Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Couric: I’m the only woman news anchor, poor me

posted at 5:47 pm on January 17, 2007 by Ian
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Katie starts her “blog” post by writing that she noticed something “unusual” during a top secret White House briefing she and other network news anchors had with “unnamed VERY senior administration officials” prior to the President’s address on Iraq last week. She thought it was “unusual” that she was, gasp, the only woman anchor in the room. Which, as an experienced journalist, she was bound to notice:

And yet, the meeting was a little disconcerting as well. As I was looking at my colleagues around the room—Charlie Gibson, George Stephanopoulos, Brian Williams, Tim Russert, Bob Schieffer, Wolf Blitzer, and Brit Hume—I couldn’t help but notice, despite how far we’ve come, that I was still the only woman there. Well, there was some female support staff near the door. But of the people at the table, the “principals” in the meeting, I was the only one wearing a skirt. Everyone was gracious, though the jocular atmosphere was palpable.

So if Wolf Blitzer showed up in a skirt, that would make it better? Anyway. And women can’t be “jocular,” palpably or otherwise? Katie, to paraphrase Chevy Chase Dan Akroyd, you’re a humorless scold.

Couric credits feminism for having made “tremendous strides” for womankind, but there’s more work to do:

The feminist movement that began in the 1970’s helped women make tremendous strides—but there still haven’t been enough great leaps for womankind. Fifty-one percent of America is female, but women make up only about sixteen percent of Congress—which, as the Washington Monthly recently pointed out, is better than it’s ever been…but still not as good as parliaments in Rwanda (forty-nine percent women) or Sweden (forty-seven percent women). Only nine Fortune 500 companies have women as CEO’s.

That meeting was a reality check for me—and not just about Iraq. It was a reminder that all of us still have an obligation to ask: Don’t more women deserve a place at the table too?

And while Katie fretted about her skirt and waxed poetic about the long, hard slog to shatter the glass ceiling in war-torn Fortune 500 boardrooms in tremendous strides of self-absorption, Michelle Malkin put on body armor and walked around Baghdad with the US Army without makeup or a single complaint. Which one is the feminist icon again?

I can’t wait until Rush tomorrow.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Can we get a little violin in the hand again?

budorob on January 17, 2007 at 5:50 PM

So if Wolf Blitzer showed up in a skirt, that would make it better?

Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!!

.

GT on January 17, 2007 at 5:51 PM

Usually the relation between quality and quantity is inverse, which makes exceptions like this all the more fascinating.

Blacklake on January 17, 2007 at 5:52 PM

Given her ratings, Katie might want to do womynkind a favor, and step down; lest her horrific performance ruin the chances for another, more qualified female anchor.

Kid from Brooklyn on January 17, 2007 at 5:52 PM

Katie, to paraphrase Chevy Chase, you’re a humorless scold.

Are you thinking of “Jane, you ignorant slut”? That was Dan Ackroyd.

Jim Treacher on January 17, 2007 at 5:53 PM

…Michelle Malkin put on body armor and walked around Baghdad with the US Army without makeup or a single complaint. Which one is the feminist icon again?

That is priceless. Quote. Of. The. Year. Money, baby, money! That really made my day, thanks!

robblefarian on January 17, 2007 at 5:54 PM

You’ll note that she misused “jocular” rather badly. It means humorous, and has been around for a lot longer than the idea of a “jock”. Her understanding of the English language is as bad as those who think that “niggardly” is a racial slur. Niggardly can be an ethnic steotype when combined with “Scot”, but it simply means cheap, miserly, parsimonious.

libertarianuberalles on January 17, 2007 at 5:55 PM

…a little awe-inspiring…”no matter who is sitting in the Oval Office”

hmmm. NO bias in the media. Nope. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

serpentineshel on January 17, 2007 at 5:56 PM

MM is many more times the journalist and woman than that sniveling little Couric.Hell,she’s even more of a man than most of the male journalists for that matter.

bbz123 on January 17, 2007 at 5:57 PM

You’ll note that she misused “jocular” rather badly.

She must not have been wearing her glasses when she wrote her post.

Kid from Brooklyn on January 17, 2007 at 5:58 PM

I figured she meant that boys were joking around, like the boys’ club that no girls are allowed into, except her because she was wearing a skirt, or whatever the hell she’s trying to say.

