Comments on: Video: David Duke calls Wolf Blitzer a Jewish extremist

By: Jimmy Carter or David Duke? « infotainment still rules

Jimmy Carter or David Duke? « infotainment still rules — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:55:56 +0000

[...] Duke launched into an extraordinary personal attack on Wolf Blitzer on the Situation Room yesterday. He gets extra points for bringing “Harvard” and “Walt and Mearsheimer” into his tirade. You can read all about it and view a clip here. [...]

By: Estradiol levels.

Estradiol levels. — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:12:34 +0000

Injectable estradiol without a prescription….

Injectable estradiol with a prescription….

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: Moore sneers at Blitzer over CNN debunking of “Sicko”

Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:46:54 +0000

[...] Sure, Breitbart’s had it for a few hours but he doesn’t give you any of the background segment. The big A’s got five and a half minutes of pure gold for you, baby, starting with Dr. Sanjay Gupta slapping around the Iraqi “minutemen’s” favorite documentartian followed by big Mike slapping around cable news’s eternal punching bag. Don’t you go complaining about the little ethnic tweak in his pronunciation of Sanjay Gupta’s name at the end — Mikey’s leftist credentials give him an all-you-can-smear ticket to the racist buffet for eternity. [...]

By: Black Adam

Black Adam — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:03:44 +0000

Why does David Duke look like he's wearing someone else's face a-la Ed Gein? LEATHER FACE! Either that, or it's an incurable case of jaundice. See what hatred does to you?

By: Video: David Duke calls Wolf Blitzer a Jewish extremist « Red State American

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:00:51 +0000

[...] read more | digg story [...]

By: Kralizec

Kralizec — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:32:28 +0000

I bet David Duke would be upset to learn he bears a resemblance to Leo Strauss.

By: shooter

shooter — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:24:45 +0000

Where is that guy who asked which news service he could watch in the hopes of it being honest?
Duke clearly shows that anyone can twist the ‘news’ or letters/memo’s etc. into anything they want.
Like Bush (W) started the shia/sunni fighting 1400 years ago, they have proof…..in writting.
…reminds me of Jordan or Lather-Rather.

By: Rightwingsparkle

Rightwingsparkle — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:17:24 +0000

natesnake beat me to it. The quote from Byrd in 2002 was something like “You know there are white n*ggers too.” This racist comment was just swept under the rug. Believing that Byrd is no longer a racist is just a case of turning a blind eye. For political gain he denounced who he had been and that’s the only reason he did.

Imagine a Republican saying such a thing???? We would still be hearing about it.

At least the Republican party denounced Duke and had nothing to do with him. Sometimes the hypocrisy of it drives me insane.

By: natesnake

natesnake — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:01:28 +0000

While not excusing his membership, I think it’s fair to say his career of public service, record on civil rights, and constant apologies and denouncements have convinced most Americans that he is not a racist and his membership was youthful indiscretion.

JaHerer22, I assume you failed U.S. History in highschool. Byrd led the Senate fillibuster against civil rights.

Also, Byrd said “white n*gger” not once, but twice in an interview in 2002.

I’m not saying he’s David Duke either, but he’s definitely not the person you see through your rose colored glasses.

By: doginblack

doginblack — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:54:54 +0000

You Can’t Handle the Truth!- funny, not really the Nicholson delivery I would have hoped for.

By: MarkB

MarkB — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:50:31 +0000

I wonder if the NAACP gets the same condemnation.

By: tormod

tormod — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:32:11 +0000

John Bolton for Secretary of State, 2006?
John Bolton for POTUS, 2008?

We need to search diligently for candidates.

By: retired

retired — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:14:27 +0000

they both suck, so it’s a wash..

By: Timber Wolf

Timber Wolf — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:14:14 +0000

A couple of Dimmicrat jihad PR men eating each other. Mrs. Cheney would have enjoyed this.

By: Esthier

Esthier — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:49:47 +0000

even if the Left’s social policies have been as destructive for blacks as anything the KKK ever envisioned.

But isn’t that a point worth noting? Maybe there isn’t racism behind those policies, but when electing a former keagle in the KKK who was a segregationist for much of his early political career, why assume anything?

I try not to worry about the overt racists. I worry about the ones who think they’re fooling everyone. Maybe he isn’t one, but it seems a disgrace that we allow former KKK members anywhere near a political office, Republican or Democrat.

Duke may be the devil himself, but Byrd is no angel.

By: Esthier

Esthier — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:46:02 +0000

Bryd’s involvement with the KKK ended over 50 years and since that time he has been upfront and apologetic regarding his ties to the organzation. He has said he joined “because it offered excitement and because it was strongly opposed to communism” and has repeated multiple times “I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized a thousand times . . . and I don’t mind apologizing over and over again. I can’t erase what happened.”

Actually, I’ve read articles that indicate Byrd had dealings with the KKK as late as 2000. And what, Duke just needs to wait 20 more years before people quit referring to his work with the Klan?

Byrd wrote a letter, after the point he claims he cut ties with the Klan, claiming he would never fight in a war, “with a Negro by [his] side”, filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and opposed the Voting Rights Act of 1965. What civil rights record could you be referring to?

But you do say this:

I don’t think it’s wrong to point out either man’s membership

So do you agree that if a former membership in the Klan is to be mentioned that it shouldn’t be ignored for any others?

That was my only point by the way, not to ask whose membership in the most racist organization in the history of the United States was worse.

By: Lancer

Lancer — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:41:02 +0000

Maybe JaHerer22 would, or maybe not, but his point is still good. Senator Byrd has not espoused KKK talking points in decades (that I am aware of), even if the Left’s social policies have been as destructive for blacks as anything the KKK ever envisioned. David Duke is still as much a Klansman as he ever was.
Incidentally, are we sure that Duke is still a “former” Grand Wizard? Now that he is not running for office, has he rejoined his old gang, and if not, why not? He doesn’t strike me as a guy who does anything without a reason (however evil or looney).

By: irishsquid

irishsquid — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:11:44 +0000

By: JaHerer22

JaHerer22 — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:43:03 +0000

At the risk of agreeing with the racist (even only for a second), why is it that he is mentioned so many times (and even as the caption under him reads) as a former leader of the KKK, while Robert Byrd is not?

Was Duke a higher ranking member of the KKK than Byrd or what?

I’m not against calling out former KKK members, but why one and not the other?

Bryd’s involvement with the KKK ended over 50 years and since that time he has been upfront and apologetic regarding his ties to the organzation. He has said he joined “because it offered excitement and because it was strongly opposed to communism” and has repeated multiple times “I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized a thousand times . . . and I don’t mind apologizing over and over again. I can’t erase what happened.”

While not excusing his membership, I think it’s fair to say his career of public service, record on civil rights, and constant apologies and denouncements have convinced most Americans that he is not a racist and his membership was youthful indiscretion. Duke on the other hand, has proven time and time again his racist and bigot nature and has done nothing to even attempt to convince Americans he regrets his membership. I don’t think it’s wrong to point out either man’s membership, but equating Byrd to Duke is ridiculous.

By: Jimmy Carter or David Duke? at infotainment rules

Jimmy Carter or David Duke? at infotainment rules — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:15:17 +0000

By: Josephine

Josephine — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:14:21 +0000

P.S. I meant Duke would fit in with the DinnerJacket and his ilk, not any freedom-loving Iranians who might still be there.

By: Josephine

Josephine — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:13:11 +0000

What a racist creep. Maybe he’ll move to Iran; he’d fit right in.

By: Pajamas Media

Pajamas Media — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:08:25 +0000

David Duke Calls Wolf Blitzer a Jewish Extremist and an Israeli Agent:…

Hot Air has the video…….

By: Doda McCheesle

Doda McCheesle — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:00:30 +0000

Hmmm…. Wolfie works for CNN… CNN got a BILLION DOLLAR investment from…. SAUDI ARABIA! One of the Saudi “ministers” stated publicly he is in touch with top CNN editors on a daily basis to make sure the news stays “balanced”….

Zionist conspiracy…. MY A$$!!! If there is one, HOW COME THEY HAVEN’T INVITED MY KIKE TUCHAS IN YET! I WANT MONEY AND POWER TOO!!!! I’m BROKE and not even a doctor, lawyer, or accountant! Waitaminit… maybe I’m not really a Joooooo?!?

By: Esthier

Esthier — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:48:49 +0000

At the risk of agreeing with the racist (even only for a second), why is it that he is mentioned so many times (and even as the caption under him reads) as a former leader of the KKK, while Robert Byrd is not?

Was Duke a higher ranking member of the KKK than Byrd or what?

I’m not against calling out former KKK members, but why one and not the other?