Text: Ahmadinejad’s letter to the American people
posted at 1:40 pm on November 29, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Hot off the presses. I’ve only glanced at it but it looks like the usual melange of Jew-baiting, Aquarian peace and love, and left-wing Bush-hate bullet points. Back with quotes in a few. In the meantime, here’s an image to meditate on while you read.

Update: MSNBC.com has a poll up asking if its readers are interested in Ahmadinejad has to say and whether it’s time for dialogue. As of this writing, 58% say yes.
Update: Here you go. Jew-baiting:
We, like you, are aggrieved by the ever-worsening pain and misery of the Palestinian people. Persistent aggressions by the Zionists are making life more and more difficult for the rightful owners of the land of Palestine…
What have the Zionists done for the American people that the US administration considers itself obliged to blindly support these infamous aggressors? Is it not because they have imposed themselves on a substantial portion of the banking, financial, cultural and media sectors?
I recommend that in a demonstration of respect for the American people and for humanity, the right of Palestinians to live in their own homeland should be recognized so that millions of Palestinian refugees can return to their homes and the future of all of Palestine and its form of government be determined in a referendum. This will benefit everyone.
Even Jimmy Carter rejects the right of return. Aquarian peace and love:
I am confident that you, the American people, will play an instrumental role in the establishment of justice and spirituality throughout the world. The promises of the Almighty and His prophets will certainly be realized, Justice and Truth will prevail and all nations will live a true life in a climate replete with love, compassion and fraternity.
And the Bush-hate:
Governments are there to serve their own people. No people wants to side with or support any oppressors. But regrettably, the US administration disregards even its own public opinion and remains in the forefront of supporting the trampling of the rights of the Palestinian people…
The US Government used the pretext of the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but later it became clear that that was just a lie and a deception…
[American soldiers'] mothers and relatives have, on numerous occasions, displayed their discontent with the presence of their sons and daughters in a land thousands of miles away from US shores…
You have certainly heard the sad stories of the Guantanamo and Abu-Ghraib prisons…
You are witnessing daily that under the pretext of “the war on terror,” civil liberties in the United States are being increasingly curtailed. Even the privacy of individuals is fast losing its meaning…
Now that Iraq has a Constitution and an independent Assembly and Government, would it not be more beneficial to bring the US officers and soldiers home, and to spend the astronomical US military expenditures in Iraq for the welfare and prosperity of the American people? As you know very well, many victims of Katrina continue to suffer, and countless Americans continue to live in poverty and homelessness.
So he covered all his bases. But what’s this?
I’d also like to say a word to the winners of the recent elections in the US:…
If the US Government meets the current domestic and external challenges with an approach based on truth and Justice, it can remedy some of the past afflictions and alleviate some of the global resentment and hatred of America. But if the approach remains the same, it would not be unexpected that the American people would similarly reject the new electoral winners, although the recent elections, rather than reflecting a victory, in reality point to the failure of the current administration’s policies.
Long story short, he wants us out of Iraq and on the Palestinians’ side. Those two demands or some variation of them are probably his preconditions for talks, too, so there’s what you have to work with if the Baker Commission approach prevails. Good luck.
One last thing. What’s up with this?
It is possible to govern based on an approach that is distinctly different from one of coercion, force and injustice.
It is possible to sincerely serve and promote common human values, and honesty and compassion.
It is possible to provide welfare and prosperity without tension, threats, imposition or war.
He uses those clusters of abstract nouns constantly, not only in this letter but in other things he’s written. Does anyone know if that’s a convention of Farsi style? Or is this some sort of rhetorical strategy the point of which I’m missing?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
**snore**
Sasnak on November 29, 2006 at 1:46 PM
The US Leads by coercion.
Sorta like, “Let us build a nuclear reactor or we will suicide bomb you and cut off the flow of oil!”
Again, I ask, Is November the month to say “WFT?!?”
Mazztek on November 29, 2006 at 1:47 PM
Steveegg’s letter to Ahmadinejad – drop dead.
steveegg on November 29, 2006 at 1:50 PM
I guess Olberdunce is voting alot in that MSNBC poll. Assuming them still let him anywhere near a computer.
JammieWearingFool on November 29, 2006 at 1:53 PM
Of course the MSNBC poll would lean to “Yes”. The lib channel of lies.
I’ll co-sign your letter steveegg.
