he “shoulda gone to specsavers”

If he meant conservative blogs in general…

…then I imagine he would have said that and we wouldn’t have been talking about Pajamas Media specifically. Make sense?

First, what does Jamil Hussein have to do with PJM? Did I miss an exclusive? Next, what does the fact that the Jamil Hussein that seems to have appeared doesn’t appear to be the source of the 61 stories do to your theory?

Then, what part of “We have received an unconfirmed report that he is dead” is wrong?

Then, Adnan Hajj, was also outed by PJM founder Charles Johnson of LGF, who shares a bit of Dan Rather’s scalp with present company and some others.

Now, tally that score again, won’t you?

If he meant conservative blogs in general, you’d have to throw the whole “John Kerry sits alone” thing in there as well. All within the last week. To HA’s credit they do admit their errors, but half the commenters still are in denial… “this raises more questions” “i definitely heard cracker” etc

They’re still investigating, they say, which I guess prevents them from making a full retraction. The investigation is slated to continue until 2022. Background on the story here. Speaking of corrections, I have a couple of my own. As you……

Bummer….

See previous: Saddam gets a roommate Alive: Iran’s supreme leader makes public appearance in Tehran A little sweaty but otherwise none the worse for wear. Beware Iranian dissidents bearing good news — or bad news. Unless it’s nuclear in nature….

What, and no sniper? WTF? I thought this was a ploy to get him out into the open for a clean shot!
Tony737 on January 8, 2007 at 9:41 AM

Nice thought, Tony 737, I agree. Of course, I’m the sort that would like to see him splattered all over an @l-j@zerr@ news conference and hence, the rest of the news media. They would be fighting for the exclusive-that’s who they are and where their priorities lie(pun intended). IMHO.

Just goes to show you that everything in life can be related to a Monty Python Sketch from Youtube….

Well then it looks like they’ve got some work to do. First Jamil really exsists and now this.

First, what does Jamil Hussein have to do with PJM? Did I miss an exclusive? Next, what does the fact that the Jamil Hussein that seems to have appeared doesn’t appear to be the source of the 61 stories do to your theory?

Then, what part of “We have received an unconfirmed report that he is dead” is wrong?

Then, Adnan Hajj, was also outed by PJM founder Charles Johnson of LGF, who shares a bit of Dan Rather’s scalp with present company and some others.

Now, tally that score again, won’t you?

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has apparently succumbed to cancer. It is the first natural death reported in Iran this year. Typically, Iranians are very unlucky people, with many public figures dying as a result of accidents. Update: O…

I really want to see PJM succeed as highly-respected news source to counter the MSM.

flipflop on January 8, 2007 at 9:20 AM

Well then it looks like they’ve got some work to do. First Jamil really exsists and now this. 0 for 2. If the NYT or WaPo were on the wrong end of these two stories instead of PJM I can just imagine some of the adjectives and adverbs that would be thrown around. But wait, I thought only liberals had double standards…

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks in Tehran January 8, 2007. Khamenei said on Monday Tehran would never yield to international pressure to deprive it of its right to nuclear technology, state radio said….

Catchy.

That’s how our Troops captured Tirek Azeez. The moron fell for it. “Look, I’m alive! I’m right here you American fools! … Oh, hello, American Soldiers (nervous smile) … My country does not want … uh, how you say? How you say? War.” Dummy.

True. But I think I’d have sat on it another day (hey, you can’t go wrong second-guessing someone!).

I really want to see PJM succeed as highly-respected news source to counter the MSM.