Jim Treacher on January 17, 2007 at 5:58 PM

The comments there on her blog are a hoot! Get over yourself Katie, and get some ratings before you are taken seriously, is what most are saying.

The story was not about YOU, you narcissist, but what was the content of this meeting? A friendly brunch, an afternoon tea?

More sloppy, lazy, “reporting”. A career full of it.

CrimsonFisted on January 17, 2007 at 6:03 PM

That meeting was a reality check for me—and not just about Iraq. It was a reminder that all of us still have an obligation to ask: Don’t more women deserve a place at the table too?

Not if they are like you. Or Pelosi. Or Boxer. Or Hillary.

Condi, maybe, but not you.

Just serve the coffee to the real men.

CrimsonFisted on January 17, 2007 at 6:07 PM

Boxer says Katie doesn’t understand and fails to grasp the consequences of or the price of the ratings war. She has children that might pay the cost but she’ll never notice unless they stand behind her at the makeup mirror. Even then she’ll demand a fazed withdrawal or redeployment to their rooms. Because she has a big date tonight!!!

Griz on January 17, 2007 at 6:09 PM

Katie, two tips:
Cover your meat and have more babies.

bloggless on January 17, 2007 at 6:11 PM

Michelle Malkin put on body armor and walked around Baghdad with the US Army without makeup or a single complaint. Which one is the feminist icon again?

Oh that is pure gold.

infidel4life on January 17, 2007 at 6:12 PM

What a narcissistic twit. But at least she doesn’t write in “poetry” to disguise her borderline illiteracy like Rosie does.

And the line about Michelle in Baghdad? F— YEAH!

ReubenJCogburn on January 17, 2007 at 6:18 PM

Wolf Blitzer showed up in a skirt

LMAO Help, I can’t breath, diall 911, I’m gonna die…

Scotsman on January 17, 2007 at 6:21 PM

Charlie Gibson, George Stephanopoulos, Brian Williams, Tim Russert, Bob Schieffer, Wolf Blitzer, and Brit Hume

She failed to note, however, the only one with credibility is Brit Hume.

JammieWearingFool on January 17, 2007 at 6:41 PM

Fifty-one percent of America is female, but women make up only about sixteen percent of Congress—which, as the Washington Monthly recently pointed out, is better than it’s ever been…but still not as good as parliaments in Rwanda (forty-nine percent women) or Sweden (forty-seven percent women). Only nine Fortune 500 companies have women as CEO’s.

Well, if she moves to Rwanda, maybe she can bump that up to 50%. Good grief.

JammieWearingFool on January 17, 2007 at 6:44 PM

…but Katie has children and the family is at risk if she goes to Iraq…you say “Michelle has children too”. Then, it must be who’s children stand to lose a richer and more famous mom and which station stands to lose the only woman anchor in the greatest county in the world…it all makes sense now.

Seriously, for all the millions she gets paid, I expect for her to know that, in her context, 1970’s and CEO’s are not possessive. Calling Barbra Steisand…

Violins are way too small for her head – she needs a double-bass.

Entelechy on January 17, 2007 at 6:47 PM

Am I gonna be the first to say it? Boo-Freakin-Hoo.

vcferlita on January 17, 2007 at 6:50 PM

Don’t more women deserve a place at the table too?

Sure Katie, if they have earned it. Her definition of “deserve” is get the ratio right.

The fact of the matter is she doesn’t “deserve” to be at the same table with real journalists. Her “network news anchor” title is the end result of nothing more than a cheap ratings ploy that went horriby wrong.

BacaDog on January 17, 2007 at 6:51 PM

Pre-empting trolls:

“But Katie doesn’t have a husband”.

Entelechy on January 17, 2007 at 6:51 PM

What a bleeping narcissist. She attends a background briefing on the most critical foreign policy issue of our generation, and comes away fretting that hers was the only (important) skirt in the room?

SWLiP on January 17, 2007 at 7:02 PM

So if Wolf Blitzer showed up in a skirt, that would make it better?

Heh.

Greg Tinti on January 17, 2007 at 7:05 PM

Free market doesn’t lie.

