Iranian leaders move to isolate Ahmadinejad from nuclear program
posted at 8:58 pm on January 18, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The pessimist in me says this is all for show, a gesture of “moderation” designed to lure the west into believing those penny-ante U.N. sanctions are having an effect on the Iranian economy. But … the man is not popular. He had his ass handed to him at the phony polls last month and his Holocaust conference didn’t exactly enhance the regime’s credibility. And the goodwill he earned with Iran’s neighbors by demagoguing the U.S. is up in smoke in the anti-Shia Iraq backlash among Sunnis.
Has Mahdi become radioactive?
Less than a month after the United Nations Security Council imposed sanctions on Iran to curb its nuclear program, two hard-line newspapers, including one owned by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, called on the president to stay out of all matters nuclear.
In the hazy world of Iranian politics, such a public rebuke was seen as a sign that the Supreme Leader himself — who has final say on all matters of state — may no longer support the president as the public face of defiance to the West…
[T]he message that Iran’s most senior officials seem to be sending is that the president, with his harsh approach and caustic comments, is undermining Iran’s cause and its standing.
Mr. Ahmadinejad dismissed the Security Council resolution as “a piece of torn paper.
“But the daily newspaper Jomhouri-Elsami, which belongs to Ayatollah Khamenei, said, “The resolution is certainly harmful for the country,” adding that it is “too much to call it a piece of torn paper.”…
The stock market, which was already in a slump, continued to decline more rapidly in the past month as buyers stayed away. The daily Kargozaran reported last week the number of traders decreased by 46 percent since the Security Council resolution was passed.
“The resolution has had a psychological effect on people,” said Ali Hagh, an economist in Tehran. “It does not make sense for investors not to consider political events when they want to invest their money.”
Jordan’s not waiting around to see how this plays out: King Abdullah said today that his country will pursue nuclear “power.” Meanwhile, an Iranian delegation arrived in North Korea this morning, a few hours before a bipartisan group in the House introduced a bill making sure Bush gets their non-approval before launching any attacks on Tehran.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Doesn’t this just prove what everyone, including terrorists, already knows? Democrats will never use military force for any reason no matter how dangerous the enemy.
januarius on January 18, 2007 at 9:08 PM
Shouldn’t the headline read:
War Mongering President’s Efforts at World Destruction Halted!
Then start the post with:
The President of Iran; that is….
Really sell it!
lorien1973 on January 18, 2007 at 9:11 PM
Lately, Allah, I wonder if there is anything else! :^)
mikeyboss on January 18, 2007 at 9:15 PM
AP you’re right to be pessimistic. A nuclear program directed and controlled by mad mullahs who hate us doesn’t make me feel any less insecure.
CliffHanger on January 18, 2007 at 9:16 PM
Libs won’t get it until we get a few cities nuked. Then, they’ll “seriously consider” having a bi-partisan committee look into it.
Mojave Mark on January 18, 2007 at 10:38 PM
Yes, but it will be a “blue ribbon” bi-partisan commission.
Slublog on January 18, 2007 at 11:10 PM
Clinton did a few times in the 90s, but only after checking the world popularity meter. He was always very careful when it came to Muslims (like tomahawks to empty pharmaceutical plants), but he “TRIED” to catch Bin Laden and failed. What Meehan’s comment tells me is that the Dems are the liars. I’m tired of hearing that “Bush lied” – what did he lie about?? If he lied, then everybody else lied too. What a joke the Dems are.
Rick on January 18, 2007 at 11:53 PM
Smoke, mirrors, more smoke….
Look Europe we are tryingggggggggggggg! Geeeezzzzzzzzzzz!
Abraham, son, sacrifice….hmmmmmmmmmmmm?
Playing the U.N. fiddle in a sheer nightie.
Limerick on January 19, 2007 at 12:44 AM
Does anyone here like a good puppet show?
Egfrow on January 19, 2007 at 1:06 AM
As long as it is with Mr. Hat and Mr. Hankie
Limerick on January 19, 2007 at 1:07 AM
The “non-approval” congressional bill made me laugh out loud. Why would President Bush sign such? Did Mr. Clinton ask Congress about Kosovo first? Last line in this quote is just too funny:
Entelechy on January 19, 2007 at 1:23 AM
AP is right in his first guess. This is for show. Amanahandjob isn’t the power in Iran, it’s the Ayatollahs. He’s a front, at best. More likely he’s their verson of a “useful idiot.” When the time is right, he’ll be “retired” or “terminally ill.”
And the new President will be part of the religious ruling council.
georgej on January 19, 2007 at 2:35 AM
The greybeards can’t find the off switch. Distancing oneself from Ahmawhackjob is sensible… say, about 30 miles at a minimum. No doubt in my mind that as he sees his star fade he will undertake something desperate and provocative.
shaken on January 19, 2007 at 6:35 AM
Does the Iranian delegation in North Korea mean we should prepare for the next nuke test there?
eagles5 on January 19, 2007 at 7:53 AM
Priceless.
labwrs on January 19, 2007 at 11:08 AM
Allah, I think your instincts are right on this one. I also don’t believe Ahmedini-jihad is a thorn in the mullahs sides. He is advancing the message of doom to perfection. This is a diversionary tactic to make the west think there is turmoil in jihadi paradise. Anything to take our eye off the nuke ball………….
ritethinker on January 19, 2007 at 11:55 AM
One reason that we hang tough in the region is that it strengthens those in Iran who do not want confrontation with the United States. Read the last chapter of Mark Bowden’s “Guests of the Ayatollah” describing his trip in recent times to Iran. There are plenty of Iranians who are friendly to the United States. The radicals came to power only because the mullahs knocked the moderates off of the ballot.
Phil Byler on January 19, 2007 at 10:36 PM
Comment pages: