Ellison to crowd: Have faith in Allah
posted at 6:53 pm on December 26, 2006 by Ian
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
Can I get an Allahu Akbar?
Speaking in Dearborn late Sunday night, the first Muslim elected to Congress told a cheering crowd of Muslims they should remain steadfast in their faith and push for justice.
“You can’t back down. You can’t chicken out. You can’t be afraid. You got to have faith in Allah, and you’ve got to stand up and be a real Muslim,” Detroit native Keith Ellison said to loud applause.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « 1 [2]
may his momma sleep with the fleas of a 1000 camels…
areseaoh on December 27, 2006 at 11:53 AM
For historical comparison: Check out the aims and goals of another (anti-)religiously-themed group. Seems to line up well with the gameplan advocated here.
torrentprime on December 27, 2006 at 12:02 PM
torrentprime, you are a typical idiot on the left in this country, this discussion is about islam and democracy, it has nothing to do with christianity. You have the typical response that most on the left have when an issue dealing with islam arises… bash christianity, please pull your head out of your a$$ and address the issue at hand and stop deflecting the criticism onto another group. By the way I AM NOT religious, not one bit, I think all organized religions are for the weak minded who need a crutch, but the only religion that poses any threat to the US and the world is islam, not christianity or judeaism. GET A CLUE YOU MENTAL MIGET!!!
NeverSubmit on December 27, 2006 at 12:27 PM
torrentprime,
I sincerely doubt you belong to the Republican party. You, as well as others posting as apologists for islam have yet to answer why the rest of the imaginary world of “moderate” muslims isn’t doing anything to stop the violence and hate that is being spread around the world.
Let’s get one thing straight. Islam does not belong in this country or any other western country in it’s current form. I couldn’t care less how many names you call me or how adept you are at dodging questions. Isalm is destroying the social fabric of Europe and that’s not gonna happen here. I sincerely hope Europe wakes up and kicks every muslim back to where they belong. The middle east is a hell hole and muslims made it that way. They will not take the rest of the world with it.
The only salvation for muslims is to speak up and fight back. Destroy the cult that has brainwashed millions for centuries. I’d be happy to fight along side any muslim, anyday, as long it’s he or she that controls their own life and not islam.
Stop trying to equate islam with anything. It’s heinous, destructive and has enslaved the wills of men and women around the globe. Each word you post does nothing for your cause. On the contrary, it makes me more and more committed to fight the disease of islam and people like you that bend over backwards to rationalize it.
darwin on December 27, 2006 at 12:43 PM
torrential,
claiming to vote for Bush may not be the best way to burnish your conservative credentials here, and no, I don’t suppose that you have a clear picture of my vision of America.
As for being liberal, the GOP seems to have room for plenty of those, and your post at 11:48pm — which doesn’t merit quoting — seems to define you more clearly than you define yourself. I believe that most commenters here have determined with some certainty that McVeigh was not a Christian, no matter what you think.
Lastly, you seem to like broad brushes apparently, but I have not seen evidence here that the commenters generally “hate all Muslims”, but rather, they seem to focus on anti-American Islamists, the people that we are at war with? You bet that many of them come from Saudi Arabia; we know that. We also know that some of the Iraqis hate America and regard Jews as vermin, and Christians as infidels.
But, focus: criticizing Keith Ellison for his association with Louis Farrakhan, CAIR, and other supporters of terrorism doesn’t necessarily equate with hating all Muslims.
Jaibones on December 27, 2006 at 12:46 PM
I’ve seen it (Jesus camp).
Do Jesus camp participants advocate the killing of all Jews, Muslims, Buddists, Hindus, etceteras?
Do Jesus camp participants kill anyone that insults the Holy Trinity or the Bible?
Do Jesus camp participants kill cartoonists or writers that disagree with them or that make fun of them?
Do Jesus camp participants capture Muslim civilians and behead them?
Do Jesus camp participants make use of car bombs, IEDs, RPGs? Do they shoot short range missiles/rockets into urban/civilian neighborhoods?
And to paraphrase Michelle Malkin’s response at a lecture and (aborted) book-signing given at UC Berserkly three years ago:
“When was the last time that you saw a Jesus camp participant flying a junbo jet full of passengers into a mosque of 3000+ Muslim worshippers, all the while shouting “Hail Mary, full of grace.”
Well? Have any of these things happened yet? I’m waiting. What’s that? No? Not yet? It’s not gonna’ happen, is it?
