Video: Robert Gates sworn in as Defense Secretary

posted at 3:00 pm on December 18, 2006 by Allahpundit

The soundbite: “Failure in Iraq at this juncture would be a calamity that would haunt our nation, impair our credibility, and endanger Americans for decades to come.”

Fred Barnes says they’ve finally got a plan for victory. You can read it for yourself here; it calls for 50,000 more troops to help clear Baghdad’s neighborhood of jihadis and militiamen. Once each neighborhood is cleared, a contingent of U.S. and Iraqi forces will move in and hold the area. Paul Mirengoff is skeptical, with good reason.

The plan comes from AEI, which ought to make it extra popular with the media.

Please do read the report in Newsweek about Iraq’s surprising economy, though. (“Booming,” the copy editor calls it.) Instapundit linked it this morning but I want to make sure it doesn’t get lost in the shuffle. Quote:

Civil war or not, Iraq has an economy, and—mother of all surprises—it’s doing remarkably well. Real estate is booming. Construction, retail and wholesale trade sectors are healthy, too, according to a report by Global Insight in London. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce reports 34,000 registered companies in Iraq, up from 8,000 three years ago. Sales of secondhand cars, televisions and mobile phones have all risen sharply. Estimates vary, but one from Global Insight puts GDP growth at 17 percent last year and projects 13 percent for 2006…

Imported goods have grown increasingly affordable, thanks to the elimination of tariffs and trade barriers. Salaries have gone up more than 100 percent since the fall of Saddam, and income-tax cuts (from 45 percent to just 15 percent) have put more cash in Iraqi pockets. “The U.S. wanted to create the conditions in which small-scale private enterprise could blossom,” says Jan Randolph, head of sovereign risk at Global Insight. “In a sense, they’ve succeeded.”

Not well enough. Bush’s approval rating on Iraq is at an all-time low.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Thank you Mr. Rumsfeld and Congratulations to Secretary Gates.

infidel on December 18, 2006 at 3:17 PM

From the Newsweek link: Ironic how Iraq’s economony is probably doing better than many metropolitan areas of this country that are one-party operations.

BTW, when Stretch is sworn in as Queen, can we make sure Bush and Cheney are never together? Line of succession jitters.

JammieWearingFool on December 18, 2006 at 3:35 PM

Line of succession jitters.

JammieWearingFool on December 18, 2006 at 3:35 PM

Allah, now THERE’s something to be scared of (President Pelosi). NOT peaches.

CyberCipher on December 18, 2006 at 3:37 PM

I love how we immediately publish the “plan” for all to read … including the enemy.

Geniuses

Gregor on December 18, 2006 at 3:57 PM

ROE. It’s all about rules of engagement ,folks. Unless winning includes taking the gloves off and doing whatever is necessary, it won’t matter if we send another 50 million troops — all we’ll be doing is setting up more targets for our enemies. Security, a functioning government, a functioning economy;none are possible, unless the rules of engagement are sufficiently changed to allow our troops to go after, and kill the enemy. A good start would be the removal of Al Sadr and the destruction of his Mahdi Army. Anything else is just hanging our troops out to dry so that politicians and others in this country can have their asses covered while they maneuver to win elections.

tomk59 on December 18, 2006 at 4:45 PM

Steel hard Rumsfeild….

to soft as butter Gates….

gonna miss ya Rummy!

S!

Romeo13 on December 18, 2006 at 5:00 PM

The plan comes from AEI, which ought to make it extra popular with the media.

Yeah – I’m already cringing in anticipatory pain at what is going to be said.

RD on December 18, 2006 at 5:08 PM

Did it bother anyone else that he said something to the effect of “he can’t wait until he can talk to the military leaders to get their honest assessments and getting their advice on how to proceed and the unvarnished truth?

Shouldn’t he have done this when he put out the Iraq Sell Out Report?

With how the report comes across, I had suspicions that he and the panel did not talk to the people who were running things on the ground.

His ties to defending the saudi’s against the 9/11 attacks make me question him as well.

I’m at a loss on him getting that position..no wonder the demos approved him so fast. That should tell us a lot lol.

Highrise on December 19, 2006 at 5:14 PM