<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brit&#8217;s Bits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 10:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: KP&#8217;s video blog debuts</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-273325</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: KP&#8217;s video blog debuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-273325</guid>
		<description>[...] She&#8217;s very smooth, as always, although she hasn&#8217;t quite figured out what to do with her hands yet. Believe it or not, that can be a thorny problem when you&#8217;re standing in for a minutes-long medium shot. The boss solves it elegantly with the mutual hand clasp. I&#8217;m sure KP will figure something out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] She&#8217;s very smooth, as always, although she hasn&#8217;t quite figured out what to do with her hands yet. Believe it or not, that can be a thorny problem when you&#8217;re standing in for a minutes-long medium shot. The boss solves it elegantly with the mutual hand clasp. I&#8217;m sure KP will figure something out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128832</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128832</guid>
		<description>Except for Britney? When did Britney become a &quot;waste of flesh&quot;?

I don&#039;t think we need to obsess over her... or even talk about her unless you happen to feel like it.

But your choice of words for someone who is going through a divorce and acting foolishly... is offensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except for Britney? When did Britney become a &#8220;waste of flesh&#8221;?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we need to obsess over her&#8230; or even talk about her unless you happen to feel like it.</p>
<p>But your choice of words for someone who is going through a divorce and acting foolishly&#8230; is offensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L Frederick (Sniper One)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128684</link>
		<dc:creator>E L Frederick (Sniper One)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128684</guid>
		<description>Well... here&#039;s to hoping we don&#039;t get to hear about Britney again any time in the near future. While I appreciate Michelle&#039;s advice to her, lets not waste a perfectly good vent on a pop culture waste of flesh again...

Nothing but love for ya&#039;ll...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; here&#8217;s to hoping we don&#8217;t get to hear about Britney again any time in the near future. While I appreciate Michelle&#8217;s advice to her, lets not waste a perfectly good vent on a pop culture waste of flesh again&#8230;</p>
<p>Nothing but love for ya&#8217;ll&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiakjones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128454</link>
		<dc:creator>kiakjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128454</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sudden thought: Can anybody be sure that the photos of Britney were not photoshopped in one fashion or the other?
Such things/events grab everybodys’ attention, all sorts of commentary follows, but whether or not things are authentic does not get asked. Just like those doctored photographs from the mideast. 

Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:17 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Don&#039;t forget there was much ado about Diana Spencer before her Princess days. 19-year-old Lady Diana Spencer was taken by John Minihan with the morning sun to her back, her legs in silhouette through her skirt.  Wow, that was considered to be such &lt;em&gt;big&lt;/em&gt; news back then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sudden thought: Can anybody be sure that the photos of Britney were not photoshopped in one fashion or the other?<br />
Such things/events grab everybodys’ attention, all sorts of commentary follows, but whether or not things are authentic does not get asked. Just like those doctored photographs from the mideast. </p>
<p>Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:17 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget there was much ado about Diana Spencer before her Princess days. 19-year-old Lady Diana Spencer was taken by John Minihan with the morning sun to her back, her legs in silhouette through her skirt.  Wow, that was considered to be such <em>big</em> news back then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skilletfan-My first blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128326</link>
		<dc:creator>Skilletfan-My first blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128326</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Britney...What are you thinking...&lt;/strong&gt;

What is this girl thinking? There once was a time she looked sexy. I admit it, I thought she looked hot a one point.  I am not advocating that women dress half-naked. Modest is hottest. Girls shouldn&#039;t have to sexualize themselves to get noticed. .......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Britney&#8230;What are you thinking&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>What is this girl thinking? There once was a time she looked sexy. I admit it, I thought she looked hot a one point.  I am not advocating that women dress half-naked. Modest is hottest. Girls shouldn&#8217;t have to sexualize themselves to get noticed. &#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R D</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128121</link>
		<dc:creator>R D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 07:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128121</guid>
		<description>OK. The writing is getting worse than usual on my end. I&#039;ll say g&#039;nite now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. The writing is getting worse than usual on my end. I&#8217;ll say g&#8217;nite now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R D</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128119</link>
		<dc:creator>R D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 07:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128119</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;…James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.

    Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM

But what’s up with his wife? How did such an ugly, stupid MF end up with an (otherwise) intelligent woman like her? It doesn’t make sense.

thedecider on December 3, 2006 at 1:04 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;That&lt;/em&gt;,my friend,is one of life&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Great Mysteries.&lt;/em&gt; To be pondered for centuries.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>…James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.</p>
<p>    Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM</p>
<p>But what’s up with his wife? How did such an ugly, stupid MF end up with an (otherwise) intelligent woman like her? It doesn’t make sense.</p>
<p>thedecider on December 3, 2006 at 1:04 AM</p></blockquote>
<p><em>That</em>,my friend,is one of life&#8217;s <em>Great Mysteries.</em> To be pondered for centuries&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedecider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128094</link>
		<dc:creator>thedecider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 06:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128094</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass. 

Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But what&#039;s up with his wife?  How did such an ugly, stupid MF end up with an (otherwise) intelligent woman like her?  It doesn&#039;t make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass. </p>
<p>Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>But what&#8217;s up with his wife?  How did such an ugly, stupid MF end up with an (otherwise) intelligent woman like her?  It doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R D</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128062</link>
		<dc:creator>R D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 05:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128062</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Note to seejanemom: The Raging Cajun is Doug Kershaw. James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.

Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oilpatcher, that is just perfect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Note to seejanemom: The Raging Cajun is Doug Kershaw. James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.</p>
<p>Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Oilpatcher, that is just perfect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R D</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128061</link>
		<dc:creator>R D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 05:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128061</guid>
		<description>Why is there so much being made of this? A celebrity flashes a beaver? BFD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is there so much being made of this? A celebrity flashes a beaver? BFD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oilpatcher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128049</link>
		<dc:creator>Oilpatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128049</guid>
		<description>Note to seejanemom:  The Raging Cajun is Doug Kershaw.   James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to seejanemom:  The Raging Cajun is Doug Kershaw.   James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oilpatcher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-128048</link>
		<dc:creator>Oilpatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-128048</guid>
		<description>Sudden thought:  Can anybody be sure that the photos of Britney were not photoshopped in one fashion or the other?
 Such things/events grab everybodys&#039; attention, all sorts of commentary follows, but whether or not things are authentic does not get asked.   Just like those doctored photographs from the mideast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sudden thought:  Can anybody be sure that the photos of Britney were not photoshopped in one fashion or the other?<br />
 Such things/events grab everybodys&#8217; attention, all sorts of commentary follows, but whether or not things are authentic does not get asked.   Just like those doctored photographs from the mideast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127927</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 00:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127927</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Third, do we really need to see this? I mean, the view up the skirt is not the most attractive view of even the prettiest girl. There is a reason why you turn off the lights when you have sex.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;
Tantor&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;You are insane.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Third, do we really need to see this? I mean, the view up the skirt is not the most attractive view of even the prettiest girl. There is a reason why you turn off the lights when you have sex.&#8221;</em><br />
<em><br />
Tantor</em></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>You are insane.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L Frederick (Sniper One)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127863</link>
		<dc:creator>E L Frederick (Sniper One)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 23:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127863</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Second, can we spare a little outrage for the photographers looking up celebrities’ skirts? Does it occur to anyone that such photos are ungentlemanly behavior and kinda creepy? What kind of trash makes their living off such photography?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unfortunately the porn industry is full of such low-lifes and bottom-feeders (pun intended). The depths of their ungentlemanly behavior knows no limits.

Outside of California and Hollywood, I believe they are called peeping toms, and sexual predators. For a list of sex offenders in your area, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.familywatchdog.us/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you can go here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Second, can we spare a little outrage for the photographers looking up celebrities’ skirts? Does it occur to anyone that such photos are ungentlemanly behavior and kinda creepy? What kind of trash makes their living off such photography?</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately the porn industry is full of such low-lifes and bottom-feeders (pun intended). The depths of their ungentlemanly behavior knows no limits.</p>
<p>Outside of California and Hollywood, I believe they are called peeping toms, and sexual predators. For a list of sex offenders in your area, <a href="http://www.familywatchdog.us/" rel="nofollow">you can go here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Favazza</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127836</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie Favazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127836</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Unfit for motherhood&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Some have seen a little too much of Britney Spears lately, and Michelle Malkin isn&#039;t about to let it slide. Watch her Vent episode from yesterday and be sure to check out the links on the side of the video.I&#039;m considering a campaign to adopt......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Unfit for motherhood&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Some have seen a little too much of Britney Spears lately, and Michelle Malkin isn&#8217;t about to let it slide. Watch her Vent episode from yesterday and be sure to check out the links on the side of the video.I&#8217;m considering a campaign to adopt&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tantor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127816</link>
		<dc:creator>Tantor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127816</guid>
		<description>First, let me say that I didn&#039;t even look at Britney&#039;s crotch shot and even still the image is burned in my cortex.  Make It Stop!

Second, can we spare a little outrage for the photographers looking up celebrities&#039; skirts?  Does it occur to anyone that such photos are ungentlemany behavior and kinda creepy?  What kind of trash makes their living off such photography?

Third, do we really need to see this?  I mean, the view up the skirt is not the most attractive view of even the prettiest girl.  There is a reason why you turn off the lights when you have sex.  I&#039;d be happier if Britney preserved her mystery better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, let me say that I didn&#8217;t even look at Britney&#8217;s crotch shot and even still the image is burned in my cortex.  Make It Stop!</p>
<p>Second, can we spare a little outrage for the photographers looking up celebrities&#8217; skirts?  Does it occur to anyone that such photos are ungentlemany behavior and kinda creepy?  What kind of trash makes their living off such photography?</p>
<p>Third, do we really need to see this?  I mean, the view up the skirt is not the most attractive view of even the prettiest girl.  There is a reason why you turn off the lights when you have sex.  I&#8217;d be happier if Britney preserved her mystery better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127734</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127734</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I&#039;m a guy and I like the photos. However, I shouldn&#039;t have seen them, they are private.

She shouldn&#039;t show the entire world, not without a good reason, which I think Nexus may have discovered:
&lt;strong&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;I believe that Britney flashed her upskirt on purpose. This was an intentional ploy to take the sting out of K-Fed releasing their sex tape by beating him to the punch.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

If that&#039;s true and this is her poorly thought out emotionally-reckless attempt to muddle through, poor girl.

I respect Britney unlike most of the people in her class for when confronted with a life or death decision re: choosing life, being a mother, and trying to raise her child.

I hope she doesn&#039;t lose my respect completely. I found her &quot;hot&quot; for the above reasons... her body, though appreciated, doesn&#039;t begin to touch the reasons mentioned above.

She&#039;ll lose one guaranteed because we all do as we age. I hope she will keep the other (her character) intact and improve on it.

She has much to work with, whatever her faults, and I hope she will make less foolish decisions than I did at her age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m a guy and I like the photos. However, I shouldn&#8217;t have seen them, they are private.</p>
<p>She shouldn&#8217;t show the entire world, not without a good reason, which I think Nexus may have discovered:<br />
<strong></p>
<blockquote><p>I believe that Britney flashed her upskirt on purpose. This was an intentional ploy to take the sting out of K-Fed releasing their sex tape by beating him to the punch.</p></blockquote>
<p></strong></p>
<p>If that&#8217;s true and this is her poorly thought out emotionally-reckless attempt to muddle through, poor girl.</p>
<p>I respect Britney unlike most of the people in her class for when confronted with a life or death decision re: choosing life, being a mother, and trying to raise her child.</p>
<p>I hope she doesn&#8217;t lose my respect completely. I found her &#8220;hot&#8221; for the above reasons&#8230; her body, though appreciated, doesn&#8217;t begin to touch the reasons mentioned above.</p>
<p>She&#8217;ll lose one guaranteed because we all do as we age. I hope she will keep the other (her character) intact and improve on it.</p>
<p>She has much to work with, whatever her faults, and I hope she will make less foolish decisions than I did at her age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedecider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127731</link>
		<dc:creator>thedecider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127731</guid>
		<description>Britney, Madonna, K-Fed, TomKat, etc...  Does anyone notice a common denominator?  These folks top the list of what qualifies for entertainment today.  Sad, really.  There are no more stars in Hollywood, and the recording studios no longer care about quality.  Our biggest export to the world is steaming, smelly pile of crap.  How long until they figure out what we already know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britney, Madonna, K-Fed, TomKat, etc&#8230;  Does anyone notice a common denominator?  These folks top the list of what qualifies for entertainment today.  Sad, really.  There are no more stars in Hollywood, and the recording studios no longer care about quality.  Our biggest export to the world is steaming, smelly pile of crap.  How long until they figure out what we already know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flagwaver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127723</link>
		<dc:creator>flagwaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127723</guid>
		<description>She should wear a beard from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She should wear a beard from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127644</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127644</guid>
		<description>:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauraw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127643</link>
		<dc:creator>lauraw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127643</guid>
		<description>What I mean by going too far- it will be rather obviously deliberate, and in a completely inappropriate setting.

One can hope. You&#039;re harshing me, Christoph.

Let me close my eyes and see some Hilton acolyte led away in wire-tie handcuffs with tears streaming down her face, won&#039;t you?? &lt;em&gt;Is this too much to ask?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I mean by going too far- it will be rather obviously deliberate, and in a completely inappropriate setting.</p>
<p>One can hope. You&#8217;re harshing me, Christoph.</p>
<p>Let me close my eyes and see some Hilton acolyte led away in wire-tie handcuffs with tears streaming down her face, won&#8217;t you?? <em>Is this too much to ask?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127635</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127635</guid>
		<description>* Yes, I was out of uniform in civies. Thank goodness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Yes, I was out of uniform in civies. Thank goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127634</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127634</guid>
		<description>How do you convict over it?

I see people&#039;s asses all the time. Men and women. I&#039;m sure someone has seen mine when I didn&#039;t intend it and on one memorable occasion, (too much info, I know) I recall looking down while standing in line at a Subway store while wearing Canadian Forces issue boxer shorts, which didn&#039;t have buttons on the fly to make it easier when you&#039;re wearing winter gloves, chemical warfare suit, etc.) and realizing that my fly was undone and, yes, I was exposed.

I left the store instantly and didn&#039;t return -- oh -- for about 5-years.

How do you get a criminal conviction in these cases and should you?

Constitution, reasonable doubt, et. al.

These are NOT unimportant concepts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you convict over it?</p>
<p>I see people&#8217;s asses all the time. Men and women. I&#8217;m sure someone has seen mine when I didn&#8217;t intend it and on one memorable occasion, (too much info, I know) I recall looking down while standing in line at a Subway store while wearing Canadian Forces issue boxer shorts, which didn&#8217;t have buttons on the fly to make it easier when you&#8217;re wearing winter gloves, chemical warfare suit, etc.) and realizing that my fly was undone and, yes, I was exposed.</p>
<p>I left the store instantly and didn&#8217;t return &#8212; oh &#8212; for about 5-years.</p>
<p>How do you get a criminal conviction in these cases and should you?</p>
<p>Constitution, reasonable doubt, et. al.</p>
<p>These are NOT unimportant concepts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauraw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127629</link>
		<dc:creator>lauraw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127629</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Ain’t going to happen. And it shouldn’t&lt;/em&gt;

Eventually, when soemone goes too far, it will.

Its hard for me to believe that flashing labia doesn&#039;t qualify yet as &#039;too far.&#039;

The younguns disgust me.

YOU KIDS GET OFF MY DAMN LAWN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Ain’t going to happen. And it shouldn’t</em></p>
<p>Eventually, when soemone goes too far, it will.</p>
<p>Its hard for me to believe that flashing labia doesn&#8217;t qualify yet as &#8216;too far.&#8217;</p>
<p>The younguns disgust me.</p>
<p>YOU KIDS GET OFF MY DAMN LAWN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/comment-page-2/#comment-127603</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 16:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/01/brits-bits/#comment-127603</guid>
		<description>*nether regions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*nether regions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
