<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain grumbles about having to build &#8220;the goddamned fence&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:31:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Speak of the devil&#8230; &#171; HoodaThunk?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-2123049</link>
		<dc:creator>Speak of the devil&#8230; &#171; HoodaThunk?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-2123049</guid>
		<description>[...] Guess what robo-call just landed on my answering machine at home? Why, it was Senator &#8220;I&#8217;ll build the g*ddamned fence&#8221; McCain himself asking for my vote next week. Starting already - should be a fun week for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Guess what robo-call just landed on my answering machine at home? Why, it was Senator &#8220;I&#8217;ll build the g*ddamned fence&#8221; McCain himself asking for my vote next week. Starting already &#8211; should be a fun week for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; McCain to Univision: Fence? I didn&#8217;t vote for any fence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-1431602</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; McCain to Univision: Fence? I didn&#8217;t vote for any fence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-1431602</guid>
		<description>[...] circa January 2007: &#8220;I&#8217;ll build the goddamned fence if they want it.&#8221; McCain, two days ago to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] circa January 2007: &#8220;I&#8217;ll build the goddamned fence if they want it.&#8221; McCain, two days ago to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCain Open Border policies &#171; The Proligious Times</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-1398454</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain Open Border policies &#171; The Proligious Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-1398454</guid>
		<description>[...] Is this what McCain believes in his heart, too? No wonder he cursed the “goddamned fence.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is this what McCain believes in his heart, too? No wonder he cursed the “goddamned fence.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lying As Fast As She Could Lie &#171; John McCain is a Liar</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-1383505</link>
		<dc:creator>Lying As Fast As She Could Lie &#171; John McCain is a Liar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-1383505</guid>
		<description>[...] is the John McCain who grumbled about how much he hates immigration restrictionists before caving and ceasing to support his own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the John McCain who grumbled about how much he hates immigration restrictionists before caving and ceasing to support his own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Republican PAC ad: Barack Obama is horrible on immigration</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-1337733</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Republican PAC ad: Barack Obama is horrible on immigration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-1337733</guid>
		<description>[...] thing there&#8217;s an alternative, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thing there&#8217;s an alternative, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Conservatives Say About John McCain &#124; Words &#38; War</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-1271895</link>
		<dc:creator>What Conservatives Say About John McCain &#124; Words &#38; War</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-1271895</guid>
		<description>[...] Straight talk: He resents what he calls the &#8220;goddamned fence.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Straight talk: He resents what he calls the &#8220;goddamned fence.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; John McCain: La Raza&#8217;s voice in Washington</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-931125</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; John McCain: La Raza&#8217;s voice in Washington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-931125</guid>
		<description>[...] Straight talk: He resents what he calls the &#8220;goddamned fence.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Straight talk: He resents what he calls the &#8220;goddamned fence.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Send Illegal Aliens Home Peacefully &#124; Vote Mitt For President</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-928956</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Send Illegal Aliens Home Peacefully &#124; Vote Mitt For President</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-928956</guid>
		<description>[...] But then he was up in front of a group of businessmen, talking about illegal immigration, when he said the following: McCain had been asked how debate over the immigration bill was playing politically. “In the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But then he was up in front of a group of businessmen, talking about illegal immigration, when he said the following: McCain had been asked how debate over the immigration bill was playing politically. “In the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The New Hampshire verdict; NBC, Fox calls it for McCain</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-861257</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The New Hampshire verdict; NBC, Fox calls it for McCain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-861257</guid>
		<description>[...] to remind you of how much contempt John McCain has shown the grass-roots over the past year. In January 2007, he cursed and grumbled about immigration enforcement activists who&#8217;ve spotlighted the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to remind you of how much contempt John McCain has shown the grass-roots over the past year. In January 2007, he cursed and grumbled about immigration enforcement activists who&#8217;ve spotlighted the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Amnesty bill will pass by July 4th, predicts Kyl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-458101</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Amnesty bill will pass by July 4th, predicts Kyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-458101</guid>
		<description>[...] Exit question: If, as McCain has suggested, the Republican leadership is afraid to oppose amnesty lest it be demagogued as anti-Hispanic and lose Latino votes, hasn&#8217;t that ship already sailed insofar as the Republican base is clearly and adamantly opposed to amnesty, no matter what its elected representatives do? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Exit question: If, as McCain has suggested, the Republican leadership is afraid to oppose amnesty lest it be demagogued as anti-Hispanic and lose Latino votes, hasn&#8217;t that ship already sailed insofar as the Republican base is clearly and adamantly opposed to amnesty, no matter what its elected representatives do? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: St. John panders about the &#8220;goddamned fence&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-455969</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: St. John panders about the &#8220;goddamned fence&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-455969</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember this? A day earlier, in Milwaukee, in front of an audience of more sympathetic businessmen, McCain had been asked how debate over the immigration bill was playing politically. “In the short term, it probably galvanizes our base,” he said. “In the long term, if you alienate the Hispanics, you’ll pay a heavy price.” Then he added, unable to help himself, “By the way, I think the fence is least effective. But I’ll build the goddamned fence if they want it.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember this? A day earlier, in Milwaukee, in front of an audience of more sympathetic businessmen, McCain had been asked how debate over the immigration bill was playing politically. “In the short term, it probably galvanizes our base,” he said. “In the long term, if you alienate the Hispanics, you’ll pay a heavy price.” Then he added, unable to help himself, “By the way, I think the fence is least effective. But I’ll build the goddamned fence if they want it.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Romney addresses abortion comments from 1994 Kennedy debate</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-179379</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Romney addresses abortion comments from 1994 Kennedy debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-179379</guid>
		<description>[...] What does he have to lose with the abortion comments, anyway? Giuliani&#8217;s infamously socially liberal and McCain, despite his voting record on the issue, is suspect: “Yes, he’s a social conservative, but his heart isn’t in this stuff,” one former aide told me, referring to McCain’s instinctual unwillingness to impose on others his personal views about issues such as religion, sexuality, and abortion. “But he has to pretend [that it is], and he’s not a good enough actor to pull it off. He just can’t fake it well enough.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What does he have to lose with the abortion comments, anyway? Giuliani&#8217;s infamously socially liberal and McCain, despite his voting record on the issue, is suspect: “Yes, he’s a social conservative, but his heart isn’t in this stuff,” one former aide told me, referring to McCain’s instinctual unwillingness to impose on others his personal views about issues such as religion, sexuality, and abortion. “But he has to pretend [that it is], and he’s not a good enough actor to pull it off. He just can’t fake it well enough.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evangelicals for Mitt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-174027</link>
		<dc:creator>Evangelicals for Mitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-174027</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;CBS NEWS POLL...&lt;/strong&gt;

