifth columnists get a free pass on these absurd, vile, malicious calls to violent, indecent behavior.</p>
<p>William</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riehl World View</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194084</link>
		<dc:creator>Riehl World View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194084</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Marg ... inalized Stark: He Don&#039;t Beat Down, He Beats ......&lt;/strong&gt;

Naturally there&#039;s bound to be a hometown team effect regarding reactions to Mike Stark and I appearing together today on CNN&#039;s Reliable Sources. Frankly, I&#039;d have liked a little more time for rebuttal, but such is life. Kurtz was working...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Marg &#8230; inalized Stark: He Don&#8217;t Beat Down, He Beats &#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Naturally there&#8217;s bound to be a hometown team effect regarding reactions to Mike Stark and I appearing together today on CNN&#8217;s Reliable Sources. Frankly, I&#8217;d have liked a little more time for rebuttal, but such is life. Kurtz was working&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbz123</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194059</link>
		<dc:creator>bbz123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194059</guid>
		<description>Notice the projection of &quot; let these people keep talking so that all of America can see how unhinged they are&quot;
I am sure that you could find a few unhinged people in any given group,however if you look at the sheer volume of wacky left-wing rants, and the spectrum of them, one might come to certain conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice the projection of &#8221; let these people keep talking so that all of America can see how unhinged they are&#8221;<br />
I am sure that you could find a few unhinged people in any given group,however if you look at the sheer volume of wacky left-wing rants, and the spectrum of them, one might come to certain conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jones Zemkophill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194054</link>
		<dc:creator>Jones Zemkophill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194054</guid>
		<description>wow...

How can I describe this?

Mike Stark Came off as, Wormy? (glances through thesaurus)

Fawning? Smarmy? Snively? Sycophantic?

Smarmy....

Yes, that&#039;s the one. He combined being hypocritical with sucking up to the host so blatantly that the host actually remarked about it.

Smarmy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;</p>
<p>How can I describe this?</p>
<p>Mike Stark Came off as, Wormy? (glances through thesaurus)</p>
<p>Fawning? Smarmy? Snively? Sycophantic?</p>
<p>Smarmy&#8230;.</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s the one. He combined being hypocritical with sucking up to the host so blatantly that the host actually remarked about it.</p>
<p>Smarmy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah &#187; New Fox News promos (UPDATED)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194047</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah &#187; New Fox News promos (UPDATED)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194047</guid>
		<description>[...] Update:  Here&#8217;s the video (hat tip: Allah): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update:  Here&#8217;s the video (hat tip: Allah): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy70</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-194044</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/21/video-dan-riehl-versus-mike-stark-on-reliable-sources/#comment-194044</guid>
		<description>Mike was hard to watch with all his stumbling and bumbling his way through the whole segment. He just repeated the question and tried to sound intelligent, but came off like a Freshman down at the local coffee house expounding (see, I know some $10 words, too) on subjects he knows nothing about. Please. Whining about conservative speech is so 90&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike was hard to watch with all his stumbling and bumbling his way through the whole segment. He just repeated the question and tried to sound intelligent, but came off like a Freshman down at the local coffee house expounding (see, I know some $10 words, too) on subjects he knows nothing about. Please. Whining about conservative speech is so 90&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
