Targeted by animal-rights terrorists, Pom agrees to stop testing
posted at 2:07 pm on January 18, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Did they cave to the fluffy-bunny jihadis who claimed to have poisoned their containers before Christmas?
Nah. ‘Twas corporate power that killed, or rather saved, the beast(s).
“Pom Wonderful pomegranate juice has ceased all animal testing, and we have no plans to do so in the future,” Lynda and Stewart Resnick wrote to all Pom retailers by e-mail or post Wednesday…
Last month, an animal rights group claimed that it had tampered with 487 bottles of Pom juice, prompting Wild Oats Markets Inc., the No. 2 U.S. natural and organic grocer, to pull the product from shelves in some of its East Coast stores…
Pom’s decision came as Whole Foods Market Inc. told Reuters that it had decided to stop selling the company’s juice and associated tea blends by April 1 if Pom continued to fund studies that might include animal testing.
More good news: thanks to its decision, it will now be a welcome part of urban hipster mating rituals.
I linked the Penn & Teller show about animal testing the last time I wrote about this so I won’t link it again, but file this one away for the next time a progressive lectures you about taking science seriously.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
The market is the only REAL threat to a corporation.
Typical leftist strategy; the citadel’s walls are old and broken down, but they INSIST on charging directly at the front gate.
mikeomatic on January 18, 2007 at 2:10 PM
How does Pomegrante Juice do testing on animals anyway? Do they allow them to taste it?
Defector01 on January 18, 2007 at 2:13 PM
Why are these PETA terrorists allowed to continue?
Why isn’t Ingrid Newkirk and her folloowers languishing at Gitmo as domestic terrorists?
georgej on January 18, 2007 at 2:18 PM
I enjoy a glass of freshly squeezed bunnies every morning.
mmmmmmmm bunny goodness.
natesnake on January 18, 2007 at 2:20 PM
Wow. They lefties really are taking control of key markets. It’s interesting to see how they use capitalism to their advantage when it benefits them while claiming it’s an evil tool of the devil when it does not.
One Angry Christian on January 18, 2007 at 2:21 PM
Putting her in the same facility as the jihadis? I’m pretty sure that would actually violate Geneva Convention rules against cruel treatment.
For the jihadis.
Slublog on January 18, 2007 at 2:23 PM
Does anyone get off by seeing a chicken get choked, or a clam roughed up or a mokey slapped? No? then why is PETA giving us a cow?
Defector01 on January 18, 2007 at 2:31 PM
Gee, so somebody tampers with a food product and response is to quit animal testing. Makes sense to me.
bloggless on January 18, 2007 at 2:33 PM
I was wondering that myself.
CP on January 18, 2007 at 2:33 PM
“a clam roughed up”!!!!!!! LOL!!!!
bloggless on January 18, 2007 at 2:34 PM
Silly question: Is it still terrorism if you terrorize a terrorist?
PETA somehow manages to stay off the media radar when they
pull their stuntsterrorize. Could we terrorize them and get away with it? Do two negatives make a positive?natesnake on January 18, 2007 at 2:35 PM
What’s really stupid is the fact that Whole Foods has a great big, shiny counter filled with the delicious dead animal flesh that they sell for evil humans to consume. But at least, they don’t test the animals first before they slaughter them.
bloggless on January 18, 2007 at 2:39 PM
Geez, Islamofascists knocking on the door and they are worried about bunnies.
Priorities, kids, priorities.
KelliD on January 18, 2007 at 2:39 PM
I can’t wait for the Pom Wonderful pomegranate juice launch party where the “Beautiful People” will gather to celebrate the bunny saving wearing, of course, leather shoes, carrying the big leather handbag, wrapped in chinchilla.
KelliD on January 18, 2007 at 2:45 PM
From the NYPost link:
Is that serious? I am very anti-PETA, but that is really freekin’ strange if true.
B Moe on January 18, 2007 at 2:52 PM
that’s so freakin weird I don’t believe it
Defector01 on January 18, 2007 at 2:53 PM
If the bunnies are tasting the juice, they are dumb bunnies. I love pomegranates, and this stuff does not taste like pomegranates. More like grape juice, IMO.
Plus it’s a bit awkward to ask the supermarket employee,
“Where do you stock the Pom Wonderful, please?”
