Comments on: Secret Saudi intel report: 77,000 Sunni insurgents in Iraq

By: easyitnews.com » Blog Archive » Encore set to bag Brazilian laptop order (IT)

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:40:23 +0000

[...] Secret Saudi intel report: 77,000 Sunni insurgents in IraqHot Air, MD - Dec 18, 2006As of nine months ago. And most aren t jihadis: if their intel is right, 60,000 of them are ex-military or Saddam fedayeen. I … [...]

By: Mensa Barbie Welcomes You

Mensa Barbie Welcomes You — Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:36:47 +0000

Iraq: World resisted Peace-Keeping Efforts…

Post Saddam removal and de-Baathification of Iraq, met with challenge against effort as it prevented full Int’l peace-keeping support. This wrought with it, the escalation of violence….

By: William2006

William2006 — Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:09:11 +0000

Is the US going to be serious and kick butt, destroy the insurgents of all stripes in a three to four month military offensive, or are they going to order our soldiers to stand out in the open, open targets, like ducks in a shooting gallery, for snipers and IEDs to kill?

Why even bother if our soldiers are merely to be lined up in the open and killed rather than allowed to do what they can do so well, track down and kill as many Jihadis as possible, and blow things up so these roaches cannot hide in some crevice somewhere.

Instead our soldiers are supposed to be “charitable” Social Workers, making a bridge between the Iraqis and the US, good will ambassadors if you will.

Come on! Whose good will are they doing?

Even our so-called allies are giving aid and comfort to the enemy, and trashing US, even though our “allies” (France, Germany, and others) have been, and are totally dependent on US for their safety!

Please,

Stop playing, and stop putting our soldiers out to be slaughtered.

Organize and attack, kill the Jihadis, and secure that land. Don’t let the Jihadis get entrenched, and stop them from killing the Iraqi citizens!

Do it!

William

By: Dave R.

Dave R. — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:26:22 +0000

At least it is 77,000 insurgents wha aren’t over here.

By: Buzzy

Buzzy — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:04:06 +0000

Once you remember that Saudi Arabia and the UAE have very close ties with Clinton, Gore, and Carter it makes understanding exactly why the left seems to support our enemies much more than President Bush’s actions in Iraq.

I’m sure that Bush went after Saddam because he was a truly evil person but the political reality is that he attacked a Sunni controlled country and has all but given it to their enemy, Shi’a controlled Iran. Even worse we’ve injected democracy into Iraq which most kingdoms in the region view as a very dangerous thing, something they feel they must stop before it reaches their own palace door.

By: Rick

Rick — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:26:30 +0000

I get liberals telling me all the time that this is why we should have left Saddam in power – because with him there was a balance of power

By: I think the Iranian loon is scaring the Saudis | MY Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

Tue, 19 Dec 2006 04:33:50 +0000

[...] Which would be a good thing. Iran has effectively created a Shi’ite “state within a state” in neighboring Iraq, defying both Iraqi Sunnis and neighboring Sunni nations, according to a Saudi security report. [...]

By: right2bright

right2bright — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:48:01 +0000

Yup, and how much Saudi money has gone to finance the 77,000 jihadis? Keep ‘em fightin’ us in Iraq and they won’t have time to attack the Saudi royal family.
Tony737 on December 18, 2006 at 8:42 PM

Good analysis Tony; the Saudi’s, et.al., are not unlike most dictators. Create an outside evil (Castro=U.S., Chavez=U.S.)and the “natives won’t turn on you.

By: Kralizec

Kralizec — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:57:36 +0000

This appears to be another manifestation of the demographic problem. And one remedies a demographic problem in three modes: birth, barrenness, and death. Perhaps one somehow puts one’s own women to work bearing children for many years, and then one patiently waits two decades for the babies to become adults. Or perhaps one somehow keeps millions of the enemy’s people from reproducing. Or perhaps one makes them unable even to think of reproducing.

Don’t look at me that way, whoever you are; if I merely do the math, and thereby spare you the necessity to do it yourself, perhaps I might merit some excuse. It seems the West survives by demanding women do their natural work, by making the others unable or unwilling to reproduce, by making an obscene slaughter, or by mixing these three modes. But if any reader knows know how to right a demographic imbalance other than by birth, barrenness, and death, let him tell us.

By: Tony737

Tony737 — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:42:14 +0000

Yup, and how much Saudi money has gone to finance the 77,000 jihadis? Keep ‘em fightin’ us in Iraq and they won’t have time to attack the Saudi royal family.

Off topic: Michelle is on the Factor and DAMN she looks good! Bill just told her “I think you were right and I was wrong.”

By: Griz

Griz — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:38:43 +0000

One must refrain from basing conclusions on reports when the topic concerns the Middle-East. In this region loyalties change like the moon. Everyone gets ‘paid.’ No one speaks in public as they do in private and everyone is counting on someone else to do the work. Most have never had a ‘job.’ Most would prefer not to have one. We must face the fact that there is only one answer. Oil revenues. Everyone gets a check. Everyone gets the same amount. Then they can go back to doing what they do best. Getting over on one another.

By: Bill's Bites

Bill's Bites — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:14:14 +0000

Secret Saudi intel report: 77,000 Sunni insurgents in Iraq…

Saudis report Shi’ite ‘state’ inside of Iraq Iran has effectively created a Shi’ite state within a state in neighboring Iraq, defying both Iraqi Sunnis and neighboring Sunni nations, according to a Saudi security report. Iranian military forces are…

By: jummy

jummy — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:06:57 +0000

i wish there was a clash. so far as i can tell, atheists (or at least ones who present them selves as the face of the atheist “community”) seem to not recognize any dissonance there. i really believe the reaoning is that as long as you’re not under the destructive spell of the malign christchild religion, you’re all together in solidaity with the non-christian cause.

i wish i believed it was more nuanced and less stupid than that, but since the revalation of nancy pelosi not knowing about zarqauwi…

By: NEMETI IN SYRACUSE

NEMETI IN SYRACUSE — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:53:14 +0000

Wonderful, just wonderful!!!!!!!