<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Venezuela set to let Chavez rule by decree for 18 months</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:31:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chavez to United States: &#8216;Go to Hell!&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-194365</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chavez to United States: &#8216;Go to Hell!&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-194365</guid>
		<description>[...] Can you guess what I wanted him to do to himself? As Allah said, &#8220;He’s got important stuff he needs to do, like confiscating people’s businesses and repealing the presidential term-limits law.&#8221;  Keep in mind that he will be able to get away with this because Venezuela&#8217;s political opposition has no representation in the National Assembly since it boycotted elections in 2005.  Chavez says an Enabling Law is a key step in what he calls an accelerating march toward socialism.  He has said he wants to see major Venezuelan power and telecoms companies come under state control, as well as scrap limits on the terms a president can serve. .  Mr Chavez also called for an end to foreign ownership of lucrative crude oil refineries in the Orinoco region.   So when the State Department voiced some concerns about this plan,  Chavez reacted to our concerns by saying: &#8220;Go to hell, gringos! Go home!&#8221; In typical style, Chavez spoke for hours Sunday during his first appearance on the weekly program in five months. He sent his best wishes to the ailing Cuban leader Fidel Castro, his close ally and friend who has been sidelined since intestinal surgery last summer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Can you guess what I wanted him to do to himself? As Allah said, &#8220;He’s got important stuff he needs to do, like confiscating people’s businesses and repealing the presidential term-limits law.&#8221;  Keep in mind that he will be able to get away with this because Venezuela&#8217;s political opposition has no representation in the National Assembly since it boycotted elections in 2005.  Chavez says an Enabling Law is a key step in what he calls an accelerating march toward socialism.  He has said he wants to see major Venezuelan power and telecoms companies come under state control, as well as scrap limits on the terms a president can serve. .  Mr Chavez also called for an end to foreign ownership of lucrative crude oil refineries in the Orinoco region.   So when the State Department voiced some concerns about this plan,  Chavez reacted to our concerns by saying: &#8220;Go to hell, gringos! Go home!&#8221; In typical style, Chavez spoke for hours Sunday during his first appearance on the weekly program in five months. He sent his best wishes to the ailing Cuban leader Fidel Castro, his close ally and friend who has been sidelined since intestinal surgery last summer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-193117</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-193117</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Venezuela set to let Chavez rule by decree for 18 months&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Guess somebody is predicting Chavez&#039;s overthrow in the near future, because that is the only way that it will only be an 18-month absolute dictatorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Venezuela set to let Chavez rule by decree for 18 months</p></blockquote>
<p>Guess somebody is predicting Chavez&#8217;s overthrow in the near future, because that is the only way that it will only be an 18-month absolute dictatorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k2comp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-192750</link>
		<dc:creator>k2comp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-192750</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Potemkin’s Village with the willfully blind
Catherine the Great and Stalin would be proud 

Defector01 on January 19, 2007 at 12:21 PM

I&#039;m not too sure that Catherine the Great would be proud.  She was after all hoodwinked by  Grigori Aleksandrovich Potemkin, her commander in the Crimea, while on a tour of her newly won southern provinces.  Now HE would be proud!&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Potemkin’s Village with the willfully blind<br />
Catherine the Great and Stalin would be proud </p>
<p>Defector01 on January 19, 2007 at 12:21 PM</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not too sure that Catherine the Great would be proud.  She was after all hoodwinked by  Grigori Aleksandrovich Potemkin, her commander in the Crimea, while on a tour of her newly won southern provinces.  Now HE would be proud!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R D</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-192551</link>
		<dc:creator>R D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-192551</guid>
		<description>OK. I&#039;ll clean that up. Those two are poster children for birth control. Sheehan looks mentally challenged with her thumb in the air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. I&#8217;ll clean that up. Those two are poster children for birth control. Sheehan looks mentally challenged with her thumb in the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-192501</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-192501</guid>
		<description>AZ_Redneck, I&#039;m pretty Libertarian and also have my issues with our form of government, but I haven&#039;t found a better one yet. 