BobK on November 29, 2006 at 1:54 PM
I have a counterproposal. How about we “negotiate” peace with Iran AFTER we detonate a 5 megaton nuke over his head instead. The sooner we eliminate this Hitler and his evil “religious’ regime, the better it will be for the entire world.
georgej on November 29, 2006 at 1:55 PM
Hmm… didn’t know KOS/Honora/Constantine was ghostwriting for Ahmadinejad
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 1:57 PM
Can someone post a comparison between This nut and the DU or Kos or even the democrats ?
Sorry if I get confused they all sound the same.
William Amos on November 29, 2006 at 1:58 PM
I can hardly wait to see what it says. “Dear America, sorry about that hostage thing back in the late 70’s, got a little carried away…We love Americans, we just hate Joooos and George Bush. Please let us build nuclear ‘power plants’.Thank you.”
vcferlita on November 29, 2006 at 1:59 PM
O/T: Thanks, Colin!
Former Secretary of State says Iraq a “civil war.”
Slublog on November 29, 2006 at 1:59 PM
From the letter:
An interesting point, no?
GregH on November 29, 2006 at 2:03 PM
I dunno, Greg. Coming from him, that’s kind of the pot and the frickin’ kettle.
Slublog on November 29, 2006 at 2:05 PM
From the letter:
Yes apply it to the iraqi insurgency there Greg
William Amos on November 29, 2006 at 2:06 PM
This from the president of a country with brigades of suicide bombers? And sponsors Hezbollah?
It’s a load of crap, GregH. It’s only interesting if you like being lied to. I don’t see anyone killing hundreds of thousands of innocents in an effort to stop terrorism, do you?
Pablo on November 29, 2006 at 2:07 PM
A few more statements of his that he left out of this love letter.
“Thanks to the blood of the martyrs, a new Islamic revolution has arisen and the Islamic revolution of 1384 will, if God wills, cut off the roots of injustice in the world.”
“The wave of the Islamic revolution will soon reach the entire world.”
“Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation’s fury,”
“Iran is ready to transfer nuclear know-how to the Islamic countries due to their need.”
“We ask the West to remove what they created sixty years ago and if they do not listen to our recommendations, then the Palestinian nation and other nations will eventually do this for them.”
“Israel is a rotten, dried tree that will be annihilated in one storm.”
BobK on November 29, 2006 at 2:07 PM
GregH,
Sorry forgot to mention you as one of the ghostwriters above… as I said on another post…
Maybe your foolish enough to believe the scorpion when he tells you he won’t sting you. Maybe you decide to carry him across the river.
I however, choose not to trust the scorpion.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 2:08 PM
It figures GregH would find some validity in anything this clown has to say.
Good grief. Once you’re finished with your African geography lesson, go rinse your brain.
JammieWearingFool on November 29, 2006 at 2:08 PM
Dear Mahmoud,
I’ll pass on the global caliphate crap, but thanks for the offer.
RedWinged Blackbird on November 29, 2006 at 2:08 PM
Well maybe if the terrorists stopped using human shields to protect themselves.
I can tell right now that “hundreds of thousands”have not been killed in the war on terror.
Of course it’s saying that George Bush is a terrorist on a grander scale than your average suicide bomber is they only kill a few innocents at a time not hundreds of thousands. I think Cindy Sheehan wrote that line.
vcferlita on November 29, 2006 at 2:09 PM
I had absolutely no idea he was a KOS kid. All this time I thought he was a psychopath. Now I’m sure he is.
RobG on November 29, 2006 at 2:18 PM
Dearest Ahmadinejad,
As an American citizen, I would like to give you my personal response.
“SUCK IT!”
Sincerely,
Noble AmericanInfidelGraceless on November 29, 2006 at 2:18 PM
Oh, GregH…..I know you have a brain….please use it.
RobG on November 29, 2006 at 2:20 PM
All this will start to make sense…
As soon as we come to grips with the simple fact that the entire Jihadi, Islamofascist, Jew-hating, Western Civilization hating movement (which has been going on since about 620 AD) is solely to convert the world to Islam. And to rule the world under Sharia Law.
That’s it. This is all this is about.
The solution is simple. We have two choices:
1. We fight back.
2. We submit.
3. We ingore the real issue, and just wait for them to kill us.
The current Politically Correct world opinion solution is to do #3.
The Iranian solution is solely focused on encouraging us to do #2. Or to kill us if we choose #1.
The Islamofascist Terrorist solution is to encourgage us to do #1, giving them a legitimate reason to kill us. And if we choose #2, they’ll probably just kill us anyway, legitimately or not.
This is such a brave new ‘progressive’ world we live in, ain’t it?