CBS News released a new poll showing possible candidates ranking among Americans. It reported the favorable ratings of the top three candidates: Giuliani 41% McCain 39% Romney 5% So, what to make of these low numbers for Gov. Romney? Patrick......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CBS NEWS POLL&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>CBS News released a new poll showing possible candidates ranking among Americans. It reported the favorable ratings of the top three candidates: Giuliani 41% McCain 39% Romney 5% So, what to make of these low numbers for Gov. Romney? Patrick&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pelosi and Reid send letter to Bush urging &#8220;phased redeployment&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-171066</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pelosi and Reid send letter to Bush urging &#8220;phased redeployment&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-171066</guid>
		<description>[...] Biden opts for the conspiratorial view as all leftists do and must, but it looks like Bush really is approaching this as his last chance to win. McCain defended his own pro-surge position in Vanity Fair by saying, &#8220;I saw the kind of impact of a broken army, a defeated army and Marine Corps, after Vietnam. And I&#8217;d much rather have &#8216;em take a strain and have some success than be defeated.&#8221; Bush doubtless agrees. The problem, as Michael Duffy puts it, is that &#8220;the surge is a strange half-measure&#8211;too large for the political climate at home, too small to crush the insurgency in Iraq and surely three years too late.&#8221; It&#8217;d be nice to have &#8220;some&#8221; success, as McCain says, but &#8220;some&#8221; can mean a lot of things, potentially at a steep price. Defending an honorable government is one thing but if all we&#8217;re doing is going to bat for the Sadrists, then maybe Batiste is right: &#8220;We have reached the point where we need to ask the question whether it is more important to preserve the country of Iraq with its façade of democratic government, or protect our own national security interests.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Biden opts for the conspiratorial view as all leftists do and must, but it looks like Bush really is approaching this as his last chance to win. McCain defended his own pro-surge position in Vanity Fair by saying, &#8220;I saw the kind of impact of a broken army, a defeated army and Marine Corps, after Vietnam. And I&#8217;d much rather have &#8216;em take a strain and have some success than be defeated.&#8221; Bush doubtless agrees. The problem, as Michael Duffy puts it, is that &#8220;the surge is a strange half-measure&#8211;too large for the political climate at home, too small to crush the insurgency in Iraq and surely three years too late.&#8221; It&#8217;d be nice to have &#8220;some&#8221; success, as McCain says, but &#8220;some&#8221; can mean a lot of things, potentially at a steep price. Defending an honorable government is one thing but if all we&#8217;re doing is going to bat for the Sadrists, then maybe Batiste is right: &#8220;We have reached the point where we need to ask the question whether it is more important to preserve the country of Iraq with its façade of democratic government, or protect our own national security interests.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Burton</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-170724</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-170724</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Muslim Apostate–a person practicing the religion of Islam.
Christian–a person practicing the religion of Christianity
Muslim–a Muslim who wishes to impose his religious beliefs on others (ie. Sharia law)
Christianist–a Christian who wishes to impose his relgious beliefs on others (ie. ban gay marriage, outlaw the teaching of evolution)&lt;strike&gt;