I&#039;m almost certain that you didn&#039;t intend to argue that it&#039;s better now in Venezuela, and Nirvana is not here in the U.S. either. Maybe the dems will bring it to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AZ_Redneck, I&#8217;m pretty Libertarian and also have my issues with our form of government, but I haven&#8217;t found a better one yet. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m almost certain that you didn&#8217;t intend to argue that it&#8217;s better now in Venezuela, and Nirvana is not here in the U.S. either. Maybe the dems will bring it to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ_Redneck</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-192427</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ_Redneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-192427</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Last I checked, in the U.S. we still have:
- freedom of ownership and competition
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Regarding ownership; no, see Kelo v. New London
Regarding competition; no, two words - government subsidies

&lt;blockquote&gt;- freedom of the press&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Regarding free press; yes, unfortunately the MSM has  declined to accept the associated responsibility.

&lt;blockquote&gt;- multiple branches of government&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Regarding multiple branches; yes, but note that each has been operating outside the context of the Constitution for the last century.

&lt;blockquote&gt;- freedom of speech&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Regarding free speech; no, see McCain-Feingold 

&lt;blockquote&gt;- freedom to form as many parties as we like&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would like to see more libertarians and constructionists come forward

&lt;blockquote&gt;- freedom to be ignorant, stupid, educated, poor, rich or whatever, so long as we don’t interfere with others’ freedoms to be the same.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Regarding ignorance &amp; stupid; no, we have Helmet laws, seat belt laws, gun control laws, ...

Regarding freedom to be poor; no, we have government welfare.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Entelechy on January 19, 2007 at 2:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Last I checked, in the U.S. we still have:<br />
- freedom of ownership and competition
</p></blockquote>
<p>Regarding ownership; no, see Kelo v. New London<br />
Regarding competition; no, two words &#8211; government subsidies</p>
<blockquote><p>- freedom of the press</p></blockquote>
<p>Regarding free press; yes, unfortunately the MSM has  declined to accept the associated responsibility.</p>
<blockquote><p>- multiple branches of government</p></blockquote>
<p>Regarding multiple branches; yes, but note that each has been operating outside the context of the Constitution for the last century.</p>
<blockquote><p>- freedom of speech</p></blockquote>
<p>Regarding free speech; no, see McCain-Feingold </p>
<blockquote><p>- freedom to form as many parties as we like</p></blockquote>
<p>I would like to see more libertarians and constructionists come forward</p>
<blockquote><p>- freedom to be ignorant, stupid, educated, poor, rich or whatever, so long as we don’t interfere with others’ freedoms to be the same.</p></blockquote>
<p>Regarding ignorance &amp; stupid; no, we have Helmet laws, seat belt laws, gun control laws, &#8230;</p>
<p>Regarding freedom to be poor; no, we have government welfare.</p>
<blockquote><p>Entelechy on January 19, 2007 at 2:21 PM</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catseye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-192122</link>
		<dc:creator>Catseye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-192122</guid>
		<description>Off topic, on thread..TANSTAAFL

iam7545, budorob, mojo,
as much as I would like to attribute this to Heinlein, it appears that it&#039;s pre-Friedman, pre-Heinlein. Depending upon which source you cite, it&#039;s been attributed to economist Leonard P. Ayres (circa.1946), and to the 1 June 1949 edition of the San Francisco News (with claims that it was a reprint of a 1938 editorial. Either way, it&#039;s not Friedmans or Heinleins. Sorry *POP!* (bubble bursting)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off topic, on thread..TANSTAAFL</p>
<p>iam7545, budorob, mojo,<br />
as much as I would like to attribute this to Heinlein, it appears that it&#8217;s pre-Friedman, pre-Heinlein. Depending upon which source you cite, it&#8217;s been attributed to economist Leonard P. Ayres (circa.1946), and to the 1 June 1949 edition of the San Francisco News (with claims that it was a reprint of a 1938 editorial. Either way, it&#8217;s not Friedmans or Heinleins. Sorry *POP!* (bubble bursting)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x95b10</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-192080</link>
		<dc:creator>x95b10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-192080</guid>
		<description>I remember when Comrade Sheehan defended Chavez saying he was not a dictator but rather a democratically elected leader... I wonder if she&#039;s ready to revise her BS comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when Comrade Sheehan defended Chavez saying he was not a dictator but rather a democratically elected leader&#8230; I wonder if she&#8217;s ready to revise her BS comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191993</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191993</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So much for the Chargers. I’m with the Saints all the way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Me too.  As for the bolts, I told you, the Pats are on a roll.  

