Pelosi defends al Qaeda, chastises Bush (Update: Video added)
posted at 4:49 pm on November 28, 2006 by Ian
Send to a Friend |
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Pelosi is mad Bush is blaming violence in Iraq on al Qaeda:
House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told reporters on Wednesday that she feels it is “sad” that President Bush continues to blame Iraqi insurgent violence on al Qaeda.
“My thoughts on the president’s representations are well-known,” Pelosi said. “The 9/11 Commission dismissed that notion a long time ago and I feel sad that the president is resorting to it again.”
If it’s not al Qaeda’s fault that they are killing soldiers and innocent civilians, then who should be blamed? Bush? U.S. Soldiers? America?
Update (Bryan): What a clueless gasbag. She supported Abscam pal Murtha over Hoyer. She almost put an impeached corruptocrat in charge of House Intel. And now she shows the world that she doesn’t know what the tainted 9-11 Commission did and did not study and report on. I had low expectations for Pelosi, yet I still find her dimwitted lurching from one idiotic scene to another surprising.
And she’s going to be a couple of heartbeats from the presidency.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: [1] 2 »
My bet is America
Defector01 on November 28, 2006 at 4:51 PM
So when does congress go back to work?
InstantNemesis on November 28, 2006 at 4:52 PM
I am going to enjoy watching her make an arse of herself the next 2 years.
bopbottle on November 28, 2006 at 4:54 PM
How dare Bush continue to point out reality!
Opinionnation on November 28, 2006 at 4:54 PM
…it’s the Council of Mythical Figures Liberation Front.
Unicorns are making IEDs, leprechauns are burying them.
Santa Claus knocked an F16 out of the sky yesterday, and the Easter Bunny is the go-between to get Bin Laden’s tapes to Al Jazeera.
They are negotiating an alliance with the characters From Looney-Tunes. If that comes about, expect Iran to get involved with things more directly. Ahmadenijad is a related to Daffy Duck, and is expected to side with family.
Puritan1648 on November 28, 2006 at 4:55 PM
She has the legs for those Armani suits,
but she has the EYES FOR A BURQA….
seejanemom on November 28, 2006 at 4:56 PM
It stand to (liberal) reason.
Terrorist aren’t responsible for acts of terrorism, someone else (President Bush) made them do it.
Rapists aren’t responsible for attacks on chidlren, someone else made them into the mosters they are.
Murderers aren’t responsible for their murders, it is all the guns fault.
etc. etc…
This is going to be a very interesting couple of years for U.S. politics.
Lawrence on November 28, 2006 at 4:57 PM
…she’s certainly got the *FACE* for a burqa. She’s got the sort of face it takes to be a real star…on radio….
Puritan1648 on November 28, 2006 at 4:58 PM
Bush. Definitely Bush. He’s making the jihadis mad. As soon as he’s gone, they’ll revert to the sweethearts they’ve been for the last 1,400 years.
Good question. Two hundred years ought to be enough vacation for anyone.
RedWinged Blackbird on November 28, 2006 at 4:58 PM
The hate America crowd is back in town. My guess is the Democrats aren’t going to do so well with such a light weight in charge. You can feel the hate and rage coming from these folks, Rangel, Hasting, Frank-furter, Conyers, Murtha … the whole lot of them. Not ready for prime time.
Maybe the Republicans weren’t so good, but at least they acted like adults.
tarpon on November 28, 2006 at 4:58 PM
And it’s not my fault I can’t spell check my last post, it couldn’t possibly be my teacher’s fault, it must be my parent’s fault then.
Lawrence on November 28, 2006 at 4:59 PM
She can’t really be that clueless can she? The 9/11 commission was focusing on the WTC and Pentagon attacks. Iraq is another front in the War on Terror, and yes al-Qaeda has been involved in supporting and supplying the jihadists. So yes it is possible to say that AQ is invovled in Iraq and no Iraq was not directly involved in 9/11. Is that too complex a concept for Madame Speaker?
