<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1,001 reasons not to trust the L.A. Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:12:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-165601</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/#comment-165601</guid>
		<description>One other note:  Without the sports section the LAT readership would be about 16.  Without the Sports and Business section about 9 people would actually read the LAT.  No one respects the editorials or articles.  Everyone I ever talked to bought the LAT for the business and sport section only.  They have the internal marketing studies, and it absolutely confuses them that most people do not see the world their way.

But then look at their competition, why should they change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other note:  Without the sports section the LAT readership would be about 16.  Without the Sports and Business section about 9 people would actually read the LAT.  No one respects the editorials or articles.  Everyone I ever talked to bought the LAT for the business and sport section only.  They have the internal marketing studies, and it absolutely confuses them that most people do not see the world their way.</p>
<p>But then look at their competition, why should they change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctorDentons</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-165600</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctorDentons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/#comment-165600</guid>
		<description>Anyone who puts that rag in a birdcage or down for the puppy should be arrested for animal cruelty !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who puts that rag in a birdcage or down for the puppy should be arrested for animal cruelty !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill's Bites</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-165588</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill's Bites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/#comment-165588</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;1,001 reasons not to trust the L.A. Times&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

... It&#039;s a shame Patterico&#039;s only one person. I&#039;m sure posts just as long could be written about al-NYT, al-WaPo and al-AP, just for starters. 
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;1,001 reasons not to trust the L.A. Times&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; It&#8217;s a shame Patterico&#8217;s only one person. I&#8217;m sure posts just as long could be written about al-NYT, al-WaPo and al-AP, just for starters.<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terp Mole</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-165584</link>
		<dc:creator>Terp Mole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/#comment-165584</guid>
		<description>Recalls an old Rodney Dangerfield line: &quot;I tell you I get no respect. The other day the dog went on the newspaper three times... twice I was reading it!&quot;

LA Times: Still unfit to line bird cages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recalls an old Rodney Dangerfield line: &#8220;I tell you I get no respect. The other day the dog went on the newspaper three times&#8230; twice I was reading it!&#8221;</p>
<p>LA Times: Still unfit to line bird cages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-165582</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/02/1001-reasons-not-to-trust-the-la-times/#comment-165582</guid>
		<description>I like Larry Elder&#039;s statement &quot;Facts to a liberal is like kryptonite to superman&quot;.  Facts will bring down most of the MSM papers, and the circulation is telling the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Larry Elder&#8217;s statement &#8220;Facts to a liberal is like kryptonite to superman&#8221;.  Facts will bring down most of the MSM papers, and the circulation is telling the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