College hoops, not there yet.  Who do you root for?

Do you watch the NBA at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So much for the Chargers. I’m with the Saints all the way.</p></blockquote>
<p>Me too.  As for the bolts, I told you, the Pats are on a roll.  </p>
<p>College hoops, not there yet.  Who do you root for?</p>
<p>Do you watch the NBA at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191984</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191984</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder what would happen if a Republican took the exact wording for Chavez’ bid for rule by decree and introduced it in Congress and substituted Bush? Think there’d be orgasms by the Dems for it then? 

ScottG on January 19, 2007 at 2:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Dems have.  Can anyone say &quot;Fairness Doctrine&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder what would happen if a Republican took the exact wording for Chavez’ bid for rule by decree and introduced it in Congress and substituted Bush? Think there’d be orgasms by the Dems for it then? </p>
<p>ScottG on January 19, 2007 at 2:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>The Dems have.  Can anyone say &#8220;Fairness Doctrine&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191982</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191982</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rick, Rick, Rick: Hitler was a leftist….

I wonder what would happen if a Republican took the exact wording for Chavez’ bid for rule by decree and introduced it in Congress and substituted Bush? Think there’d be orgasms by the Dems for it then? 

ScottG on January 19, 2007 at 2:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry.  I always get nazis, socialists, communists, fascists, world citizens, and democrats confused.  Someone please help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rick, Rick, Rick: Hitler was a leftist….</p>
<p>I wonder what would happen if a Republican took the exact wording for Chavez’ bid for rule by decree and introduced it in Congress and substituted Bush? Think there’d be orgasms by the Dems for it then? </p>
<p>ScottG on January 19, 2007 at 2:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry.  I always get nazis, socialists, communists, fascists, world citizens, and democrats confused.  Someone please help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191972</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191972</guid>
		<description>The liberals profess to fight single-branch power in the U.S. and nary an alarm or expression against the usurpation of such in Venezuella, or anywhere else, except a few flippant statements. I despise their form of liberalism and progressiveness for this more than anything else. 

Last I checked, in the U.S. we still have:

- freedom of ownership and competition
- freedom of the press
- multiple branches of government
- freedom of speech
- freedom to form as many parties as we like
- freedom to be ignorant, stupid, educated, poor, rich or whatever, so long as we don&#039;t interfere with others&#039; freedoms to be the same.

But, that&#039;s only good for them here - never mind the loss of all these freedoms anywhere else. I despise your hypocrisy.

&quot;When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered&quot;, and

&quot;It is not the fact of liberty but the way in which liberty is exercised that ultimately determines whether liberty itself survives&quot; --Dorothy Thompson

&quot;None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free&quot;. --J.W.v Goethe

&quot;No nation ancient or modern ever lost the liberty of freely speaking, writing, or publishing their sentiments, but forthwith lost their liberty in general and became slaves&quot;. --John P. Zenger

&quot;In this possibly terminal phase of human existence, democracy and freedom are more than just ideals to be valued - they may be essential to survival&quot;.
--Noam Chomsky

&quot;A right is not what someone gives you; it&#039;s what no one can take from you&quot;. -- Ramsey Clark

&quot;If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too&quot;. --Somerset Maugham

