Comments on: Lieberman hater hijacks Connecticut for Lieberman Party

By: MarkB

MarkB — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:00:12 +0000

Go Cyber.

By: CyberCipher

CyberCipher — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:44:51 +0000

Don’t bother me, I’m busy creating a machine that will mass produce “minor parties.” My production goal is to create at least 100,000,000 “minor parties” before the 2008 election. Membership in these parties will be open to all Democrats.

By: ritethinker

ritethinker — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:26:38 +0000

Just when you think dems can’t get any funnier or wackier, is that a word, wackier? It is also a study in how their mind works. The democratic process played out, with Liebs being re-elected by the people. But this isn’t going to satisfy the dems, no way. To hell with the process, I’m going to hijack the winners organization and do everything I can to suppress the will of the people. Tolerance? That is the biggest lie running, that dems believe in tolerance. Look at Pelosi refusing to administer the oath of office to Vern Buchanan of Florida because they have issues with the voting-machines. The state of Florida certified him the winner but no King Nancy, Miss America, institutes her own ruling and makes herself the law. Not one repub that I know of is challenging an election result but can the same be said of the dems? Hell no, bitter losers and sore winners. Pelosi didn’t know how right she was when she said a dem victory would have children in charge of congress……..

By: RalphyBoy

RalphyBoy — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:04:13 +0000

Actually, this is a great strategy. What would have been better though would have been to just start showing up for Senate meetings and for votes as Sen. Lieberman. Much like in the Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

By: One Angry Christian

One Angry Christian — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:42:54 +0000

but remember … they’re not shrill and insane.

By: Mallard T. Drake

Mallard T. Drake — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:18:27 +0000

This story parallels nicely with Mother Sheehan commandeering the microphone at the Donk newsconference. The libs in-fighting will be quite entertaining over the next two years. Will this culminate in a 2008 Donk convention similar to Chicago 1968? Let’s sit back and watch.

By: right2bright

right2bright — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:57:55 +0000

Freelancer on January 4, 2007 at 9:45 AM

yeah, your right. (typed with slumping shoulders)

By: Freelancer

Freelancer — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:45:49 +0000

Joe is less than your standard socialist one precisely one issue, that of national defense. He is pro-gay, pro-abort, anti-death penalty; soft on crime, immigration, and fiscal restraint. There is a 0.0% chance of him turning Republican.

By: right2bright

right2bright — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:01:09 +0000

This is the democratic party at its best, eating their own.
This is going to be a great year.
Prediction: Joe switches to Republican within 14 months.

By: seejanemom

seejanemom — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:57:28 +0000

That fence post in his @$$ has gotta hurt.

By: dalewalt

dalewalt — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:56:31 +0000

Ian, pay attention: sleep (def) “a natural and periodic state of rest during which consciousness of the world is suspended”

4:25am? I really hope for your sake you live in PST or farther rest :-)

By: Neo

Neo — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:47:42 +0000

The tolerant, for-the-people Democratic party ladies and gentlemen.

By: alflauren

alflauren — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:32:02 +0000

I’m more worried about the political science professorship that this jagoff seized.

By: Ringmaster

Ringmaster — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:19:20 +0000

If that’s the case, I want to head the Hawk party of killing communists and other assorted dingbats (HOKCOAD)

By: Pablo

Pablo — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:03:32 +0000

You gonna eat the rest of those fries?

By: GT

GT — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:03:14 +0000

And this is a fella who teaches our children.

Chew on that for a while.

By: Gwillie

Gwillie — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:27:24 +0000

It’s my party and I’ll ~~cry~~ vote myself chairman if I want to…

By: meep

meep — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:22:05 +0000

I don’t quite understand how this happens.

I assume Connecticut for Lieberman was a party with no members before this guy signed up? So now it’s a party with one member. I don’t think there are great growth prospects for this party….and I can imagine who the party-nominated 2010 candidate for Senate will be.