Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Centcom: AP wrongly blamed us for jihadi attack on civilians

posted at 11:54 pm on November 27, 2006 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The victims said American troops gunned down a group of Iraqis, American troops say otherwise.

Curt’s having a good day, huh?

Sir -

Reference the clarification requested on the story by AP below.

Anti-Iraqi Forces opened fire, targeting civilians in the al-Husseiniya area. 10 civilians were killed and six wounded at 11 p.m. Nov. 26. The incident was reported by the Iraqi Police through the Joint National Operations Center (a civilian matter relayed to the Coalition for tracking purposes). There was no Coalition involvement.

That makes three suspect incidents in the past four days, starting with Patterico’s post about the phony airstrike on Friday, then Curt’s expose of the fake police captain this morning, and now this. Yet the only one of the three where the body count is in (substantial) dispute is the second one, which had to do with the six Sunnis supposedly set on fire by Shiites whom no one seems to have heard of.

Kind of dampens the celebration.

On that note, I’m going to take the opportunity to ask you again to donate to Nabil’s escape fund if you haven’t already. The PayPal button’s in the sidebar.

Update: Samir Yacoub, the AP reporter responsible for the latest smear job, was apparently on the scene when American contractors were hung from the bridge in Fallujah in 2004.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Oh come now, how post-modern would it be to let trifles like facts interfere with such plusgood narratives?

Blacklake on November 28, 2006 at 12:07 AM

AP (Assoc. Press, not our deity) today – ne plus ultra!

Entelechy on November 28, 2006 at 12:27 AM

It’s profoundly depressing. As others have noted, most Americans buy the MSM version hook, line and sinker. And so does the rest of the world. The nutroots (and the world) would reply to this correction, “Of course the official US military response is to deny it. No one believes those Nazis.”

laelaps on November 28, 2006 at 12:40 AM

When will the military pull the press credentials of all reporters over there and kick them out? I hope it’s soon.

marianpaul on November 28, 2006 at 12:45 AM

Im sure the left will try to defend this “Bagdad Bob” Samir Yacuob. Dhimmis.

infidel on November 28, 2006 at 12:58 AM

Let’s see, why does the MSM see their audience decline? Could it be that their “reporting” is being recognized as propaganda?

omegaram on November 28, 2006 at 1:19 AM

Update: Samir Yacoub, the AP reporter responsible for the latest smear job, was apparently on the scene when American contractors were hung from the bridge in Fallujah in 2004.

I think Samir needs a good ol’ fashioned interrogation – the kind libs have been complaining about.

Rick on November 28, 2006 at 1:26 AM

Raise your hand if you’re surprized…..

Janos Hunyadi on November 28, 2006 at 1:53 AM

Just a reminder from AP’s About page:

“… AP operates as a not-for-profit cooperative with 3,700 employees working in more than 240 worldwide bureaus. AP is owned by its 1,500 U.S. daily newspaper members. They elect a board of directors that directs the cooperative. ….”

Write your local AP owner to tell them what you think of AP’s mission in “… providing distinctive news services of the highest quality, reliability and objectivity with reports that are accurate, balanced and informed.”

Dusty on November 28, 2006 at 2:13 AM

Curt’s having a good day, huh?

Truly, but it’s always a mixed blessing. First, he has to redirect traffic because of some sort of AP-alanche at HotAir. Now, apparently all of his commenters are required to start their comment with “Oh, honey…”

What the heck…

Jaibones on November 28, 2006 at 9:31 AM

Let’s see, why does the MSM see their audience decline? Could it be that their “reporting” is being recognized as propaganda?

Unfortunately there are a whole lot of people (my mother among them) who only get their information from the ‘big three’ networks (ABC/CBS/NBC) or CNN – and who have been told time and time again that FOX is evil incarnate.

CrazyFool on November 28, 2006 at 11:02 AM

The military “propaganda” lesson in this “news reporting” folly -that has distorted the meaning of the fighting in Iraq all along- should be:

-keep the reporters out of the zone of conflict for as long as possible;

-go in hard, fast, and kill as many people and detroy as much enemy infrastructure as is feasible as quickly as you can, before the “journalists” get a chance to come in and start undermining the mission.

Which is all they can do, since their job is ratings and sales not victory or security. Their Rule: Chaos is more photogenic.

The Press should be completely controlled during wartime in live battle areas, otherwise you are de facto infiltrated by the enemy’s agents (or their consciously fellow-travelling, or unconsciously suicidal, fatally short-sighted, useful idiots).

In the future, wars fought by the West against “terrorism” (Jihad, or any later mutations) will need to be intense and aimed at obliterating the majority of the enemy in the opening weeks of the campaign.

Or intent on crushing the opposition utterly within a few months, at most, before the insidious, self-loathing, colonialist-guilt-eviscerated Media begins to smugly erode public will and support …apparently now for any military action…, and turns every death in the field, trooper or civilian, into a dog-and-pony Gotterdammerung.

Propaganda is 51% of all warfare, and those who lose control over the telling of the “story” risk losing this- and any upcoming- war.

Psy-ops needs to get in gear from our side.

Or the jihadists (resurgent imperialists of Islam) will win the most important battle (the one that precedes and can decide the outcome of modern warfare): they set themselves up as the “oppressed”. Which makes anyone who fights them, for whatever reason, and against any outrages, as “oppressors”.

Those who define the terms steer the conflict.

Letting it get out of your hands and into the paws of terrorists (or their self-defeating nihilist mouthpieces/enablers in the Western media) is to cede a crucial “highground” that is as important as any literal piece of landscape.

The enemy needs to be creatively and constantly portrayed as serious, deadly maniacs.

As the misogynists and gay-bashing homophobes and anti-art and anti-music and sexually-repressed and joyless and intellectually regressive cranks and fools …that their own words prove them to be.

Somehow the MSM Press is more enraptured by disembowelling itself over ancient sins rather than explaining to their audience why someone… our self-declared enemy… thinks that beheading a member of the Press on video and broadcasting this psychopathic crime to the world -in gibbering triumph- is to be considered as a rational opponent. Who the Media then trivialize and romanticize and cutesify and give illegitimate moral equivalence to.

The treason of the press seems more rote than even seditious.

But that only means they need to be herded, not embedded.

Because their heads are already embedded elsewhere.

profitsbeard on November 28, 2006 at 11:31 AM

Allah,

Thank you for fighting back for the troops.

I’m old enough to remember the way our troops were treated when they returned from VietNam.

One of my biggest fears is that our troops will be treated the same when they return from Iraq and Afghanistan – sadly, I see it happening more and more every day.

If people continue to fight back with honesty, maybe we can stem that tide.

Thanks again.

Tink on November 28, 2006 at 11:58 AM

Outstanding work Profitsbeard!

I see this little story as the media playing the “BIG story / teeeeeny tiny correction” game. Anybody remember the ABC News vs Food Lion thing a few years ago? An ABC reporterette gets herself “hired” at Food Lion in the meat dept and asks the manager what to do with the old meat. She puts bleach in it and repacks it for sale. BUT, if ya watch ALL of the footage taked by hidden camera, the manager tells her “Throw it away.” Well ABC makes it look like Food Lion bleaches their meat, but in the lawsuit that followed ABC was proven to be making up false news. The next day, at the very end of tye show they “Oh, and by the way, we lost our lawsuit to Food Lion. Good night.”

Same thing here. AP blames us for a mass murder in BOLD letters but will retract it in the fine print.

Tony737 on November 28, 2006 at 2:54 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.