Mallard T. Drake on November 28, 2006 at 5:01 PM
The woman is absolutely insane. I wonder if the mindless electorate really understand what they have done?
rplat on November 28, 2006 at 5:02 PM
that’s astonishing. if i’m interpreting this correctly, she appears to believe that “no operational ties” means that there’s no such thing as al qaeda in iraq. no wonder she’s being so reckless with the intelligence committee nomination. she seems to believe it to be beneath her to stay even minimally abreast.
jummy on November 28, 2006 at 5:02 PM
Can someone please direct me to the section of the 9/11 Commission report which addresses the current violence in Iraq.
Maybe I need my BDS decoder ring to see it.
12thman on November 28, 2006 at 5:05 PM
How come every time you see a picture of her, she’s wagging an admonitory finger like a cranky old schoolteacher?
Lehuster on November 28, 2006 at 5:08 PM
this isn’t bds, this is truly frightening incompetence.
i’m not one to do this sort of thing, but i really feel like i must call her office for clarification. its right there in black and white, but i can hardly believe she’s this uninformed.
jummy on November 28, 2006 at 5:09 PM
Clueless and batshit crazy. Not a good way to go through Congress,Flounder,oops, I mean Nancypants.
bbz123 on November 28, 2006 at 5:11 PM
Bu…wha…
Damn. We need jesters at news conferences, obviously.
I’m not even sure I WANT to know what’s going on with the Dem leadership these days, but it seems pretty clear that wherever Rep Pelosi’s heart is on these matters, her brain is somewhere cold, and dark, and covered with spiders.
Okay, Ms. Pelosi, we’ll play your stupid little game. Who do YOU blame for the terrorism by foreign and local jihadi fighters in Iraq? Cheney? Or perhaps Bert of Bert and Ernie - after all, he’s always been a little illiberal, and he has been seen in montages with Bin Ladin! :)
And what do you think it is that Al Qaeda does, anyway? I mean, what “industry” are they in, if it’s not fomenting violence, chaos and disorder? Interior design? Catering?
Then again, being from San Francisco, these things are probably “thruthy” in her world.
Merovign on November 28, 2006 at 5:11 PM
Has there ever been a stupider Speaker in the history of the House?
B Moe on November 28, 2006 at 5:11 PM
Bush
Pelosi
Ian
I would say that the violence in Iraq is probably mostly due to religeous tensions and historical hatreds between Sunnis and Shiites. These are being fanned by al Qaeda, and Iran and Syria.
So let’s assume that we were able to kill or capture every al Qaeda member who was in Iraq, and to do the same to every al Qaeda member who entered Iraq to replace them. And thus we have completely removed al Qaeda from having any influence in Iraq. I don’t think that this would mean that the situation in Iraq would go back to peace and stability. The violence might abate somewhat. But I don’t think it would disapear.
EFG on November 28, 2006 at 5:12 PM
The violence in the ME is ageless and timeless, Old MO invented his little program to try and keep the fighting among themselves under check long enough to loot and pillage the rest of the world to get the things they are incapable of producing themselves.I don’t ever see an end to violence there ever.
bbz123 on November 28, 2006 at 5:16 PM
Geez, I certainly hope that al Qaeda is paying close attention to Bela, er… Nancy.
It wouuld be a crying shame if they targeted landmarks like, oh I don’t know, the Golden Gate Bridge, the cable cars, the Transamerica Pyramid, Coit Tower, and Chinatown, just to name a few.
That would be terrible. Wouldn’t it?
there it is on November 28, 2006 at 5:17 PM
yes it would be terrible, and i don’t think even a trgedy like that would penetrate. i’d never considered it in these terms, but pelosi isn’t just a progressive from san fransisco. she’s “trancendental medidation can open pathways into extradimensional space allowing me to travel to other worlds” san fransisco.
jummy on November 28, 2006 at 5:23 PM
Pelosi and the Dems don’t hate the USA - they just want it under their complete control - it’s called socialism/communism.
ar_basin on November 28, 2006 at 5:25 PM
Meanwhile, fellow Leftist Wesley Clark– who thinks supporting Israel against Hezbollah was “a mistake“– asks Brown University to “Imagine“;
General Clark should explain how those “golden rules of behavior” applied during his Abrams tank assault at Waco.
Apparently, Clark’s underwear didn’t muffle his voice once during this entire asshatted lecture.
Terp Mole on November 28, 2006 at 5:32 PM
The answer is ‘D’ all of the above.
Its this asinine denial stuff the dems keep putting out that gives hope to our enemies and prolongs the war. It used to be you waited til the badguy was dead before you critiqued your efforts.
Iblis on November 28, 2006 at 5:34 PM
The plastic surgeons removed whatever clue it was that Pelosi had a long time ago.
bj1126 on November 28, 2006 at 5:35 PM
One can only hope she eventually sticks her foot so far in that even the ‘old media’ can’t cover her ignorance.
Griz on November 28, 2006 at 5:37 PM
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot is she saying? That there is no Al Qaeda in Iraq? Hello… Zarqawi! Muhajir!
That the Hotel does the 9/11 commission have to do with the current sitrep in Iraq?
Earth to Speaker Botox, engage brain before opening mouth!
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 28, 2006 at 5:38 PM
how long before bin laden is before the house intelligence committee giving his side of 9/11?
lorien1973 on November 28, 2006 at 5:38 PM
That statement shows an incredible lack of awareness by our new House Speaker.
The media will bury it.
JohnJ on November 28, 2006 at 5:38 PM
She would just blame it on Bush - after all, it’s all his fault (always has been). MSM recently reported that Bush traveled back in time and started the Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, and Vietnam (those are just the ones they can confirm from a White House leaker that has seen Bush on his Time Machine)
Rick on November 28, 2006 at 5:39 PM
It’s all Bush’s fault
vcferlita on November 28, 2006 at 5:40 PM
We need to stop assuming that Pelosi is crazy while she’s spouting the secular socialist anti American party’s agenda.
Buzzy on November 28, 2006 at 5:44 PM
“how long before bin laden is before the house intelligence committee giving his side of 9/11?”
They dream of such a scenario, they want to give platforms to anybody that can claim that the evil USA/white devils did them wrong.
bbz123 on November 28, 2006 at 5:45 PM
Give it time. Stretch hasn’t had her formal coronation yet. I figure by mid-January.
JammieWearingFool on November 28, 2006 at 5:46 PM
My God … I just read the comments at the end of the article and I’m flabbergasted. Are these people really this dense? Here’s an example:
“For simple thinking people create a boogey man… thus al Qaeda. It diverts attention away from the “source” of the problem. Thinking is dangerous.”
Anonymous | 11.28.06 - 3:32 pm | #
darwin on November 28, 2006 at 5:50 PM
Nancy, can we have some more of this please? The world needs to hear more of your infinite wisdom. Keep talkin’ Nancy.
I hope this is all over the news, imagine millions of people scratchin’ their heads goin’ “How did *this* moron become Speaker?”
Is it ‘08 yet?
Nancy and her boys (the Nancyboys) are gonna get crushed in ‘08 when people see enough of this crap.
Keeeeep talkin’.
Tony737 on November 28, 2006 at 5:57 PM
As of today, there has not been a terrorist attack on American soil in 1903 days… any bets on if we make it to 2000 before these idiots get us hit again?
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 28, 2006 at 6:04 PM
In the words of Archie Bunker.
DingBat ! ! Edith, Go tell it to the meathead.
Texyank on November 28, 2006 at 6:07 PM
I actually just emailed Ian about this video, probably as he was adding it… we need about 10 seconds more though… Brett Baier reported that Pelosi’s handlers later tried to save her ass from looking even stupider by saying she “didn’t hear” the question.
RightWinged on November 28, 2006 at 6:17 PM
The worst thing is that she has no clue how dangerous her words are. Her words and actions are treasonous. When Al Queda is cutting off her head with a rusty, dull sword, will she then see the light?
PinkyBigglesworth on November 28, 2006 at 6:20 PM
It must be those stupid, ignorant, low-income, soldiers we have. They are killing each other just like they do in the U.S. inner-cities.
Kerry and Rangel are right! Pelosi is a genius.
Who votes for these people?
BTW, how many undocumented workers work for Pelosi at her vinyards and resturants? Aren’t you forced to resign after that is discovered, via Chavez (Linda).
right2bright on November 28, 2006 at 6:22 PM
She is so used to being under a knife Pinky that I don;t think she’d even notice.
bbz123 on November 28, 2006 at 6:24 PM
I am tired of the ignorance!
It is clear that Iraq had the Salman Pak training center along the Tigris River. It is also clear that this training center housed an airline fuselage with no flight line, not place for the aircraft to take off and land, along with other equipment, such as a train and other equipment, on which terrorists were trained, in exactly the way the 9/11 terrorists behaved - small groups, armed with short, easily osbcured cutting devices, to jump up and shout and terrorize the passengers and crew and take over the aircraft.
Most of their flying lessons took place here, under our own noses, under our own liberties and freedoms. They used our own goodness against us. Now they are being rewarded again and again and again and again by our on politicians!
It is sick!
Yes, Iraq DID have a part in 9/11, and other terrorist activity, including training, financing, and other.
And yes, there were WMDs found in Iraq. We all know it, why is it being ignored? It was even revealed a few months ago again.
What did people think we would find after allowing this freak, Saddam Hussein, almost one year, plus the 11 or so years prior to that - after the cease fire agreement, to hide his arsenal? Saddam played chicken with the UN and the US for more than 11 years since that cease fire, and the UN was found to be corrupt, skimming millions out of the oil for food program.
Give a liar, deceiver like Saddam enough time, let him play around and taunt and tease as he did, and you think he could not end up looking like the cat who ate the canary.
“Hey, what happened to the canary?”
“Canary? What canary? Burrrrp!”
Bush and Rice have let us down. They are not serious in this war against Jihadis. They appease, they praise the Jihadis, making the false claim that Islam if a Religion of Peace, and, with Bush and Congress, they are not securing the borders and are allowing amnesty for millions of invaders.
No. They are not taking this seriously!
It sucks!
Are we all dihmmies yet?
By the way, Pelosi is an idiot, elected by idiots from the San Francisco area. She has diahrrea of the mouth!
Some one should send her a few cases of Imodium!
William
William2006 on November 28, 2006 at 6:27 PM
Say, speaking of Speaker Botox, what ever happened to the story of her employ of illegals on her vineyard? That disappeared right quick.
Iblis on November 28, 2006 at 6:44 PM
lblis, so did the story that she and husband don’t hire unions for their hotel chain, while she runs every time on 100% support of unions…MSM, hello? never mind…
She also looks lately as if they just took an entire layer of skin off her face.
Entelechy on November 28, 2006 at 6:50 PM
She is not the Speaker yet.
It is possible for the House to elect somebody else as Speaker.
I think we need to talk with the ‘Blue Dog Dems’ about getting a better Speaker.
Marvin on November 28, 2006 at 6:58 PM
Being a webmaster is cool, because you can use any headlines you want regardless of their accuracy.
Let me get this straight: al Qaeda hates America…. sooo….. they’re encouraging Muslims… in Iraq…
….
to kill…
….
each other.
….
I’m sure it makes perfect sense to Mr. Bush.
Constantine on November 28, 2006 at 7:02 PM
Muslims killing each other?
Who ever heard of such a thing?
Islam is the Relgion of Peace, tolerance, love, brotherhood, and harmony!
A Muslim would NEVER perpetrate violence on another Muslim!
William
William2006 on November 28, 2006 at 7:06 PM
Constantine, to simply for you (not that you need it, you just don’t want to internalize it):
“if it’s bad for the U.S., it’s good for al Qaeda”.
Entelechy on November 28, 2006 at 7:13 PM
The answer is: all of the above with special emphasis on the soldiers - being a fine example of the democratic party that she is. I’m sure if the soldiers weren’t there stirring up all that trouble, then the insurgents would all just go back to their peaceful lives. *cough*
thedecider on November 28, 2006 at 7:16 PM
It’s abundantly clear Pelosi means the majority of Americans killed in Iraq are the result of them trying to referee the Sunni/Shia civil war that’s raging through Baghdad and other parts of the country. Yes al-Qaeda is there, yes they kill us sometimes, but when Bush blames them for the insurgant violence/civil war it means he’s either lying or he’s ignoring reality. Both of which he has history with. Regardless, if you remove al-Qaeda from the equation Sunni and Shia are still killing each other and Americans are still dying in the middle.
Stories like this are the right wing’s crack. Most threads sit around for days with 20 or so posts, then there is a chance to say Democrats love terrorists and an hour later….50 posts. By tomorrow there will be 150. Enjoy the fodder. You’ve had a rough month.
