Freak high tide would have been sweet :)

The moonbats favorite ‘elected’ official is at it again.

Chavez

Lord Nazh on January 9, 2007 at 3:18 AM

Impeach Pelosi??? sounds good to me!!!!

Romeo13 on January 9, 2007 at 3:42 AM

Just imagine what they could do with their hate if it was put towards something useful.

Seriously… the extreme left is really just sickening, and gets worse by the day. Don’t these people have graduate school classes or backbacking trips to Europe to get to?

RightWinged on January 9, 2007 at 4:22 AM

Actually, CI, I don’t think Zombie has clarified his or her gender either way. Some pundits have branded her a she,but I think the question remains unsettled (and I would like to help keep him/her as anonymous as possible.)

That said, nothing is stopping us from picturing Zombie as a dead ringer for Linnea Quigley in The Return of the Living Dead.

see-dubya on January 9, 2007 at 4:33 AM

I’m glad to see they did this during the weekend. After all, it would’ve been a shame if this event had cut into the time these people need to spend on their important careers.

What’s that? Oh, yeah. My bad.

Sean M. on January 9, 2007 at 4:57 AM

Hmmm….I wonder what font they used.

.

GT on January 9, 2007 at 7:00 AM

Life’s a beach! The fringe kooks will do anything to lay down in the dirt and nuzzel a butt crack!

sonnyspats1 on January 9, 2007 at 7:04 AM

You do realize that there is absolutely no relationship between approval ratings and impeachment, don’t you THeDRiFTeR? You noticed that the people responsible for getting 1000 people to spell out “IMPEACH” in the sand really want Bush and Cheney to “RESIGN” and make Nancy Pelosi president, didn’t you?

Heh. Nancy Pelosi.

Pablo on January 9, 2007 at 7:25 AM

Hmmm….I wonder what font they used.

GT on January 9, 2007 at 7:00 AM

That’s gotta be Dingbats.

Pablo on January 9, 2007 at 7:33 AM

It’s a good thing it was cold and they didn’t get nekkid to do this. Giant inflated scrotum man might have showed up.

Ellen on January 9, 2007 at 8:08 AM

Can we be certain that this particular font was available for use on beaches when the photo was claimed to have been taken?

James on January 9, 2007 at 8:21 AM

This is sooooo typical of these crazies. They think Bush went into Iraq for his Big Oil buddies, and yet they line the pockets of those buddies by using a gas guzzling helicopter to take those pictures.

Dee de deeeeee.

csdeven on January 9, 2007 at 8:41 AM

Wow … See how easy these nuts are manipulated? A herd of cattle if I ever saw one.

darwin on January 9, 2007 at 8:53 AM

Squid Vicious you just about beat me to it. The intellectual level of the things these morons do is usually on a par with what, 6th graders, junior high school kids?

Jeff on January 9, 2007 at 8:57 AM

Do any of these people have a job?

GT on January 9, 2007 at 9:15 AM

Pelosi aka Nurse Ratched is pleased with her patients…

“If you continue to behave, next month you can go to the zoo” she said.

flagwaver on January 9, 2007 at 9:18 AM

Nearby, the seagulls seemed to emulate the humans by spelling out a message in their own mysterious language.

W E R E N O T P E A C H

Hey, come on, it is San Francisco after all.

fogw on January 9, 2007 at 9:31 AM

Ian, Zombie is a girl….just a little fyi

:O

Rich on January 9, 2007 at 9:38 AM

REAL QUESTION FOR AN INTREPID COMMENTER:

WHAT IS THE JOKE ABOUT THE TIN-FOIL HATS? I don’t get it. I was at KOS and I actually heard a moonbat say that “(his) tin foil hat was tingling”.

SOMEBODY TELL ME–my copy of “Moonbats for Dummies” is missing that chapter.

THANKS Y’all!

seejanemom on January 9, 2007 at 9:55 AM

The tin foil hats reflect evil thoughts from Karl Rove.

fogw on January 9, 2007 at 10:01 AM

seejanemom - i believe the purpose of the tin foil hats are for people who believe that signals from aliens cannot penetrate your brain if you cover your head with tin foil.

