1,001 reasons not to trust the L.A. Times

posted at 9:36 am on January 2, 2007 by Allahpundit

Well, roughly speaking. There’s probably only five or six hundred there.

Go for the sock puppetry, stay for the relentless, pervasive left-wing bias.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I like Larry Elder’s statement “Facts to a liberal is like kryptonite to superman”. Facts will bring down most of the MSM papers, and the circulation is telling the story.

right2bright on January 2, 2007 at 9:52 AM

Recalls an old Rodney Dangerfield line: “I tell you I get no respect. The other day the dog went on the newspaper three times… twice I was reading it!”

LA Times: Still unfit to line bird cages.

Terp Mole on January 2, 2007 at 9:55 AM

Anyone who puts that rag in a birdcage or down for the puppy should be arrested for animal cruelty !

DoctorDentons on January 2, 2007 at 10:12 AM

One other note: Without the sports section the LAT readership would be about 16. Without the Sports and Business section about 9 people would actually read the LAT. No one respects the editorials or articles. Everyone I ever talked to bought the LAT for the business and sport section only. They have the internal marketing studies, and it absolutely confuses them that most people do not see the world their way.

But then look at their competition, why should they change?

right2bright on January 2, 2007 at 10:13 AM