LOL. The press playing an adversarial role in a democracy? Nah. Give me lapdogs anyday.

honora on January 12, 2007 at 11:13 AM

What do you mean by this?
Whose lapdogs are we talking about?
I can only surmise that you’re branding all the folks at Fox as Conservative “lapdogs” when we have to put up with Colmes and Shep Smith, not to mention Greta “Crime wh*re” Van Sustern and Bill “Independent” O’Reilly.
Fox News isn’t really all that fair and balanced: it’s just infinitely more fair and “in the middle” than the rest of the Enemedia (ABC, CNN, CBS, NBC, MSNBC. NPR, C-Span, PBS, etc., etc., etc.–and those are just the TV outlets of the Liberal MSM!).

God Bless Condi and I do so wish she’d run for the White House in ’08!
She could win a cage match against Hillary.

Fair and balanced.

Kid from Brooklyn on January 11, 2007 at 1:26 PM

LOL. The press playing an adversarial role in a democracy? Nah. Give me lapdogs anyday.

I would love to have one night with Condi…

Sacwannabe on January 11, 2007 at 1:24 PM

It just might be her first.

Contrary to initial reports, no top AQ leaders were killed in the air strikes in Somalia. But over in Afghanistan, NATO reports that it has taken out 150 insurgents in ground and air operation on the Pakistan border. That’s the……

She’s a fine Soviet specialist.

As for current work… D+ at best.

She opposes partial birth abortion and federal funding of abortion. Liberals described her as “mildly pro-choice” in order to throw people off. She explained her position to Tim Russert and Katie Couric.

As for Rice, no I don’t think she’ll run, but I’d love a Gingrich/Rice ticket. Two intellectuals, one well versed in history the other in world affairs. Could you just imagine the pres/VP debates. Gingrich waxing Hillary and Condi spanking Obama. I’m not a conservative who puts all of his eggs in the abortion basket. Don’t misunderstand, I’m opposed to abortion and would like to see Roe-v-Wade over-turned so that it will be settled by the states and not the courts. But I’m not a single issue kind of voter. If I agree with the candidate on most issues, I’m not going to have my vote hinge on the one issue we don’t share in common. The one exception is issues regarding national defense..this is the most important issue always. So the answer is yes, Condi would get my vote..she is competent, bright, and certainly understands the world stage with vast experience under her belt………

Another handle matching his desires…

Entelechy on January 11, 2007 at 4:11 PM

Now THAT was funny.

Freelancer on January 11, 2007 at 4:42 PM

Yes, yes it was.

Gee, I wish I was a Fox guy…..Condi is the TP, total package. She is physically appealing no doubt, but her main appeal is her brilliant mind. Her intellect is quite a turn on…she is a thinkers thinker……

ritethinker on January 11, 2007 at 4:09 PM

“ritethinker,”

I also find Condi to be quite the package regarding her intellect and her articulate, eloquent skill as a public speaker.

I am puzzled, however, at her musings regarding Palestinian Arabs and their violence, and some of her comments in which she placates Islamic Jihadi terrorists and bad behavior.

I enjoyed Condi keeping her cool but dishing out a small can of whoop ass during the 9/11 hearings in which certain panelists took themselves too seriously and attempted to make themselves bigger than life at Condi’s expense.

Do you think she will run for president?

If so, will she get your vote?

My understanding of Condi is that she is an abortion supporter and does not actually have a strong stance against certain bad behavior, including in the Muslim world.

I cannot vote for a person who does not value the baby living inside her mother’s womb and who does not see the atrocity which is abortion.

Nevertheless, I think she is more intelligent, more articulate, more shrewd, and more eloquent than anyone the Democrats have in their camp.

William

Another handle matching his desires…

Now THAT was funny.

On topic, who cares, really, if an administration diplomat has a preference in news reporters? Could it possibly mean anything of substance? Or is a reality check just too strong at this juncture?

5) They are not grating on the nerves, but they are actually pleasant to watch and listen to…

William2006 on January 11, 2007 at 3:22 PM

Unrelated to looks, none grates on my nerves more than Soledad O’Brien. Switch.Channel.Immediately.Lest.I.Throw.Hotel.Pillow.At.TV. What a conceited and faux-smart creation!

Me, I have this fantasy of being the meat in a Julie Banderas/Megyn Kelly sandwich.

ReubenJCogburn on January 11, 2007 at 2:19 PM

Another handle matching his desires…

William

Got a late start due to an ISP outage, there’s a lot happening in the world, and I have some behind-the-scenes things to try to make time to take care of. Gonna be pretty much pure warblogging for now but…

1) They are extremely bright and eloquent.
2) They do not come off as stuffy, difficult, arrogant, and condescending as the male and female reporters and anchor persons as other stations-networks, such as BBC, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, etc.
3) They are talented.
4) They are quite attractive.
5) They are not grating on the nerves, but they are actually pleasant to watch and listen to.

I wonder sometimes. Were I to be one of the male hosts of the Fox News Channel’s morning program, how could I function? I am afraid I’d have trouble keeping my gaze away from the female co-hosts’ legs, which they display to the max, and I might have difficulty just keeping my eyes away from gazing at these women, period!

Bottom line, it is pleasant and a treat for the eyes, to listen to the news, and watch the news and topical broadcasts delivered by the beautiful, bright, talented women of Fox News.

William

Spruiell thinks it’s funny how mics keep “accidentally” getting left on around Bush and Condi, followed by the recordings “accidentally” making their way into the media.

Sounds like we have some nutjob, wacko, truther, conspiracy freaks in here.

We all know there’s no such thing as a true conspiracy.

Sarcasm off