Somehow, aluminum foil blocks the signals… haha
Recall the Mel Gibson movie “Signs” when his family was waiting for the alien invasion and they were wearing tin foil hats.

flagwaver on January 9, 2007 at 10:03 AM

Zombie won’t admit as to what he or she is. But Zombie is AWESOME.

Why don’t the dimocraps and libz just admit that the only reason they want to impeach Bush is for Revenge for Cliton?

They are so insulated from normal society

Yea, Tinfoil will do that… ;-)

Mazztek on January 9, 2007 at 10:11 AM

Teutonic Yes Man,
If you had spent any time on this board, you would realize that the “Nuke Mecca” crowd is not tolerated here. Conservatives have ostracized the right fringe (people like the looney tune Fred Phelps cult). On the other hand, the liberals have embraced their lunatic fringe (Moore, Shehan, Dean).

BohicaTwentyTwo on January 9, 2007 at 10:31 AM

Sure, those people are on the fringe, but probably less fringe than the carpet-bomb Iraq/nuke Mecca/kill ‘em or convert ‘em/deport the traitious liberals crowd that lurks around here.

I’m calling Bull-Sh@tt. Link one comment from HotAir where that statement was acceptable.

And when it comes to “deport the traitious liberals”, I’d rather incarcerate than deport. If you don’t love it, leave it. And if you undermine American security, I’m more than happy to throw your arse into the clink.

natesnake on January 9, 2007 at 10:33 AM

The real story here is that they couldn’t muster enough unemployed Berkeley losers to finish the image:
IMPEACH AHMEDINEJAD

Damned economy…

Jaibones on January 9, 2007 at 10:36 AM

“people like the looney tune Fred Phelps cult”

From what I understand Phelps is a democrat. His actions would be totally embraced by the left except for the fact he’s “religious”. If it weren’t for that, they’d love ‘em.

darwin on January 9, 2007 at 10:40 AM

This is what happens when too many people who have had too many hits of LSD all get together; worshipping helicopter gods, wearing foil hats, and sitting in the sand to spell IMPEACH! And the notion of Bush & Cheny resigning to make Pelosi and Obama the new POTUS and VP? Indeed a new kind of Shock and Awe, but maybe not like they’re thinking!

DR Good on January 9, 2007 at 10:57 AM

You know, unless I missed it, I haven’t yet seen 1000 people on a South Carolina beach spelling out “Nuke Mecca” and anything similar.

BohicaTwentyTwo on January 9, 2007 at 11:36 AM

I’m trying to get a crowd up for a beach spell-out on Coney Island this coming Shrove Tuesday to spell out:

“CARPET BOMB IRAQ / NUKE MECCA /KILL ‘EM OR CONVERT ‘EM / DEPORT THE TRAITOROUS LIBERALS”

I figure I’ll need 67 very flexible folks, and 3 stiffs, and 2 kids.

profitsbeard on January 9, 2007 at 11:46 AM

How to short-circuit the impeachment moonbats? Let VP Cheney retire (keep his # on speed-dial) and make Condi #2.

Impeach away :-)

DuffBeer on January 9, 2007 at 11:57 AM

I’ll bet the local Starbucks really took it on the chin that day. All their customers were at the beach.

Labamigo on January 9, 2007 at 12:31 PM

QFT

Well said darwin

Sure, those people are on the fringe, but probably less fringe than the carpet-bomb Iraq/nuke Mecca/kill ‘em or convert ‘em/deport the traitious liberals crowd that lurks around here.”

What an odd statement. Islams leaders have said quite publically that it’s the ultimate goal of islam to convert the world, and kill those that resist. How in the world do you equate what’s happening in the world today with anyone who posts here and calls for defense of our homeland and an offense to rid the world of the heinous cult perpetuating what you claim we call for?

How do you equate an invasion of our country by millions who are sucking the well dry to people who post here begging for our government to do something … anything to stop the daily flow?

And yes, there are many “liberals” who have gone above and beyond in aiding and comforting the enemy, as well as revealing national security classified info.

You bub, are on the fringe, the rest of us are slowly waking up to the treachery of your kind.

darwin on January 9, 2007 at 10:38 AM

MarkB on January 9, 2007 at 12:52 PM

wana see something a bit more crazy?

