The next most human way to reduce the population might be to put something in the water, a virus that would be specific to the human reproductive system and would make a substantial proportion of the population infertile.

“How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It’s incredibly obvious, isn’t it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That’s the way your hard-core Commie works.”

Are you kidding? It’s time to breed like there’s no tomorrow.

CyberCipher on December 13, 2006 at 11:17 PM

“Now, wouldn’t that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?”

“Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious… service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.”

1. Democrats – Hey, it isn’t like they are producing that much anyways.
2. Leftists – Hey, their all about abortions, just think of it like pre-abortions.
3. Muslims – We need to stop their suicide bomber factories some how….

You first, Doc. But skip the water. Cowboy up and grab a pair of tweezers.

THATS why I only drink beer. Water will kill ya.
Limerick on December 14, 2006 at 8:38 AM

Amen.

if it all boils down to demographics and birth rates, what can be done?
Granted, I don’t have any kids, and I am closing in on 40… so I am part of the problem. But what can be done?
Wyrd on December 13, 2006 at 10:01 PM

Are you kidding? It’s time to breed like there’s no tomorrow. SO WHAT if you’re 40! If you’re a Christian guy (Catholic or protestant) and you’ve decided that your prospects of finding a mate at age 40 are less than favorable, I know precisely where you can EASILY get an attractive, English speaking Christian wife who is in her prime child-bearing years.

CyberCipher on December 13, 2006 at 11:17 PM

“Well, we’re waiting!” Judge Smails

or at least I am. I’ve just about given up having a family myself. Maybe I need to get out of the bars, church, softball league, work and casinos.

Oh, and death to Amerikkka.

Wearyman, I took your advice and tried to convince Mrs.737 that to do our part to save Western Civ, I’d hafta have a harem. She didn’t go for it and now I’m sleepin’ on the couch! Any other bright ideas? J/K

Me too, Cyber…I’ve two daughters that fit that bill exactly. Think they can find decent, educated men? They’d love to marry and make some babies, but they don’t much want to get stuck with an idiot to do it.

Bob’s Kid on December 13, 2006 at 11:57 PM

Damn, really? How about a 21 year old cop from Texas? :)

if it all boils down to demographics and birth rates, what can be done?
Granted, I don’t have any kids, and I am closing in on 40… so I am part of the problem. But what can be done?
Wyrd on December 13, 2006 at 10:01 PM

Are you kidding? It’s time to breed like there’s no tomorrow. SO WHAT if you’re 40! If you’re a Christian guy (Catholic or protestant) and you’ve decided that your prospects of finding a mate at age 40 are less than favorable, I know precisely where you can EASILY get an attractive, English speaking Christian wife who is in her prime child-bearing years.

As everyone including several below-average seven-year-olds has already noticed, starting your “save-the-world everyone-must-go” program with the most productive and orderly societies makes about as much sense and committing a murder-suicide starting with the suicide.

In other words, this man’s last words will almost assuredly be “What are you laughing at! You’re next!”

I haven’t said 90% of the things I’m thinking about this moron, and I’d better not. When people talk about wiping me and my culture out, I kinda take it personally. Go figure.

Aussie scientist: Let’s save the planet — through mass involuntary sterilization

First, we kill bigmouth scientists.

[no, really. call your local Planning Commission and check. phrases like: "sustainable" "environmental justice" "equity" and the like are the dead give-aways.]

[then check Taking Liberty -- worth your time.]

A virus or other chemical agent planted in the water that makes you incredibly FERTILE, and makes women have 24-7 baby lust. (Just plain old lust isn’t enough. They gotta want the baby too.) I don’t suggest it for men because, frankly, I don’t think many of us could get much hornier than we already are.

With something like this the West would solve it’s population problems in a single generation. Of course, we would have to make some other concessions too, we might even have to resort to Polygamy in some countries, but I’m willing to do my part to help support Western Civilization against the Islamic onslaught.

Frankly, if the West wants to out-populate the Muslim world, this is the only moral way to do it. We have to out-breed them. The only other option available is to reduce their population through systematic genocide or extreme violence (nukes). I’m not sure out civilization could survive that kind of mortal wound to it’s psyche, not to mention the economic damage that amount of killing would wreak.

Besides, beating the Islamofasicts through sex is somehow more poetic than simply nuking them. :)

Europe, US, Japan… the most afluent areas, are all at or very near Zero Population growth once you take out immigration.

Even if you ignore all the vapid stupidity and evil banalities in this article – and that is one helluva a lot of ignoring to do – that bit about “let’s start with the rich countries” stands out as particularly stupid, even for this brain-child.

Even if such a policy were not truly evil (which it is) and actually necessary (which its not) and was actually a superior solution the roughly 7.2 million better ideas, what’s the logic behind starting with “affluent” countries? The rich countries – especially in Europe – all ALREADY have comparatively low population growth, or in many cases, negative growth.

Speaking purely hypothetically, starting with, oh, the exploding Muslim third-world countries might make just a little more sense … (not to mention the other problems neatly solved).

Now a quick question: why is that it is ALWAYS the people who love to call others “Hitler” of “fascist” that seem to routinely bring up ‘eugenics’ sorts of ideas, stuff that, well, actually IS Nazi-esque? Am I crazy – or should you lose the right to call others “Nazis,” once you start supporting mass global involuntary sterilization?

Just more of the beauty of liberalism, I suppose.