Video: The littlest anti-moonbat
posted at 11:04 am on January 4, 2007 by Allahpundit
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
What he lacks in acting chops he makes up for in righteousness and sheer hug-ability. He’s not as cute as Dizzy, though.
Follow that last link and watch the vid if you haven’t yet. Otherwise you won’t understand this.
Coming soon to an O’Reilly segment near you.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
“…of all the Charlie Browns in the world, you’re the Charlie Browniest!”
Kid from Brooklyn on January 4, 2007 at 11:07 AM
…Zionist pig ;o)
Right Tracker on January 4, 2007 at 11:10 AM
I nearly soiled myself.
“We got all the money. Why kill people??”
Ringmaster on January 4, 2007 at 11:15 AM
My only question is … where are the cries of “child abuse” now?
Personally, I don’t really care. I think the whole thing is kinda cute except … for the whole mass profanity and huge amounts of hatred from the littlest moonbat.
Much like her older lefty counterparts … she has no concept of a civil conversation. Instead it’s KILL THE CHRISTIANS THEY’RE EVIL!!! BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED!!!
Raising kids to be fanatical idiots … good stuff.
One Angry Christian on January 4, 2007 at 11:15 AM
Based on what I’ve witnessed over the past few terms (recent congressional history), perhaps ALL of our political discourse should be delivered by eight year old children.
BTW, has anyone besides me noticed that this little fella’ remained pretty calm throughout his presentation, but NOT SO for the littlest moonbat. The defining characteristic of ALL liberals is their ANGER.
CyberCipher on January 4, 2007 at 11:20 AM
I like this kid. But if these are smartest 8-year-old boy & girl, Beck is the cutest, funniest 8-year-old.
Editor on January 4, 2007 at 11:21 AM
Great! With the Dems in office now, we’ll see child abuse legislation voted on regarding the use of children in political statements if they deal with hate-mongering, racist, sexist, “homophobic” “propaganda. (read = republicans). All because of this.
Then they’ll continue their crusade for children by taking them out of homes (read: republican homes) that teach this and turning them over to the state.
armyvet on January 4, 2007 at 11:23 AM
This is every bit as ridiculous as the little girls’ rant. As OAC said, this kid will end up being a fanatic… As far as I’m concerned, this is as much child abuse as the other one, only the message is different.
One day we’ll see a reality show with these two little brats debating each other.
dalewalt on January 4, 2007 at 11:24 AM
These parents ought to be thrown in jail. Children are children, not pets.
Let me dress you up, read what I have written, look cute, sit, speak…good boy.
right2bright on January 4, 2007 at 11:28 AM
Would this be considered biological warfare then?
That would be cute.
Ringmaster on January 4, 2007 at 11:28 AM
Agreed, this is so annoying! Way to show we’re above this sorta thing.
emmaline1138 on January 4, 2007 at 11:50 AM
I said:
If you’re going to refer to my post keep it in context. The conservative kid kept it calm and reasonable. There was no massive screaming and cussing. There was no fanatical rhetoric. There was no anti religious bigotry or any bigotry for that matter … at all.
I was refering to the leftist kid, so please quote me accurate. Keep your references in context, or state your own case
please?
thanks.
One Angry Christian on January 4, 2007 at 11:59 AM
Sorry OAC, I had thought you were referring to BOTH children being raised to be fanatics. For the record:
I don’t think fanaticism requires
.
dalewalt on January 4, 2007 at 12:04 PM
Hehehe.
Theworldisnotenough on January 4, 2007 at 12:06 PM
There’s no child abuse calls for this video because this smart young man’s parents didn’t put vulgar words into his mouth.
It was quite jarring to see the little princess smirk up to the camera and declare “That’s a hell of a …” Sorry, it just ain’t right to hear that coming out of the mouth of what should have been an innocent child.
Classic sign of the hard Left: vulgarity = sophistication.
The boy comes off more likable than that awful snarky girl-child, she’d been told what to say, of course, but her attitude of superiority had been well-developed since birth. Her parents probably read her Leftie screeds while she was in the womb.
naliaka on January 4, 2007 at 12:13 PM
If anything, I’d say the kind of debating this eight-year-old (if we can call it debating even though I’m sure we all realize he probably didn’t know what he was saying) was engaging in is precisely what parents should be teaching their children.
He didn’t get angry or use bigotry for his response and instead debated like a rational adult would.
What he said wouldn’t be considered fanaticism in an adult. And I think that’s the disctintion here. What the little girl said would be considered fanaticism no matter how old the speaking was. What the boy is saying (specifically the words he is using) would never be.
But then again, I didn’t consider the other video child abuse anyway. I believe it was inappropriate but a far cry from actual child abuse, which is a truly horrible problem in our world.
Esthier on January 4, 2007 at 12:21 PM
To be fair, I’m sure plenty of Righties and religious people do the same.
The superiority thing isn’t needed in a child, but I don’t blame a parent for educating their child on what they believe to be true.
Esthier on January 4, 2007 at 12:23 PM
Oh, I disagree. He is WAAAAAYYYYY cuter than Dizzy!
Glynn on January 4, 2007 at 12:23 PM
I agree. If those two had been left out of her video, it would have been entertaining. And to be fair, if they’d been left out, I doubt anyone would have been crying child abuse in the first place.