&quot;So long as the people do not care to exercise their freedom, those who wish to tyrannize will do so; for tyrants are active and ardent, and will devote themselves in the name of any number of gods, religious and otherwise, to put shackles upon sleeping men&quot;. --Voltaire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberals profess to fight single-branch power in the U.S. and nary an alarm or expression against the usurpation of such in Venezuella, or anywhere else, except a few flippant statements. I despise their form of liberalism and progressiveness for this more than anything else. </p>
<p>Last I checked, in the U.S. we still have:</p>
<p>- freedom of ownership and competition<br />
- freedom of the press<br />
- multiple branches of government<br />
- freedom of speech<br />
- freedom to form as many parties as we like<br />
- freedom to be ignorant, stupid, educated, poor, rich or whatever, so long as we don&#8217;t interfere with others&#8217; freedoms to be the same.</p>
<p>But, that&#8217;s only good for them here &#8211; never mind the loss of all these freedoms anywhere else. I despise your hypocrisy.</p>
<p>&#8220;When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered&#8221;, and</p>
<p>&#8220;It is not the fact of liberty but the way in which liberty is exercised that ultimately determines whether liberty itself survives&#8221; &#8211;Dorothy Thompson</p>
<p>&#8220;None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free&#8221;. &#8211;J.W.v Goethe</p>
<p>&#8220;No nation ancient or modern ever lost the liberty of freely speaking, writing, or publishing their sentiments, but forthwith lost their liberty in general and became slaves&#8221;. &#8211;John P. Zenger</p>
<p>&#8220;In this possibly terminal phase of human existence, democracy and freedom are more than just ideals to be valued &#8211; they may be essential to survival&#8221;.<br />
&#8211;Noam Chomsky</p>
<p>&#8220;A right is not what someone gives you; it&#8217;s what no one can take from you&#8221;. &#8212; Ramsey Clark</p>
<p>&#8220;If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too&#8221;. &#8211;Somerset Maugham</p>
<p>&#8220;So long as the people do not care to exercise their freedom, those who wish to tyrannize will do so; for tyrants are active and ardent, and will devote themselves in the name of any number of gods, religious and otherwise, to put shackles upon sleeping men&#8221;. &#8211;Voltaire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Amos</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191963</link>
		<dc:creator>William Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191963</guid>
		<description>Hitler wasnt a leftist he was a socialist though. He believed that government was the solution to all the states problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitler wasnt a leftist he was a socialist though. He believed that government was the solution to all the states problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottG</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191959</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191959</guid>
		<description>Filled with nuggets indeed!!

&lt;blockquote&gt;Mr Finlayson said his delegation ignored such voices because the goal was to express solidarity, not investigate. But the group did encounter some Chavez critics: walking through a wealthy district of Caracas, &lt;em&gt;it was pelted with eggs&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Lucky for him he wasn&#039;t pelted with little lead pellets instead....

&lt;blockquote&gt;Okay then, Stalin (the left’s equivalent of Hitler). 

Rick on January 19, 2007 at 1:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Rick, Rick, Rick: Hitler &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; a leftist....

I wonder what would happen if a Republican took the exact wording for Chavez&#039; bid for rule by decree and introduced it in Congress and substituted Bush? Think there&#039;d be orgasms by the Dems for it then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filled with nuggets indeed!!</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr Finlayson said his delegation ignored such voices because the goal was to express solidarity, not investigate. But the group did encounter some Chavez critics: walking through a wealthy district of Caracas, <em>it was pelted with eggs</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lucky for him he wasn&#8217;t pelted with little lead pellets instead&#8230;.</p>
<blockquote><p>Okay then, Stalin (the left’s equivalent of Hitler). </p>
<p>Rick on January 19, 2007 at 1:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Rick, Rick, Rick: Hitler <em>was</em> a leftist&#8230;.</p>
<p>I wonder what would happen if a Republican took the exact wording for Chavez&#8217; bid for rule by decree and introduced it in Congress and substituted Bush? Think there&#8217;d be orgasms by the Dems for it then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191955</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191955</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Robertson is in no positon of power. Pelosi is in a very omportant position of power.

We dont elect our problem children to office. 

William Amos on January 19, 2007 at 1:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks for the clarification.  I&#039;ll write this down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Robertson is in no positon of power. Pelosi is in a very omportant position of power.</p>
<p>We dont elect our problem children to office. </p>
<p>William Amos on January 19, 2007 at 1:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks for the clarification.  I&#8217;ll write this down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191953</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191953</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is that Cindy’s hand or is Hugo picking her nose? 

TugboatPhil on January 19, 2007 at 2:01 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Like I said, man-hands!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is that Cindy’s hand or is Hugo picking her nose? </p>
<p>TugboatPhil on January 19, 2007 at 2:01 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Like I said, man-hands!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191952</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191952</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In case you haven’t noticed, The Tuna Queen does indeed represent your side. And it’s a side filled with the stench of ethical malfeasance and hypocrisy. You fit right in. 

