<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Conyers and bipartisan CYA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 18:21:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Imperial John Conyers, bipartisan CYA</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-539244</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Imperial John Conyers, bipartisan CYA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 12:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-539244</guid>
		<description>[...] I go back to the trash can to cover crooked John Conyers, Nancy &#8220;Mrs. Clean&#8221; Pelosi, and bipartisan rump-coverers today at Hot Air. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I go back to the trash can to cover crooked John Conyers, Nancy &#8220;Mrs. Clean&#8221; Pelosi, and bipartisan rump-coverers today at Hot Air. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halley</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-168416</link>
		<dc:creator>Halley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-168416</guid>
		<description>Michelle - you&#039;re assuming that Democrats are against corruption. How could their party survive a day without it???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle &#8211; you&#8217;re assuming that Democrats are against corruption. How could their party survive a day without it???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-168240</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 05:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-168240</guid>
		<description>It appears we have a &quot;culture of corruption&quot; in Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears we have a &#8220;culture of corruption&#8221; in Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-168156</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-168156</guid>
		<description>This is too easy:

A pox on both Houses!

&quot;the most ethical...&quot; - on which planet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is too easy:</p>
<p>A pox on both Houses!</p>
<p>&#8220;the most ethical&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; on which planet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L Frederick (Sniper One)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167964</link>
		<dc:creator>E L Frederick (Sniper One)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167964</guid>
		<description>Speaker Botox Clean House? Please! That&#039;s what her illegals are for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaker Botox Clean House? Please! That&#8217;s what her illegals are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakko77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167890</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakko77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167890</guid>
		<description>The more things change, the more they stay the same.

I seriously wish there was a viable 3rd Party.  A Party that doesn&#039;t only give lip service to conservative values and ideals.

I can only imagine how the Founding Fathers would react to what the nation they formed has become but I imagine they&#039;d be tempted to grab a rifle and start another Revolution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more things change, the more they stay the same.</p>
<p>I seriously wish there was a viable 3rd Party.  A Party that doesn&#8217;t only give lip service to conservative values and ideals.</p>
<p>I can only imagine how the Founding Fathers would react to what the nation they formed has become but I imagine they&#8217;d be tempted to grab a rifle and start another Revolution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbancenturion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167668</link>
		<dc:creator>urbancenturion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167668</guid>
		<description>Sorry, MM. Meant to say great Vent, very hard-hitting without pulling punches. I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, MM. Meant to say great Vent, very hard-hitting without pulling punches. I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbancenturion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167665</link>
		<dc:creator>urbancenturion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167665</guid>
		<description>Launch the stones! The glass be damned! It&#039;s time to start slitting throats. If the righties went on a rampage, in the end, they would win because truth will out. By holding ourselves back, we play their game and thereby lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Launch the stones! The glass be damned! It&#8217;s time to start slitting throats. If the righties went on a rampage, in the end, they would win because truth will out. By holding ourselves back, we play their game and thereby lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167525</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167525</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;John Conyers Admits He Might be Part of the Problem in DC....&lt;/strong&gt;

	It looks like everybody is trying to run from their dirt while much of the media is on vacation.  Now the Democrats and John Conyers are trying to slide out news that congressman Conyers is corrupt.  Of course they are using a massive amount of sugar ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Conyers Admits He Might be Part of the Problem in DC&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>	It looks like everybody is trying to run from their dirt while much of the media is on vacation.  Now the Democrats and John Conyers are trying to slide out news that congressman Conyers is corrupt.  Of course they are using a massive amount of sugar &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumb Ox News</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167476</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumb Ox News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167476</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Under-Reported News of 2006, and THE Question of 2...&lt;/strong&gt;

We can add to the &quot;World Net Daily&quot; outline of top under-reported stories that the Mainstream Media NON-trumpeted:  The calculations of ideology and sympathy for Leftist causes, or for any cause that stands opposed to traditional values, are thinly v...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Under-Reported News of 2006, and THE Question of 2&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>We can add to the &#8220;World Net Daily&#8221; outline of top under-reported stories that the Mainstream Media NON-trumpeted:  The calculations of ideology and sympathy for Leftist causes, or for any cause that stands opposed to traditional values, are thinly v&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167451</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167451</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;CyberCipher on January 3, 2007 at 11:56 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I think you are right on the fact about glass houses.  But the Dems have no problems throwing stones and it works for them.  Being passive will not win you elections.
Oh and here is novel idea, how about cleaning our house so we can throw stones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>CyberCipher on January 3, 2007 at 11:56 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I think you are right on the fact about glass houses.  But the Dems have no problems throwing stones and it works for them.  Being passive will not win you elections.<br />
Oh and here is novel idea, how about cleaning our house so we can throw stones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167286</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167286</guid>
		<description>Good Vent, perfect finish. It really should be that simple. 