Esthier on January 4, 2007 at 12:25 PM
They must be the smartest American kids. Possibly like how the World Series is for American Baseball. I’ll betcha there’s a couple of Japanese kids all set to take the titles.
This smacks of child beauty pagents, in which children are made to look like adults. It also puts me in mind of parents making their kids carry various abortion signage at a rally.
In essence, using children as mouthpeices or window dressing is tasteless and reeks of bad parenting.
Krydor on January 4, 2007 at 12:29 PM
Nice fisking.
CrimsonFisted on January 4, 2007 at 12:33 PM
The editting was irritating. If he’s the smartest 8 year old, why did he flub his lines so much, requiring so much cutting?
The hippie girl was better at this, but I’m not sure I’m fond of 8 year olds not being kids. Both should be out playing and riding their bikes, not debating religion and world politics.
lorien1973 on January 4, 2007 at 12:42 PM
What a creepy kid. I agree with lorien, put some sneakers on and lose the tie.
honora on January 4, 2007 at 12:49 PM
“This country was founded by christians, and will always be run by christians.”
A bit more extreme than slinging mud at O’Reilley and christianists, wouldn’t you say?
Whilst the little girl annoyed me more, (I was completely indifferent to the little boy) I did however, find the little girl a little more natural, better actress. Just my 2 centimes.
THeDRiFTeR on January 4, 2007 at 12:58 PM
That kid’s what I imagine Bella Lugosi looked like at 8.
Shy Guy on January 4, 2007 at 1:15 PM
The way the clip
was assembled to
gether from snip
pets really anno
yed me. What do
es everyone else
think?
Note to anyone who wants to do this in the future. Don’t.
But if you must, get your stooge to deliver an entire sentence in one take, then turn as if to face ‘the other camera’, and repeat the same move with the camera in the other position before doing the next sentence (you actually shoot the odd-numbered sentences first, then reposition the camera and do the others). Then you can edit the sentences together and it’ll look like it was done seamlessly. Alternatively, provide some other visual break such as a full-screen picture of what’s being discussed to cover the splicing.
The Monster on January 4, 2007 at 1:16 PM
And this is the bottom line.
dalewalt on January 4, 2007 at 1:19 PM
The “littlest moonbat” is being taught hatred and extremist idiocy. This is indoctrination.
Our little anti-moonbat is being taught responsible debate. I hope others notice the difference.
stonemeister on January 4, 2007 at 1:36 PM
I don’t know. Wait, yes I do. How about telling your “parents” you’d like to return to being a kid again.
What did Daddy promise to give you if you read through all his talking points in front of a camera?
CliffHanger on January 4, 2007 at 1:40 PM
I have to agree with some other posts. At least the kid is being taught valid debate techniques vs. the rant and rave of the littlest moonbat.
Reminds me of when my 8 yr old daughter asked what a Democrat is and I told her it was someone who is mean, annoying, and doesn’t clean their room. Thereafter, she started calling her little brother a democrat any time he annoyed her.
Sure she’s only eight, but I was only explaining political parties to her in terms she could best understand!
armyvet on January 4, 2007 at 1:53 PM
That’s a nasty thing to say about a child.
Hahahaha
I went back and watched the littlest moonbat and remembered that her rant was viral marketing for a band called the Bastard Fairies. So she was being used to sell a product.
Hmmmm, using children to sell something. Isn’t that some type of capitalist exploitation?
I wasn’t much older than this kid when my parents had me stuffing envelopes for Reagan. There is a fine line between a teaching moment and abuse, I guess.
Bill C on January 4, 2007 at 3:08 PM
Watch out y’all - Pelosi is a mother!
Entelechy on January 4, 2007 at 4:39 PM
Fantastic idea, not so great execution. Sometimes you have to give the Devil his due and the Lefty’s 8-year-old performance was flawless. This kid could have used some rehearsal. I think this film is a prime candidate for a remake. And no Golden Globe for editing either, it made the whole thing seem like an out-take gag reel.
dostrick on January 4, 2007 at 5:05 PM
The editing is very YouTube. The content is very talk radio.
At least one Traditionalist is trying make some media rather than bitching about the liberal media…
ScottMcC on January 4, 2007 at 5:50 PM
I was disappointed, I thought he would say ‘Jane, you ignorant Slut!”
retired on January 4, 2007 at 6:15 PM
Oh come on folks! I teach eight year old kids. Child abuse? Gimme a break. I laughed my butt off.
robblefarian on January 4, 2007 at 10:24 PM
Appreciative for the rebuttal, no matter how un-rehearsed it looked. It was cute.
Now…as to that Becky kid in Ireland (thanks, Editor for that couple of links - brilliant!)…that’s well executed and funny as hell.
“Is this the demolition company? I want you to knock down my school.”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
tickleddragon on January 4, 2007 at 10:54 PM
I guess he “ran by Christians” comment only applies to Non-Minnesota residents.
Tim Burton on January 5, 2007 at 12:19 AM
My 4 year old niece could own both of these kids.
RightWinged on January 5, 2007 at 12:33 AM
Just goes to show you these liberals have much the same tactics as if you were to watch the young ones on the media in palestine.
As a conservative (I used to be a liberal), I want to protect my child from all of this for as long as I can. That is the difference between me and the liberals I meet. They can’t wait to indoctrinate their children. Sad.
Highrise on January 5, 2007 at 4:45 AM