JammieWearingFool on January 19, 2007 at 1:32 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh you charmer you.  It&#039;s so rare I am accused of &quot;stench&quot;.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In case you haven’t noticed, The Tuna Queen does indeed represent your side. And it’s a side filled with the stench of ethical malfeasance and hypocrisy. You fit right in. </p>
<p>JammieWearingFool on January 19, 2007 at 1:32 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh you charmer you.  It&#8217;s so rare I am accused of &#8220;stench&#8221;.  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TugboatPhil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191949</link>
		<dc:creator>TugboatPhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191949</guid>
		<description>Is that Cindy&#039;s hand or is Hugo picking her nose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that Cindy&#8217;s hand or is Hugo picking her nose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191947</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191947</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that, by giving Chavez 18 months of power by decree, Venezeula&#039;s MPs -- primarily members of Chavez&#039; party as the opposition boycotted the elections -- are just trying to cover their asses with plausible deniability for when the country crumbles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that, by giving Chavez 18 months of power by decree, Venezeula&#8217;s MPs &#8212; primarily members of Chavez&#8217; party as the opposition boycotted the elections &#8212; are just trying to cover their asses with plausible deniability for when the country crumbles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Amos</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191943</link>
		<dc:creator>William Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191943</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;OK, I’ll take Pelosi to represent my side, you get Robertson. Deal? 

honora on January 19, 2007 at 12:59 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Robertson is in no positon of power. Pelosi is in a very omportant position of power.

We dont elect our problem children to office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>OK, I’ll take Pelosi to represent my side, you get Robertson. Deal? </p>
<p>honora on January 19, 2007 at 12:59 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Robertson is in no positon of power. Pelosi is in a very omportant position of power.</p>
<p>We dont elect our problem children to office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WriterMom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191931</link>
		<dc:creator>WriterMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191931</guid>
		<description>I think if Venezuela could organize mass production Cuban Happy Sticks, they would get more tourism. Definitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if Venezuela could organize mass production Cuban Happy Sticks, they would get more tourism. Definitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191930</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191930</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Chavez also envisions gas at 35 cents a gallon for the masses.

ROTFLMAO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Chavez also envisions gas at 35 cents a gallon for the masses.</p>
<p>ROTFLMAO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JammieWearingFool</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191923</link>
		<dc:creator>JammieWearingFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191923</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;OK, I’ll take Pelosi to represent my side, you get Robertson. Deal?

honora on January 19, 2007 at 12:59 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In case you haven&#039;t noticed, The Tuna Queen does indeed  represent your side. And it&#039;s a side filled with the stench of ethical malfeasance and hypocrisy. You fit right in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>OK, I’ll take Pelosi to represent my side, you get Robertson. Deal?</p>
<p>honora on January 19, 2007 at 12:59 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>In case you haven&#8217;t noticed, The Tuna Queen does indeed  represent your side. And it&#8217;s a side filled with the stench of ethical malfeasance and hypocrisy. You fit right in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191921</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191921</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Okay then, Stalin (the left’s equivalent of Hitler). 

Rick on January 19, 2007 at 1:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So much for the Chargers.  I&#039;m with the Saints all the way.

BTW, you obviously didn&#039;t get the memo:  there are a significant number of people who frequent this blog who hold that fascism is the logical sequence as the following:  Democrat/liberal/socialist/communist/fascism.  Go figure.  Kinda makes you uncomfortable re our public schools though.

Actually, I am pretty disinterested in football, getting jazzed for college hoops!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Okay then, Stalin (the left’s equivalent of Hitler). </p>
<p>Rick on January 19, 2007 at 1:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>So much for the Chargers.  I&#8217;m with the Saints all the way.</p>
<p>BTW, you obviously didn&#8217;t get the memo:  there are a significant number of people who frequent this blog who hold that fascism is the logical sequence as the following:  Democrat/liberal/socialist/communist/fascism.  Go figure.  Kinda makes you uncomfortable re our public schools though.</p>
<p>Actually, I am pretty disinterested in football, getting jazzed for college hoops!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KelliD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/comment-page-1/#comment-191919</link>
		<dc:creator>KelliD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/19/venezuela-set-to-let-chavez-rule-by-decree-for-18-months/#comment-191919</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;TO &lt;strike&gt;SCEPTICS&lt;/strike&gt; people with a brain, they are naive Westerners who would not recognise communist tyranny if it expropriated their sandals.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Had to fix that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>TO <strike>SCEPTICS</strike> people with a brain, they are naive Westerners who would not recognise communist tyranny if it expropriated their sandals.</p></blockquote>
<p>Had to fix that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