I&#039;m just too pissed to say much here, she hasn&#039;t really even started, and we have two more years of this crime spree?

Pelosi= I&#039;ve been writing peloser but it might need to be looser= pelooser.
Her actions are clearly not helpful cleaning, but actually  getting looser!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Vent, perfect finish. It really should be that simple. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just too pissed to say much here, she hasn&#8217;t really even started, and we have two more years of this crime spree?</p>
<p>Pelosi= I&#8217;ve been writing peloser but it might need to be looser= pelooser.<br />
Her actions are clearly not helpful cleaning, but actually  getting looser!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R D</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167247</link>
		<dc:creator>R D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167247</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When are the Republicians going to go on the offense? Start calling the Demo’s out on all their BS. We need a Designated Hitter to get in front of cameras to make the Demo’s cry “you’re not playing fair.” Where is the leadership? And I’m not talking about the wimps there now.

VikingGoneWild on January 3, 2007 at 11:20 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That job used to belong to Newt and Trent. See where that got them? Hey now. That&#039;s a team I could vote for. Gingrich/Lott &#039;08!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When are the Republicians going to go on the offense? Start calling the Demo’s out on all their BS. We need a Designated Hitter to get in front of cameras to make the Demo’s cry “you’re not playing fair.” Where is the leadership? And I’m not talking about the wimps there now.</p>
<p>VikingGoneWild on January 3, 2007 at 11:20 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>That job used to belong to Newt and Trent. See where that got them? Hey now. That&#8217;s a team I could vote for. Gingrich/Lott &#8217;08!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167142</link>
		<dc:creator>Carin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167142</guid>
		<description>You know, Conyer&#039;s wife (part of his illegal use of staff concerned her campaign) is now a Detroit City Council Member.  SHE presented to city council earlier this year that the Detroit/Windsor tunnel be renamed in  HIS honor. I guess that whas her &quot;thanks honey.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Conyer&#8217;s wife (part of his illegal use of staff concerned her campaign) is now a Detroit City Council Member.  SHE presented to city council earlier this year that the Detroit/Windsor tunnel be renamed in  HIS honor. I guess that whas her &#8220;thanks honey.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omegaram</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167114</link>
		<dc:creator>omegaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167114</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Great Vent Michelle!&lt;/strong&gt;

I believe that comments by  (thirteen28 on January 3, 2007 at 11:55 AM) were right on.  (It sure would be nice to have numbers on the commments to make reference easier.)

Hope you get better soon Michelle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great Vent Michelle!</strong></p>
<p>I believe that comments by  (thirteen28 on January 3, 2007 at 11:55 AM) were right on.  (It sure would be nice to have numbers on the commments to make reference easier.)</p>
<p>Hope you get better soon Michelle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberCipher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167066</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberCipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167066</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am more pissed off at the weak Republicans who are afraid to stand up and shout down these criminals.

right2bright on January 3, 2007 at 9:30 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;When are the Republicians going to go on the offense?

VikingGoneWild on January 3, 2007 at 11:20 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry Michelle (and the rest of you), but I am not at all mystified by the &quot;bi-partisan CYA syndrome&quot; that we are all witnessing. I believe that the Republicans are cognizant of that old proverb:
&quot;People who live in glass houses shouldn&#039;t throw stones.&quot;

The Republicans know they are guilty of PLENTY. Sure, the Dhimmicrats are most likely guilty of WAY more graft and corruption than our side, but the Republicans know that if they speak up, the Democrats will retaliate. The Republicans also know that if the Dhimmis can&#039;t find any wrong-doings on the Republican side to &quot;expose,&quot; the unhinged leftists won&#039;t hesitate to fabricate or manufacture something completely artificial. Furthermore, both sides know that by the time that the MSM finally owns up to (or finishes) fanning the flames of false charges, the damage will have already been done. Sort of like the Duke U. lacrosse team rape case that has been playing out in the media. 