–> blank look
“You know, pomegranate juice?”
–> what-in-tarnation-are-you-talkin-about look
RushBaby on January 18, 2007 at 3:00 PM
thank you SOMEONE for getting that joke!
Defector01 on January 18, 2007 at 3:09 PM
They’re testing on animals to produce health claims. So now they’ll only test on humans. Soo much better.
The animal testing would involve testing high concentrations of specific chemicals present in pomegranate juice for correlation/causation with respect to improved health outcomes. Think of the red wine studies, especially the reservatrol, falvorins, and various anti-oxidants.
The media are overly emotional and give PETA play, and suck people in with emotional arguments rather than facts or logic. Another reason not to patronize Whole Paychecks and other image only firms. If you’re looking for good produce go to your local high-end providers, or help start your own high-end grocer, produce store, butcher, or provider of fresh prepared foods.
The city I live in has a WholeFoods within 1 mile of another 2 gourmet grocer/caterer as well as a slew of high-end specialty delicatessens, green grocers, butchers, fishmongers, cheesemongers, and caterers with fresh and frozen prepared meals. Whole Foods is at the low-end of these and is usually a disappointing experience for prepared foods. It’s price to value ratio isn’t there (same price as higher end stores but dramatically lower quality) and there is far too much green preachy crap (the vast majority of customers avoid the center of the store that has all the hippy stuff and stick with the periphery of produce, cheese, meat, fish, bakery, and prepared foods). WF is an image play rather than a company actually focused on high quality food. Great for projecting an image through your grocery purchases, but not great for providing high quality food for your family and guests. It’s the logo stamped bag rather than the high-quality plain leather bag, or the Burberry plaid shirt rather than the bespoke Turnbull & Asser shirt, of course with a granola feel.
libertarianuberalles on January 18, 2007 at 3:21 PM
Or simply wearing cotton clothing made from farms that destroy millions of insects yearly and deny usable habitat to hundreds of species of animals. Animal experimentation == bad. Wholesale slaughter == good. Go figure.
spmat on January 18, 2007 at 3:23 PM
I myself prefer testing next years major league baseball bats on baby seals in Canada.
csdeven on January 18, 2007 at 3:31 PM
Personally, if the animal testing was so unimportant to POM that they were able to immediately drop it as soon as their pocketbook was threatened, then I doubt it was that important in the first place.
I’m not against animal testing in all instances, but, I believe that if you are going to test on animals, you should have a good reason for what you’re doing. That reason should at least be good enough to withstand the threat of WF dropping your product.
JadeNYU on January 18, 2007 at 3:48 PM
Man, they can test that stuff on me anytime. It tastes great, but it’s like $4.50 a cup down here. Not the kind of test defector01 describes, of course. More in the vein of a ‘taste testing’ role.
Kevin M on January 18, 2007 at 4:11 PM
#1: To hell with POM for causing sufficient shortages in the Pomegranate Market that they (Pomegranates) cost triple what they used to.
(Used to be I could buy 3 for a dollar… now I’m lucky if I can find them for a dollar each.)
#2: Anyone stupid enough to demand that there be less quality control in their food consumption, deserves whatever freaky disease or chemically induced injuries that their disruption of safety earns them.
#3: I already refuse to support POM because of #1… so really I don’t know why I care.
Jones Zemkophill on January 18, 2007 at 4:26 PM
Why do they test porn on animals first anyway?
pedestrian on January 18, 2007 at 4:28 PM
As I’ve always said, if hooking a monkey’s brain to a car battery will save someones life, I only have two things to say about it……red is positive and black is negative…
ritethinker on January 18, 2007 at 5:50 PM
Jones Zemkophill – Is that what happened? I remember when POM first came out in NY, it was about $2 a bottle and they were in glass bottles. Now they are $4.50 a bottle and they’re in plastic bottles. Some of the other companies have started providing pomegranate juice (Naked Juice, Odwalla, etc) but I don’t like any of those…..they always use a wierd “berry extract” that makes it taste odd to me. Trader Joes has a Pure Pomegranate that tastes decent and is only $2.50, but that’s still a lot to pay for a 10oz bottle of juice.
JadeNYU on January 18, 2007 at 8:33 PM
Comment pages: