CNN is using the younger glamor shots of Rosie.

She was a pig faced bag of rat guts then too.

Soothsayer on December 23, 2006 at 2:16 AM

Clinton isn’t enough for you? How about Kerry all the way back to 1990 and up to the start of the war? How about the rest of the Dems? How about the rest of the world? How about the fact that in a post 9/11 world, we couldn’t allow Saddam to keep jerking us around?
SPOILER ALERT FOR SOOTHTARD: Bush wasn’t in the White House throughout the 90s, feeding this “cherry-picked” WMD intel to the Dems to “fool” them.

BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. As I so brilliantly stated before, WHAT CLINTON OR KERRY OR KENNEDY OR HILLARY said, IS IRRELEVANT~!! Those sodomites were just talking crap, they never intended to fight anyone! It’s a long way from talking tough to bombing people. And as for the “resolutions”, big deal! There are U.N. resolutions against THIS COUNTRY, I don’t see you whining about that! When some left leaning group convinces the U.N to issue a resolution condemning RACISM IN THE UNITED STATES, all of a sudden you think resolutions are “ridiculous”, more “cherry picking”. LOL. The point which you in your denseness missed completely, is not about Clinton or resolutions but about lies! It is about the fact that if BUSH JUST TOLD THE TRUTH AS HE KNEW IT, we wouldn’t have gone to war. Nobody was going to war on a “BEST GUESS” or a “HIGH PROBABILITY” and apparently you’re too dumb to grasp the fine point I was making. You and this other numbnuts…

Gee Soothsayer, you read only about half of what is given to you in life. France knew of WMD, Briton, Aussie, Saudi Arabia, Germany, Italy, most dem leades, Austria, Greece, Israel, Egypt, the U.N.,and more also felt their were WMD. right2bright on December 23, 2006 at 5:43 PM

….are completely missing the point. And as it is brilliant, I will take you through it AGAIN like the third graders you are. Right2bright (NOT), says that all the intell agencies in the world “knew of ” WMD. What’s that mean? Then he says they “felt” that there were WMD, well feelings are like farts, everyone’s got a few in ‘em! The brilliance of my missive which just SAILED over you head, was that it is a lie to take an intelligence report which uses words like “HIGH PROBABITLITY” and “WE HAVE REASON TO BELIEVE” and eliminate thost QUALIFYING STATMENTS! There is NOT A SHRED of documentation that says that the CIA,FBI or the NSA, KNEW there were weapons, they said they “believed” there were weapons. Even your Kool Aid addled brain should be able to distinguish between the two! In fact, one of the Bush Admin’s early defenses to the “cherry picking” argument was that the Whitehouse Daily Breifings are OVERLY CAUTIOUS unless there is “ACTIONABLE INTELL” which there wasn’t at any time! How is it NOT “cherry picking” to read an OVERLY CAUTIOUS assessment of the enemy and to delete the CAUTION? You, sir, are the ‘TARD. Not me.

The fact that Saddam gassed his people, tortured them, means nothing to you. Let them die, I don’t know them, is your answer. Your pathetic.

Your mangling of the English language notwithstanding, you have no idea what you’re talking about. I am a real Christian, I know you’ve probably never met an actual one. Born of the SPIRIT, 12-27-92 at 4:00 in the afternoon and anyone of you Christmas tree loving folk should (but can’t) be able to answer similarly…

Jeremiah 10:3-5 (King James Version)
2. Thus saith the LORD, LEARN NOT THE WAY OF THE HEATHEN, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

3. For the customs of the people are VAIN: for one cutteth A TREE out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.

4.They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. (Hmmmm. What part of DON’T BE LIKE THE STUPID HEATHENS WITH THEIR DECORATED TREES, do you not understand?)

