Brit’s Bits

posted at 8:33 am on December 1, 2006 by Bryan

Lessons in Modesty
Britney photos take Web by storm
Unfit for motherhood
Stand up to Girls Gone Wild

Download Vent for your iPod
Watch Hot Air on YouTube
Subscribe to Hot Air TV on iTunes

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

A Subarau Michelle!? You hippy! And if you lived up here in VT, odds would be a lesbian hippy, and you’d have a kayak attached to the top.

RightWinged on December 1, 2006 at 3:29 PM

(joking, obviously you’re not a hippy, and I actually like Subarus, but you know the stereotype, that is all too true up here)

RightWinged on December 1, 2006 at 3:29 PM

a pillow?

jummy on December 1, 2006 at 3:34 PM

Who’s that “body” guard (using the term very loosely)?

Heh. Just kidding!

Ian on December 1, 2006 at 3:41 PM

Allahpundit, would that be you?

pullingmyhairout on December 1, 2006 at 3:21 PM

Looked like Bryan to me…

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on December 1, 2006 at 4:03 PM

I’m surprised the prudes at Hot air missed this one:

Bare Bellies on the Beach indeed.

Vanya on December 1, 2006 at 4:05 PM

Britney can’t think about her children because she’s still one herself. And she’s scared and oh so desperate for attention.

Michelle, I really like this departure from international/political jihad to cultural jihad, so to speak. Examples of poor taste and exhibitionism seem to have no limits.

Ugh.

Webutante

Webutante on December 1, 2006 at 4:17 PM

Very nice Vent. It’s about time someone ridiculed so called pop icons for being horrible mothers.

TheThink on December 1, 2006 at 4:18 PM

***NSFW*** And Do Not Click This Link Unless You Want To See Britney’s C-Section Scar And Whatnot ***NSFW***

SilverStar830 on December 1, 2006 at 3:06 PM

Nice, eh ah er, pussy.

Rich on December 1, 2006 at 4:18 PM

Spears and Shame will never be friends.

JeffB. on December 1, 2006 at 4:20 PM

Brit….go home, open the top right drawer on the dresser, reach in, there…..thats better. The other option is a K-fed/Brit episode on Springer.

HA…the Leasure Suite Larry music has to go.

Limerick on December 1, 2006 at 4:29 PM

Dang Michelle, you had me all excited, then nothing. ;)

1sttofight on December 1, 2006 at 4:33 PM

SilverStar830 on December 1, 2006 at 3:06 PM

Thanks for the link. Was that Chicken of the Sea? oops wrong blonde.

infidel on December 1, 2006 at 4:37 PM

This is funny because my friends and I have called her “Britney Smears” for about 8 years. Now it REALLY suits her.

NTWR on December 1, 2006 at 5:32 PM

“Vikings wouldn’t hit that s*** …”

Ali-Bubba on December 1, 2006 at 10:12 AM

Are you kidding??? ODIN!!!!!

VikingGoneWild on December 1, 2006 at 6:25 PM

my friends and I have called her “Britney Smears”

NTWR on December 1, 2006 at 5:32 PM

Does that make K-Fed “Pap Smears”? Sorry, couldn’t resist.

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on December 1, 2006 at 6:27 PM

SNIPER ONE—-

THANKS FOR MY PORTRAIT AT YOUR SITE.

I have worked for years on those abs. I look great for two kids. And I didn’t even have to shuck my panties to look fabulous.

Jane

seejanemom on December 1, 2006 at 6:44 PM

That link does not look right.

EnochCain on December 1, 2006 at 6:45 PM

Heh… This was what she was talking about…

Doesn’t every Marine’s wife look like that?

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on December 1, 2006 at 6:48 PM

Heh.

EnochCain on December 1, 2006 at 6:49 PM

SPEAKING OF PAP SMEAR, make sure you get your HPV VACCINE while you are there!

Free in NEW HAMPSHIRE to minors 11-18 and all with 4.8 MILLION of your FEDERAL tax dollars, folks. (I’ll save you the self promotion link, but I did blog about it today. It disgusts and enfuriates me.)

Or end up like Brit.Washed and posing for her PAP.

seejanemom on December 1, 2006 at 6:50 PM

Well, from the looks of it, every Marine’s wife lacks a brain stem. I swear I did it like I always do it. Try again.

HOT MARINE WIFE PORTRAIT ON SNIPER ONE’S BLOG

….crossong my legs fingers…..

seejanemom on December 1, 2006 at 6:54 PM

Actually, I have to tell you. Hunky Husband GUT laughed when he saw it. Because I actually …dare I say, resemble that.Except that I am 5’10″ (she is a TINY thing). But we both have the scary muscles, we can both break down an M16 blindfolded and our love interests are beasty badasses.

seejanemom on December 1, 2006 at 7:00 PM

Great Vent (again) Michelle. It’s about time someone addressed civility in public. Out of control pop tarts are not attractive. There is a time and a place for that type of display to be really “enjoyed”. Getting out of a car in front of a mob is not the time or place.

Zorro on December 1, 2006 at 7:08 PM

Ever hear of “freedom of expression” all of you conservative constitution protectors. She has every right…oh man this must be friday.

right2bright on December 1, 2006 at 7:09 PM

Okay, it appears this is something that’s vanished from our culture, but here is how a LADY exits a car…

Keeping your body positioned as it was while the car was moving, open the car door. Keeping knees and ankles together, tilt your knees slightly away from the door while pushing your feet out and onto the ground. At that point in classier days there would have been a man (husband boyfriend, etc.) ready at the car door to help you, but class seems to have been the victim of “liberation”, so with knees and ankles still together and giving a slight bounce, lean forward and stand.

Getting in the car is more or less the reverse. Open the door, face away from the car and gracefully sit. Then swivel your legs into the car.

A lot of work, but then isn’t being a lady always more work? Isn’t that the point?

I don’t mean to say Michelle’s not a lady, but while she made a good effort, she still did it wrong getting out of the car. This method removes the need for props to hide…uh…ahem…well…you know…

Danny Carlton on December 1, 2006 at 7:19 PM

Very well stated DC.

Zorro on December 1, 2006 at 7:49 PM

meh. seen one, seen ‘em all.

jummy on December 1, 2006 at 2:08 PM

Correct me if I’m wrong, but Benjamin Franklin made a similar disparaging observation regarding female anatomy.

What I want to know is, how long will it take before we hear about this from the muslim clerics? Will this incident precipitate more “uncovered meat” analogies? If so, I guess we better be on the look-out for the feral felines that will be attracted to Britney — whatever THAT means. It’s STILL a bad analogy, though. It is hard for me to imagine that even the MUSLIMS would entertain thoughts of rape after being subjected to SUCH a display of bad manners. How can a woman like Britney POSSIBLY make herself MORE repulsive to opposite sex? Hmmm. I’d better retract that rather quickly. It could have been Rosie O’Doughnut, who ATE her panties, and then treated the paparazzi to a photo session.

CyberCipher on December 1, 2006 at 8:20 PM

Nice vent, Michelle. I don’t understand the pillow, though. The book, the suitcase, yes, but carrying a pillow to your destination?

Anyway, we should not be surprised at “bit” exposing nowadays. Many actresses have their boobs pop out now and then, especially, it seems during news conferences, academy awards, formal functions, etc. It seems to be a status symbol among many of them, and a symbol of being a fearless, tough, modern woman who is out and about. This, of course, does not include movie roles and stage plays that require body exposure.

Personally, dresses that show leg, tummy, low cut cleavage is fine by me. I enjoy seeing great looking ladies wear that stuff. In America, there are nudist beaches and parks that permit people to enjoy the outdoors au naturel. Indeed, who cares who seems whom naked? For me, it is not a big deal. And, I will add that as far as I am concerned, no woman should feel ashamed or embrassed if someone happens to see her boob or “whatever” regardless if she is married, has kids, has a boyfriend, or whatever. BUT, THERE IS A TIME AND A PLACE FOR THAT….BRITTNEY!

Strutting around where a person knows there is a next to excellent chance that a body part will be seen does indeed violate civility. Performers like Brittany KNOW what they are doing. They have a pretty good idea that a boob will pop out, or if they wear a skirt 2mm below their navel that we will certainly see a “bit.”

