Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


The Associated (with America’s enemies) Press

posted at 9:10 am on December 5, 2006 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

End AP’s “60 Minutes moment”
NYT’s Zeller: Hyperbole & horror
Allah *Curt * JYB * MM

Download Vent for your iPod
Subscribe to Hot Air TV on iTunes


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

This Georgia Dawg longs for the days of ZELL.

PARTY POLITICS, holiday style.

seejanemom on December 5, 2006 at 9:13 AM

I know, bad pun about Zell…but if somebody could just keep his name in the news, maybe I wouldn’t feel so lied to.

seejanemom on December 5, 2006 at 9:15 AM

Great vent MM. Keep the heat on until they retract!

infidel on December 5, 2006 at 9:39 AM

Michelle, one of your better Vents as of late. I think you are on the road to full recovery after 11-7.

Wade on December 5, 2006 at 9:45 AM

The media bias has always been one of my pet peeves, but this takes it to another level. Keep up the good work Michelle.

Donkeyhue on December 5, 2006 at 9:56 AM

AP is covering their back, whereas the TIMES has yet to decide whose side they are on.

Wander on December 5, 2006 at 9:56 AM

Just another reason to cancel your subscription to your local AP feed, errrr. . . newspaper.

MCPO Airdale on December 5, 2006 at 10:13 AM

AP is covering their back, whereas the TIMES has yet to decide whose side they are on.
Wander on December 5, 2006 at 9:56 AM

Oh they all know what side they are on and it’s not the side of Truth, Justice and the American Way. You can be sure of that.

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on December 5, 2006 at 10:47 AM

I gave up my paper and ink pablum subscription about the time I got out of political diapers.

seejanemom on December 5, 2006 at 11:06 AM

…”war porn”…

I love it….

Puritan1648 on December 5, 2006 at 11:06 AM

My daughter is giving her college Speech class persuasive speech on the AP story.

Her thesis goes something like this: “Did you hear the story about the 6 Iraqi Sunnis that were burned alive in the street in Baghdad? There is good reason to believe that it didn’t happen. In fact, very little that you might have heard about what is happening in the Middle East is accurate.”

Can’t wait to hear what her leftist professor of diverse speech has to say about it. Heh.

Jaibones on December 5, 2006 at 11:11 AM

The main stream media lies to us???????
SAY IT ISN’T SO!!

Vanquisher on December 5, 2006 at 11:12 AM

Great Vent Michelle! We need reporting and commentary on how the Mainstream Media (MSM) is manipulating their “reporting”.

In my opinin the MSM has long been using tactics ranging from persuasion to fraud in their “reporting” to influence public policy to their Left biased political agenda. Many components of the MSM are not engaged in “news” but providing propaganda that is approved of by the Left. Don’t bother them with the facts or call them on inaccuracies – they are not interested.

The “Freedom of the Press” according to the MSM means not questioning them when they disclose classified information crucial to the interests of the United States – and don’t question their “reporting” because if it is published or broadcast it must be true. “Freedom of the Press” according to the MSM is a free ticket to publish whatever they want to support their political agenda and their bias to the Left.

This abuse of the “Freedom of the Press”, to print propaganda disguised as “reporting”, supports political positions so far to the Left that they are the biggest single weakness that the United States has. Many of the enemies and opponents of the United States do not gage their success on military victories but on how effectively they have used the Western Press to mold public opinion to their favor. The MSM often happily is complicent in these efforts as long as it supports their political agenda – detriment to the interests of the United States is not a consideration.

The MSM is slowly loosing some appeal but focus is needed on how this state of affairs, the MSM using the shield of “Freedom of the Press” to distribute propaganda to support their bias to the Left, can be resisted. Any Ideas?

omegaram on December 5, 2006 at 11:15 AM

Great Vent. War Porn? ROFL. Warnography.