Lawrence on November 29, 2006 at 2:22 PM
Okay.. I meant we have three choices…
Lawrence on November 29, 2006 at 2:23 PM
#2 and #3 are pretty much the same thing… so I think you got it right the first time.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 2:25 PM
If only his people could elect a legitimate government of their choice.
Fritz on November 29, 2006 at 2:26 PM
I’m not playing the role of apologist for Ahmadinejad.
The point remains though, that it’s tough to condemn the terrorism committed by others when the actions of your own government could be construed as state sponsored terrorism on a grand scale.
I guess it’s only terrorism when “they” are committing the acts, whomever “they” may be.
GregH on November 29, 2006 at 2:28 PM
One American’s response:
Don’t make any long-term plans, monkey-boy.
mojo on November 29, 2006 at 2:32 PM
He forgot the final line in this statement:
“It’s just easier not bothering with all that BS”
conservativecaveman on November 29, 2006 at 2:33 PM
Last I checked, our guys aren’t out there flying “their” planes into “their” buildings and specifically targetting “their” civilians.
I digusts me to know end that people like you sincerely do not seem to be able to understand the difference between what we have done and what terrorists have done.
You are being an apologist for him, like it or not.
Esthier on November 29, 2006 at 2:34 PM
Anyone remember the fable of the wounded snake? I think that Ah’madamnjihad thinks that Americans will fall for it. (Unfortunately, he may be right about a lot of them…)
lan astaslem on November 29, 2006 at 2:34 PM
GregH,
Did you just call the United States a Terrorist State?
I’m sure I must of read that wrong. Because if I didn’t read that wrong… you and I have large issues.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 2:35 PM
Is there any other way to interpret what GregH is saying? If so, someone clue me in here.
Esthier on November 29, 2006 at 2:38 PM
Dude,
This terrorist government sends more humanitarian aid than any other entity in the world. If it weren’t for the actions of the US the world would be a much darker place. We have had many military operations to help defend Muslims innocents- Bosnia, Somalia the peacekeeping operation in Macedonia, Kosovo etc. No other country gives as much with so little in return. Your moral equivalence and dim logic is astounding.
Trooper on November 29, 2006 at 2:39 PM
Oh and another telling phrase GregH uses is
Not our government- I find that interesting. Please move to wherever YOUR government is located.
Trooper on November 29, 2006 at 2:43 PM
I’m sure GregH didn’t mean that… after all… his physical address and phone number are available in WHOIS for greghartnett.com.
Nobody is THAT dumb.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 2:44 PM
Ahmadinejad to Americans: ‘U.S. governs by coercion’
Americans to Ahmadinejad: ‘Get bent’
Oh and nice pic to start off. Kinda puts the whole Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell thing into perspective.
BohicaTwentyTwo on November 29, 2006 at 2:50 PM
The DoD defines terrorism as : “the unlawful use of — or threatened use of — force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives.”
The British government’s definition is similar: “Terrorism is the use, or threat, of action which is violent, damaging or disrupting, and is intended to influence the government or intimidate the public and is for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, or ideological cause.”
Are you going to try to argue the case that American actions throughout the last 4 decades are immune from this type of classification?
GregH on November 29, 2006 at 2:51 PM
It’s an open invitation to convert to Islam. Usually, Islamic warlords issue an offer for conversion, and declining means that you rather die.
An offer before the attack, that is.
Niko on November 29, 2006 at 2:53 PM
Oh my! You ARE right. We WERE trying to coerce Hitler to stop gassing the Jews. WE ARE TERRORISTS!!!
I’m so ashamed.
Esthier on November 29, 2006 at 2:56 PM
Tell you what GregH, I will pay for a one way flight to the country of your choice. The only catch is, you have to renounce your US citizenship on the way out.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 2:57 PM
Wow he even invoked Katrina. He speaks Moonbatese.
vcferlita on November 29, 2006 at 2:58 PM
Who wrote this? Ahmadinejad or (insert any loony lib name here)
Gafffawww!
Wow…does that include liberties like the right to life? get an education? vote?
Hypocrite. Liar.
RightWired on November 29, 2006 at 2:59 PM
The DoD defines terrorism as : “the unlawful use of — or threatened use of — force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives.”
When we (u.s.) conduct operations it is through lawful authorization i.e. a civilian, elected to office to protect the nation’s interests. The operations are conducted according (though admittedly not always perfectly) in accordance with our national and international laws most notably the Geneva Convention. So yes I can say we are not conducting terrorist operations.
Trooper on November 29, 2006 at 3:01 PM
GregH, before you say something stupid about “Love it or leave it”. I make this offer to you out of the kindness in my heart. I know how much it must disturb such a gentle soul as yours to have your tax dollars go to supporting State Terrorism. I know that your moral standing must now make it impossible for you to stay in such a country as this nation.
So I offer you a way out. I know that since you so despise terrorism, in all forms, that you must relinquish your citizenship out of disgust for the last 40 years of global oppression.
Might I suggest Switzerland? I hear the skiing is choice.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 3:08 PM
And their taxes are just perfect for any liberal.
Esthier on November 29, 2006 at 3:13 PM
I hear Iran is nice this time of year, and Greg and Ahamalamadingdong are already on the same philosophical page. Maybe we can visit him someday soon!
Pablo on November 29, 2006 at 3:20 PM
A perfect candidate for after-birth abortion.
It is time for the good guys to assasinate these animals.
If Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, the Kaiser, the Czar, the bolsheviks, etc had been eliminated what a better world we would have
accdat on November 29, 2006 at 3:22 PM
Though I don’t agree with Greg’s opinion I respect that it is just that, his opinion. I find it interesting how you post
You express your love for all things American yet when a fellow American has a different view point as yours and expresses his opinion openly with all of you for civil discourse; you attempt to strip away his anonymity by directing people to his personal information.
Are you THAT DUMB and can not continue with friendly dialog, thus having to incite fear with those that disagree with your opinions on a political blog?
ShandyKing on November 29, 2006 at 3:24 PM
My last post was direct to E L Frederick (Sniper One)
ShandyKing on November 29, 2006 at 3:25 PM
If can equate calling America, thereby all of US who are citizens, a terrorist nation… and still call this a civil discourse, then your a better man than I.
I see someone calling me, my wife, my children, my neighbors, my friends, my family, and all Americans, murderers. I see someone saying that we murder in cold blood children, babies, women, and children.
I don’t count that a civil.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 3:28 PM
He called you, me, our military, and everyone American, a cold blooded killer.
That goes well beyond friendly dialog. I responded in kind, and I make no apologies for it.
When that kind of sheer hate for me and my family, and my country, it must be slapped down like the bratty child it is.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 3:32 PM
ShandyKing, when someone posts his personal information on the Internet for the entire world to see, he’s obviously not overly concerned with maintaining his anonymity. E L Frederick didn’t post GregH’s information there, GregH did.
ReubenJCogburn on November 29, 2006 at 3:34 PM
I thought that’s what makes America so great. One can have an opinion, outlandish as it may be and as long as it is not threatening anyone’s personal safety they can feel safe and free to express it.
ShandyKing on November 29, 2006 at 3:36 PM
There’s just so much crap here but it raises some questions in my puny infidel head.
Persistent aggressions by the Zionists are making life more and more difficult for the rightful owners of the land of Palestine…
Constant rocket attacks and suicide bombings don’t count? So, just how did those aggressions against Israel go anyway?
Is it not because they have imposed themselves on a substantial portion of the banking, financial, cultural and media sectors?
And why hasn’t the Muslim world done this instead? Still living with 7th century economics and culture, eh?
The promises of the Almighty and His prophets will certainly be realized,
Who’s Almighty and His Prophets?
Governments are there to serve their own people. No people wants to side with or support any oppressors.
So why do you and the mullahs still have a job?
You are witnessing daily that under the pretext of “the war on terror,” civil liberties in the United States are being increasingly curtailed.
Just what do you know about “civil liberties”?
I could go on and on but, alas my puny infidel brain is weak and tired.
Oh, and did Keith Oberwho write this? Just wondering….
JohnnyD on November 29, 2006 at 3:38 PM
RubenJCogburn that is not the point. EL Frederick took a friendly debate of words to a place much more personal. EL obviously did not like what Greg had to say and took the time to research Greg’s personal information.
ShandyKing on November 29, 2006 at 3:38 PM
Free speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences. Sure you can say stupid things all you want. You can even make a career of it like the Dixie Chicks.
However when I exercise my free speech to slap you down like the bratty-red-headed-step-child your acting like, don’t act all shocked and shaken.
You can say what you want, you can be as stupid as you want, but free speech doesn’t mean that you can’t be sued for liable or treated like an idiot.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 3:39 PM
So your making clear!
ShandyKing on November 29, 2006 at 3:45 PM
Yeah, but doesn’t free speech go both ways?
I mean GregH can say what he wants, and E L Frederick (Sniper One) can do exactly the same.