Politics is a very dirty business. Righteous people who possess some measure of integrity are not at all immune to being unfairly soiled by all of it. Perhaps that&#039;s why we all hang out at blogs like HA -- and why we find all of this stuff so fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am more pissed off at the weak Republicans who are afraid to stand up and shout down these criminals.</p>
<p>right2bright on January 3, 2007 at 9:30 AM</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>When are the Republicians going to go on the offense?</p>
<p>VikingGoneWild on January 3, 2007 at 11:20 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry Michelle (and the rest of you), but I am not at all mystified by the &#8220;bi-partisan CYA syndrome&#8221; that we are all witnessing. I believe that the Republicans are cognizant of that old proverb:<br />
&#8220;People who live in glass houses shouldn&#8217;t throw stones.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Republicans know they are guilty of PLENTY. Sure, the Dhimmicrats are most likely guilty of WAY more graft and corruption than our side, but the Republicans know that if they speak up, the Democrats will retaliate. The Republicans also know that if the Dhimmis can&#8217;t find any wrong-doings on the Republican side to &#8220;expose,&#8221; the unhinged leftists won&#8217;t hesitate to fabricate or manufacture something completely artificial. Furthermore, both sides know that by the time that the MSM finally owns up to (or finishes) fanning the flames of false charges, the damage will have already been done. Sort of like the Duke U. lacrosse team rape case that has been playing out in the media. </p>
<p>Politics is a very dirty business. Righteous people who possess some measure of integrity are not at all immune to being unfairly soiled by all of it. Perhaps that&#8217;s why we all hang out at blogs like HA &#8212; and why we find all of this stuff so fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167064</link>
		<dc:creator>thirteen28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167064</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What rankles is that this air of “bipartisanship” is a one-way road. It takes little imagination to surmise what the reaction would be if a Republican had done the same thing that Conyers has: Donk and media page one/lead story caterwauling about the “culture of corruption” coupled with his fellow Republicans calling for (and getting) his pelt.

...

Spurius Ligustinus on January 3, 2007 at 8:56 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;What the heck have the Republicans been drinking? Been drinking at the Dems trough? I am more pissed off at the weak Republicans who are afraid to stand up and shout down these criminals. Giving Conyers a pass is stupid, let alone enabling. A party of wimps. 

right2bright on January 3, 2007 at 9:30 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bullseye on both counts.  

It&#039;s un-freakin&#039;-believable that Dems can continue to get away with corruption like this.

And it&#039;s un-freakin&#039;believable that so-called Republicans in congress are too p***y to call them on it, instead adopting W&#039;s &quot;new tone&quot;.  

On an unrelated note, Michelle you need another bowl or two of chicken soup ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What rankles is that this air of “bipartisanship” is a one-way road. It takes little imagination to surmise what the reaction would be if a Republican had done the same thing that Conyers has: Donk and media page one/lead story caterwauling about the “culture of corruption” coupled with his fellow Republicans calling for (and getting) his pelt.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Spurius Ligustinus on January 3, 2007 at 8:56 AM</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>What the heck have the Republicans been drinking? Been drinking at the Dems trough? I am more pissed off at the weak Republicans who are afraid to stand up and shout down these criminals. Giving Conyers a pass is stupid, let alone enabling. A party of wimps. </p>
<p>right2bright on January 3, 2007 at 9:30 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Bullseye on both counts.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s un-freakin&#8217;-believable that Dems can continue to get away with corruption like this.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s un-freakin&#8217;believable that so-called Republicans in congress are too p***y to call them on it, instead adopting W&#8217;s &#8220;new tone&#8221;.  </p>
<p>On an unrelated note, Michelle you need another bowl or two of chicken soup ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VENT: Michelle Malkin on Corruptocrat John Conyers at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167063</link>
		<dc:creator>VENT: Michelle Malkin on Corruptocrat John Conyers at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167063</guid>
		<description>[...] And Nancy Pelosi, the new Madame Speaker, who so arrogantly proclaimed that the next session of Congress (which opens Thursday) would be the &#8220;most honest, most open, most ethical&#8221; Congress in history, will start the aforementioned session by keeping the corrupt Democrat John Conyers as the House Judiciary Chairman. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And Nancy Pelosi, the new Madame Speaker, who so arrogantly proclaimed that the next session of Congress (which opens Thursday) would be the &#8220;most honest, most open, most ethical&#8221; Congress in history, will start the aforementioned session by keeping the corrupt Democrat John Conyers as the House Judiciary Chairman. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SevenStripes.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167035</link>
		<dc:creator>SevenStripes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167035</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;VENT: Michelle Malkin on Corruptocrat John Conyers...&lt;/strong&gt;


