…

Question, what will it take to outlaw Islam, a nuke cause it is going to happen.

honora, I don’t understand your point.

bloggless on January 18, 2007 at 2:30 PM

Maybe it’s my strange sense of humor. I find it incongruous that in a statement like this, this terrorist refers to “you guys”. Oddly casual–I prefer my threats to be more formal!!!

Distraught man with wiskers cheers Allah somebody – Liberal View

Ellison named to Judiciary Committee

Borrowing from Mark Steyn’s speech, I ask, should the response resemble aviation security or should it resemble patrons at a sports bar?

Yes to profiling!

Wade on January 18, 2007 at 9:20 AM

I affirm the “shout out.”

Its anti-self-defense. And Bush should call it such. But I guess he’s to nice…

There is a very good reason for profiling muslims – 1400-odd years of reasons. Not to mention the 3,000 reasons created on 9/11….

In my opinion Ellison is a traitor in our midst. He was put there by Muslims, with the cooperation of the Left, and works towards Islamic conquest. The Left, with their misguided and absurd “multicultural” ideology, are willing accomplices of the Islamofacist to the detriment of our nation.

To those that wonder why citizens of the United States don’t “wake up” to this threat I would say there are many that clearly see that Islam is a serious threat who desires only conquest and enslavement for those who do not believe as they do. The problem is that the Left is supporting them not only in the United States but in Europe.

In Europe this will lead to civil war, and in the United States, I believe, it will take not one but two disasters for the majority of the electorate to “wake up” to what Islam is.

But for the ISALM MURDERERS, islamofascists, muhammed(pissbeonhim) follwers, they’ve been killing on every continent but Antarctica, in over 100 COUNTRIES, for 1300 years…we’ll make laws to not even glance at these devil worshipping warmongers.

Civil war in Iraq? Screw that, it might be coming to your neighborhood soon.

Would we really be safer if the only element common to all jihad attackers, a devout attachment to islam were ruled out as an object of consideration? The anti-profiling initiative is based on a proposition that there is no more reason to be concerned about devout muslims than about devout amish . . .unfortunately, the evidence leads in exactly the opposite direction.

It would have been great to see this report annex the video links from the 6 part english program “Dispatches, Undercover mosque“, or “I, a muslim”, The 2005 Freedom House Report “Saudi publications on Hate Ideology Fill American Mosques,” or the reports by Laura Mansfield who provided details of her mosque adventures etc. as examples of exactly why profiling is absolutely necessary.

# of terrorist attacks by Amish: 0

# of terrorist attacks by Jihadists:______

Thanks.

Apologies.