JaHerer22 on November 28, 2006 at 7:17 PM
They are trying to thwart a democracy in the making. They target civilians and Iraqi interests (police recruiting stations) to scare the civilians away from whatever form of self-government can be realized. To imply they have some moral code of respect for fellow muslims is bizarre since these people are, terrorists. Such a code of conduct didn’t stop the Taliban, it didn’t stop al-qaeda, and it won’t stop the insurgents - many of whom are not even Iraqi’s.
thedecider on November 28, 2006 at 7:21 PM
President Bush blames the violence on al Qaeda. Ms. Pelosi, GregH and JaHerer22 blame it on the American soldiers and especially on Mr. Bush.
I blame it on the ‘insurgents’, except I don’t like the term. I blame it on the violent.
Entelechy on November 28, 2006 at 7:27 PM
Don’t waste your breath. The only way Constantine is going to get a clue is if they deploy to Iraq to see it for themselves. The required liberal pre-frontal lobotomy has long since removed any intelligent thought.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 28, 2006 at 7:41 PM
KNOCK KNOCK - who’s there? NOBODY!
iam7545 on November 28, 2006 at 7:42 PM
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 28, 2006 at 7:44 PM
Heaven knows I’m no military strategist, but wouldn’t it make more sense for them to unite the factions to fight the Americans and the new government, instead of encouraging them to kill each other and deplete their manpower and ordinance? Sounds a lot like the nonsensical argument that we didn’t find WMDs because Saddam cleverly shipped them to Syria instead of using them to fight the invasion.
Constantine on November 28, 2006 at 7:45 PM
But if they are shooting at our boys, we can take them down. We haven’t lost a battle in Iraq.
How do we shoot at when they are shooting each other?
And then media screams Quagmire! Civil War! Retreat! Defeat!
This isn’t a war that is being lost on the battlefield, this is a war that is being lost in the media. They know that if the death toll rolls up, even if it isn’t our boys dying, that Americans will get sick of the war, and lose heart.
Eventually, people like yourself will force the military to give the terrorists what they wants… Iraq, on a silver platter.
So go ahead, keep cheer-leading for Osama…
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 28, 2006 at 7:55 PM
HowWho do we shoot at when they are shooting each other?E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 28, 2006 at 7:56 PM
That’s magical thinking. Al Qaeda’s chances of uniting the Shia, Sunni, and Kurds in Iraq are even worse than those of the US (after all, what can you possibly think of that a small group of Wahhabi terrorists would have to offer Iraq’s Shiite majority?). Throw in the fact that the US also wants consolidation, and that Al Qaeda’s strategic objective is merely to thwart US efforts in the region, and it’s clear that you’re not only not a military strategist, you (thankfully) wouldn’t even make a good terrorist.
Blacklake on November 28, 2006 at 8:01 PM
I’m no military strategist either and, I agree, it would make more sense for them to unite against the US military yet, they don’t. Doesn’t it make you curious to know why? My opinion is that they know a face to face confrontation with the world’s most sophisticated military power will result in their undisputed defeat. So, they must change the target. They can’t win against the US military presence so they target the political aims of the Bush administration (a.k.a. democracy) by hitting civilian targets that represent those aims.
thedecider on November 28, 2006 at 8:04 PM
Constantine,
The factions are maneuvering for power so an alliance would be counter productive. Furthermore, if they united then they would be easy targets. I think their goal is to create chaos and weakent the resolve of the U.S. It’s easier to do this in small bands through guerilla warfare.
p.s. if being a webmaster is so cool how come you don’t spend some time on your site? It looks like crap and hasn’t been updated for three weeks. No offense intended, just some constructive criticism.
Troy Rasmussen on November 28, 2006 at 8:10 PM
Did anyone noticed in the picture “Terror Alert: Elevated”?
With Pelosi at the helm, it should be elevated.
Kokonut on November 28, 2006 at 8:25 PM
Just ignore that the war is immoral and ill-advised from the start, then blame the media for reporting what’s going on. Have you considered that we’re unintentionally enabling the violence because those perpetrating it know we’ll prevent total collapse while they act on their sectarian hatred?
Believe it or not, even people who hate the war still feel a sense of responsibility for cleaning up the mess that BushCo. has created, even as you repeat the phrase “cut and run” until you’re foaming at the mouth. So I don’t see that happening.
Go ahead, keep making the offensive distortions. They worked so well for the Republicans in the last election.
Constantine on November 28, 2006 at 8:35 PM
It’s true. Thanks for the reminder.
Constantine on November 28, 2006 at 8:42 PM
I guess all of the time and effort we spent taking out Zarqawi was just a waste of time.
Zarqawi was just an innocent peaceful al Qaeda guy and we had no business hunting him down.
And I suppose the American Soldiers he killed and the people he beheaded like Nick berg aren’t really dead, just hiding someplace.
Pelosi, al Qaeda useful idiot…best team member they’ve got.
Typical feminist reaction to liberating Islamic women…none.
Speakup on November 28, 2006 at 8:45 PM
Yeah, I wonder why the Democrats spent 13 years arguing that WMDs were there then, and Clinton used stronger language when he attacked Iraq in 1998 after making regime change our policy. Those damn immoral Democrats and the ill-advice, right?
RightWinged on November 28, 2006 at 9:00 PM
The first problem is, people put too much stock into the 9/11 commission. In my opinion, it was deeply flawed. Another key point that isn’t discussed much, is that back in ‘03 and ‘04, we were fighting a large number of foreign terrorists, Al Qaeda become more invloved, then the terrorists figured out they could start blowing up Sunnis and/or Shiites and making it look like the other side was doing it.
There is no need to unite the factions, because it just increases the chaos and fog of war. Just like the rest of the middle east, it seems we more more groups fighting a war by proxy, by supporting/instigating/maniuplating another entity.
The war wasn’t ill-advised from the start, I’m not even going to adress the immoral part, that’s just silly liberal BS. the mistakes were made after the war, when we decided to fight with both our hands tied behind our backs. Everyone knows the effect the media has an any war, since 1968. Everyone wants to be the next Cronkite. The reporting has been slanted to show the US in the worst way possible.
This war would have went much differently if everyone was on the same team, so, in my opinion, the left and the media deserve at least 67% of the blame.
reaganaut on November 28, 2006 at 9:36 PM
Thank you Constantine, you’ve re-affirmed my belief that you are beyond reason.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 28, 2006 at 9:44 PM
What are you all talking about, we are winning!! Bush rules!!
“MISSION ACCOMPLISHED”
Pelosi did not understand to question, I could barely hear the question my self. Al qaeda is a problem NOW, but so is the civil war, I mean sectarian squirmishes. The point, al qaeda was not an issue in Iraq before March 2003. Now that’s not the case, they’re clearly there now. As a moderate I’m tired of having to defend the Dems against right rhetoric and hate, some of you all repeat. I’m an American and want America to win, GOP or Dem, I don’t care who gets the job done, but I want what’s best for the people, not one party or the other.
YOUR WISH FOR THE DEMS TO FAIL IS LIKE WANTING THE TERRIORIST TO WIN.
Is Bush denial, delusional or just determined?
THERE ARE NO GOOD IDEAS OR OPTIONS LEFT, SO WE ARE GOING BACK TO “STAY THE COURSE”. The admin got us in there, without enough ground troops, dismantaled the Iraq military and just screwed it up. FACT. BTW the US military are the best bunch of men and woman and we owe them a great debt. They are doing great.
FOR THOSE BLAMING or IMPLYING IT’S THE SOLDIERS ARE AT FAILT IS AS LOW AS IT GETS. SHAME ON YOU. IF YOU DENIGRATE THE SERVICE OF OUR MILITARY MEN AND WOMAN TO MY FACE I’D KNOCK YOU ON YOU ASS. SHUT UP!
To admit that there’s a civil war is admit failure. Yes we are failing and we can blame, bush, Chaney, rumsfeld and to GOP ran congress and senate. This has been the common theme of the Bush admin from the beginning, denial. The ability to deal with the reality has been missing from either arrogance or incompetency. This latest, THERE IS NO CIVIL WAR BS, to save face, Bush’s face, while soldiers are killed everyday is a shame and surprised Pelosi did not into Bush, she just looked SAD, which is an appropriate emotion.