Esthier on November 29, 2006 at 3:45 PM
I said no such thing. You have ascribed those points unto me. I was simply making the point that terrorism is such a generic word that people throw around. Whenever a country perpetrates violence upon another populace, the receiving end of the attack can view the aggression as a form of terrorism. The perpetrators of the aggression of course do not see their actions as terrorism. That’s why I said it’s only terrorism when “they” are committing the acts, whomever “they” may be.
There are many instances of US aggression throughout the globe over the last 40 years (most notably in Latin America and Southeast Asia) that could be classified by the receivers of the aggression as acts of terrorism. In the US, of course we don’t label them as terrorist acts, but I’d bet the history books in Vietnam tell quite a different story.
GregH on November 29, 2006 at 3:46 PM
You can dress it up all you want… it still walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck.
That sure looks to me like US = Terrorist State, thereby everyone in the US is a sponsor of terror, thusly Americans are terrorists.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 3:50 PM
Northern Vietnam maybe, but to the allies we left high and dry (which is what liberals want us to do in Iraq), we were just that, allies, at least until leaving, which is when the real violence took place.
Because we left Vietnam, millions of people died. That’s on us.
Esthier on November 29, 2006 at 3:50 PM
Except for the God stuff, that letter could have easily been written by the DNC.
infidel4life on November 29, 2006 at 3:50 PM
Esthier, I agree 100% with that point and that E L Frederick is free to say whatever he wants. In fact, politically I agree with his points.
My only point is the fact he researched someone’s name on this blog because he did not like what he had to say and publicly stated he knew this guys personal information. Granted this information is out there, I found it disturbing he needed to “research” the person contradictory point of view.
That’s all..
ShandyKing on November 29, 2006 at 3:52 PM
I’m a computer security guy by trade… it’s what I do. It took me two seconds to do. Don’t read too much into it, it isn’t that hard, and it doesn’t take any time.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 3:55 PM
We (?) should all heed the Divine Word of the Holy Qur’an:
“But those who repent, have faith and do good may receive Salvation. Your Lord, alone, creates and chooses as He will, and others have no part in His choice; Glorified is God and Exalted above any partners they ascribe to Him.” (28:67-68)
What you mean “we” asshole. F**K Off.
auspatriotman on November 29, 2006 at 3:58 PM
I think our new Speaker of the House should pen a response to Mr. Ahmadinejad. I’d be really interested to see how she handles it.
RedWinged Blackbird on November 29, 2006 at 4:05 PM
Bit of a stretch to call it ‘research’. That whois info is very easy to find.
And if that’s really Greg’s info, well personally, I find that disturbing. Note to all who post on this interweb thingie: guard and protect your personal info.
I gotta go with E L Frederick (Sniper One)’s assessment that Greg’s just not that bright.
I also find it disturbing that Greg is as comfortable as he is identifying positively with what ahmagonnajihad says in that letter. And that he obviously has never gone to MEMRI.com and watched what ahmagonnajihad actually says to his own people and the jihadi press.
techno_barbarian on November 29, 2006 at 4:09 PM
Ah, ok. Well then, let’s terrorize.
How about a drone loaded with a couple of old Russkie cluster munitions paying a 3am visit on the quarters areas of random Iranian RG bases?
mojo on November 29, 2006 at 4:17 PM
.
GregH, so in other words, the U.S. is nothing more than a large sovereign version of Al-Qaeda?
Rick on November 29, 2006 at 4:23 PM
NUKE ‘EM…JUST PLAIN NUKE ‘EM…they are happy to die…who cares what this guy says or writes…
areseaoh on November 29, 2006 at 4:26 PM
ShandyKing, E L Frederick (Sniper One) just posted the information available on GregH’s link.
Rick on November 29, 2006 at 4:29 PM
The sound you just heard was millions and millions of Lefties falling in love.
Halley on November 29, 2006 at 4:32 PM
There is a link on my blog to email me. You can send your hate mail there. No sense buggaring up the comments here any further.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 4:37 PM
the US military defines terrorism based on terrorism committed against the US.
Only an idiot argues otherwise.
And as counter point we have enemies greg and we must defeat them and yes do harm as well as good. but our enemies dont stop being our enemies because you wish it to be true.