WriterMom on December 5, 2006 at 12:41 PM

A hardy “AMEN” Michelle! If only we could subject the AP et al to a good public spanking. How could that come about? Would make a great news story. Oh, but they (MSMs)wouldn’t report it would they? Too embarrassing. But SOOOOO needed.

Roger Brown on December 5, 2006 at 1:03 PM

Columbia’s J school isn’t the only one with an ethics problem. My younger daughter is majoring in journalism, at a major university’s J school, and was blown away by a recent lecture topic: Bending the Truth. Assuming the lecture would be a tutorial on how to avoid such a thing, she was stunned, to the point of nausea, that the lecture was instructional.

Aunt B on December 5, 2006 at 1:27 PM

This would seem to be a good time to remind everyone that Al-Reuters refused, refuses to call Muslim terrorist, “terrorist”. When did they make that decision? Right after 9-11.

It’s time for the rest of us to grow some balls and call these Islamic terrorist PR media fronts what they are. Traitors.

Timber Wolf on December 5, 2006 at 1:39 PM

To me in many ways the press has been, since the Vietnam War, trying to set itself up as an institution outside and above the rest of society–in many ways reminiscent of the medieval Church from the late 11th through early 14th centuries. Its successful efforts in turning public opinion around with the Vietnam War combined with its role in bringing down the presidency of Richard Nixon has encouraged it to develop a conception of itself as the ultimate moral authority as regards government and society just as Gregory VII and other popes claimed. Later, we have the media claiming credit for bringing about the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty giving it even more of a political dimension as an international arbiter–again shades of the medieval papacy. Efforts on the part of the media to encourage legislation shielding reporters from revealing confidential sources plus laws in countries such as France permitting the media to sue those who challenge its reporting further this notion of the media attempting to establish itself as a separate class governed by its own rules, exempt from the rules of the rest of society–again just like the medieval clergy.

This evolutionary process was moving along relatively smoothly until a monkey wrench was thrown into the process: the internet and the active blogosphere that has evolved. Blogs such as this one, LGF, Michelle’s and others have disrupted this movement and we’re seeing the media attempting through publicity, legislation, and other means to neutralize these challenges. It’ll be interesting to see whether the media succeeds in its goal or not–hopefully for all concerned, it doesn’t.

Matt Helm on December 5, 2006 at 1:48 PM

Quite right, Matt,

But the Church was trying to preserve the civilization at least, not undermine it. They will never be able to fully silence bloggers but the only way to really hold them to account is through the government. President Bush had excellent opportunities to do this in the last 2 years. NYT reporters possibly committing Obstruction of Justice, others effectively committing espionage and treason by leaking secrets that help the terrorists. Bush should have revoked NYT’s press credentials throught the executive branch and made a point to sic FBI Counterintelligence after NYT and whatever oathbreakers in the government are compromising national security to satisfy their BDS. But he didn’t, and he won’t.

Lancer on December 5, 2006 at 2:07 PM

But the Church was trying to preserve the civilization at least, not undermine it.

True. One of the things I always try to do in the classes I teach is to dispell the misconception of the Church as an institution out to suppress all learning and knowledge. While it could and did suppress knowledge on occasions (Galileo, Copernicus), more often than not, churchmen were at the forefront of learning: Roger Bacon, William of Ockham, Peter Abelard, are just few examples.

Returning to the topic: I agree that the President and his administration has dropped the ball on dealing with leakers to the press and as well as dealing with the NY Times which has willfully, and I might add maliciously, published classified documents putting lives at risk. I firmly believe in a free press–it is necessary element for a free society to exist. But with freedom comes responsibility. The press is a part of society–it is not outside or above it, and it has the duty to act in a responsible manner and not put our society at risk. The actions of the Associated Press and New York Times is putting our society at risk.

PS: Circulation for the NY Times must really be down–they are literally giving the paper away at the university I teach at.

Matt Helm on December 5, 2006 at 2:59 PM

Matt Helm on December 5, 2006 at 1:48 PM

Great post Matt; very insightful connecting the two ideologies.

