<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LA Times revisits controversial Ramadi airstrike story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:35:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BizzyBlog &#187; Correcting an LA Times Headline on Its Ramadi Follow-up Story</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/comment-page-1/#comment-161215</link>
		<dc:creator>BizzyBlog &#187; Correcting an LA Times Headline on Its Ramadi Follow-up Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/#comment-161215</guid>
		<description>[...] Patterico has noticed (&#8221;L.A. Times (Almost) Admits Ramadi Airstrike Didn’t Happen&#8221;) and promises much more later. Also, Hot Air has weighed in. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Patterico has noticed (&#8221;L.A. Times (Almost) Admits Ramadi Airstrike Didn’t Happen&#8221;) and promises much more later. Also, Hot Air has weighed in. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Thunder Run</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/comment-page-1/#comment-161203</link>
		<dc:creator>The Thunder Run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/#comment-161203</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Reconnaissance for 12/29/2006...&lt;/strong&gt;

A short recon of whats out there that might draw your attention....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Reconnaissance for 12/29/2006&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A short recon of whats out there that might draw your attention&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/comment-page-1/#comment-161173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/#comment-161173</guid>
		<description>And speaking of America&#039;s worst newspapers, Allah, did you guys post on the sale of the hilarious Strib in Minneapolis?  I don&#039;t remember it.

That would be worth commenting on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And speaking of America&#8217;s worst newspapers, Allah, did you guys post on the sale of the hilarious Strib in Minneapolis?  I don&#8217;t remember it.</p>
<p>That would be worth commenting on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subsunk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/comment-page-1/#comment-161139</link>
		<dc:creator>Subsunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/#comment-161139</guid>
		<description>So now we go from one bridge to 6 homes destroyed, and from a couple dozen insurgents to 40 or so civilians dead? I&#039;ve always known who was telling the Truth. Now thanks to Patterico, we do too.

We can never believe anything this source says again. His credibility is gone. Since the LA Times refuses to name him and does not screen his stories for truthfulness any more seriously than this, then every story which Mr. Moore writes will be suspect until he can explain how his source gets it so wrong. Every time.

Why would I ever believe anything our enemies say, even when they have some truth to them? They have so consistently lied in the press, I no longer care whether their side gets told, because it is always, and always has been, and always will be, a lie.

Subsunk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now we go from one bridge to 6 homes destroyed, and from a couple dozen insurgents to 40 or so civilians dead? I&#8217;ve always known who was telling the Truth. Now thanks to Patterico, we do too.</p>
<p>We can never believe anything this source says again. His credibility is gone. Since the LA Times refuses to name him and does not screen his stories for truthfulness any more seriously than this, then every story which Mr. Moore writes will be suspect until he can explain how his source gets it so wrong. Every time.</p>
<p>Why would I ever believe anything our enemies say, even when they have some truth to them? They have so consistently lied in the press, I no longer care whether their side gets told, because it is always, and always has been, and always will be, a lie.</p>
<p>Subsunk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/comment-page-1/#comment-161116</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/#comment-161116</guid>
		<description>Much too little.
Way too late.

The media lies and this recent LA Times piece was simple an attempt to cover it up after they were caught &lt;strong&gt;LYING&lt;/strong&gt;, again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much too little.<br />
Way too late.</p>
<p>The media lies and this recent LA Times piece was simple an attempt to cover it up after they were caught <strong>LYING</strong>, again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ringmaster</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/comment-page-1/#comment-161084</link>
		<dc:creator>Ringmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/#comment-161084</guid>
		<description>Over 50 to 1 Kill Ratio in an Urban setting.

Hell, LA Gangs don&#039;t even have that kind of efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 50 to 1 Kill Ratio in an Urban setting.</p>
<p>Hell, LA Gangs don&#8217;t even have that kind of efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy70</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/comment-page-1/#comment-161031</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/#comment-161031</guid>
		<description>Does the media get anything right in Iraq when relying on these stringers? This is getting tiresome. It may not be a box of chocolates over there, but I would rather the truth get reported than a bunch of lies from the mouths of lying &quot;sources&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the media get anything right in Iraq when relying on these stringers? This is getting tiresome. It may not be a box of chocolates over there, but I would rather the truth get reported than a bunch of lies from the mouths of lying &#8220;sources&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill's Bites</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/comment-page-1/#comment-160996</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill's Bites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/29/la-times-revisits-controversial-ramadi-airstrike-story/#comment-160996</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;L.A. Times (Almost) Admits Ramadi Airstrike Didn’t Happen ...&lt;/strong&gt;

CENTCOM says AP’s Iraqi police source isn’t Iraqi police -- Part 26 -- Continued from this post. LA Times revisits controversial Ramadi airstrike story See-Dubya Back in November, blogger Patterico spent a lot of time looking into an incident in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>L.A. Times (Almost) Admits Ramadi Airstrike Didn’t Happen &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>CENTCOM says AP’s Iraqi police source isn’t Iraqi police &#8212; Part 26 &#8212; Continued from this post. LA Times revisits controversial Ramadi airstrike story See-Dubya Back in November, blogger Patterico spent a lot of time looking into an incident in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
