…. yeah, this doesn’t embolden the terrorists in any way.

I know people hate when I say this because they think I’m taking all responsibility away from President Bush, but seriously, what can he do when the Dems have insisted on dividing us ever since 2003 when they smelled the 2004 elections coming? The terrorists play to Kennedy and friends, and it’s working. Let’s see, terrorist groups endorsed the Dems in the last 2 elections, attacks were oddly stepped up 3.5 years in to the war when they saw a victory for themselves/Dems on the horizon, AQ took credit for the 2006 Dem victory, etc. etc.

Don’t dismiss this so quickly. I don’t think anyone is stupid enough to claim that anyone can match us in a fight… but they can defeat us in Washington, and the Dems are all to happy to speed up the process, and again have been since late 2003. If the Dems could keep with the tradition of ONE foreign policy and standing behind the Commander in Chief in a time of war, I maintain that we wouldn’t be looking at the same Iraq today. I think it’s almost certain we wouldn’t have nearly the amount of people there, and I believe it’s even possible that we’d be virtually gone, or at least not leading operations… but I don’t think “operations” would even be a necessary regular event the way they are now.

Sickening. Fu** you and all your shameful friends Ted Kennedy.

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
– Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

In closing, and someone unrelated I just want to post something I had wanted to find for a while, but hadn’t run across it until this week.

I think we can agree that Edwards became anti-war the day he agreed to jump on the John “Bush is a liar” Kerry ticket in 2004, and has lately bashed McCain for troop increase ideas, and has essentially tried to make a name for himself as THE anti-war 2008 candidate.

Here’s what this POS said on October 13, 2003 on Hardball:

MATTHEWS: Let me ask but the war, because I know these are all students and a lot of guys the age of these students are fighting over there and cleaning up over there, and they’re doing the occupation.

Were we right to go to this war alone, basically without the Europeans behind us? Was that something we had to do?

EDWARDS: I think that we were right to go. I think we were right to go to the United Nations. I think we couldn’t let those who could veto in the Security Council hold us hostage.

And I think Saddam Hussein, being gone is good. Good for the American people, good for the security of that region of the world, and good for the Iraqi people.

MATTHEWS: If you think the decision, which was made by the president, when basically he saw the French weren’t with us and the Germans and the Russians weren’t with us, was he right to say, “We’re going anyway”?

EDWARDS: I stand behind my support of that, yes.

MATTHEWS: You believe in that?

EDWARDS: Yes.

MATTHEWS: Let me ask you about-Since you did support the resolution and you did support that ultimate solution to go into combat and to take over that government and occupy that country. Do you think that you, as a United States Senator, got the straight story from the Bush administration on this war? On the need for the war? Did you get the straight story?

EDWARDS: Well, the first thing I should say is I take responsibility for my vote. Period. And I did what I did based upon a belief, Chris, that Saddam Hussein’s potential for getting nuclear capability was what created the threat. That was always the focus of my concern. Still is the focus of my concern.

So did I get misled? No. I didn’t get misled.

MATTHEWS: Did you get an honest reading on the intelligence?

EDWRADS: But now we’re getting to the second part of your question.

I think we have to get to the bottom of this. I think there’s clear inconsistency between what’s been found in Iraq and what we were told.

And as you know, I serve on the Senate Intelligence Committee. So it wasn’t just the Bush administration. I sat in meeting after meeting after meeting where we were told about the presence of weapons of mass destruction. There is clearly a disconnect between what we were told and what, in fact, we found there.

MATTHEWS: If you knew last October when you had to cast an aye or nay vote for this war, that we would be unable to find weapons of mass destruction after all these months there, would you still have supported the war?

EDWARDS: It wouldn’t change my views. I said before, I think that the threat here was a unique threat. It was Saddam Hussein, the potential for Saddam getting nuclear weapons, given his history and the fact that he started the war before.

MATTHEWS: Do you feel now that you have evidence in your hands that he was on the verge of getting nuclear weapons?

EDWARDS: No, I wouldn’t go that far.

MATTHES: What would you say?

EDWARDS: What I would say is there’s a decade long pattern of an effort to get nuclear capability, from the former Soviet Union, trying to get access to scientists…

Why does anyone still bother being civil with Democrats? I’m tired of this sh** being allowed to stand.

RightWinged on January 10, 2007 at 7:43 AM

georgej on January 10, 2007 at 8:07 AM

Thanks for confirming that I’m not totally crazy. I’m really sick and tired of tolerating Democrats… but if we don’t, we look like the loons because the media has done a good job at hiding just how evil the left is and that they ARE WITH THE ENEMY as long as it assists them politically and in taking down Bush.

RightWinged on January 10, 2007 at 10:35 AM

You may not accept it honora, but I just explained it at 7:43, and many times before… there’s no point in repeating it in an indepth manner (as has been done constantly) because you’ll only take the liberal route of diverting and changing the subject by taking out single sentence fragments of larger points and trying to argue over them… We’ve all wasted our times with liberals doing this too many times.

This “buck stops” is crap, when these people made the WMD case and voted for the war, and within months were opposing it and essentially promising defeat… Does that not embolden terrorists? If we are united and we maintain our ONE FOREIGN POLICY no one would think for a second that they stand a chance. It is politics that is losing this war, and there is NOTHING Bush can do to overcome it. And that’s not even getting in to the fact that you can’t beat a lying mass media that is clearly even further left than the elected Dems. You may not accept that there is a liberal media, etc… but there’s your explanation I didn’t think I was going to bother reiterating. You may dishonestly insist that daily creation of bogus “scandals” and dividing the country over the war (which has been ALL DEMS) doesn’t help the enemy, and enemy that would have been crushed if we were together and didn’t have the Dems and media lying day in and day out… you can dishonestly insist that all day long if you’d like… but I’ve given you your answer (which I wasn’t intending to spell out for you child). Perhaps if you consider what would have happened if we had the media and left today back in WWII, etc. and you’ll understand.

And if you need proof that the media is far more powerful than any branch of government, consider what I always point out… An EXTREME majority of Americans rank their own financial situation positively, yet a vast majority rank the economy negatively… how can that be?! Would you agree that 99.99% of the public aren’t economists and outside of their own finances, rely on the media to tell them about the economy (jobs, unemployment, housing, etc. etc.) If you have an honest bone in your body, you’ll admit that the negative view of the economy is from MEDIA PORTRAYAL because as I said, they are happy with their own finances… these people are lead to believe that they are a fluke and one of the “lucky” few, even though in reality the numbers show they are an extreme majority.

That’s just the economy, but the same holds true across all topics, ESPECIALLY THE WAR… Which is why the troops hate the media’s coverage of what they’re doing and consistently tell visitors that the media isn’t telling the true story….

RightWinged on January 10, 2007 at 11:16 AM