5. They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.

HINT: The reason that the above scripture comes as a complete surprise to you is because you have been taught by the people that Jesus WARNED US NOT TO LISTEN TO, the fakes sent by the devil who formed the Catholic Church (1 TIM 4:1-4) See, salvation only comes by water baptism in Jesus’ name (not those ridiculous TITLES that you guys use) and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit as evidenced by you speaking in tongues at the SPIRIT gives utterance (save your denials for the bird cage). That’s why you’re luggin around dead ass trees that THE LORD SPECIFICALLY WARNED YOU AGAINST and willing to risk American lives for Satan’ children, you are , as they say, BACK ASSWARDS! . So, do I care about people who have made CHRISTIANITY a CRIME in their land? Do I care about people who behead Missionaries and OUTLAW THE BIBLE? The answer is no, I don’t give a HOT PLATE OF PIG SPIT ABOUT ‘EM! Not only would I not risk a single AMERICAN LIFE for these 7th century SAVAGES, I wouldn’t piss on ‘em to put them out if they were on fire! Yeah I know, doesn’t seem “Christlike” to you does it? That’s because your whole concept of Jesus comes from a friggin greeting card. That’s actually what should scare you, the fact that your “Concept” is so FAR AWAY FROM THE BIBLICAL REALITY! Does your namby pamby Christianity understand what it takes to actually cut vines, braid a WHIP, and commence to opening up a can of WHOOPASS IN THE TEMPLE? NOPE. How about the Apostles and disciples walking around with SWORDS on ? Does that comport with your lily livered faith? I think not. Why on earth would I want to see one drop of American blood spent on Muslims, who by the way are, ACCORDING TO YOUR BIBLE, the CHILDREN OF SATAN? Perhaps you should study Matthew Ch. 13 and educate yourself on the two types of beings IN this world before you commit Amercian lives to save the wrong ones!

We have the fact that we discovered 500 “old” chemical warheads, which are actually extremely important, because regardless of how useful they now are, the point is that Saddam wasn’t “disarming and disclosing” as he was supposed to. Is it so hard to believe he worked harder to hid his ongoing WMD program?

AGAIN did we go to war over NON USABLE WEAPONS? You make a mockery of your own arguement with this weak offering. Either you’re too stupid to get it or you’re just pulling my leg. I’ll be charitable and assume the latter. EVERYTHING IN YOUR QUOTE IS TRUE, but THAT’S NOT WHY WE WENT TO WAR. See, Saddam had wiped his ass with those resolutions for years, pal. NO ONE, EITHER IN THIS COUNTRY or in ENGLAND was going to war over that, there was no “Political Will”. But when you add seasoning to the soup, in this case the seasoning of a lie about weapons, now you have something people can get behind! Riddle me this Batman…if Bush really thought the weapons were there, why did he wait FOURTEEN MONTHS, before going in? I mean, you announce to a guy, “hey we’re invading your country ’cause of those weapons” and then you don’t show up for FOURTEEN MONTHS?????

If there were weapons there, that kind of delay would seem designed to MAKE SURE THAT THEY WERE NEVER FOUND DOESN’T IT? I mean how much crime do you think the cops would solve if they called people up and said, “hey we’re heading on over with a search warrant make sure the dopes on the table, okay?” Get your head out of your ass, you’ve been PLAYED.

I could go on and on, but why bother? I’m sure you’ll tell me it’s white peoples’ fault anyway, and then tell everyone that they’re going to hell. RightWinged on December 23, 2006 at 3:29 PM

You must really BE a racist because only racists bring race into subjects that aren’t about race. It’s real easy to try and dismiss me by implying that I’m some kind of reactionary that is always calling whites racist, but it’s just another lie. For the record, the only people I’ve EVER called racists were people ON THIS SITE! There were the numbnuts who were defending the genocidal rascist named Mark Furhman, who said he wanted, “to put all black people in a pile and burn them”. Now, in my book anybody who defends such, must be of like mind, else why the defense? I called the people who were DEFENDING AND EXCUSING Michael Richards racist and it’s hard to dispute that since their defense ran the gamut from, “He didn’t meant it” despite that fact that he said he did and “So what’s the Big Deal, anyway, blacks say it all the time”. I pointed out that any white who hid behind this canard was an UNDERCOVER RACIST. I showed, how EVERY OPPRESSED GROUP, calls itself by the derogatory names given to them by their oppressor as a “term of endearment’ and that you know damned well what I’m talking about! Whites in the south call each other “WHITE TRASH”, Italians in life and on the SOPRANOS call each other GUINEA and WOP as terms of endearment and Homos call each other FAG and QUEER , similarly. I pointed out, in my finest hour, that only RACISTS forget ALL OF THIS, when the subject is BLACK and inanely ask, “What’s wrong with the N-Word, Blacks use it all the time”! So these are the subjects about which I have called SOME of the people on this site racist and if the shoe fits, wear it.

Soothsayer on December 23, 2006 at 11:45 PM

Let it out Soothsayer, tell the white man how he done you wrong.

The white man hasn’t done me wrong because in the words of Dave Chappelle; I’M RICH BITCH! And most of my employees are White! I am the American dream. I notice you didn’t respond to any of the areas that I called people racist IN. That’s because it was a narrowly defined area that cannot reasonably be disputed so instead you make a vague charge designed to portray me as some radical black. Nice try numbnuts, but anyone who’s been reading my posts knows that I am MORE CONSERVATIVE than MOST OF YOU on this site. They’ve also read the open contempt that I have for race baiters like Jackson and Shaprton who make a living of yelling racism when there is little or NO RACISM in the issue at hand. However, to use that same measuring stick to describe me is absurd. I called you racist for supporting Mark Furhmen and admitted racist and Michael Richards ANOTHER ADMITTED RACIST. Hardly the same thing as “crying wolf”. You’re and idiot and a loser because you think that everyone who “cries racism” is just making it up. Well get your head out of your ass because racism is real and is in the hearts of you and a lot of the losers on this site. I HAVE NEVER brought race into a subject that was not ABOUT RACE and I defy you to find ONE TIME that I did so STFU! What about your fake assed baptism? No answer for that one huh? Acts 2:38 and the ENTIRE BOOK OF ACTS tells your dumb ass to be baptized in Jesus name yet you follow an apostATE in Rome with a pointy hat and no Holy Ghost! What’s your answer to your failed dunking, genius? You didn’t deal with the racist attitudes expressed by people on this site either, probably because you share their sentiments. What about all of the whites critizing blacks for saying the N-WORD when every other ethnic or oppressed minority does the same even “White Trash”? No answer, because you already know that don’t ya, you just conveniently forget it when the subject is BLACK. Again my genius in this area goes unrefuted because the arrow struck true!

Anyway, you deliberately ignored my larger point and I won’t waste time repeating it… but whether you like it or not, showing that everyone else thought the stuff was there, is relevant when you’re going to call Bush a liar.

BOY YOU MUST BE STUPID AS A BAG OF HAMMERS! How many times must I print this? THIS you idiot…is the subject I was addressing….

The brilliance of my missive which just SAILED over you head, was that it is a lie to take an intelligence report which uses words like “HIGH PROBABITLITY” and “WE HAVE REASON TO BELIEVE” and eliminate thost QUALIFYING STATMENTS! There is NOT A SHRED of documentation that says that the CIA,FBI or the NSA, KNEW there were weapons, they said they “believed” there were weapons. Even your Kool Aid addled brain should be able to distinguish between the two! In fact, one of the Bush Admin’s early defenses to the “cherry picking” argument was that the Whitehouse Daily Breifings are OVERLY CAUTIOUS unless there is “ACTIONABLE INTELL” which there wasn’t at any time! How is it NOT “cherry picking” to read an OVERLY CAUTIOUS assessment of the enemy and to delete the CAUTION? You, sir, are the ‘TARD. Not me. Soothsayer

Even a nutjob like you should be able to differentiate between we “BELIEVE” and we “KNOW”, right? Did the Intelligence Estimate say we ‘KNOW” or did it say we “HAVE REASON TO BELIEVE”, I’ve read them have you? Stupid idiot. Bush is a liar and he is not a conservative and he is from the fake assed Episcopalian and Methodist churches which are DEVOID OF THE SPIRIT OF CHRIST. And just so you’ll know that I read your links, AGAIN, SO WHAT? Do you think I care about Clinton bombing Muslims? Or was my post bashing BUSH becasue HIS LIES GOT AMERICANS KILLED? Clinton was overly cautious in the way he conducted aggression,because AS A LIBERAL, he was naturally distrustful of those in the INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY and didn’t want to leap without looking fifty times he was also because of his soft punk liberalism, crippled in his decision making by the FEAR OF U.S. CASUALTIES! So, he dint’ send in ground troops and it DOESN’T MATTER WHETHER HE WAS RIGHT OR WRONG WHEN THE ONLY ONES DYING ARE MUSLIMS WHO NEED TO BE KILLED ANYWAY! This is obvious in the way he conducted the action in Kosovo, right? So what does it matter if Clinton “believed” and even “said” the same things that Bush did, when NO AMERICANS DIED? It means nothing. The issue is Americans dead for weapons that didn’t exist, and the “proof” that they didn’t exist is the FOURTEEN MONTHS IT TOOK TO GO TO WAR. What could you reasonably expect to find after a YEAR AND TWO MONTHS? Not a damned thing. And only an idiot like you would think otherwise! The ABSURD DELAY IN WAR PROSECUTION implies at least tangentially, that they KNEW THERE WAS NOTHING THERE TO FIND. How else can you explain such delay when there is a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER? I didn’t ignore your “larger” point, it was stupid and not worth responding to.

Bush is the one that sent Powell to the U.N. WITH PICTURES of weapons that were NOT. Not Clinton, as much as I despise him, not yo mama, and not anyone else. Bush, the same liar that thought his grandmama would make a good Supreme Court Justice, the same liar that told you he’s for a constitutional ammendment that would hopefully put the Sodomites BACK IN THE DAMN CLOSET! Where’s the action on that by the way. How about his lies to the “faith community” ? How about his plan to make your granchildren SPEAK SPANISH. You asshole. How can you continue to support this utter and complete FAILURE!!!!! None of this bothers you? Was he lying when he stated that Rumsfeld would be with his administration for the duration a week before he canned him? Hey KOOL AID, what say you?

Soothsayer on December 24, 2006 at 3:54 PM

There are conservatives by the way, who believe that Bush delayed the Rumsfeld sacking until after the election, because to do so before the election, would have helped the Republicans and doomed his chance to be the IMMIGRATION PRESIDENT. Just food for thought.

Soothsayer on December 24, 2006 at 4:30 PM

You are angry at someone so everyone you argue with becomes that person. You know nothing about me, yet you’ve just said:

Then what is your problem with me? You call me a radical because of a problem I had with “someone else” and yet you judge me because of it? Mind your damn business then! Don’t form opinions about me based on my communication with someoned else because then YOU BECOME THAT PERSON. Or at the very least you make yourself seem sympathetic to their views.

Not baptized, and haven’t defending Richards or Furhman’s comments. You however blamed white record producers for black rappers use of the N-word.

If you’re not baptized your going to burn in hell PERIOD. So wake up, moron.

Don’t have a Christmas tree. Besides, you’re totally twisting that passage… it’s about false idols. Now if you know of Christians who pray to a Christmas tree as their God, then perhaps you should have a conversation with them.

The passage is NOT about false idols and only an idiot would think that. The passage is about EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS IT IS, it is about the GOD warning the Children of God not to emulate the HEATHEN practices of the heathens, period. Praying to a tree is not a necessity. Otherwise why would food sacrificed to idols be prohibited since food can neith pray nor be eaten by an idol. The whole thing had to to with Spiritual Adultery and honoring things that didn’t do anything for you, like trees. Only an idiot who is “not baptized” would read it that way, and that my friend is because you are “empty”. I did not confuse you with someone else, I defended myself from your assertions that I’m some kind of race hustler, opinions you formed by coming in on the ass first end of an argument I was having with “someone else”, btw. You have not sited a single time that I injected race into a thread when race was not the issue so you’re just WRONG. When I write to you, I’m not just writing to YOU, I’m writing to all the dummies that think like you too! Some of them actually THINK they ARE Christian, even though they lack the sign and the proof.

You seem to think that even though I might respond to some triviality of yours, that my entire post then becomes some communication between you and I. Well it isn’t I was responding to various people at various times. If you don’t want to get splashed mind your own business and speak when spoken to. I have never found one of your posts interesting enough to respond to even though I have agreed with many of them, especially your condemnations of homosexuality, but seriously dude, you were the one who jumped in and attacked me, calling me names and stuff before I even took your existence seriously. Soooo, since you are “not” baptized, none of the stuff I said was to you, I retract those pearls. Good luck to you, our interaction is at an end.

Soothsayer on December 24, 2006 at 7:59 PM

You however blamed white record producers for black rappers use of the N-word.

O.K. I’ll respond to this one and THEN our interaction is at an end. I said that White Record EXECUTIVES not PRODUCERS, won’t give a record deal to rappers that aren’t “gangsta rappers”. That’s the truth and I ought to know since I produced music for WILLY DENZEY former billboard #9 in Europe. I know many rappers with “conscious” rap, talking about black or Latino “empowerment” and self responsibility, music even produced by big time producers, falls on deaf ears at the record company if it isn’t negative. This is a fact, not opinion. Clive Davis and Quincy Jones are both on record saying that Artists like, The Fresh Prince (Will Smith) and KRS One, both of whom rapped about common sense, wouldn’t get signed today. Will Smith’s biggest hit prior to T.V. fame was “Parents jut don’t understand Me”, and there isn’t a single record company of any worth that would produce this benign offering today. Now, our interaction is over.

Soothsayer on December 24, 2006 at 8:09 PM

No, instead you like to come and scream and shout and tell people they’re going to hell. Great approach. I suppose that’s the behavior Jesus taught though, right?

RightWinged on December 24, 2006 at 11:59 PM

Uhmmm Yes RightWinged that is EXACTLY the behavior that Jesus not only taught but that he used himself!

Matthew 3:7
But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
Matthew 12:34
O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.
Matthew 23:33
Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
Luke 3:7
Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

In fact, when Jesus spoke to people and they couldn’t understand Him, he knew it was because they were not God’s children.

John 8:43-44
43. Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

44. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. ( HARDLY THE “SOFT SELL” WOULDN’T YOU SAY?)

He knew that his words worked on a “special frequency” if you will and that His word was active rather than passive. See, if the Word were PASSIVE then you would be right, my approach would matter and people would be driven off, so I would moderate it. I’m not stupid after all. I just know several lifetimes more about Jesus than you do, my boast is in the Lord’s blessing, and I know that the Word is Active.

Hebrews 4:12 (King James Version)
12.For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

See the Word of God, weeds out the wheat from the chaff and “finds” it’s intended targets, so my “approach” is of no consequence since “no one can pluck them out of My hand”, is what Jesus said, concerning those that are His. Here you have Jesus calling people a generation of Vipers which I daresay is greater in disrespect than “idiot” and telling them that they are NOT the Children of God, which they had fervently believed, but instead that they were the Children of the Devil with NO OPPORTUNITY FOR SALVATION! In the “harshness” category the Lord’s got me beat!

My point wasn’t that other “sects” are also real, my point was that they think they are, and wouldn’t a better approach be to not be an ass to everyone, but calmly explain why you’re right and they aren’t?

If Christianity was a club that anyone can join you would be CORRECT. But alas it is not…

Ephesians 1:4,5
4. According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:

5. Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,

See RW the Bible declares that those who are in the process of being saved are already known to God in His Omniscience. Our futures are already written from before the foundation of the World and there will be many who will not listen. As Peter said we are the….

1 Peter 1:2
Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.

Elect means chosen by the foreknowledge of God. That’s why Jesus said…

John 10:28
And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.

See? It doesn’t matter your approach, the word will find those for whom it is intended. Think I’m Kidding, LOOK AT YOURSELF. You objected to my approach but yet you’ve read and absorbed everything I’ve written! If salvation is in your future, those words will be a catalyst. As Jesus said, One plants, another waters, but God giveth the increase. Meaning one person tells you the truth, that truth sets down in you like a seed underground. Then, someone ELSE (probably nicer!) will stop by two months or ten yrs later and tell you the same thing. Only this time, it WATERS the seed that lay dormant for so long and before you know it,you’re having trouble sleeping. Then you start reading the New Testament on your own, then you start noticing the difference between EVERYTHING that Jesus said and what the Pope or Graham teaches. Then you get to the Book of Acts and it could be the fifteenth time you’ve read it but this time it will be different. This time the seed blossoms and you are discomfited at the thought that you haven’t been baptized, or in the case of others, are baptized incorrectly and you decide to change that. Then someone prays with you saying nothing more than “thank you Jesus’ in the faith and belief that He will poor out his Spirit upon YOU and then your language changes, fait accompli! Oh, sure it’d be nicer to BE nicer, I’ll grant you that. But when you spend your life fighting false doctrine you get a little crotchedy! However I have taken your comments to heart, even the nasty ones and for the sake of comity, I will moderate my tone, If you will read the Book of Acts and write down every instance of difference between Christs established church and the churhes we have come to know. When I answered before I understood your point but I was trying to show you what the Bible says about the METHOD of being called and how little of that can be “affected” by one’s “approach” as long as the truth is spoken… Anyhoo, thanks for listening, have a wonderful and happy and safe Christmas, okay?

Soothsayer on December 25, 2006 at 12:44 AM

BTW Right Winged, you’re right, I do have a problem with rambling and not staying on point and mixing up the people I am responding to. I will try to absorb that and do better in the future…Merry Christmas!

Soothsayer on December 25, 2006 at 1:10 AM