I knew you did

One Angry Christian on January 9, 2007 at 12:59 PM

Can’t… resist… Photoshopping… this!

Somebody please stop me!

Dave Shay on January 9, 2007 at 1:11 PM

JaHerer22 on January 9, 2007 at 1:19 PM

Have you visited DU?? You think those comments you quoted are bad?? Sure, sometimes people here at HA can get a little excited about topics, but for the most part, it doesn’t even come close to some of the off-the-wall stuff being posted at DU. Also, AP and the rest of the HA gang tend to do a very good job of guarding against any crazies that choose to comment here (every so often, something gets by - as expected).

Rick on January 9, 2007 at 1:34 PM

JaHerer, I didn’t vote to make Cindy Shehan your queen. Heck, I didn’t even vote to make Pelosi Speaker of the House(her constituents being featured prominently in the photos linked above). Take a good hard look at those photos, that is the BASE of the Democratic Party.

profitsbeard, since I do not believe in nuking Mecca, I will only support your message if I can be part of a ‘/’

Meanwhile in South Carolina, Thousands of people are expected at Williams-Brice Stadium in Columbia on Saturday for what officials say will be the largest single deployment of South Carolina’s National Guard since World War Two.

BohicaTwentyTwo on January 9, 2007 at 1:55 PM

JaHerer22 wrote: “I’d much rather be on the fringe than stuck in the middle of the hoarde of ignorance.”

You’ve achieved your goal then. BTW, it is spelled hoard, not hoarde.

Normally, I am very tolerant of dissent and dissenters. In the past, I could have at one time proudly (if ignorantly) said that “I are one,” on a whole number of issues.

I am no longer in that camp. I view people like you as lemmings pursuing a suicidal policy that includes appeasement and emboldening our enemies. I view the actions of people like you and those in the picture as literally endangering the lives of me and my family.

In the past 3 decades, people like you have stupidly pursued policies that have been designed to weaken our country, erode our national security, and undermine our values.

Because of 9/11/01, I have become extremely intolerant of people like you, because during a time of war, your version of “dissent” is designed to sabotage our efforts to prevail. And I will not tolerate that.

I don’t care if you hate George W. Bush or not. What I despise is that in your zeal to destroy the Bush presidency, your kind are willing to aid and abet the very enemies we are fighting.

I consider the worst form of treason to be the undermining of a country’s war effort for POLITICAL GAIN. The media, the “liberals” and the leadership of the Democratic Party have been willing accomplices of the people we are fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Somalia, just to regain political power.

In every war that America has fought, there have been those who opposed it. From the very Revolution, there were dissenters such as John Dickinson (see Footnote 1) who resigned from Congress rather than sign the Declaration of Independence because he opposed revolution. There have always been what we call conscientious objectors. Nevertheless, some of these conscientious objectors still served their country in spite of their objection to war and killing (see Footnote 2).

But when “objectors” become “activists” in order to undermine the nation’s will to fight, then I agree with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, who wrote: “When a nation is at war many thing which might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its efforts that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight and no court could regard them as protected by any Constitutional right.” [Schenk v. US, 249 US 47, 52 (1919)]

And when “activists” openly give aid and comfort to the enemy, as Medea Benjamin and her Code Pink group did when they gave $600,000 in cash to Al Qaeda while my son was fighting them in Fallujah, or when Democratic Party demagogues like Murtha, Rockerfeller, or Durbin, openly undermine our military and intelligence services for political purposes, or when “activist’s behavior” is acknowleged by our enemy as advancing their cause, they cross the line from being “dissenters” into being traitors.

There are times when it is not possible for “people of good will to agree to disagree.” We are in one of those times. The stakes in this war are not “international respect,” or “peace in our time,” or “no war for oil,” but national survival and the lives of our citizens, in the face of 7th Century religious fanaticism that has shown a willingness to murder us by the thousands.

The people who participated in the event described above, and the people who defend them, are doing the work of the enemy, here in America. And no, I do NOT believe that traitors have “a right to express their opinions,” either. I am in good company as neither did Justice Holmes, one of the foremost liberals of the 19th Century.