A Democrat Representative from Michigan by the name of John Conyers (one of the moonbats pushing for the impeachment of President Bush) has been found guilty by the House Ethics committee of being in flagrant violation of ethics rules, including the f...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>VENT: Michelle Malkin on Corruptocrat John Conyers&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A Democrat Representative from Michigan by the name of John Conyers (one of the moonbats pushing for the impeachment of President Bush) has been found guilty by the House Ethics committee of being in flagrant violation of ethics rules, including the f&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VikingGoneWild</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-167028</link>
		<dc:creator>VikingGoneWild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-167028</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can I be in charge of the beer and wine supplies then?&lt;/strong&gt;

Unbelievable.  Only in Congress can you break the law and then be put in charge of the Judiciary committee.

When are the Republicians going to go on the offense?  Start calling the Demo&#039;s out on all their BS.  We need a &lt;em&gt;Designated Hitter&lt;/em&gt; to get in front of cameras to make the Demo&#039;s cry &quot;you&#039;re not playing fair.&quot;  Where is the leadership?  And I&#039;m not talking about the wimps there now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can I be in charge of the beer and wine supplies then?</strong></p>
<p>Unbelievable.  Only in Congress can you break the law and then be put in charge of the Judiciary committee.</p>
<p>When are the Republicians going to go on the offense?  Start calling the Demo&#8217;s out on all their BS.  We need a <em>Designated Hitter</em> to get in front of cameras to make the Demo&#8217;s cry &#8220;you&#8217;re not playing fair.&#8221;  Where is the leadership?  And I&#8217;m not talking about the wimps there now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill's Bites</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-166994</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill's Bites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-166994</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Imperial John Conyers, bipartisan CYA...&lt;/strong&gt;

Imperial John Conyers, bipartisan CYAMichelle Malkin I go back to the trash can to cover crooked John Conyers, Nancy Mrs. Clean Pelosi, and bipartisan rump-coverers today at Hot Air. The New York Post editorial board weighs in on the imperial...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Imperial John Conyers, bipartisan CYA&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Imperial John Conyers, bipartisan CYAMichelle Malkin I go back to the trash can to cover crooked John Conyers, Nancy Mrs. Clean Pelosi, and bipartisan rump-coverers today at Hot Air. The New York Post editorial board weighs in on the imperial&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazztek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-166970</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazztek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-166970</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Fox, meet henhouse...&lt;strong&gt;

Don&#039;t EGG them on...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Fox, meet henhouse&#8230;<strong></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t EGG them on&#8230;</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbz123</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-166958</link>
		<dc:creator>bbz123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-166958</guid>
		<description>Well,the Republicans will be in for a surprise when that &quot;bipartisan&quot; concept is thrown out the window tomorrow and Pelosi&#039;s gang starts ramming through all sorts of nonsense while not allowing the GOP to participate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,the Republicans will be in for a surprise when that &#8220;bipartisan&#8221; concept is thrown out the window tomorrow and Pelosi&#8217;s gang starts ramming through all sorts of nonsense while not allowing the GOP to participate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bones47</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-166946</link>
		<dc:creator>bones47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-166946</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Throw the garbage Out&lt;/strong&gt; Right on again Michelle..........gotta love her facts of truth but it won&#039;t matter with the Demmi&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Throw the garbage Out</strong> Right on again Michelle&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.gotta love her facts of truth but it won&#8217;t matter with the Demmi&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/comment-page-1/#comment-166931</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/03/john-conyers-and-bipartisan-cya/#comment-166931</guid>
		<description>What the heck have the Republicans been drinking?  Been drinking at the Dems trough?  I am more pissed off at the weak Republicans who are afraid to stand up and shout down these criminals.  Giving Conyers a pass is stupid, let alone enabling.  A party of wimps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck have the Republicans been drinking?  Been drinking at the Dems trough?  I am more pissed off at the weak Republicans who are afraid to stand up and shout down these criminals.  Giving Conyers a pass is stupid, let alone enabling.  A party of wimps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