MSM won’t succeed, the genie has been let out. The blogs are the new watch dogs. And if one of them gets out of kilter, another will right it. Now if we could just get some bloggers into congress…

right2bright on December 5, 2006 at 3:04 PM

Circulation for the NY Times must really be down–they are literally giving the paper away at the university I teach at.

The Boston Globe, as part of the Times Family, is finacially killing the Times Co.

With the Red Sox dropping $60 mil on JD Drew and potentially $90-100 mil on a Japanese pitcher ($50 mil just to talk to the guy), I can’t imagine the Times getting any ROI for the 17% of the Red Sox they own as well.

Rich on December 5, 2006 at 3:18 PM

They will never be able to fully silence bloggers but the only way to really hold them to account is through the government
Lancer on December 5, 2006 at 2:07 PM

Sorry to disagree Lancer, but government has rarely solved any problem. And in imposing its solution it has usually caused more problems. The people will be the final arbitor in what is accepted and not. The MSM is losing revenue, and that will bring change. It is a slow process, but as more is revealed they must either adopt new rules of reporting, or lose their readership (profits). Right now they feel they are stronger than the blogs and are standing and fighting. They have been in power so long they won’t recognize(like any tyannical historical dictator) when they are about to lose it. Their power and influence is slipping away. If it wasn’t for sports news and business news, and free coupons, most of the MSM would not be read.

right2bright on December 5, 2006 at 3:21 PM

The associated press must be forced to change its name. Why? Mainly because whenever I read posts on this site, I always have to carefully examine the context of the post in order to figure out if people are talking about the AP (associated press) or the AP (Allah Pundit).

CyberCipher on December 5, 2006 at 3:41 PM

CyberCipher – I totally agree. Someone a few posts up said that we needed to subject AP to a public spanking. Even with the context, I’m not entirely sure which AP they meant. :)

JadeNYU on December 5, 2006 at 5:23 PM

Plus, in the MSM, you never get the wit we find on HA everyday.

urbancenturion on December 5, 2006 at 5:53 PM

Timberwolf spoke the key: balls. Michelle mentioned them a couple of weeks ago on FoxNews, I think. Remember when America used to have them? It’s been a while. If America still had them, we’d be without the memories of Bill Clinton, Jimmah Cawtah, Ted Kennedy, Joe Biden and on and on. They’d have never been elected or bounced out when they screwed up. Plus, there would be the WWII patriotism that we sadly lack today. Yes, there is still patriotism but there are too few of us waving our flags and shouting it. Not like it used to be. As a charter baby-boomer, I’m old enough to remember it. There would be wide spread respect for our flag, not coddling of those who trash it. There would be swift retribution of those who leak sensitive materials/information to the public, which now means the whole world in a span of milliseconds. And of course they leak it right into the hands of our enemies, no matter what nook or cranie they’re hiding in. Yes, the public spanking I advocated would do much to allieviate the situation in the media, but the problem goes deeper. Not sure I know a solution. Oh, and there’d be secure borders, too. Here’s a good place to stop and incert a looooong and deep sigh.

Roger Brown on December 5, 2006 at 6:47 PM

There is only one word to describe Hot Air and Michelle’s Vent, Brilliant.

Thanks.

Zorro on December 5, 2006 at 9:13 PM

While the ethical lapses prevalent in the MSM sadden me, they do not surprise me. I graduated from one of the nation’s top colleges of journalism in 1982, so most of those with whom I studied are just about now getting into the peak of their careers. Ethics in Journalism was one of my favorite courses and I recall noting at the time that those who were the least engaged in the classroom discussions were those who were preoccupied by their work at the school paper: There are deadlines in the business and, by God, how were they supposed to become great reporters if they had to take time to stop and think about ethics?

Every time I read about another ethical lapse like this AP mess, I am reminded that the students who seemed most put-out by having to take one prerequisite course in ethics were, more often than not, the very ones who went on to become minions of the MSM professional journalists.

kdaddy on December 6, 2006 at 9:41 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.