Although, the Fairness Doctrine comes to mind.

Kini on January 17, 2007 at 7:09 PM

Groan … now she’s the victim. She’s deflecting the fact she sucks as CBS’s propaganda mouthpiece.

darwin on January 17, 2007 at 7:11 PM

Only nine Fortune 500 companies have women as CEO’s.

Nobody thought to make a joke about this? I’m so disappointed in you people.

JasonG on January 17, 2007 at 7:12 PM

How about this?

A majority of Americans (male and female) are overweight. Does Katie feel bad that she is part of the “thin and pretty” oppressors that hold back the ‘not so thin and pretty’ people?

A good chunk of the population isn’t white. Was Katie shocked when she looked around at the table and realized she was among people of pallor? Did she need to blog away her guilt at taking a spot that could have gone to an underrepresented black/hispanic woman?

Why do some misguided people think that things are only fair if the reality matches up perfectly with the demographics?

I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that there are probably more men than women that WANT to be an anchor. And, when I say want, I don’t just mean ‘think it would be nice’….I mean they want to be an anchor so badly that they put in the long hours, take the grueling assignments, work their way up, never take time off, etc etc. While I’m sure there are also women that are doing this, I’m also fairly certain that there are more men than women putting in that effort. In the end, that’s what matters…or at least, what should matter.

Side Note: Was anyone else offended by Katie’s simplistic breakdown of the population as 51% female and 49% male? I am tired of people being pigeonholed in that manner! What about the transgendered, the di-gendered and the non-gendered? Who will represent them at the anchor’s table?

JadeNYU on January 17, 2007 at 7:22 PM

“What about the transgendered, the di-gendered and the non-gendered? Who will represent them at the anchor’s table?”

By God JadeNYU … you’re right! Who will? Is Katie aware of this massive underrepresentation?

darwin on January 17, 2007 at 7:25 PM

…… your so vain, you probably think this blog is about you, your so vain…..you probably think this blog is about you, don’t you, don’t you?

PinkyBigglesworth on January 17, 2007 at 7:30 PM

Hope comrade Katie enjoyed being the only female because if her ratings continue the current pace she will not be there next year.

Wade on January 17, 2007 at 7:41 PM

Hmmm. What an interesting comment. So Katie is noting that the major news media has not integrated women into its top positions. Isn’t it odd that organizations run by lefties don’t follow the equal opportunity line they castigate others for? Why would lefty news organizations lag behind, say, conservative organizations such as business or the military who have long ago catapulted women to top positions.

While you’re chewing on that, why did it take lefty Hollywood so long to hand out Oscars to black actors? It was thirty years before three black actors were nominated for leading role Oscars in 2002: Halle Berry for Monster’s Ball; Denzel Washington for Training Day; Will Smith in Ali. Hollywood celebrated it as a big breakthrough but why did all those lefties in Hollywood trail America’s racial breakthrough by so many years?

In short, why don’t lefty organizations eat their own dog food?

Tantor on January 17, 2007 at 7:42 PM

Yes the feminist movement did do something for women: “51% of Women Are Now Living Without a Spouse,”

Pam on January 17, 2007 at 7:46 PM

But of the people at the table, the “principals” in the meeting, I was the only one wearing a skirt.

Well it’s not like at least a couple of those guys don’t wear skirts under their trousers. :P

Benaiah on January 17, 2007 at 7:51 PM

Sometimes I wish Katie Couric was born in Saudi Arabia, where she wouldn’t even be allowed to speak.

freakagriep on January 17, 2007 at 8:21 PM

As soon as feminists like Katie learn it’s about what’s between your ears and not your legs, they will make all the advancements in the world. Poor Katie, all that perkiness and still no respect. Try a little common sense and intellect Katie….it may not be too late…..

ritethinker on January 17, 2007 at 8:39 PM

If she didn’t wear a skirt she would not have been there.

right2bright on January 17, 2007 at 8:45 PM

I wonder why she was worrying about her skirt. Was she insecure about whether she was under/over-dressed?