Fixed! There are no Islamists, there are Muslims and Muslim Apostates.  Read their doctrine.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prophetofdoom.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Doctrines of the Koran&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Clearly the tactics used by Islamists and Christianists are radically different, most notably the fact Christianists haven’t blown up any buildings or killed any civilians lately. The similarities lie in that both wish to impose the moral standards and practices of their personal, relgious faith to society at large. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wait Wait Wait.

Atheists put their moral standards to law all the time.  Everyone does.  In fact, part of Natural Law says that murder is wrong, we have that legislated.  Now, you can say that is different, but it isn&#039;t.  It is a moral judgement on an act.  The only thing left is what morals are we going to enact.&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Muslim Apostate–a person practicing the religion of Islam.<br />
Christian–a person practicing the religion of Christianity<br />
Muslim–a Muslim who wishes to impose his religious beliefs on others (ie. Sharia law)<br />
Christianist–a Christian who wishes to impose his relgious beliefs on others (ie. ban gay marriage, outlaw the teaching of evolution)<strike></p>
<p>Fixed! There are no Islamists, there are Muslims and Muslim Apostates.  Read their doctrine.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prophetofdoom.net" rel="nofollow">Doctrines of the Koran</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Clearly the tactics used by Islamists and Christianists are radically different, most notably the fact Christianists haven’t blown up any buildings or killed any civilians lately. The similarities lie in that both wish to impose the moral standards and practices of their personal, relgious faith to society at large. </p></blockquote>
<p>Wait Wait Wait.</p>
<p>Atheists put their moral standards to law all the time.  Everyone does.  In fact, part of Natural Law says that murder is wrong, we have that legislated.  Now, you can say that is different, but it isn&#8217;t.  It is a moral judgement on an act.  The only thing left is what morals are we going to enact.</strike></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ritethinker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-170513</link>
		<dc:creator>ritethinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-170513</guid>
		<description>Just for the record honora, making something legal is condoning it.  Is this that hard to understand?  When you make something legal you allow it, therefore you&#039;ve condoned the behavior.  This is the problem when you try to have a legit debate on abortion, you end up with fuzzy platitudes instead of getting to the heart of the matter.  Abortion is simply whether a human life should be ended by another human life after it has been conceived.  That&#039;s it, period.  It&#039;s not about choice, unless it&#039;s about the choice to not have a baby or to use contraception, that is the choice-before, not after the fact.  It&#039;s not about &quot;it&#039;s my body&quot;, hell I could ues that excuse to engage in any bahavior.  It&#039;s not about convenience.  It is simply whether one human life can be ended by another human life after conception.  You either believe yes it can be ended by another or no it can&#039;t be ended by another.  It should be legal(condoned)or illegal(condemned).  Oh, and don&#039;t even try the parsing of arguments with well, it should be legal but rare.  If it&#039;s a legit law, then why rare?  The only thing good I may want rare is a steak.  The government is charged with very little really, according to our Constitution, but it&#039;s one main task is the protection of life.  The pursuit to do so with regards to abortion is hardly govt. interference.

For the record, I would love to see Roe V Wade overturned.  Most people don&#039;t know this but it wouldn&#039;t make abortion illegal it would just send the issue back to the states..where it belongs.  This issue should be settled by the people not the courts.

There was a time in our history when people were not considered full citizens with full rights.  In fact, there were people not even considered to be human at all.  This distinction was based on skin color.  It seems today we make that distinction based on age, whether too young, and now more recently, too old.

Now stepping down from my soap-box.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record honora, making something legal is condoning it.  Is this that hard to understand?  When you make something legal you allow it, therefore you&#8217;ve condoned the behavior.  This is the problem when you try to have a legit debate on abortion, you end up with fuzzy platitudes instead of getting to the heart of the matter.  Abortion is simply whether a human life should be ended by another human life after it has been conceived.  That&#8217;s it, period.  It&#8217;s not about choice, unless it&#8217;s about the choice to not have a baby or to use contraception, that is the choice-before, not after the fact.  It&#8217;s not about &#8220;it&#8217;s my body&#8221;, hell I could ues that excuse to engage in any bahavior.  It&#8217;s not about convenience.  It is simply whether one human life can be ended by another human life after conception.  You either believe yes it can be ended by another or no it can&#8217;t be ended by another.  It should be legal(condoned)or illegal(condemned).  Oh, and don&#8217;t even try the parsing of arguments with well, it should be legal but rare.  If it&#8217;s a legit law, then why rare?  The only thing good I may want rare is a steak.  The government is charged with very little really, according to our Constitution, but it&#8217;s one main task is the protection of life.  The pursuit to do so with regards to abortion is hardly govt. interference.</p>
<p>For the record, I would love to see Roe V Wade overturned.  Most people don&#8217;t know this but it wouldn&#8217;t make abortion illegal it would just send the issue back to the states..where it belongs.  This issue should be settled by the people not the courts.</p>
<p>There was a time in our history when people were not considered full citizens with full rights.  In fact, there were people not even considered to be human at all.  This distinction was based on skin color.  It seems today we make that distinction based on age, whether too young, and now more recently, too old.</p>
<p>Now stepping down from my soap-box&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evangelicals for Mitt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-170417</link>
		<dc:creator>Evangelicals for Mitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-170417</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RE: FAKING IT...&lt;/strong&gt;

More fall-out from that article, this time from Hot Air Blog: Romney’s people e-mailed me the link to his exploratory committee’s new website today and I was going to ignore it, but after this? Go on — explore Mitt.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RE: FAKING IT&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>More fall-out from that article, this time from Hot Air Blog: Romney’s people e-mailed me the link to his exploratory committee’s new website today and I was going to ignore it, but after this? Go on — explore Mitt&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traction Control &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Headline Summaries: Border Security</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-170356</link>
		<dc:creator>Traction Control &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Headline Summaries: Border Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-170356</guid>
		<description>[...] Would “the goddamned fence” have helped here? It couldn’t have hurt. … h/t Allahpundit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Would “the goddamned fence” have helped here? It couldn’t have hurt. … h/t Allahpundit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hillbillyjim</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-170258</link>
		<dc:creator>hillbillyjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-170258</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;NTWR on January 4, 2007 at 4:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wasn&#039;t questioning your usage of &quot;condone&quot;. I was pointing out to our liberal friend that she was jumping off on a nitpicking linguistic tangent that wasn&#039;t valid in the first place. 

She wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I find your comments re “condoning” interesting. Is making/keeping something legal the same as condoning it? I hardly think so. 

honora on January 4, 2007 at 3:28 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just wanted to point out that her &quot;I hardly think so.&quot; was hardly linguistically accurate, therefore I conclude that she was trying to engage in misdirection, or didn&#039;t understand the very word about which she was commenting.

Your point was well-spoken and correct, in my opinion. Which of course in my own little mind is always right./sarc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>NTWR on January 4, 2007 at 4:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t questioning your usage of &#8220;condone&#8221;. I was pointing out to our liberal friend that she was jumping off on a nitpicking linguistic tangent that wasn&#8217;t valid in the first place. </p>
<p>She wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>I find your comments re “condoning” interesting. Is making/keeping something legal the same as condoning it? I hardly think so. </p>
<p>honora on January 4, 2007 at 3:28 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Just wanted to point out that her &#8220;I hardly think so.&#8221; was hardly linguistically accurate, therefore I conclude that she was trying to engage in misdirection, or didn&#8217;t understand the very word about which she was commenting.</p>
<p>Your point was well-spoken and correct, in my opinion. Which of course in my own little mind is always right./sarc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cop The Truth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-170156</link>
		<dc:creator>Cop The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 07:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-170156</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;National Guard attacked at U.S. border...&lt;/strong&gt;

Un-freaking-believable! National Guard unit stormed while patrolling the border. No injuries were reported, thankfully, but what was this all about? Intel gathering? Distraction? Trying to see if the NG are armed and would engage? The NG may be armed a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>National Guard attacked at U.S. border&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Un-freaking-believable! National Guard unit stormed while patrolling the border. No injuries were reported, thankfully, but what was this all about? Intel gathering? Distraction? Trying to see if the NG are armed and would engage? The NG may be armed a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mexican gunmen cross border, rout National Guard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-170009</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mexican gunmen cross border, rout National Guard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 04:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-170009</guid>
		<description>[...] Would &#8220;the goddamned fence&#8221; have helped here? Well, it couldn&#8217;t have hurt. Nor could arming the National Guard or tasking them with something more ambitious than making pizza runs for the local border patrol unit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Would &#8220;the goddamned fence&#8221; have helped here? Well, it couldn&#8217;t have hurt. Nor could arming the National Guard or tasking them with something more ambitious than making pizza runs for the local border patrol unit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MITX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-169838</link>
		<dc:creator>MITX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-169838</guid>
		<description>Sooth:
Just as foolish...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooth:<br />
Just as foolish&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soothsayer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-169761</link>
		<dc:creator>Soothsayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-169761</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Not that it surprises me, but you’re really behind the times ’sayer. Sullivan’s been proudly using his new word every chance he gets and it’s quickly spreading across the lexicon. For all of those still confused, let me try to help you out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks for the update but Andrew Sullivan is a FOOL, that would be why I don&#039;t know and couldn&#039;t give a hot plate of pig spit what he said. And BANNING Gay &quot;marriage&quot; isn&#039;t imposing your religious beliefs on anyone, since there never has been a society in the history of man dumb enough to let filthy sodomites &quot;marry&quot;. The filthy homos that surrounded Lots house in Sodom weren&#039;t even DEPRAVED enough to think they should be MARRIED. So obviously any stupid atheist like Sullivan who misses an upheaval of every tradition in the history of man, yet chafes at anyone OBJECTING to said upheaval is, alas I said it before, a FOOL. And so are those who find any worth in what he says, btw. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Psalm 14:1
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;The FOOL hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

See, according to the Lord your supposed God, &lt;strong&gt;Atheists are FOOLS&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;em&gt; What do you think that makes those who see them as &quot;trendy&quot;, and who follow their &quot;trends&quot;? Hmmmmmm.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Not that it surprises me, but you’re really behind the times ’sayer. Sullivan’s been proudly using his new word every chance he gets and it’s quickly spreading across the lexicon. For all of those still confused, let me try to help you out.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks for the update but Andrew Sullivan is a FOOL, that would be why I don&#8217;t know and couldn&#8217;t give a hot plate of pig spit what he said. And BANNING Gay &#8220;marriage&#8221; isn&#8217;t imposing your religious beliefs on anyone, since there never has been a society in the history of man dumb enough to let filthy sodomites &#8220;marry&#8221;. The filthy homos that surrounded Lots house in Sodom weren&#8217;t even DEPRAVED enough to think they should be MARRIED. So obviously any stupid atheist like Sullivan who misses an upheaval of every tradition in the history of man, yet chafes at anyone OBJECTING to said upheaval is, alas I said it before, a FOOL. And so are those who find any worth in what he says, btw. </p>
<blockquote><p>Psalm 14:1<br />
<strong><em>The FOOL hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.</em></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>See, according to the Lord your supposed God, <strong>Atheists are FOOLS</strong>.<em> What do you think that makes those who see them as &#8220;trendy&#8221;, and who follow their &#8220;trends&#8221;? Hmmmmmm.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Katharine Ham</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-169486</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Katharine Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-169486</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;McConnell: &#039;Civility Does Not Mean Capitulation&#039;...&lt;/strong&gt;


John Hawkins was in on a conference call today with newly minted Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell. I was invited, but couldn&#039;t get away from the filming of HamNation in time. Luckily John&#039;s on the ball.
Like John, I have a hard time......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>McConnell: &#8216;Civility Does Not Mean Capitulation&#8217;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>John Hawkins was in on a conference call today with newly minted Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell. I was invited, but couldn&#8217;t get away from the filming of HamNation in time. Luckily John&#8217;s on the ball.<br />
Like John, I have a hard time&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NTWR</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-169443</link>
		<dc:creator>NTWR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/mccain-grumbles-about-having-to-build-the-goddamned-fence/#comment-169443</guid>
		<description>Ok, I should have said &quot;legislating the behavior to be not only acceptable, but to make it criminal if you do not condone it.&quot; 

But what James said is the real point:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Abortion and gay rights can be debated after we ensure that there is an America in which to debate it.

Terrorism and border security are national survival issues. Abortion and gay rights, along with most of the other mostly petty liberal/conservative hangups that we’ve previously had the luxury to debate will all be moot if we don’t take care of them first. 

James on January 4, 2007 at 2:01 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I should have said &#8220;legislating the behavior to be not only acceptable, but to make it criminal if you do not condone it.&#8221; </p>
<p>But what James said is the real point:</p>
<blockquote><p>Abortion and gay rights can be debated after we ensure that there is an America in which to debate it.</p>
<p>Terrorism and border security are national survival issues. Abortion and gay rights, along with most of the other mostly petty liberal/conservative hangups that we’ve previously had the luxury to debate will all be moot if we don’t take care of them first. </p>
<p>James on January 4, 2007 at 2:01 PM
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
