<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientific American: Soy won&#8217;t give you teh ghey, we promise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:42:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-406310</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-406310</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;After 20 plus years, I cancelled my subscription to Scientific American a few years ago. Seems PC is more important than pure science. That new editor holds some seriously flawed views of people who practice their religion and he gets a lot of exercise jumping to conclusions. In my opinion, Scientific American is Junk.

Zorro on December 14, 2006 at 7:44 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


I agree Zorro, I have much more confidence in World Net Daily than the politically correct crowd over at Scientific American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>After 20 plus years, I cancelled my subscription to Scientific American a few years ago. Seems PC is more important than pure science. That new editor holds some seriously flawed views of people who practice their religion and he gets a lot of exercise jumping to conclusions. In my opinion, Scientific American is Junk.</p>
<p>Zorro on December 14, 2006 at 7:44 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree Zorro, I have much more confidence in World Net Daily than the politically correct crowd over at Scientific American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-143800</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-143800</guid>
		<description>After 20 plus years, I cancelled my subscription to Scientific American a few years ago.  Seems PC is more important than pure science.  That new editor holds some seriously flawed views of people who practice their religion and he gets a lot of exercise jumping to conclusions.  In my opinion, Scientific American is Junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 20 plus years, I cancelled my subscription to Scientific American a few years ago.  Seems PC is more important than pure science.  That new editor holds some seriously flawed views of people who practice their religion and he gets a lot of exercise jumping to conclusions.  In my opinion, Scientific American is Junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradky</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-142833</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-142833</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;…but now that I think about it, asians… who happen to include some of the shortest, most feminine male populations in the world, who notoriously have trouble getting non-asian women, and who also have trouble with asian women because so many of them date non-asians…

I think I’d better lay off that soy. 

kaltes on December 13, 2006 at 3:31 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL considering there are about 4 billion Asians in the world Asian males seem to have overcome these challenges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>…but now that I think about it, asians… who happen to include some of the shortest, most feminine male populations in the world, who notoriously have trouble getting non-asian women, and who also have trouble with asian women because so many of them date non-asians…</p>
<p>I think I’d better lay off that soy. </p>
<p>kaltes on December 13, 2006 at 3:31 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL considering there are about 4 billion Asians in the world Asian males seem to have overcome these challenges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbancenturion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-142674</link>
		<dc:creator>urbancenturion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-142674</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;educational tool&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ted Kennedy is and &lt;em&gt;educational tool&lt;/em&gt;...hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>educational tool</p></blockquote>
<p>Ted Kennedy is and <em>educational tool</em>&#8230;hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-142309</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-142309</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The soy/estrogen thing is a load of junk. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not so fast. Now, full disclosure, I&#039;m not opposed to soy, especially if it is properly handled, so I&#039;m not thrilled with the idea of it being portrayed as inducing femininity into males. Non-GMO sourced soy protein is one of the most effective health-enhancers available anywhere, with much less downside than whey protein. (Hmm, whey...ghey, couldn&#039;t be a connection, right?)

However, somebody thinks it&#039;s worth studying. If you follow the links at the NIH PubMed site you&#039;ll encounter more than a dozen studies concerned with connections between soy consumption and estrogen levels.

Last point, not everything Jim Rutz writes is 100% serious. Even when he&#039;s making a serious point, he intentionally tosses a bit of hyperbole in there to keep the pot stirred. It&#039;s always a good educational tool; people learn more when they are involved, and sometimes getting them involved takes ruffling their feathers. AP does it here all the time, with virtuosity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The soy/estrogen thing is a load of junk. </p></blockquote>
<p>Not so fast. Now, full disclosure, I&#8217;m not opposed to soy, especially if it is properly handled, so I&#8217;m not thrilled with the idea of it being portrayed as inducing femininity into males. Non-GMO sourced soy protein is one of the most effective health-enhancers available anywhere, with much less downside than whey protein. (Hmm, whey&#8230;ghey, couldn&#8217;t be a connection, right?)</p>
<p>However, somebody thinks it&#8217;s worth studying. If you follow the links at the NIH PubMed site you&#8217;ll encounter more than a dozen studies concerned with connections between soy consumption and estrogen levels.</p>
<p>Last point, not everything Jim Rutz writes is 100% serious. Even when he&#8217;s making a serious point, he intentionally tosses a bit of hyperbole in there to keep the pot stirred. It&#8217;s always a good educational tool; people learn more when they are involved, and sometimes getting them involved takes ruffling their feathers. AP does it here all the time, with virtuosity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pillage Idiot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141855</link>
		<dc:creator>Pillage Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141855</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Soy, the &quot;devil food&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

For some reason, the Indians, at least in Mumbai (Bombay), are paying for home-delivered meals for their dogs:More than 50 ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Soy, the &#8220;devil food&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>For some reason, the Indians, at least in Mumbai (Bombay), are paying for home-delivered meals for their dogs:More than 50 &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141836</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141836</guid>
		<description>The soy/estrogen thing is a load of junk.  HOWEVER, I will never trust SciAm after they published that long hit piece of Bjorn Lomborg.  It was a disgrace, and entirely contrary to science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The soy/estrogen thing is a load of junk.  HOWEVER, I will never trust SciAm after they published that long hit piece of Bjorn Lomborg.  It was a disgrace, and entirely contrary to science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorien1973</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141562</link>
		<dc:creator>lorien1973</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141562</guid>
		<description>All japanese anime (even the stuff on cartoon network) make a point of showing the girl characters&#039; panties ALL the time. Low camera angles. Ackward positions they stand in. Anything. Gotta love the japanese animators! Country can&#039;t reproduce in real life, but they can draw characters who are ready to get funky at the drop of a hat :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All japanese anime (even the stuff on cartoon network) make a point of showing the girl characters&#8217; panties ALL the time. Low camera angles. Ackward positions they stand in. Anything. Gotta love the japanese animators! Country can&#8217;t reproduce in real life, but they can draw characters who are ready to get funky at the drop of a hat :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali-Bubba</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141536</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali-Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141536</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why do you think Sailor moon was such a hit?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh, dude ... you actually &lt;em&gt;typed&lt;/em&gt; that, and then hit &quot;submit comment.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why do you think Sailor moon was such a hit?</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh, dude &#8230; you actually <em>typed</em> that, and then hit &#8220;submit comment.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141454</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141454</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, since a human adult can consumes more than a human baby and phytoestrogens may block the effect of estrogen, WND’s “point”* is completely refuted.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Um, the WND article was talking about soy formula. In other words, babies young enough to be only eating milk as yet--in other words, 100% of their diet containing soy. 

That&#039;s not less than an adult eats, even an Asian adult. It&#039;s far more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, since a human adult can consumes more than a human baby and phytoestrogens may block the effect of estrogen, WND’s “point”* is completely refuted.</p></blockquote>
<p>Um, the WND article was talking about soy formula. In other words, babies young enough to be only eating milk as yet&#8211;in other words, 100% of their diet containing soy. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not less than an adult eats, even an Asian adult. It&#8217;s far more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeyboss</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141444</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeyboss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141444</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Phytoestrogens are estrogen mimics. BUT - get this - they are actually less effective than regular estrogens when they hit estrogen receptors on your cells. That&#039;s right - these substances, far from juicing you up with lady-hormones, might actually block the effects of estrogen&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This would be true only if the phytoestrogens are competing with real estrogen that is already present.  

An analogy from medicine:  Nubain is partially active at opiate receptors.  If you give it to a patient with no opiates on board, there will be an effect and pain will be reduced.  If, however, the patient already has a stronger opiate in his system, the competing Nubain will occupy some of the receptors and have a lesser effect; thus pain is worsened.

I don&#039;t know enough about the baseline level of estrogen in children or adult males, so I don&#039;t know which of the above scenarios is most applicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Phytoestrogens are estrogen mimics. BUT &#8211; get this &#8211; they are actually less effective than regular estrogens when they hit estrogen receptors on your cells. That&#8217;s right &#8211; these substances, far from juicing you up with lady-hormones, might actually block the effects of estrogen</p></blockquote>
<p>This would be true only if the phytoestrogens are competing with real estrogen that is already present.  </p>
<p>An analogy from medicine:  Nubain is partially active at opiate receptors.  If you give it to a patient with no opiates on board, there will be an effect and pain will be reduced.  If, however, the patient already has a stronger opiate in his system, the competing Nubain will occupy some of the receptors and have a lesser effect; thus pain is worsened.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know enough about the baseline level of estrogen in children or adult males, so I don&#8217;t know which of the above scenarios is most applicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141390</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141390</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This sucks…I had a really great practical joke planned out where I would slip some concentrated soy into my roommate’s food every day until he came out of the closet (figuratively), upon which I would come out of the closet (literally), point and laugh and call him a gay.

JaHerer22 on December 13, 2006 at 2:57 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Skater?  Is that &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/07/video-the-parlor/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This sucks…I had a really great practical joke planned out where I would slip some concentrated soy into my roommate’s food every day until he came out of the closet (figuratively), upon which I would come out of the closet (literally), point and laugh and call him a gay.</p>
<p>JaHerer22 on December 13, 2006 at 2:57 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Skater?  Is that <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/07/video-the-parlor/" rel="nofollow">you</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wander</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141389</link>
		<dc:creator>Wander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141389</guid>
		<description>Here we go:

Hops are full of female hormone.

Beer is full (or should be)  of Hops.

I am often full of beer.

So far, so good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go:</p>
<p>Hops are full of female hormone.</p>
<p>Beer is full (or should be)  of Hops.</p>
<p>I am often full of beer.</p>
<p>So far, so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberCipher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141387</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberCipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141387</guid>
		<description>We have large Asian populations (as a percentage of our population) here on the Left Coast. Tofu is very popular around these here parts. I am suspiscious. What else is in those scientific reports? Do they say anything about there being something in soy that feeds the fungus growing on the inside lining of the brains of all the moonbat liberals in Seattle and San Francisco? Maybe we can start a new conspiracy theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have large Asian populations (as a percentage of our population) here on the Left Coast. Tofu is very popular around these here parts. I am suspiscious. What else is in those scientific reports? Do they say anything about there being something in soy that feeds the fungus growing on the inside lining of the brains of all the moonbat liberals in Seattle and San Francisco? Maybe we can start a new conspiracy theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrflashman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141374</link>
		<dc:creator>mrflashman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141374</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Japanese are the kings of &lt;strong&gt;strange bizarre fetish&lt;/strong&gt; Porn&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There I fixed it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Japanese are the kings of <strong>strange bizarre fetish</strong> Porn</p></blockquote>
<p>There I fixed it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradky</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141372</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141372</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ach! I forgot about the Chinese laws regarding one-child per household.  

wearyman on December 13, 2006 at 4:05 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I heard soy causes amnesia too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ach! I forgot about the Chinese laws regarding one-child per household.  </p>
<p>wearyman on December 13, 2006 at 4:05 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I heard soy causes amnesia too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kokonut</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141370</link>
		<dc:creator>Kokonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141370</guid>
		<description>Soy boy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soy boy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wearyman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141367</link>
		<dc:creator>wearyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141367</guid>
		<description>Bradky,

Ach!  I forgot about the Chinese laws regarding one-child per household.  You are completely correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bradky,</p>
<p>Ach!  I forgot about the Chinese laws regarding one-child per household.  You are completely correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wearyman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141344</link>
		<dc:creator>wearyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141344</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
The Japanese are the kings of Porn…really kinky porn…Why do you think Sailor moon was such a hit?

Look up Hentai, Bukakke, or anything on the “j-list:

(And no, I don’t watch a lot of porn, just went to the wrong web sites one day when I was an innocent youth and looking for some good anime)

Wyrd on December 13, 2006 at 3:01 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh, that&#039;s true.  The Japanese definitely have a penchant for unusual porn.  Heck, they INVENTED the concept of &quot;Tentacle Rape&quot;.  (Don&#039;t ask if you don&#039;t REALLY want to know)

Most of the Japanese porn we get here in the states is of the animated variety.  Of course, most &quot;live action&quot; (non-animated) Japanese porn isn&#039;t really watchable anyway.  They have some really freaky decency laws there,  and native Japanese porn always has all the naughty bits either blacked out with black blobs, or &quot;pixellated&quot; into unrecognizable blurs.  It makes for some very unsatisfying porn watching.

The Hentai (Animated porn) can go either way.  Some of it is pretty good (Romantic themes, a normal storyline but with sex), some of it is just grotesque (rape, domination, gore and other nasty stuff).  But most of it is fairly bland or stupid.  (What do you expect, it&#039;s animated porn.)

Yeah, yeah, I watch porn sometimes.  So sue me.  I don&#039;t get Playboy for the articles either.  (Oooo!  I&#039;m an Eeevil male mysoginist because I like Teh Boobies!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
The Japanese are the kings of Porn…really kinky porn…Why do you think Sailor moon was such a hit?</p>
<p>Look up Hentai, Bukakke, or anything on the “j-list:</p>
<p>(And no, I don’t watch a lot of porn, just went to the wrong web sites one day when I was an innocent youth and looking for some good anime)</p>
<p>Wyrd on December 13, 2006 at 3:01 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh, that&#8217;s true.  The Japanese definitely have a penchant for unusual porn.  Heck, they INVENTED the concept of &#8220;Tentacle Rape&#8221;.  (Don&#8217;t ask if you don&#8217;t REALLY want to know)</p>
<p>Most of the Japanese porn we get here in the states is of the animated variety.  Of course, most &#8220;live action&#8221; (non-animated) Japanese porn isn&#8217;t really watchable anyway.  They have some really freaky decency laws there,  and native Japanese porn always has all the naughty bits either blacked out with black blobs, or &#8220;pixellated&#8221; into unrecognizable blurs.  It makes for some very unsatisfying porn watching.</p>
<p>The Hentai (Animated porn) can go either way.  Some of it is pretty good (Romantic themes, a normal storyline but with sex), some of it is just grotesque (rape, domination, gore and other nasty stuff).  But most of it is fairly bland or stupid.  (What do you expect, it&#8217;s animated porn.)</p>
<p>Yeah, yeah, I watch porn sometimes.  So sue me.  I don&#8217;t get Playboy for the articles either.  (Oooo!  I&#8217;m an Eeevil male mysoginist because I like Teh Boobies!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infidel4life</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141343</link>
		<dc:creator>infidel4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141343</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Guess we can expect to see an advertisement in the not too distant future with Rosie O doing a “Got Soy” commercial.

Sorry for those on the west coast who may be eating lunch when you see this!

Bradky on December 13, 2006 at 3:23 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Uh... that would be me. &lt;strong&gt;*barf*&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Guess we can expect to see an advertisement in the not too distant future with Rosie O doing a “Got Soy” commercial.</p>
<p>Sorry for those on the west coast who may be eating lunch when you see this!</p>
<p>Bradky on December 13, 2006 at 3:23 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh&#8230; that would be me. <strong>*barf*</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141338</link>
		<dc:creator>torrentprime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141338</guid>
		<description>Anwyn: Yes, actually, the article did.
&lt;em&gt;Phytoestrogens ... are actually less effective than regular estrogens when they hit estrogen receptors on your cells. That&#039;s right - these substances, far from juicing you up with lady-hormones, might actually block the effects of estrogen...Anyway no one&#039;s ever shown that soy is biologically active in the amounts a normal human can consume in a day.&lt;/em&gt;
So, since a human adult can consumes more than a human baby and phytoestrogens may block the effect of estrogen, WND&#039;s &quot;point&quot;* is completely refuted.

* Point = faux-scientific justification for a religious opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anwyn: Yes, actually, the article did.<br />
<em>Phytoestrogens &#8230; are actually less effective than regular estrogens when they hit estrogen receptors on your cells. That&#8217;s right &#8211; these substances, far from juicing you up with lady-hormones, might actually block the effects of estrogen&#8230;Anyway no one&#8217;s ever shown that soy is biologically active in the amounts a normal human can consume in a day.</em><br />
So, since a human adult can consumes more than a human baby and phytoestrogens may block the effect of estrogen, WND&#8217;s &#8220;point&#8221;* is completely refuted.</p>
<p>* Point = faux-scientific justification for a religious opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila (Pillage Idiot)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141331</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila (Pillage Idiot)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141331</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am in no way drinking anybody’s kool-aid here, BUT Sci-Am doesn’t really refute WorldNet’s main point, which is that it’s too much soy given to *babies* that causes hormonal overdose, not adults–therefore their Asian thing is irrelevant. 

Anwyn on December 13, 2006 at 3:39 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps, but when you trace it to the Devil, SciAm isn&#039;t obligated to refute THAT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am in no way drinking anybody’s kool-aid here, BUT Sci-Am doesn’t really refute WorldNet’s main point, which is that it’s too much soy given to *babies* that causes hormonal overdose, not adults–therefore their Asian thing is irrelevant. </p>
<p>Anwyn on December 13, 2006 at 3:39 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps, but when you trace it to the Devil, SciAm isn&#8217;t obligated to refute THAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141319</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141319</guid>
		<description>I am in no way drinking anybody&#039;s kool-aid here, BUT Sci-Am doesn&#039;t really refute WorldNet&#039;s main point, which is that it&#039;s too much soy given to *babies* that causes hormonal overdose, not adults--therefore their Asian thing is irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in no way drinking anybody&#8217;s kool-aid here, BUT Sci-Am doesn&#8217;t really refute WorldNet&#8217;s main point, which is that it&#8217;s too much soy given to *babies* that causes hormonal overdose, not adults&#8211;therefore their Asian thing is irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaltes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141304</link>
		<dc:creator>kaltes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141304</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Plus, there are billions of asians who are eating way more of it than most westerners every day, and you don&#039;t see them mincing about town in spotless waistcoats like Oscar Wilde now do you? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow.

I didn&#039;t really believe that any of this was true...

...but now that I think about it, asians... who happen to include some of the shortest, most feminine male populations in the world, who notoriously have trouble getting non-asian women, and who also have trouble with asian women because so many of them date non-asians...

I think I&#039;d better lay off that soy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Plus, there are billions of asians who are eating way more of it than most westerners every day, and you don&#8217;t see them mincing about town in spotless waistcoats like Oscar Wilde now do you? </p></blockquote>
<p>Wow.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really believe that any of this was true&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;but now that I think about it, asians&#8230; who happen to include some of the shortest, most feminine male populations in the world, who notoriously have trouble getting non-asian women, and who also have trouble with asian women because so many of them date non-asians&#8230;</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d better lay off that soy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradky</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-141291</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/13/scientific-american-soy-wont-give-you-teh-ghey-we-promise/#comment-141291</guid>
		<description>Guess we can expect to see an advertisement in the not too distant future with Rosie O doing a &quot;Got Soy&quot; commercial.

Sorry for those on the west coast who may be eating lunch when you see this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess we can expect to see an advertisement in the not too distant future with Rosie O doing a &#8220;Got Soy&#8221; commercial.</p>
<p>Sorry for those on the west coast who may be eating lunch when you see this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