Instead of her dress, she should have been wondering why she was the only idiot in the room, when 50% of the population is below average intelligence. “Don’t more morons deserve a place at the table too?”

pedestrian on January 17, 2007 at 8:57 PM

“They watched helplessly as their husbands, fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, friends and even children were cut down with machetes. After the genocide, Rwandan women picked up the pieces of their broken lives and their broken country and began to rebuild. Women have played a pivotal role in reconstructing Rwanda since Hutu extremists slaughtered 800,000 people in 1994. They have been prominent in and outside the government, and recently were elected to fill nearly half the seats in the lower house of Parliament. Their leadership has been critical to the continuing recovery of a nation that lost one-tenth of its population in about 100 days, according to international peace experts.”

From here.

Stupid f***ing moron. Only part of Rwanda that concerns her is the part that makes it sound like we would do well to be more like them.

She is the anti-news. Takes a horrific story and makes it only about her.

MamaAJ on January 17, 2007 at 9:47 PM

Yeah and I bet all their eye’s were fixed on you know where too huh Ms Coughup?……..sexist SOBS anyway

Limerick on January 17, 2007 at 9:48 PM

Oh, and by the way, it’s not like I know much about Rwanda. I just had the common sense to think that maybe holding it up as a shining example might not work out so well.

That and 30 seconds of Googling will buy you a clue. Or at least it should.

MamaAJ on January 17, 2007 at 9:57 PM

So, is there a reason that Katie can’t go out and buy a pair of pants? Maybe Bob Schieffer could loan her a pair…or is that where she got the skirt?

I love the feminist movement, especially when I’m walking behind it. – Rush Limbaugh

TugboatPhil on January 17, 2007 at 10:09 PM

The fact of the matter is she doesn’t “deserve” to be at the same table with real journalists.

BacaDog on January 17, 2007 at 6:51 PM

Yeah, but in all fairness, most of the people she named don’t either.

Wolfman on January 17, 2007 at 10:11 PM

Except for Hume, none of them are journalist, they are opinionators(?), meaning that they know how to run the country and the war better than the President.

As for Katie, she obviously doesn’t watch Fox News, where the women are abundant and very, very competent. E.D. Hill, for example is an author. What has Katie authored other than a whining blog.

pocomoco on January 18, 2007 at 12:49 AM

She probably sat there at the table and asked “where in the world is Matt?”

Rick on January 18, 2007 at 1:08 AM

I love to put ‘em on the glass ceiling.

The Ugly American on January 18, 2007 at 2:21 AM

Katie is such an idiot. Only lapdog supporters are more idiotic than she.

Black Adam on January 18, 2007 at 2:51 AM

The last bit of good reporting from her was when I took her “Colonic tour.” Having a clean large bowel is almost certainly the best “reporting” she will ever do.

georgej on January 18, 2007 at 5:23 AM

I don’t think for a minute that the “waxed” comment was not picked up by just me…c’mon guys, is it too early in the morning or what.

DoctorDentons on January 18, 2007 at 8:37 AM

Ahhhh the sweet catch 22 of afirmative action…..if you can’t make it on merit you can always resort to the minority/victim card.

Alden Pyle on January 18, 2007 at 9:07 AM

Never realized she was such a sexist.

One Angry Christian on January 18, 2007 at 9:44 AM

Gosh, I was at a baby shower recently and you know what? There were NO men there, at all, not a one.

Clearly we have a long way to go in this area.

Bob's Kid on January 18, 2007 at 10:22 AM

I think that she may have suddenly found that it’s not so good to stick your head through the glass ceiling when your really not up to it (golf anyone). And pulling it back down might hurt… just a bit.

RalphyBoy on January 18, 2007 at 11:13 AM

The liberals are truly progressive. The “downtrodden” like Katie, always demand and get progressively more than what they offer.

Heh, calling Voltaire again – do I want to be me (work hard, think, sacrifice and suffer sometimes, and not blame others, including society), or do I want to be ignorant, naive, idealistic, accusatory and blissful all the time?

Entelechy on January 18, 2007 at 12:26 PM

She is sickening. Where is her voice for other women around the world that are FORCED to cover up and their genitals mutilated?

/hears crickets from couric

I guess she thinks it is more important that the ratio of women to men is 50/50 on every room she goes into.

/hears couric bawling

Highrise on January 18, 2007 at 2:27 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.