Michael Walzer, editor of Dissent Magazine put it this way:

Many left intellectuals live in America like internal aliens, refusing to identify with their fellow citizens, regarding any hint of patriotic feeling as politically incorrect. That’s why they had such difficulty responding emotionally to the attacks of September 11 or joining in the expressions of solidarity that followed. Equally important, that’s why their participation in the policy debate after the attacks was so odd; their proposals (turn to the UN, collect evidence against bin Laden, and so on) seem to have been developed with no concern for effectiveness and no sense of urgency. They talked and wrote as if they could not imagine themselves responsible for the lives of their fellow-citizens…

But what really marks the left, or a large part of it, is the bitterness that comes with abandoning any such desire. The alienation is radical. How else can one understand the unwillingness of people who, after all, live here, and whose children and grandchildren live here, to join in a serious debate about how to protect the country against future terrorist attacks? There is a pathology in this unwillingness, and it has already done us great damage.

…We can be as critical as we like, but these are people whose fate we share; we are responsible for their safety as they are for ours, and our politics has to reflect that mutual responsibility. When they are attacked, so are we; and we should join willingly and constructively in debates about how to defend the country.” [Michael Walzer, “Can there be a decent left?” Dissent Magazine, Spring 2002,
http://www.dissentmagazine.org/wwwboard/salon.html

So I say, screw them and screw you.

Footnote 1 - For those that do not know, John Dickinson resigned his seat in the Continental Congress because he would not sign the Declaration of Independence. Dickinson believed that a peaceful resolution of our differences with England was possible. Dickinson, after he left Congress, joined the Continental Army as a “Private Soldier,” though was promoted to Brigadier General after the Battle of Brandywine.

Footnote 2 - It is possible for conscientious objectors to serve their country during war, in spite of their aversion to it.

The late Desmond T. Doss Sr was a conscientious objector who declined a religious exemption to the WWII draft (he was a Seventh Day Adventist) to serve as a medic. He was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his bravery on Okinawa.

Thomas W. Bennett was a Vietnam War draftee who was also a conscientious objector who served as a combat medic. For his bravery under fire in tending and rescuing his wounded comrades, Bennett was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, posthumously.

georgej on January 9, 2007 at 3:14 PM

I nominate georgej’s comment above to be designated “GeorgeJ’s Troll Hammer”. georgej, may we quote you?

RushBaby on January 9, 2007 at 3:24 PM

I also think zombie is a chick.

WriterMom on January 9, 2007 at 3:35 PM

I hate being right, really I do, but can there be any doubt that the Democrats ARE embracing the left wing fringe.

BohicaTwentyTwo on January 9, 2007 at 4:16 PM

It takes two minutes in MS Paint program to turn that into IMPEACHED PERJURER but unfortunately there is no room left on the beach to add Clinton’s face.

Perchant on January 9, 2007 at 4:41 PM

What about using Paint to bend IMPEACH around into a circle, since that’s really the appropriate shape for this kind of jerk?

ReubenJCogburn on January 9, 2007 at 6:40 PM

Actually, it’s spelled ‘horde’ unless you’re storing a bunch of things…then it’s a hoard.

“The Mongol horde collected a hoard of treasure.”

James on January 9, 2007 at 10:57 PM

Actually, it’s spelled ‘horde’ unless you’re storing a bunch of things…then it’s a hoard.

“The Mongol horde collected a hoard of treasure.”

“Candygram for Mongo! Candygram for Mongo!”

Dave Shay on January 9, 2007 at 11:39 PM

georgej on January 10, 2007 at 12:44 AM Thank you. Mark Steyn’s got nothing on you. In the wake of the 2000 election, I knew something fundamental in American politics the democrat party had changed somehow. Seven years later that change is still evident as you so aptly described. I know the left really hates this, but at some point, dissent and activism carried too far can indeed become treason when you root for the enemy. After gulf war I, those who opposed it in Washington prior to Saddam’s defeat looked foolish afterward. It popped the “Vietnam bubble” that liberals clung to for decades. They desperately have to restore the kind of collective national self doubt that I grew up with. No thanks. It’s time to fight.

Buck Turgidson on January 10, 2007 at 11:24 AM