Now for the REAL shocker. Jesus loves trolls and Muslims, too.
CyberCipher on December 27, 2006 at 1:20 PM
Torrent Prime:
A simple question for you - one that I fully expect you to avoid. But it’s a question that needs both asking and answering, and those who think as you do seem not even to see the question.
It’s simply this: at what point EXACTLY, when members of a group or religion or cult or organization routinely and repeatedly commit violent anti-social acts in the name of their organization… do we eventually admit that it is the ORGANIZATION that is at fault, rather than the individual?
Let me clarify. In theory, I agree with you. It is usually a sign of intellectual laziness or moral stupidity to paint an entire group with the broad brush strokes based on a few actions. Thus, in general terms, you are right.
In the specific case of Islam, I began thinking as you did. I really did. Beginning in the late 1970s, even through Iran and Afghanistan and Kuwait, all the bombings and attacks, I assumed that such actions were the exception rather than the norm. That Islam was not itself the problem. I tried to cling to that belief even after 9/11.
But here’s the problem, my friend - and I don’t think you see it. I don’t think a lot of people see it - and it may get us all killed.
The problem is that your general principle is not ALWAYS right. At least SOMETIMES, it ACTUALLY IS the religion or organization or group that is the problem. At least SOMETIMES, that broad brush is appropriate because its factually accurate. I assume you’ll acknowledge this. The ever popular Nazi example springs to mind. It wasn’t a few bad apples; the whole bunch was rotten.
So the question that must be asked is - is ISLAM the problem?
Can we at least ask the question? Maybe the answer is as you suggest. But do you not see just how logically stupid it is to not at least consider the possibility, when looking at recent world events, that Islam is, as a whole, a corrupt and evil religion?
I don’t know the answer to the question. But I’m willing to ask it now. I think those that insist, like you, that Islam is peachy-keen … have not been paying attention. There is something wrong. The question is how big the problem is, and how bad, and how widespread, and if its endemic to Islam.
So how about it …? Can we at least ask the question? Can those of us looking around at 7000 terrorist attacks in the last 5 years alone … at all of it around the world … at least ASK the obvious question?
Or is that racist? Is it forbidden?
I’m curious. Have you even considered the question?
Professor Blather on December 27, 2006 at 1:33 PM
lets’ see here - on 9/11, 19 highjackers flew planes in to the Twin Towers / the Pentagon & crashed in a field in Pennslyvania & killed 3,000 americans. guess what - those 19 highjackers were MUSLIMS! unless you liberals believe that the U.S. goverment was responsible for 9/11 & not your terrorist buddies. i just love it when these liberal trolls come out & defend their terrorist friends. btw - THE ONLY reason why muslims in this country are expressing their true feelings about americans, is because they know that there wold be a huge backlash towards them, just like after 9/11 & rightfully so.
Starblazer on December 27, 2006 at 1:38 PM
correction - THE ONLY reason why muslims are NOT expressing their true feelings about americans is because they know that there would be another backlash , just like what happened after 9/11 & rightfully so.
Starblazer on December 27, 2006 at 1:42 PM
The alleged indiscriminacy of Jesus’s love would take away most of its value, so I figure there must surely be more to the story. If He loves His own properly, He must surely at least be pissed off at adherents of a false prophet who are outbreeding and often outfighting them at present, and whose stated aim is to convert, kill, or “tax” every one of them.
Kralizec on December 27, 2006 at 1:50 PM
I didn’t know the commenters here were so powerful and all-knowing they actually determined people’s religion for them.
JaHerer22 on December 27, 2006 at 1:54 PM
Oh you radical you.
Have you ever read any of those stories on how average people were given segments of the Constitution to read and then asked if they felt those segments represented anti-American, treasonist, communist views. A depressing number of people do of course. No surprise after reading this thread.
honora on December 27, 2006 at 1:58 PM
Shall we compile a list of Christians who have been enemies of the United States? We don’t really have to go through that tiresome exercise do we?
Perhaps this will help:
“Spot” is a dog.
Collies are dog.
Ergo, “Spot” is a collie.
True or false?
honora on December 27, 2006 at 2:02 PM
“No surprise after reading this thread”.
So, one must conform to the ever present god of political correctness or be chastised by those who worship at it’s altar. It’s so easy for these worshippers of PC to forget that speaking ones mind is the essence of freedom of speech.