No, this is just flaunting what they have because they can get away with it and for many, it is something to be proud of and/or admired. Some might even respect this purposeful display.

If a lady’s got it, she can flaunt it, but she should do it with style and grace depending on the time and the place.

BRITTNEY…IN THIS SITUATION, LISTEN TO MICHELLE!!!

The False Dervish on December 1, 2006 at 8:41 PM

BTW-Brittney…

Notice the dress that Michelle is wearing in this vent? Now, THAT is an example of a great looking, sexy dress worn by a great looking, sexy lady. Nothing is popping out, nothing is flashing because it is not necessary! Dresses like this one that Michelle is wearing says it all..with taste AND civility. Not with prudery or priggishness.

The False Dervish on December 1, 2006 at 9:02 PM

BTW, how come Michelle didn’t mention the most ESSENTIAL accessory of all, viz. UNDERWEAR!? — or is that just TOO obvious?

I know what you are thinking. No, that remark should NOT be interpreted as an invitation for Michelle to bring us an additional instructive VENT video on “how to wear underwear” (you sick, horny bastards, you). Me thinks that we’ve already paid way more attention to this than what it deserves.

CyberCipher on December 1, 2006 at 9:44 PM

Talk about out of touch…i didn’t even know about this story. Last I heard of Britney, she had thrown old disco stu out of the house. Then, I get to see Michelle getting in and out of a car in a really nice dress because Britney apparently let the light of truth shine where it wasn’t meant to. Sweet. Guess Britney is still good for something. And nice dress Michelle. Just goes to show, class is much more attractive than simply throwing everything out in the street for the world to see.

It’s hypocritial to criticize her for photos that most of you spend hours a day seeking out and jerking off to.

Projecting much here? Yeah, I can see you’re going to last a long time. I think you could have used a bit more bile, or graphic language in your insult here though. I mean, if you’re going to take the time to attack everybody, do it right. There should be at least one or two four letter words, and a reference to a bodily fluid. You’re not trying very hard, Mr. Troll. If this was my board, I’d ban you for being an untalented bore. Pound your chest a bit. You’re better than all of us, right? Show it.

austinnelly on December 1, 2006 at 10:03 PM

Remember when Britney was underage and so innocent. Then that video of her in a school uniform, when she kinda lost her innocence. All I can say here is it is very sad to see the direction she has chosen. Fame has totally corrupted the once innocent little girl the Britney was. P.S. Thank You M&M for the cover up lessons to Britney. I REALLY hope she takes heed, because eeewww! What a worn out skank!!!

sonnyspats1 on December 1, 2006 at 10:28 PM

OLd but adolescent that I am, I was going to say : spoil sport, Michelle…

But I’d rather see a sexy but tasteful MM in a clip than a completely ‘nekkid’ Brittany in person.

And by the way, Katherine Hepburn was a real beauty when she chose to be, especially in her younger days.

LegendHasIt on December 1, 2006 at 10:57 PM

Who’s that “body” guard (using the term very loosely)?

Heh. Just kidding!

Ian on December 1, 2006 at 3:41 PM

No one has answered my question yet.

pullingmyhairout on December 1, 2006 at 10:58 PM

Allahpundit, would that be you?

pullingmyhairout on December 1, 2006 at 3:21 PM

Not in daylight.

pullingmyhairout, the closest and most realistic was “it looks like Bryan (Preston). You’ll have to live with this.

Regards,

Entelechy on December 1, 2006 at 11:10 PM

Talk about giving white trash a bad name…. — honora

…as a designated represtative of white trash everywhere, I would like to go on record as saying that I’m highly offended at this remark.

I would like to point out that Ms. Spears is most certainly *NOT* white trash. Trashy, yes. White, yes. White trash, no.

She appears to have all her teeth.

Puritan1648 on December 1, 2006 at 11:12 PM

Judges will now really want to grant care of the children to Britney…didn’t she question the timing?

Entelechy on December 1, 2006 at 11:12 PM

entelechy, i lost your email address. oops!! that’s the dingbat in me. go figure.

pullingmyhairout on December 1, 2006 at 11:13 PM

Katherine Hepburn sexy… NOT. Talented yes, even brilliant, attractive in a dress yes, but in pants she reminds me mostly of Spencer Tracy. — doufree

Really?? Have you ever seen the Philadelphia Story? — honora

…I’m with Honie on this one.

There’s *NOTHING* sexier than a powerful woman. It gives a powerful man something to worth playing with.

There’s a difference between sexually available and sexy. Sharon Stone played on sexually available. Paris Hilton, Spears, and that ilk are on the edges of sexually available, bordering on sexually over-exposed and therefore boring.

The difference? Watch the last minute of “To Have and to Have Not”. The band in the scene is doing a peppy little tune and Lauren Bacall does a little hip-swinging dance. Very quick. Fully dressed. Wry smile. The sexiest scene in cinema.

Oh, yes…just like Ms. Bacall, then as now, from beginning to end Ms. Hepburn was as sexy as they come.

Puritan1648 on December 1, 2006 at 11:19 PM

Puritan1648, that was a nice write-up. Sophia Loren is another one of those smart beauties.

Entelechy on December 1, 2006 at 11:38 PM

It’s hypocritial to criticize her for photos that most of you spend hours a day seeking out and jerking off to.

EF on December 1, 2006 at 9:48 AM

You sir are a hypocrat.

sonnyspats1 on December 1, 2006 at 11:44 PM

Isn’t there a war going on somewhere?

If blogs have jump-the-shark moments, this is it for Hotair.

Vanya on December 2, 2006 at 12:23 AM

Do you ever have anything constructive or positive to say, you goddamned douche? You pop in here periodically, say something snarky, and then disappear. I’ve been writing posts about Iraq and Lebanon all week. There’s your war material.

Your ass is banned. Bye.

Allahpundit on December 2, 2006 at 12:25 AM

Sophia Loren is another one of those smart beauties. — Entelechy

…and Lillian Gish, Myrna Loy, Ginger Rogers, Ann Sheridan, Maureen O’Hara, Jean Simmons, Diane Keaton, Helen Mirren, Emma Thompson, and Cate Blanchett.

…and they all pale in comparison to Louise Brooks…and the Hepburn girls, Katharine and Audrey.

Best of the lot…Kate. Lulu a close second, but Kate. I remember her in “The Lion in Winter”, verbally jousting with Peter O’Toole, with a formitable actor with formitable lines. Brilliant. Beautiful. Powerful. Sexy.

Power is sexy. It takes a powerful person to appreciate it.

Puritan1648 on December 2, 2006 at 1:00 AM

Am I the only one who thought, “Yay, Britney’s bits”?

Okay, now my (even more) serious comment:

I believe that Britney flashed her upskirt on purpose. This was an intentional ploy to take the sting out of K-Fed releasing their sex tape by beating him to the punch.

I wonder how long it will be before she reaches puberty.

iNeXuS on December 1, 2006 at 1:12 PM

My thought exactly. As well as the first one.

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 1:05 AM

Interesting discourses on what makes stars sexy are nice, but not really applicable here: what Britney did (and Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton, too) is unacceptable behavior for anyone. Period.
Either she doesn’t care what her public thinks or she knows it won’t affect her celebrity or both.
Whichever is the case, our culture and our young people are in big trouble.
We can hope and pray that indignation is catching or why don’t we just ban clothes and couth altogether?
This is the culture of the gutter when our “stars” don’t bother to act in a way that resembles decency in any way in full knowledge that they are role models and admired.
Britney is the mother of 2, for God’s sake!

Jen the Neocon on December 2, 2006 at 1:23 AM

I think her excessive drinking and probably drug use are shocking and dangerous, but I’m really not overly concerned about her genitalia.

Call me a pro-life military hawk fiscally conservative socially liberal right-centrist.

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 1:30 AM

And she used to be such a cute little tyke.

This is sick, just sick. I know of some nice, moral, religious people who used to like her as an entertainer years ago, When she was still essentially just another youthful pop star.

That was then, etc.

As an Audrey Hepburn fan, I’ll say how glad I am that she never fell from grace like Brit has. Audrey Hepburn was at her worst still presentable enough to take home to Mom. None of your friends could call Audrey a skank either. They would be to busy trying to steal her from you.

In Brit’s case they could have her except for one thing … I wouldn’t want my frineds to catch anything incurable.

Worse still, I know she is doing it to herself, and I still feel sorry for her. Someday Brit is going to wake up with herself, and can you imagine how bad she will feel then?

She used to be such a cute little tyke.

USA all the way!

ValhallaMike on December 2, 2006 at 3:50 AM

So where do these skanks go from here? The only way someone could push the envelope further would be to actually risk getting arrested.

I thought Paris’ intentional skirt-rasing incident qualified as indecent exposure, frankly.

I don’t see a big difference between her and some creepy dude flashing his nasties at people in the subway.

lauraw on December 2, 2006 at 10:44 AM

I thought Paris’ intentional skirt-rasing incident qualified as indecent exposure, frankly.

You have a point, but you will never, ever get a jury of 12-people to convice Britney Spears of that, particularly if she argues it was unintentional.

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 11:07 AM

*convict

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 11:07 AM

A jury, for indecent exposure?

lauraw on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 AM

A person has a right to trial by jury, lauraw. Why wouldn’t her lawyer’s select a jury if they knew that no jury would convict for this due to reasonable doubt?

I’ve seen a flash of women (or men’s) nipples, buttocks, and occasionally never regions before at different times and especially after drinking so I’d have a tough time convicting anyone under the circumstances.

The prosecutor would know that a jury simply wouldn’t convict and s/he would be irresponsible by bringing the charge forward. That’s why no one has mentioned this until now.

Ain’t going to happen. And it shouldn’t.

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 11:30 AM

*nether regions

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 11:30 AM

Ain’t going to happen. And it shouldn’t

Eventually, when soemone goes too far, it will.

Its hard for me to believe that flashing labia doesn’t qualify yet as ‘too far.’

The younguns disgust me.

YOU KIDS GET OFF MY DAMN LAWN.

lauraw on December 2, 2006 at 12:14 PM

How do you convict over it?

I see people’s asses all the time. Men and women. I’m sure someone has seen mine when I didn’t intend it and on one memorable occasion, (too much info, I know) I recall looking down while standing in line at a Subway store while wearing Canadian Forces issue boxer shorts, which didn’t have buttons on the fly to make it easier when you’re wearing winter gloves, chemical warfare suit, etc.) and realizing that my fly was undone and, yes, I was exposed.

I left the store instantly and didn’t return — oh — for about 5-years.

How do you get a criminal conviction in these cases and should you?

Constitution, reasonable doubt, et. al.

These are NOT unimportant concepts!

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 12:25 PM

* Yes, I was out of uniform in civies. Thank goodness.

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 12:26 PM

What I mean by going too far- it will be rather obviously deliberate, and in a completely inappropriate setting.

One can hope. You’re harshing me, Christoph.

Let me close my eyes and see some Hilton acolyte led away in wire-tie handcuffs with tears streaming down her face, won’t you?? Is this too much to ask?

lauraw on December 2, 2006 at 12:41 PM

:)

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 12:44 PM

She should wear a beard from now on.

flagwaver on December 2, 2006 at 2:36 PM

Britney, Madonna, K-Fed, TomKat, etc… Does anyone notice a common denominator? These folks top the list of what qualifies for entertainment today. Sad, really. There are no more stars in Hollywood, and the recording studios no longer care about quality. Our biggest export to the world is steaming, smelly pile of crap. How long until they figure out what we already know?

thedecider on December 2, 2006 at 2:50 PM

Frankly, I’m a guy and I like the photos. However, I shouldn’t have seen them, they are private.

She shouldn’t show the entire world, not without a good reason, which I think Nexus may have discovered:

I believe that Britney flashed her upskirt on purpose. This was an intentional ploy to take the sting out of K-Fed releasing their sex tape by beating him to the punch.

If that’s true and this is her poorly thought out emotionally-reckless attempt to muddle through, poor girl.

I respect Britney unlike most of the people in her class for when confronted with a life or death decision re: choosing life, being a mother, and trying to raise her child.

I hope she doesn’t lose my respect completely. I found her “hot” for the above reasons… her body, though appreciated, doesn’t begin to touch the reasons mentioned above.

She’ll lose one guaranteed because we all do as we age. I hope she will keep the other (her character) intact and improve on it.

She has much to work with, whatever her faults, and I hope she will make less foolish decisions than I did at her age.

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 2:55 PM

First, let me say that I didn’t even look at Britney’s crotch shot and even still the image is burned in my cortex. Make It Stop!

Second, can we spare a little outrage for the photographers looking up celebrities’ skirts? Does it occur to anyone that such photos are ungentlemany behavior and kinda creepy? What kind of trash makes their living off such photography?

Third, do we really need to see this? I mean, the view up the skirt is not the most attractive view of even the prettiest girl. There is a reason why you turn off the lights when you have sex. I’d be happier if Britney preserved her mystery better.

Tantor on December 2, 2006 at 5:22 PM

Second, can we spare a little outrage for the photographers looking up celebrities’ skirts? Does it occur to anyone that such photos are ungentlemanly behavior and kinda creepy? What kind of trash makes their living off such photography?

Unfortunately the porn industry is full of such low-lifes and bottom-feeders (pun intended). The depths of their ungentlemanly behavior knows no limits.

Outside of California and Hollywood, I believe they are called peeping toms, and sexual predators. For a list of sex offenders in your area, you can go here.

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on December 2, 2006 at 6:31 PM

“Third, do we really need to see this? I mean, the view up the skirt is not the most attractive view of even the prettiest girl. There is a reason why you turn off the lights when you have sex.”

Tantor

You are insane.

Christoph on December 2, 2006 at 7:37 PM

Sudden thought: Can anybody be sure that the photos of Britney were not photoshopped in one fashion or the other?
Such things/events grab everybodys’ attention, all sorts of commentary follows, but whether or not things are authentic does not get asked. Just like those doctored photographs from the mideast.

Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:17 PM

Note to seejanemom: The Raging Cajun is Doug Kershaw. James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.

Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM

Why is there so much being made of this? A celebrity flashes a beaver? BFD.

R D on December 3, 2006 at 12:09 AM

Note to seejanemom: The Raging Cajun is Doug Kershaw. James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.

Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM

Oilpatcher, that is just perfect!

R D on December 3, 2006 at 12:10 AM

…James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.

Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM

But what’s up with his wife? How did such an ugly, stupid MF end up with an (otherwise) intelligent woman like her? It doesn’t make sense.

thedecider on December 3, 2006 at 1:04 AM

…James Carville is better known as the Ruinous Coonass.

Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM

But what’s up with his wife? How did such an ugly, stupid MF end up with an (otherwise) intelligent woman like her? It doesn’t make sense.

thedecider on December 3, 2006 at 1:04 AM

That,my friend,is one of life’s Great Mysteries. To be pondered for centuries…….

R D on December 3, 2006 at 2:06 AM

OK. The writing is getting worse than usual on my end. I’ll say g’nite now.

R D on December 3, 2006 at 2:08 AM

Sudden thought: Can anybody be sure that the photos of Britney were not photoshopped in one fashion or the other?
Such things/events grab everybodys’ attention, all sorts of commentary follows, but whether or not things are authentic does not get asked. Just like those doctored photographs from the mideast.

Oilpatcher on December 2, 2006 at 11:17 PM

Don’t forget there was much ado about Diana Spencer before her Princess days. 19-year-old Lady Diana Spencer was taken by John Minihan with the morning sun to her back, her legs in silhouette through her skirt. Wow, that was considered to be such big news back then!

kiakjones on December 3, 2006 at 4:08 PM

Well… here’s to hoping we don’t get to hear about Britney again any time in the near future. While I appreciate Michelle’s advice to her, lets not waste a perfectly good vent on a pop culture waste of flesh again…

Nothing but love for ya’ll…

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on December 3, 2006 at 10:18 PM

Except for Britney? When did Britney become a “waste of flesh”?

I don’t think we need to obsess over her… or even talk about her unless you happen to feel like it.

But your choice of words for someone who is going through a divorce and acting foolishly… is offensive.

Christoph on December 4, 2006 at 12:37 AM

Comment pages: 1 2