2883 killed, last: 11/28: Staff Sgt. Daniel M. Morris, 28, of Clinton, Tenn., died Nov. 25 in Al Judiah, Iraq, IED. That is what is going on. Drive around and get blown up, or caught in the civil war cross fire. We need to get them out of their. It will not be the end of the world fear mongers. Of course it will cut into Halliburton profits, may be we need to rethink?
gmcjetpilot on November 28, 2006 at 9:55 PM
Again I say: CUCKOO, CUCKOO, CUCKOO…..
bloggless on November 28, 2006 at 10:00 PM
Does it really matter which terror group is most responsible? I’m sick of our “leaders’ bickering over EXACTLY which terror group is doing this or that just to score “gotcha” points instead of focusing on simply KILLING THE TERRORISTS!
Yakko77 on November 28, 2006 at 10:12 PM
gmcjetpilot…
What kind of narcotic induced that madness?
reaganaut on November 28, 2006 at 10:12 PM
Ah yes, the summary judgment: it’s a good place to sit when you haven’t got a leg to stand on.
Get… the comfy chair!
Constantine on November 28, 2006 at 10:23 PM
I would expect you have alot of experience with that.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 28, 2006 at 10:28 PM
i think its not so much drug induced as it is hubris.
they believe that there is no reality but constructed texts which mediate reality. laboring under this conciet, they believe that by flipping a paradigm within a text they effect a coresponding change in the real things which are being discussed.
this is known in the schoolyard as “i know you are but what am i?” and the deadly, “i’m rubber you’re glue” reversal.
jummy on November 28, 2006 at 10:41 PM
Is anyone else beginning to think that gmcjetpilot is one of the skitzo frantic soothsayer’s other personalities?
RightWinged on November 28, 2006 at 10:47 PM
Is anyone else beginning to think that gmcjetpilot is one of the skitzo frantic soothsayer’s other personalities?
RightWinged on November 28, 2006 at 10:47 PM
Definitely Soothsayeresk . Rambling,irrational as well as rage issues mixed with borderline schitzophrenic lapses coupled with latent homophobic tendencies.
sonnyspats1 on November 28, 2006 at 11:23 PM
Gavrilo Princip is Serbian for “George Bush”. Coincidence? I think not.
jaleach on November 28, 2006 at 11:31 PM
Constantine, the Democrats DIDN’T win this past election. the Republicans lost, because they didn’t remain loyal to their conservative base. had they remain loyal to the conservative base, then the Republicans would still be in power & not trying to “cut & run” like you liberals want to. btw - E L is right you liberals are cheering for Osama to beat the U.S. & you liberals do want the U.S. to lose the war on terror.
Starblazer on November 29, 2006 at 12:35 AM
remember this Constantine, “Democrats - the cut & run / Raise the white flag / Surrender / Pro-Amnesty / Pro Terrorist” party. i’m sure that you & other liberals are very proud to be part of that party.
Starblazer on November 29, 2006 at 12:39 AM
Why do the libs come here? Are they recruiting?
Golfer_75093 on November 29, 2006 at 8:45 AM
Maybe they (libs) are here to justify their actions in helping the jihadis.
Golfer_75093 on November 29, 2006 at 8:47 AM
As Osama bin Laden puts it: “In this final phase of the ongoing struggle, the world of the infidels was divided between two superpowers — the United States and the Soviet Union. Now we have defeated the more dangerous of the two. Dealing with the pampered and effeminate Americans will be easy.” And then followed what has become the familiar description of the Americans and the usual litany and recitation of American defeats and retreats: Vietnam, Beirut, Somalia, one after another. The general theme was: They can’t take it. Hit them and they’ll run. All you have to do is hit harder.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on November 29, 2006 at 9:16 AM
pelosidumn…politicize…obstruct…mislead…and just be plan ridiculous…what else has she…no plan…no adjenda…wants to let our enemies attack us before we respond…
Anybody planning a trip to SF…I think they banned military recuiting…
GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS…GOD BLESS GW…GOD BLESS AMERICA…
areseaoh on November 29, 2006 at 9:41 AM
The American voters will wake up someday and take a look at the woman they went to bed with and (hopefully) realize what a mistake they made.
BigOrangeAxe on November 29, 2006 at 10:04 AM
What any reasonable person would glean from this video. What bullshit.
honora on November 29, 2006 at 11:17 AM
Comment pages: [1] 2 »