There are no stipulations on the 1st Amendment, no qualifiers such as “thou may speak lest it offends someone” or “thou may speak thy mind lest it be “uncomfortable” to others”, or “thou may feel free to speak lest it be about someone other than white heterosexual males”, or last but not least, “thou may speak lest it undermines the efforts of the enemies of the United States”.
darwin on December 27, 2006 at 2:09 PM
“Shall we compile a list of Christians who have been enemies of the United States? We don’t really have to go through that tiresome exercise do we?”
Yes, please do. Be sure you find the ones that are commanded by the bible and Christanity to do so.
darwin on December 27, 2006 at 2:14 PM
i have to go with darwin’s post on this one & to answer your question - true, so what’s your point there honora? it just amazes me how liberals in this country can tolerate any other religion, but when it come to christanity, they continue to bash it everyday. it would be alot easier if you liberals would just admit that 1)you’re anti-american 2)more loyal to Osama Bin Laden & Al-Qaeda rather than to this country 3)open borders 4)pro amnesty
Starblazer on December 27, 2006 at 2:43 PM
don’t forget to add those nasty radical christians that blow-up women & children / fly airplanes into buildings & kill those who inslut christanity
Starblazer on December 27, 2006 at 2:48 PM
You, honora, torrentprime, and your ilk still don’t get it. I will repeat this for about the umpty-umpth time:
A Muslim is not a “true Muslim” simply because he says that he believes in Islam.
A Christian is not “true Christian” simply because he says that he believes in Jesus.
Jesus said “By their fruits you shall know them.” (Matthew 7: 15-16) The question is NOT “Do their words or claims adhere to their faith?”, but rather, “Do both their words AND their actions conform with the fundamental/core teachings of their faith?” Jihadists ARE the true Muslims. Both their words and their actions rigidly adhere to the doctrines of Islam.
Regardless of what breed of dog Spot is, both ALL dogs are better at syllogisms and modern symbolic logic than a liberal. Since you adhere to the belief that stated claims must always be true, you should know that I have always had a collie in my household — mine plays cards, smokes cigars, and talks. My collie told me “honora is a troll.” Do you believe that too? Would I lie?
CyberCipher on December 27, 2006 at 2:59 PM
again, i just love how these liberal trolls come out & defend their terrorist supporters like Ellison
Starblazer on December 27, 2006 at 3:23 PM
Nice try. McVeigh was an atheist:
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2005/06/morgan_spurlock.html
PRCalDude on December 27, 2006 at 3:29 PM
i read the article & they say that muslims were the biggest victims of 9/11> excuse me, but 3,000 americans died because of muslims. this article also reminds me of days after 9/11 there was this lady on Fox News and she mentioned something that “how do we know that it was muslims that attacked this country, it could have been Mexicans or some other ethnic group” of course she mentioned this after the fact that the highjackers were identified as muslim extremists. if anyone else remembers this or if someone has a video link of this, it would be appreciated
Starblazer on December 27, 2006 at 4:17 PM
A tip of the hat to CyberCipher. Well said.
Not to mention one damm smart Collie. Sends my Weimaraner over for some training…heh.
MarkB on December 27, 2006 at 4:20 PM
I would note, that if we were looking for Collies, Spot would be a more likely prospect than Honora for example, after all Spot meets the first criteria…He is a dog.
Accordingly the same commonsense can be applied to our profiling and identification of likely terrorist. Its always good when a liberal at lasts sees the light, (click) oops they turned the switch off, rather than seeing the light.
MarkB on December 27, 2006 at 4:28 PM
My Shelties play chess and they win every time :)
Entelechy on December 27, 2006 at 4:34 PM
At first I thought you were just an idiot lefty who snuck in but when I read the rest of your post, I found it to be thoughtful and well reasoned, but drastically UNINFORMED. The naivete comes from NOT UNDERSTANDING THE TRUE NATURE OF ISLAM. Sorry for shouting! YES there are loads of Muslims living and working in this country who would never harm a fly, theres no question of that! In that, Muslims aren’t any different than Christians! 95% of this country “identifies themselves” as Christian. Do you really believe that 95% of this country is really Christian? If so, how is abortion legal since the question of whether a baby is a human being was answered in the Bible? See, the CHRISTIAN position on an unborn child is that it is a human being even BEFORE the egg is fertilized! It is a human in the mind of the God that placed it there who knows in his omniscience the number of hairs that will grace the head, of the as yet UN-FERTILIZED egg! Didn’t know that did ya…
So much for the 95%. The same is true of Muslims. The Muslims that you like are NOMINAL MUSLIMS people who didn’t like the SHARIA law in their homelands and fled, certainly A MINORITY OF MUSLIMS, since most Muslims prefer their culture to ours. However, to be a DEVOUT MUSLIM one MUST believe in JIHAD. To be a DEVOUT PRACTITIONER OF THE RELIGION OF PEACE, you must believe that it is not only okay to kill Christians and Jews and whomever else is not Muslim, you must also believe that IT IS REQUIRED by the KORAN to do so. You must believe that the imposition of SHARIA will be opposed by the Christians and the Jews and THEREFORE, they must die OR be subjugated to the point where they will pay certain “infidel” taxes, IF they accept their status as second class citizens. Because in order to be a DEVOUT Muslim, you must want ISLAM to DOMINATE THE WORLD, since that is ISLAMS EXPRESS MISSION IN THIS WORLD.
Soothsayer on December 27, 2006 at 4:50 PM
A) I would never regard Debbie Schlussel as a reliable, unbiased source on anything, especially something regarding religion. You’ll need a better link if you want to prove a point to me.
B) I don’t know or care what religion McVeigh was. I just thought it was funny a starblazer actually said “commenters here determined he was not a Christian” as if the commenters here had the final say on what religion people were. It wasn’t a political statement at all, you’re just anxious to jump all over me. Settle down, take a xanax.
JaHerer22 on December 27, 2006 at 5:02 PM
Nice to see the Dhimmi’s are already defending their masters.
They should be great fodder for Islam when it comes dominate over the Earth.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on December 27, 2006 at 5:15 PM
Have you ever heard a non-Arabic-speaking Muslim pray? Hey, what do you know… they use a bunch of Arabic words!
And Allah, “God.”
But it does have qualifiers about talking about the Lord in Arabic? This is an ‘effing politically correct point. Scroll up and look at the people who think that we should round up Muslims and eject them from our country!
You’re wrong. But it doesn’t really matter, because your view of what constitutes a “true Muslim” is irrelevant. As long as the majority of Muslims aren’t extremists, your Venn diagram is still backwards. To you, Collies are the only true dogs, and even Poodles are potential Collies.
Agnostic theist, not an atheist (who are you going to believe, Timothy McVeigh himself, or Debbie Schlussel?). He was raised Catholic.
Well yes. Profiling (as long as it is profiling, and not internment) is a necessary tool of law enforcement. The government does not have (and should not have) unlimited resources for law enforcement, so they need to focus their energies where crimes statistically happen and focus on those who statistically commit the crimes. And it’s not just a race or religion thing… the 17 year old white male is more of a likely criminal than a 65 year old Arab female. Age and gender are probably the most important considerations, in fact. And I’ve always been supportive of the use of statistics in focusing the energies of law enforcement officers. Heck, about 6 years ago Glenn Beck was mildly opposed to profiling and I got him to change his mind (he was just a local radio guy at the time).
Mark Jaquith on December 27, 2006 at 5:22 PM
You libs kill me with this Timothy McVeigh B.S. That piece of crap did what he did out of hatred for the U.S. govt, NOT in the name of Jesus Christ, and he’s one guy, name another ten! The koranimals that hit us on 9/11 did so for Allah and Muhammed. And YES, they were TRUE followers of Islam, we’ve all read the lines from the koran telling muslims to kill infidels, I’m still waiting to hear how and why they’re *not* the true faithful believers.
What’s with you people anyway? Always taking sides with our enemies. You hate America because we’re “imeeeeerialistic”, but ya just LOVE the Soviet Union, which really was an imperialist empire. If we were imperialist, Japan, Germany, Italy, Korea, Grenada, Panama and Kuwait would be states. You hate America because we’re totalitaaaaaarian, yet ya love the Vietcong and North Vietnam, Saddam and the Ba’athists, Kim Jong I’ll and his commie regime, Castro, etc, who really are totalitarian. You think you’re big and brave because you speak out against Bush. Well, whooptie friggin’ do! You have the freedom of speech! No jackbooted thugs drag you away for it, but try that in China and see what happens to ya. You libsm your problem is that you’ve got it so good in this country that ya think it sucks. You’re smarter than us idiots because you’re “elites” … in your own mind. Try living in any other country on earth. I lived in Europe for three years, there’s no place like America. Love it or leave it.
McVeigh. PUH-lease! You guys are like the white guy who, when talking about basketball, says “Oh yeah, well, well what about Larry Bird, huh? HE’S white!” Pathetic, pointy head intellectual types who need a girlfriend.
Tony737 on December 27, 2006 at 6:04 PM
There’s so many points to address on this thread that I can’t remember ‘em all.
Are all muslims terrorists? Duh, if they were we’d have REAL problems then, huh? And we wouldn’t be trying to turn Iraq and A-stan into our democratic allies, would we?
Tony737 on December 27, 2006 at 6:49 PM
Yes, and since they don’t speak, read, or write Arabic, the vast majority of them have no idea if they pronounced the words correctly, what those words actually mean, or even why they are saying them. Sorta’ reminds me of you liberals.
Actually, the truth be known, I like dogs of nearly all breeds, and most of them “take to me” almost immediately — probably because they can sense that I like them. Unlike the trolls here on HA that usually register their disdain for me on their very first volley. (Sorta’ like you did just now.) My selection of collies as the breed that I prefer for my personal companion has nothing to do with your sweeping generalizations, any more than the fact that I choose a particular brand of dog food. Oh, and BTW, if there’s one thing that you can be absolutely sure about with liberals, it is that they always refuse to eat their own dogfood. They are, in fact, the biggest hypocrites on the planet.
CyberCipher on December 27, 2006 at 6:53 PM
Indeterminate by the premises given. Spot may be a collie, the premises do not preclude it. Spot definitely isn’t a cat.
Only one religion on earth commands its adherents to convert or kill non-believers. Pop-quiz: When a muslim chooses to obey that, is he following islam or is he not?
I can assure you that noone who fits your suggestion can back up their actions with Scripture. People who try the “Vengeance is mine, I shall repay” line are not acting from Christianity, but their own appetite, and just as others who could fool you into thinking they were Christians, they misuse Scripture. The Bible passage is “Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.” (Romans 12:19) As you can see, Honora, God calls us not to take violent action on our own behalf, that is His job. Now, before you go in that direction, this is speaking on a personal level, it does not speak to nations deciding to go to war.
People of questionable sanity do many terrible things using many sources as justification, religion most of all. And none of them are correct in doing so. Nobody of clear sanity does such things and pretends to justify it through religion, except for Muslims who say that the Koran tells them that for infidels, it is conversion or the sword.
Moral relativism, especially when poorly presented, ought to be beneath you, Honora. Don’t sink to it.
Freelancer on December 27, 2006 at 9:11 PM
hey Tony, i have a t-shirt that says “America - Love it or Leave it!”
Starblazer on December 28, 2006 at 12:45 AM
Tony, as i have said many times before, liberals in this country will always be more loyal to Bin Laden & Al-Qaeda & to those who want kill us rather than be loyal to a country that gives them freedom
Starblazer on December 28, 2006 at 12:47 AM
Yes.
Connie on December 28, 2006 at 3:47 AM
You have to be a total jerk-off to have voted for this terrorist.
lynnv on December 28, 2006 at 8:34 AM
Qur’an 5:73 “They are surely disbelievers who blaspheme and say: ‘God is one of three in the Trinity for there is no ilah (god) except One, Allah. If they desist not from saying this, verily a grievous penalty will befall them.”
RD on December 28, 2006 at 3:11 PM
Hi Professor Blather,
Happy to answer your question, as it is a good one. “at what point EXACTLY … do we eventually admit that it is the ORGANIZATION that is at fault, rather than the individual?”
I’d say anytime now or the last several years: your points are not in debate! Now, now, now! is the time to consider whether Islam is the problem. I think that in its everyday Middle Eastern practice, it IS the problem. Of course Islam as an institution and a religion has its faults and they may be fundamental flaws. I never said it didn’t, and that’s why people on this thread calling me an Islamic apologist and the like are so laughably far off course. I don’t like Islam as a faith; I never have. It’s derogatory (ie: violent) towards women and gays, and the latter has personal relevance. I never said I liked Islam.
But the issue is not whether Islam is a problem or not, or whether you or I like it, or want to encourage it or stamp it out. The issue is how we treat American Muslims who have committed no crime, done no wrong, and have raised no suspicion of either. Keith Ellison may be a partisan shill, a forward scout in a cultural war, an honest man trying to represent his constituency, or some bizarre combination of the above. But we don’t know. And there are millions of muslims in this country who do not deserve to be told that they are disqualified from office on religion alone, which, aside from being expressly forbidden by the Constitution, is un-American by culture. That’s what makes us better than them, remember?
And do not for one second try to dignify the vitriol on this thread by claiming that all of these people here only want to stop radical Islam: look at sniper and darwin’s comment from the very top of the thread and explain to me how they should be taken and interpreted by any American Muslim, radical or secular:
Explain to me how the millions of Mulsims in this country should interpret that. Explain to me how that helps those Muslims that everyone here wants to stand up and fight radical Muslims do that job. This thread does not represent some line in the sand, saying, “We tolerate your faith, but only insofar as it doesn’t threaten our nation.” A statement like that I would not only find fair game, but I would agree with! But that’s not what we have found here. What we have found on this thread is a wholesale rejection of the faith, its practitioners, and all associated with it.
And for an American-born Muslim, who loves his/her country and has done it no wrong, they deserve far, far better than the crap (and yes, hate) on this thread.
Lastly, my favorite sign of paranoia on this thread was that when one poster tried to point out that radical Islamists had in fact rejected Ellison as being insufficiently Islamic, the poster’s knowledge of this decision was taken as proof that that poster listens to and supports radical Islam. How crazy can you get? Since our CIA guys know what terrorists are plotting by listening to or in on them, does that mean they support terrorists?
torrentprime on December 28, 2006 at 6:41 PM
Hi Professor Blather,
Happy to answer your question, as it is a good one. “at what point EXACTLY … do we eventually admit that it is the ORGANIZATION that is at fault, rather than the individual?”
I’d say anytime now or the last several years: your points are not in debate! Now, now, now! is the time to consider whether Islam is the problem. I think that in its everyday Middle Eastern practice, it IS the problem. Of course Islam as an institution and a religion has its faults and they may be fundamental flaws. I never said it didn’t, and that’s why people on this thread calling me an Islamic apologist and the like are so laughably far off course. I don’t like Islam as a faith; I never have. It’s derogatory (ie: violent) towards women and gays, and the latter has personal relevance. I never said I liked Islam.
But the issue is not whether Islam is a problem or not, or whether you or I like it, or want to encourage it or stamp it out. The issue is how we treat American Muslims who have committed no crime, done no wrong, and have raised no suspicion of either. Keith Ellison may be a partisan shill, a forward scout in a cultural war, an honest man trying to represent his constituency, or some bizarre combination of the above. But we don’t know. And there are millions of muslims in this country who do not deserve to be told that they are disqualified from office on religion alone, which, aside from being expressly forbidden by the Constitution, is un-American by culture. That’s what makes us better than them, remember?
And do not for one second try to dignify the vitriol on this thread by claiming that all of these people here only want to stop radical Islam: look at sniper and darwin’s comment from the very top of the thread and explain to me how they should be taken and interpreted by any American Muslim, radical or secular:
Explain to me how the millions of Mulsims in this country should interpret that. Explain to me how that helps those Muslims that everyone here wants to stand up and fight radical Muslims do that job. This thread does not represent some line in the sand, saying, “We tolerate your faith, but only insofar as it doesn’t threaten our nation.” A statement like that I would not only find fair game, but I would agree with! But that’s not what we have found here. What we have found on this thread is a wholesale rejection of the faith, its practitioners, and all associated with it.
And for an American-born Muslim, who loves his/her country and has done it no wrong, they deserve far, far better than the poo (and yes, hate) on this thread.
Lastly, my favorite sign of paranoia on this thread was that when one poster tried to point out that radical Islamists had in fact rejected Ellison as being insufficiently Islamic, the poster’s knowledge of this decision was taken as proof that that poster listens to and supports radical Islam. How crazy can you get? Since our CIA guys know what terrorists are plotting by listening to or in on them, does that mean they support terrorists?
torrentprime on December 28, 2006 at 6:42 PM
Apologies for the double post.
torrentprime on December 28, 2006 at 6:42 PM
Welcome to bizarro world. The major rule is that the conclusion of any set of facts is pre-determined, ergo the facts are irrelevant. The general ones–Muslims are all evil, liberals are all evil, Europeans (and generally all non-Americans) are all evil. George Bush is a benevolent idiot.
honora on December 29, 2006 at 11:05 AM
Ok. So the notion of building a peaceful democracy in Iraq is pretty stupid, right? Why are we sacrificing our troops attempting this fool’s errand?
Darwin? Anybody?
honora on December 29, 2006 at 11:10 AM
Comment pages: « 1 [2]