William Amos on November 29, 2006 at 4:40 PM
Here is my letter to Ahmadinejad via speakout@foxnews.com:
Dear Sir:
Greetings from an American citizen. Your letter, while, flowery was an interesting read. Until your faith, yourself, all of the Muslims in the world declare taqiyah as a reprehensible belief no longer held by the leaders, secular or religious, and practitioners of
your version of the Islamic faith there is no point in discussion. Oh! But, how do I believe anything you say or write even if you all denounce taqiyah? Mobias strip indeed.
Until then sir, please don’t write me again.
Sue
sharinlite on November 29, 2006 at 4:42 PM
That’s a cheap publicity stunt you just pulled to get traffic (just kidding).
Rick on November 29, 2006 at 4:45 PM
It would only work is anyone cared enough to email LOL!
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 4:49 PM
Well, hey, you’re free to make your point as well, but according to what others are saying, his information didn’t really need to be researched.
Otherwise, I might be more inclined to your viewpoint. I have seen some internet fights get way too out of hand.
Esthier on November 29, 2006 at 5:13 PM
A pox on your optical orbits! Beat me to it!
…except the explicit mentions of “Zionism”. That would be more in MoveON’s line.
I wonder if *ANYONE* on the Left sees the irony of their being on the same wavelength as Ahmedinejad. “Why you clever bastard, I was going to say that!” Our electorate doesn’t seem to have noticed.
Puritan1648 on November 29, 2006 at 5:37 PM
…get a dictionary.
…look up the word “defense”. Repeat until it sinks in.
The actions of this nation in the face of hijackings of planes, ships, even in some places of trains and buses; of attacks on our capital ships; of bombings of our embassies, barracks buildings and other facilities; and the general “death to America” mindset are clearly and completely in the “national defense” column.
Just because the guys attacking your are pipsqueaks, fleas attacking an elephant, doesn’t mean that you have to sit back and take it. Since September 11th, we either crush ‘em or we can expect more of the same.
Give me specific examples of national defensive measures which “could be construed as state sponsored terrorism on a grand scale”? What do *YOU* construe as “state sponsored terrorism”? Throw down, boy. Tell me where the nation which shelters and feeds you, makes it possible for you to come here on the Internet and present your *SMARMY*, pre-packaged, pre-digested, seditious Leftist boilerplate is an exporter of terrorism.
It’s a common mistake made by weak minds: a little guy walks away from a fight he had no business picking, after threatening the bigger guy, now all bleeding and shouting invective…and it’s the big guy who’s the villain. It doesn’t make sense for a shrimp to pick on a blue whale, but when’s the last time you saw any sense coming out of the mouth of a muslim? If you want sense, go to Oxford or Harvard or the corporate boardroom of Toshiba. If you want suicidal, shrill and unceasing hatred, go to the Middle East.
Son…I’m convinced…you need some experience of this world…that’s crap comin’ outta yer mouth.
Puritan1648 on November 29, 2006 at 5:49 PM
…considering what those “millions of inhabitants of Palestine” have done, and continue to do, for that same 60 years, I don’t blame the “Zionist regime” one little bit.
Ranchers and homesteaders used to put a bounty on wolves, coyotes and other predators, scavengers and pests. ‘Round the homestead of the “Zionists”, the wolves walk on two legs, it would seem.
Puritan1648 on November 29, 2006 at 5:51 PM
That murdering tyrant can blow it out his ear or the orifice of his choice . . . then he can go straight to his hell.
rplat on November 29, 2006 at 6:21 PM
MSN POLL NOW
47% Yes
46% NO
6.7% Dont know
shooter on November 29, 2006 at 6:35 PM
to the Ahmamadjihad :
..NUTS !!!!
shooter on November 29, 2006 at 6:52 PM
If this NON-SCIENTIFIC POLL isn’t being “smurfed” by Kos and friends like MSNBC POLLS ALMOST ALWAYS ARE, then the numbers are pretty disturbing.
RightWinged on November 29, 2006 at 6:57 PM
Does he spell any bedder than Lindsey??
He shooood get some points for that at leest…
seejanemom on November 29, 2006 at 7:10 PM
has DU and Kos said this guy can be negotiated with now and he’s better then bush?
Defector01 on November 29, 2006 at 7:12 PM
Damn, Sniper One…I’m sorry I wasn’t here earlier to cover your six…you are so good at that. Hate I missed the chance to double tap the troll.
You never leave your wing man. You never leave your wing man…
seejanemom on November 29, 2006 at 7:15 PM
like i keep saying, liberals like GregH / honora & Constantine are more loyal to the terrorist cause than they are loyal to this country & GregH keeps proving my point everytime he says stuff like this.
Starblazer on November 29, 2006 at 7:15 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »